Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
©2003
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-1046 DE-1047 Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV043134806 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 151126s2003 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 030909058X |9 0-309-09058-X | ||
| 020 | |a 0309527082 |9 0-309-52708-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 1280179465 |9 1-280-17946-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309090582 |9 978-0-309-09058-2 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309527088 |9 978-0-309-52708-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781280179464 |9 978-1-280-17946-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)54672732 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV043134806 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 507.2 |2 22 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing research-doctorate programs |b a methodology study |c Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C. |b National Academies Press |c ©2003 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (xi, 153 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 65-66) | ||
| 500 | |a How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph. D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph. D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Education, Graduate / statistics / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Universities / statistics / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biological Sciences / statistics / education / United States | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE / Research & Methodology |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Doctor of philosophy degree / Evaluation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Engineering / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Humanities / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Research / Evaluation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Science / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation |2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Onderzoeksprojecten |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Beoordeling |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Recherche |2 rasuqam | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Évaluation |2 rasuqam | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Doctorat |2 rasuqam | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques) |2 rasuqam | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ingénierie |2 rasuqam | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Recherche universitaire |2 rasuqam | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ingenieurwissenschaften | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturwissenschaft | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research |z United States |x Evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Doctor of philosophy degree |z United States |x Evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Science |x Study and teaching (Higher) |z United States |x Evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Engineering |x Study and teaching (Higher) |z United States |x Evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Humanities |x Study and teaching (Higher) |z United States |x Evaluation | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ostriker, J. P. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuh, Charlotte V. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Voytuk, James A. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.) |b Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484 |x Aggregator |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-4-EBA | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028558997 | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484 |l DE-1046 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484 |l DE-1047 |p ZDB-4-EBA |q FAW_PDA_EBA |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819295477935374336 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV043134806 |
| collection | ZDB-4-EBA |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)54672732 (DE-599)BVBBV043134806 |
| dewey-full | 507.2 |
| dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
| dewey-ones | 507 - Education, research, related topics |
| dewey-raw | 507.2 |
| dewey-search | 507.2 |
| dewey-sort | 3507.2 |
| dewey-tens | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
| discipline | Allgemeine Naturwissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04315nam a2200745zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV043134806</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">151126s2003 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">030909058X</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-09058-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0309527082</subfield><subfield code="9">0-309-52708-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1280179465</subfield><subfield code="9">1-280-17946-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309090582</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-09058-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780309527088</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-309-52708-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781280179464</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-280-17946-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)54672732</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV043134806</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">507.2</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing research-doctorate programs</subfield><subfield code="b">a methodology study</subfield><subfield code="c">Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Academies Press</subfield><subfield code="c">©2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (xi, 153 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 65-66)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph. D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph. D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education, Graduate / statistics / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Universities / statistics / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biological Sciences / statistics / education / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">SCIENCE / Research & Methodology</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Doctor of philosophy degree / Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Engineering / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Humanities / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Research / Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Science / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Onderzoeksprojecten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beoordeling</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recherche</subfield><subfield code="2">rasuqam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Évaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">rasuqam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Doctorat</subfield><subfield code="2">rasuqam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques)</subfield><subfield code="2">rasuqam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ingénierie</subfield><subfield code="2">rasuqam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recherche universitaire</subfield><subfield code="2">rasuqam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ingenieurwissenschaften</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Naturwissenschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Doctor of philosophy degree</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Science</subfield><subfield code="x">Study and teaching (Higher)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Engineering</subfield><subfield code="x">Study and teaching (Higher)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Humanities</subfield><subfield code="x">Study and teaching (Higher)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ostriker, J. P.