The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London ; New York
Routledge
[2015]
|
| Ausgabe: | Third edition |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043727936 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20161216 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 160823s2015 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781455776337 |9 978-1-4557-7633-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)968135041 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043727936 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a PH 6405 |0 (DE-625)136436:406 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vollum, Scott |d 1970- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1102565962 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The death penalty |b constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs |c Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman |
| 250 | |a Third edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a London ; New York |b Routledge |c [2015] | |
| 300 | |a XXXV, 355 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Del Carmen, Rolando V. |d 1930- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1055809805 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Frantzen, Durant |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1102566861 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a San Miguel, Claudia |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1102568325 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cheeseman, Kelly |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029139856 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804176524797018112 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents
Preface to the Third Edition.............................................................xvii
Preface to the Second Edition.............................................................xix
Preface and Introduction to the First Edition..............................................xxi
About the Authors.......................................................................xxiii
Acknowledgments...........................................................................xxv
Online Resources........................................................................xxvii
Table of Cases...........................................................................xxix
Top Ten Most Significant Death Penalty Cases.............................................xxxv
CHAPTER 1 The Death Penalty: Past and Present..............................................1
I. Introduction................................................................1
II. A Retrospective Analysis of the Death Penalty.............................2
A. The Colonial Period......................................................2
B. The Age of Enlightenment and the Early Movement to
Abolish the Death Penalty.................................................3
1. From Europe to the Colonies: The Impact of Enlightenment..............3
2. Changes in the Death Penalty from 1790-1950...........................4
III. Early Supreme Court Decisions on the Death Penalty.........................6
A. Wilkerson v. Utah: Death by Firing Squad.................................7
B. In re Kemmler: Death by Electrocution....................................8
C. Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber: The Constitutionality
of Being Executed Twice..................................................10
D. Additional Changes in the Death Penalty Prior to 1972...................12
IV. The Current Status of the Death Penalty in the United States..............13
A. Retentionist versus Abolitionist States.................................13
B. A Decline in Death Sentences and Executions.............................14
C. Recent Supreme Court and Circuit Court Rulings..........................16
V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................20
VI. Conclusion................................................................21
Cases Briefed in Chapter 1..................................................23
Case Briefs.................................................................23
Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U.S. 130 (1878)....................................23
In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890)..................................... 24
Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947)...............26
Key Terms...................................................................26
Critical Thinking Questions.................................................27
Internet Resources..........................................................27
vii
viii Contents
CHAPTER 2 The Foundation Cases: Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia.........29
I. Introduction...............................................................29
II. Furman v. Georgia (1972): The Death Penalty Is Unconstitutional............30
A. The Background..........................................................30
B. The Facts...............................................................30
C. The Majority Opinions...................................................30
D. The Dissenting Opinions.................................................32
III. Gregg v. Georgia (1976): The Death Penalty Is Constitutional in
Some Cases.................................................................33
A. The Background..........................................................33
B. The Facts...............................................................34
C. The Majority Opinions...................................................34
D. The Dissenting Opinions.................................................36
IV. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................37
V. Conclusion.............................................................. 37
Cases Briefed in Chapter 2.................................................38
Case Briefs................................................................38
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)..................................38
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)....................................39
Key Terms..................................................................41
Critical Thinking Questions................................................41
Internet Resources.........................................................42
CHAPTER 3 Race and the Death Penalty.................................................43
I. Introduction...............................................................43
II. Bias in Death Penalty Cases and Jury Selection in Capital Proceedings......44
III. Legislative Responses to Discrimination in Capital Proceedings.......45
A. Federal Response: The Proposed Racial Justice Act and Its Failure...45
B. State Responses: Racial Justice Acts and Examination of Statistical
Disparities..............................................................46
IV. The Legal Community: An Assessment of Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys.... 51
A. District Attorneys......................................................51
B. Defense Attorneys.......................................................55
V. The Jury: A Biased Bunch or Victims of Misinformation?....................57
A. Jury Selection..........................................................58
B. Peremptory Challenges...................................................60
VI. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................63
VII. Conclusion.................................................................64
Cases Briefed in Chapter 3.................................................65
Case Briefs................................................................65
Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)...................................65
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987)...................................67
Contents ix
Turner v. Murray, 476 U.S. 28 (1986)....................................68
Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 US. 231 (2005).................................69
Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 U.S. 472 (2008)................................71
Key Terms..................................................................72
Critical Thinking Questions............................................... 73
Internet Resources........................................................ 73
