U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Pettyjohn, Stacie L. (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Santa Monica, California RAND 2012
Schriftenreihe:Rand Corporation monograph series
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:FAW01
FAW02
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500
001 BV043780543
003 DE-604
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|uuu---uuuuu
008 160920s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d
020 |a 9780833076960  |c pbk. : alk. paper  |9 978-0-8330-7696-0 
020 |a 9780833079084  |c ebook  |9 978-0-8330-7908-4 
020 |a 0833079085  |c ebook  |9 0-8330-7908-5 
020 |a 0833076965  |c pbk. : alk. paper  |9 0-8330-7696-5 
035 |a (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn875239381 
035 |a (OCoLC)875239381 
035 |a (DE-599)BVBBV043780543 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
049 |a DE-1046  |a DE-1047 
082 0 |a 355/.033073  |2 23 
100 1 |a Pettyjohn, Stacie L.  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011  |c Stacie L. Pettyjohn 
264 1 |a Santa Monica, California  |b RAND  |c 2012 
300 |a 1 online resource (145 pages)  |b illustrations (some color), maps (some color) 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 0 |a Rand Corporation monograph series 
500 |a "Prepared for the United States Air Force.". - "Approved for public release; distribution unlimited." 
500 |a Description based on print version record 
505 8 |a Framework for U.S. posture -- Extent of the U.S. overseas military presence -- Operational orientation of American forces -- Continental defense, 1783-1815 -- Continental defense and commercialism, 1815-1898 -- Transition period, 1898-1905 -- Oceanic posture -- Hemispheric defense (hemispheric anti-access/area denial) -- Perimeter defense in-depth, 1943-1949 -- Consolidated defense-in-depth -- Transitioning from perimeter defense-in-depth to consolidated defense-in-depth -- Expeditionary defense-in-depth -- Comparing the GDPR to perimeter defense-in-depth -- Findings and recommendations -- Recommendations -- Concluding thoughts 
505 8 |a Debates over the U.S. global defense posture are not new. As policymakers today evaluate the U.S. forward military presence, it is important that they understand how and why the U.S. global posture has changed in the past. Today's posture is under increasing pressure from a number of sources, including budgetary constraints, precision-guided weapons that reduce the survivability of forward bases, and host-nation opposition to a U.S. military presence. This monograph aims to describe the evolution of the U.S. global defense posture from 1783 to the present and to explain how the United States has grown from a relatively weak and insular regional power that was primarily concerned with territorial defense into the preeminent global power, with an expansive system of overseas bases and forward-deployed forces that enable it to conduct expeditionary operations around the globe. This historical overview has important implications for current policy and future efforts to develop an American military strategy, in particular the scope, size, and type of military presence overseas. As new and unpredictable threats emerge, alliance relationships are revised, and resources decline, past efforts at dealing with similar problems yield important lessons for future decisions. The author draws recommendations out of these lessons that touch on the importance of strategic planning; the need to think globally; the desirability of a lighter, more agile footprint overseas; and more 
650 7 |a HISTORY / Military / Other  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science  |2 bisacsh 
650 4 |a Military bases, American  |x Planning 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druck-Ausgabe  |a Pettyjohn, Stacie L  |t . U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011 
912 |a ZDB-4-EBA 
999 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029191603 
966 e |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=674640  |l FAW01  |p ZDB-4-EBA  |q FAW_PDA_EBA  |x Aggregator  |3 Volltext 
966 e |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=674640  |l FAW02  |p ZDB-4-EBA  |q FAW_PDA_EBA  |x Aggregator  |3 Volltext 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1804176610396471296
any_adam_object
author Pettyjohn, Stacie L.
author_facet Pettyjohn, Stacie L.
author_role aut
author_sort Pettyjohn, Stacie L.