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuh, Charlotte V.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Voytuk, James A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Research Council (U.S.)</subfield><subfield code="b">Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028558997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-1047</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-4-EBA</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_EBA</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV043134806 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-24T04:42:51Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 030909058X 0309527082 1280179465 9780309090582 9780309527088 9781280179464 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-028558997 |
| oclc_num | 54672732 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1047 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (xi, 153 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-4-EBA ZDB-4-EBA FAW_PDA_EBA |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publishDateSearch | 2003 |
| publishDateSort | 2003 |
| publisher | National Academies Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies Washington, D.C. National Academies Press ©2003 1 Online-Ressource (xi, 153 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (pages 65-66) How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph. D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph. D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings Education, Graduate / statistics / United States Evaluation Studies Universities / statistics / United States Biological Sciences / statistics / education / United States SCIENCE / Research & Methodology bisacsh Doctor of philosophy degree / Evaluation fast Engineering / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Humanities / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Research / Evaluation fast Science / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Onderzoeksprojecten gtt Beoordeling gtt Recherche rasuqam Évaluation rasuqam Doctorat rasuqam Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques) rasuqam Ingénierie rasuqam Recherche universitaire rasuqam Ingenieurwissenschaften Naturwissenschaft Research United States Evaluation Doctor of philosophy degree United States Evaluation Science Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Engineering Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Humanities Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation USA Ostriker, J. P. Sonstige oth Kuh, Charlotte V. Sonstige oth Voytuk, James A. Sonstige oth National Research Council (U.S.) Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs Sonstige oth http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484 Aggregator Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study Education, Graduate / statistics / United States Evaluation Studies Universities / statistics / United States Biological Sciences / statistics / education / United States SCIENCE / Research & Methodology bisacsh Doctor of philosophy degree / Evaluation fast Engineering / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Humanities / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Research / Evaluation fast Science / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Onderzoeksprojecten gtt Beoordeling gtt Recherche rasuqam Évaluation rasuqam Doctorat rasuqam Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques) rasuqam Ingénierie rasuqam Recherche universitaire rasuqam Ingenieurwissenschaften Naturwissenschaft Research United States Evaluation Doctor of philosophy degree United States Evaluation Science Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Engineering Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Humanities Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation |
| title | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study |
| title_auth | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study |
| title_exact_search | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study |
| title_full | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_fullStr | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing research-doctorate programs a methodology study Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies |
| title_short | Assessing research-doctorate programs |
| title_sort | assessing research doctorate programs a methodology study |
| title_sub | a methodology study |
| topic | Education, Graduate / statistics / United States Evaluation Studies Universities / statistics / United States Biological Sciences / statistics / education / United States SCIENCE / Research & Methodology bisacsh Doctor of philosophy degree / Evaluation fast Engineering / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Humanities / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Research / Evaluation fast Science / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation fast Onderzoeksprojecten gtt Beoordeling gtt Recherche rasuqam Évaluation rasuqam Doctorat rasuqam Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques) rasuqam Ingénierie rasuqam Recherche universitaire rasuqam Ingenieurwissenschaften Naturwissenschaft Research United States Evaluation Doctor of philosophy degree United States Evaluation Science Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Engineering Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Humanities Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation |
| topic_facet | Education, Graduate / statistics / United States Evaluation Studies Universities / statistics / United States Biological Sciences / statistics / education / United States SCIENCE / Research & Methodology Doctor of philosophy degree / Evaluation Engineering / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation Humanities / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation Research / Evaluation Science / Study and teaching (Higher) / Evaluation Onderzoeksprojecten Beoordeling Recherche Évaluation Doctorat Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques) Ingénierie Recherche universitaire Ingenieurwissenschaften Naturwissenschaft Research United States Evaluation Doctor of philosophy degree United States Evaluation Science Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Engineering Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation Humanities Study and teaching (Higher) United States Evaluation USA |
| url | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=104484 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ostrikerjp assessingresearchdoctorateprogramsamethodologystudy AT kuhcharlottev assessingresearchdoctorateprogramsamethodologystudy AT voytukjamesa assessingresearchdoctorateprogramsamethodologystudy AT nationalresearchcounciluscommitteetoexaminethemethodologyfortheassessmentofresearchdoctorateprograms assessingresearchdoctorateprogramsamethodologystudy |