CHAPTER 4 The Mentally Impaired and the Death Penalty................................... 75
I. Introduction...............................................................75
II. Supreme Court Cases: Past and Present.....................................76
A. A Starting Point: Penry v. Lynaugh (1989)..............................76
B. Executing the Mentally Retarded Is Unconstitutional:
Atkins v. Virginia (2002)...............................................76
C. Cases After Atkins.....................................................77
III. Issues with Mental Impairment in Capital Cases...........................79
A. Definition of Mental Retardation/Developmental Disability..............79
B. The Fear of Faking......................................... ...........86
C. Mental Retardation versus Mental Illness................................87
IV. Insanity and the Death Penalty.............................................88
A. Insanity: Different From Other Mental Impairments.......................88
B. Reasons for Not Executing the Insane....................................89
1. Failure to Achieve Penological Goals.................................89
a. Deterrence........................................................89
b. Retribution.......................................................89
2. Theological...........................................................90
3. Humanity..............................................................90
C. Mental Competence and the Death Penalty................................90
V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.......................................92
VI. Conclusion.................................................................93
Cases Briefed in Chapter 4................................................ 94
Case Briefs........................................................... 95
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).................................95
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).................................. 96
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)................................ 97
Singleton v. Norris, 319 F.3d 1018 (8TH CIR. 2003)......................99
Tennard v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 274 (2004)................................. 100
Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007).............................. 101
Bobby v. Bies, 556 U.S. 825 (2009)..................................... 102
Ryan v. Gonzales/Tibbals v. Carter, 568 U.S.__(2013)....................103
Key Teims.............................................................. 104
Critical Thinking Questions............................................ 105
Internet Resources.........................................................105
X
Contents
CHAPTER 5 The Death Penalty for Juveniles....................................................107
I. Introduction.................................................................107
II. Thompson v. Oklahoma: Executing Juveniles Age 15 and Younger Is
Unconstitutional.............................................................108
A. Facts....................................................................108
B. The Court’s Holding......................................................109
C. Reasoning................................................................109
III. Stanford v. Kentucky: Executing Juveniles Ages 16 to 17 Is Constitutional.110
A. Facts....................................................................110
B. The Court’s Holding......................................................110
C. Reasoning................................................................Ill
IV. Atkins v. Virginia: A Case Involving the Mentally Retarded, But a Prelude
to the Abolition of the Juvenile Death Penalty...............................Ill
A. The Issue and Holding....................................................111
B. Significance of Atkins for the Juvenile Death Penalty: The Missouri Supreme
Court’s Decision in Simmons v. Roper.......................................112
V. Roper v. Simmons: The Supreme Court Declares the Execution of Juveniles
Unconstitutional.............................................................113
A. Facts....................................................................113
B. The Holding..............................................................114
C. Majority Opinion.........................................................114
D. Dissenting Opinions......................................................116
VI. Evolving Standards and Future Issues Concerning the Sentencing of Juveniles.. 118
VII. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?........................................120
VIII. Conclusion..................................................................122
Cases Briefed in Chapter 5...................................................123
Case Briefs..................................................................123
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988)................................. 123
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989)................................. 124
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)..................................... 125
Key Terms....................................................................127
Critical Thinking Questions..................................................127
internet Resources...........................................................128
CHAPTER 6 Juries, Jurors, and the Death Penalty...........................................129
I. Introduction.................................................................129
II. The Ultimate Responsibility: Bifurcated Trials and the Role of Capital Juries... 130
A. Jury Override: Judges Trumping Juries....................................131
B. Ring v. Arizona (2002): The End of Judicial Sentencing in Capital Cases? .,..132
III. Jury Instructions: Guided Discretion in Capital Cases....................134
A. Guilt Phase: Lesser Included Offenses....................................135
B. Penalty Phase: Future Dangerousness and Parole Eligibility...............136
Contents xi
IV. Jury Selection in Capital Cases: Death Qualification.....................138
V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?......................................140
VI. Conclusion.................................................................141
Cases Briefed in Chapter 6.................................................142
Case Briefs.................................................................143
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968)............................ 143
Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625 (1980).................................... 144
Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986)................................. 145
Mills v, Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988).................................. 146
Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992)..................................147
Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994).......................... 148
Weeks v. Angelone, 528 U.S. 225 (2000)...................................150
Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002).................................... 151
Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1 (2007)......................................152
Key Terms...................................................................153
Critical Thinking Questions.................................................154
Internet Resources..........................................................154
CHAPTER 7 The Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel and the Death Penalty...............155
I. Introduction...............................................................155
II. Strickland: A Two-Part Test for Deciding Ineffective Assistance Claims.....156
III. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the AEDPA...........................157
IV. Representation for Indigent Capital Defendants............................161
V. Defense Counsel’s Duty to Investigate and Defend..........................162
A. ABA Guidelines: A New Model for Conducting Mitigation
Investigations...........................................................164
B. Recent Cases Challenging the Adequacy of Mitigation Defense Work.......165
VI. Attorney-Client Negotiations...............................................169
VII. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.......................................174