author_variant s l p sl slp
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV043780543
collection ZDB-4-EBA
contents Framework for U.S. posture -- Extent of the U.S. overseas military presence -- Operational orientation of American forces -- Continental defense, 1783-1815 -- Continental defense and commercialism, 1815-1898 -- Transition period, 1898-1905 -- Oceanic posture -- Hemispheric defense (hemispheric anti-access/area denial) -- Perimeter defense in-depth, 1943-1949 -- Consolidated defense-in-depth -- Transitioning from perimeter defense-in-depth to consolidated defense-in-depth -- Expeditionary defense-in-depth -- Comparing the GDPR to perimeter defense-in-depth -- Findings and recommendations -- Recommendations -- Concluding thoughts
Debates over the U.S. global defense posture are not new. As policymakers today evaluate the U.S. forward military presence, it is important that they understand how and why the U.S. global posture has changed in the past. Today's posture is under increasing pressure from a number of sources, including budgetary constraints, precision-guided weapons that reduce the survivability of forward bases, and host-nation opposition to a U.S. military presence. This monograph aims to describe the evolution of the U.S. global defense posture from 1783 to the present and to explain how the United States has grown from a relatively weak and insular regional power that was primarily concerned with territorial defense into the preeminent global power, with an expansive system of overseas bases and forward-deployed forces that enable it to conduct expeditionary operations around the globe. This historical overview has important implications for current policy and future efforts to develop an American military strategy, in particular the scope, size, and type of military presence overseas. As new and unpredictable threats emerge, alliance relationships are revised, and resources decline, past efforts at dealing with similar problems yield important lessons for future decisions. The author draws recommendations out of these lessons that touch on the importance of strategic planning; the need to think globally; the desirability of a lighter, more agile footprint overseas; and more
ctrlnum (ZDB-4-EBA)ocn875239381
(OCoLC)875239381
(DE-599)BVBBV043780543
dewey-full 355/.033073
dewey-hundreds 300 - Social sciences
dewey-ones 355 - Military science
dewey-raw 355/.033073
dewey-search 355/.033073
dewey-sort 3355 533073
dewey-tens 350 - Public administration and military science
discipline Militärwissenschaft
format Electronic
eBook
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04053nmm a2200457zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043780543</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160920s2012 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780833076960</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk. : alk. paper</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8330-7696-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780833079084</subfield><subfield code="c">ebook</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8330-7908-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0833079085</subfield><subfield code="c">ebook</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-7908-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0833076965</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk. : alk. paper</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-7696-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-4-EBA)ocn875239381</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)875239381</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043780543</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355/.033073</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pettyjohn, Stacie L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011</subfield><subfield code="c">Stacie L. Pettyjohn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, California</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (145 pages)</subfield><subfield code="b">illustrations (some color), maps (some color)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rand Corporation monograph series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Prepared for the United States Air Force.". - "Approved for public release; distribution unlimited."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on print version record</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Framework for U.S. posture -- Extent of the U.S. overseas military presence -- Operational orientation of American forces -- Continental defense, 1783-1815 -- Continental defense and commercialism, 1815-1898 -- Transition period, 1898-1905 -- Oceanic posture -- Hemispheric defense (hemispheric anti-access/area denial) -- Perimeter defense in-depth, 1943-1949 -- Consolidated defense-in-depth -- Transitioning from perimeter defense-in-depth to consolidated defense-in-depth -- Expeditionary defense-in-depth -- Comparing the GDPR to perimeter defense-in-depth -- Findings and recommendations -- Recommendations -- Concluding thoughts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Debates over the U.S. global defense posture are not new. As policymakers today evaluate the U.S. forward military presence, it is important that they understand how and why the U.S. global posture has changed in the past. Today's posture is under increasing pressure from a number of sources, including budgetary constraints, precision-guided weapons that reduce the survivability of forward bases, and host-nation opposition to a U.S. military presence. This monograph aims to describe the evolution of the U.S. global defense posture from 1783 to the present and to explain how the United States has grown from a relatively weak and insular regional power that was primarily concerned with territorial defense into the preeminent global power, with an expansive system of overseas bases and forward-deployed forces that enable it to conduct expeditionary operations around the globe. This historical overview has important implications for current policy and future efforts to develop an American military strategy, in particular the scope, size, and type of military presence overseas. As new and unpredictable threats emerge, alliance relationships are revised, and resources decline, past efforts at dealing with similar problems yield important lessons for future decisions. The author draws recommendations out of these lessons that touch on the importance of strategic planning; the need to think globally; the desirability of a lighter, more agile footprint overseas; and more</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HISTORY / Military / Other</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">TECHNOLOGY &amp; ENGINEERING / Military Science</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military bases, American</subfield><subfield code="x">Planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Pettyjohn, Stacie L</subfield><subfield code="t">. U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029191603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;scope=site&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=674640</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;scope=site&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=674640</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW02</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id DE-604.BV043780543
illustrated Illustrated
indexdate 2024-07-10T07:34:55Z
institution BVB
isbn 9780833076960
9780833079084
0833079085
0833076965
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029191603
oclc_num 875239381
open_access_boolean
owner DE-1046
DE-1047
owner_facet DE-1046
DE-1047
physical 1 online resource (145 pages) illustrations (some color), maps (some color)
psigel ZDB-4-EBA
ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA
publishDate 2012
publishDateSearch 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher RAND
record_format marc
series2 Rand Corporation monograph series
spelling Pettyjohn, Stacie L. Verfasser aut
U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011 Stacie L. Pettyjohn
Santa Monica, California RAND 2012
1 online resource (145 pages) illustrations (some color), maps (some color)
txt rdacontent
c rdamedia
cr rdacarrier
Rand Corporation monograph series
"Prepared for the United States Air Force.". - "Approved for public release; distribution unlimited."