VIII. Conclusion................................................................175
Cases Briefed in Chapter 7..................................................176
Case Briefs.................................................................178
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 688 (1984)........................... 178
Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364 (1993)............................... 179
Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 (2002).................................. 180
Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 (2002)....................................... 181
Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003)................................... 182
Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. 175 (2004)....................................183
Rompilla v. Beard, 545 U.S. 374 (2005).................................. 184
Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465 (2007)............................... 186
Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010)...................................... 187
Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S.______(2012)..................................189
xii Contents
Key Terms.................................................................190
Critical Thinking Questions...............................................191
Internet Resources........................................................191
CHAPTER 8 Due Process and the Death Penalty..........................................193
I. Introduction...............................................................193
II. Guided Discretion, Juries, and Due Process................................194
A. Due Process Requires Consideration of Mitigating Evidence..............194
B. Due Process Requires Opportunity to Rebut State’s Evidence.............195
C. Future Dangerousness and the Right to Due Process......................196
D. Due Process and Third-Party Guilt......................................197
E. Due Process and the Issue of Shackling.................................198
F. Due Process and the Importance of the Jury Verdict.....................199
III. Admissibility of Psychiatric Examinations................................200
IV. The Brady Rule and the Right to Due Process..............................202
A. The Disclosure Duty....................................................203
B. Recent Brady Challenges in Death Penalty Cases........................203
V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.....................................206
VI. Conclusion...............................................................207
Cases Briefed in Chapter 8................................................207
Case Briefs...............................................................208
Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (1977)................................208
Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981)...................................209
Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982)...............................210
Gray v. Netherland, 518 U.S. 152 (1996)................................211
Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, 537 U.S. 101 (2003).........................212
Deck v. Missouri, 544 U.S. 622 (2005)..................................213
Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)...........................215
Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449 (2009).......................................216
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S.______(2011)..............................217
Key Terms.................................................................218
Critical Thinking Questions...............................................219
Internet Resources........................................................219
CHAPTER 9 Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Death Penalty Cases..................221
I. Introduction...............................................................221
II. Gregg v. Georgia and the Emerging Importance of Aggravating and
Mitigating Factors........................................................222
III. Aggravating Factors......................................................229
A. General Procedural Requirements........................................229
B. Vagueness and Guided (or Unguided) Discretion..........................229
Contents xiii
C. The Special Case of Victim Impact Evidence............................231
D. The Special Case of Future Dangerousness..............................232
IV. Mitigating Factors.......................................................233
A. General Procedural Requirements.......................................234
B. Evidence Allowed......................................................235
C. Jury Instructions.....................................................236
V. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.....................................237
VI. Conclusion...............................................................238
Cases Briefed in Chapter 9...............................................239
Case Briefs..............................................................240
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976)........................240
Presnell v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 14 (1978)................................241
Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978)...................................242
Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983)..............................243
Lewis v. Jeffers, 497 U.S. 764 (1990).................................244
McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U.S. 433 (1990)..........................245
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991)...............................246
Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (2006)................................. 248
Brewer v. Quarterman, 550 U.S. 286 (2007)..............................249
Key Terms.................................................................250
Critical Thinking Questions...............................................250
Internet Resources........................................................251
CHAPTER 10 Appeals, Habeas Corpus, and the Death Penalty............................253
I. Introduction..............................................................253
II. The Appellate Process....................................................254
III. The Great Writ..........................................................255
A. History...............................................................255
B. The Battle over Successive Petitions and the Road to the AEDPA.......257
1. The Good Faith/Bad Faith Rule.......................................257
2. New-Claim Successive Petitions Rule.................................258
3. The Impact of Gregg on Successive Petitions........................258
C. The AEDPA.............................................................260
IV. Current Consequences of the AEDPA.......................................262
A. Current Debate over Successive Petitions..............................262
B. Statute of Limitations and Actual Innocence...........................265
1. Statute of Limitations..............................................265
2. Actual Innocence....................................................267
V. Habeas Corpus and 42 U.S.C. §1983.......................................270
VI. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.....................................273
xiv Contents
VII. Conclusion.................................................................275
Cases Briefed in Chapter 10................................................276
Case Briefs................................................................277
Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982)......................................277
McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467 (1991)..................................279
Sawyer v. Whitley, 505 U.S. 333 (1992)..................................280
Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993)..................................281
Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal, 523 U.S. 637 (1998)......................283
Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651 (1996)...................................284
Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004)..................................285