Description based on print version record
Framework for U.S. posture -- Extent of the U.S. overseas military presence -- Operational orientation of American forces -- Continental defense, 1783-1815 -- Continental defense and commercialism, 1815-1898 -- Transition period, 1898-1905 -- Oceanic posture -- Hemispheric defense (hemispheric anti-access/area denial) -- Perimeter defense in-depth, 1943-1949 -- Consolidated defense-in-depth -- Transitioning from perimeter defense-in-depth to consolidated defense-in-depth -- Expeditionary defense-in-depth -- Comparing the GDPR to perimeter defense-in-depth -- Findings and recommendations -- Recommendations -- Concluding thoughts
Debates over the U.S. global defense posture are not new. As policymakers today evaluate the U.S. forward military presence, it is important that they understand how and why the U.S. global posture has changed in the past. Today's posture is under increasing pressure from a number of sources, including budgetary constraints, precision-guided weapons that reduce the survivability of forward bases, and host-nation opposition to a U.S. military presence. This monograph aims to describe the evolution of the U.S. global defense posture from 1783 to the present and to explain how the United States has grown from a relatively weak and insular regional power that was primarily concerned with territorial defense into the preeminent global power, with an expansive system of overseas bases and forward-deployed forces that enable it to conduct expeditionary operations around the globe. This historical overview has important implications for current policy and future efforts to develop an American military strategy, in particular the scope, size, and type of military presence overseas. As new and unpredictable threats emerge, alliance relationships are revised, and resources decline, past efforts at dealing with similar problems yield important lessons for future decisions. The author draws recommendations out of these lessons that touch on the importance of strategic planning; the need to think globally; the desirability of a lighter, more agile footprint overseas; and more
HISTORY / Military / Other bisacsh
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science bisacsh
Military bases, American Planning
Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Pettyjohn, Stacie L . U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011
spellingShingle Pettyjohn, Stacie L.
U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011
Framework for U.S. posture -- Extent of the U.S. overseas military presence -- Operational orientation of American forces -- Continental defense, 1783-1815 -- Continental defense and commercialism, 1815-1898 -- Transition period, 1898-1905 -- Oceanic posture -- Hemispheric defense (hemispheric anti-access/area denial) -- Perimeter defense in-depth, 1943-1949 -- Consolidated defense-in-depth -- Transitioning from perimeter defense-in-depth to consolidated defense-in-depth -- Expeditionary defense-in-depth -- Comparing the GDPR to perimeter defense-in-depth -- Findings and recommendations -- Recommendations -- Concluding thoughts
Debates over the U.S. global defense posture are not new. As policymakers today evaluate the U.S. forward military presence, it is important that they understand how and why the U.S. global posture has changed in the past. Today's posture is under increasing pressure from a number of sources, including budgetary constraints, precision-guided weapons that reduce the survivability of forward bases, and host-nation opposition to a U.S. military presence. This monograph aims to describe the evolution of the U.S. global defense posture from 1783 to the present and to explain how the United States has grown from a relatively weak and insular regional power that was primarily concerned with territorial defense into the preeminent global power, with an expansive system of overseas bases and forward-deployed forces that enable it to conduct expeditionary operations around the globe. This historical overview has important implications for current policy and future efforts to develop an American military strategy, in particular the scope, size, and type of military presence overseas. As new and unpredictable threats emerge, alliance relationships are revised, and resources decline, past efforts at dealing with similar problems yield important lessons for future decisions. The author draws recommendations out of these lessons that touch on the importance of strategic planning; the need to think globally; the desirability of a lighter, more agile footprint overseas; and more
HISTORY / Military / Other bisacsh
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science bisacsh
Military bases, American Planning
title U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011
title_auth U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011
title_exact_search U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011
title_full U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011 Stacie L. Pettyjohn
title_fullStr U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011 Stacie L. Pettyjohn
title_full_unstemmed U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011 Stacie L. Pettyjohn
title_short U.S. global defense posture, 1783-2011
title_sort u s global defense posture 1783 2011
topic HISTORY / Military / Other bisacsh
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science bisacsh
Military bases, American Planning
topic_facet HISTORY / Military / Other
TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING / Military Science
Military bases, American Planning
work_keys_str_mv AT pettyjohnstaciel usglobaldefenseposture17832011