House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006).......................................287
Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327 (2007).................................288
Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S.___(2011)....................................289
Key Terms..................................................................290
Critical Thinking Questions................................................290
Internet Resources.........................................................291
CHAPTER 11 Evolving Standards of Decency and the Eighth Amendment’s Ban on
Cruel and Unusual Punishment...............................................293
I. Introduction...............................................................293
II. Methods of Execution.......................................................294
A. Modern Execution Methods (Lethal Injection)............................295
B. Botched and Failed Executions..........................................299
III. Proportionality of Punishment.............................................300
A. Types of Crimes........................................................301
B. Degree of Involvement in Killing.......................................302
C. Proportionality Review.................................................303
IV. The Role of Public Opinion................................................303
V. International Perspectives................................................306
VI. States Repealing Death Penalty Statutes...................................308
VII. In Summary, What Do These Cases Say?.......................................310
VIII. Conclusion................................................................310
Cases Briefed in Chapter 11................................................311
Case Briefs................................................................312
Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37 (1984).....................................312
Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987)....................................313
Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008).........................................314
Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008)................................316
Key Terms..................................................................318
Critical Thinking Questions................................................318
Internet Resources.........................................................319
Contents xv
CHAPTER 12 Other Issues, Trends, and the Future of the Death Penalty......................321
I. Introduction...............................................................321
II. Penological Justifications for Punishment and the Death Penalty..........323
A. Retribution and the Death Penalty.......................................324
B. Deterrence and the Death Penalty........................................325
C. Incapacitation and the Death Penalty....................................327
D. Justifying the Death Penalty: The Supreme Court.........................328
III. Flaws in the Administration of the Death Penalty..........................330
IV. Current Death Penalty Trends in the United States.........................336
V. The Future of the Death Penalty in the United States.......................339
Key Terms...................................................................340
Critical Thinking Questions.................................................340
Internet Resources..........................................................341
Index......................................................................................343
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Vollum, Scott 1970- Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Frantzen, Durant San Miguel, Claudia Cheeseman, Kelly |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1102565962 (DE-588)1055809805 (DE-588)1102566861 (DE-588)1102568325 |
| author_facet | Vollum, Scott 1970- Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Frantzen, Durant San Miguel, Claudia Cheeseman, Kelly |
| author_role | aut aut aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Vollum, Scott 1970- |
| author_variant | s v sv c r v d crv crvd d f df m c s mc mcs k c kc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043727936 |
| classification_rvk | PH 6405 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)968135041 (DE-599)BVBBV043727936 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | Third edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01479nam a2200337 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043727936</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20161216 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">160823s2015 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781455776337</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4557-7633-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)968135041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043727936</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6405</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136436:406</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vollum, Scott</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1102565962</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The death penalty</subfield><subfield code="b">constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs</subfield><subfield code="c">Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Third edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London ; New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">[2015]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXV, 355 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Del Carmen, Rolando V.</subfield><subfield code="d">1930-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1055809805</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frantzen, Durant</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1102566861</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">San Miguel, Claudia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1102568325</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheeseman, Kelly</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029139856</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV043727936 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T07:33:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781455776337 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029139856 |
| oclc_num | 968135041 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 |
| physical | XXXV, 355 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Vollum, Scott 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)1102565962 aut The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman Third edition London ; New York Routledge [2015] XXXV, 355 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Verfasser (DE-588)1055809805 aut Frantzen, Durant Verfasser (DE-588)1102566861 aut San Miguel, Claudia Verfasser (DE-588)1102568325 aut Cheeseman, Kelly Verfasser aut Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Vollum, Scott 1970- Del Carmen, Rolando V. 1930- Frantzen, Durant San Miguel, Claudia Cheeseman, Kelly The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs |
| title | The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs |
| title_auth | The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs |
| title_exact_search | The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs |
| title_full | The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman |
| title_fullStr | The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman |
| title_full_unstemmed | The death penalty constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs Scott Vollum, Rolando V. del Carmen, Durant Frantzen, Claudia San Miguel, Kelly Cheeseman |
| title_short | The death penalty |
| title_sort | the death penalty constitutional issues commentaries and case briefs |
| title_sub | constitutional issues, commentaries, and case briefs |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029139856&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vollumscott thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT delcarmenrolandov thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT frantzendurant thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT sanmiguelclaudia thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs AT cheesemankelly thedeathpenaltyconstitutionalissuescommentariesandcasebriefs |