African American felon disenfranchisement case studies in modern racism and political exclusion

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Pinkard, John E. 1943- (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: El Paso [TX] LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC [2013]
Schriftenreihe:Criminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC)
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:DE-1046
DE-1047
Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Inhaltsangabe:
  • Introduction and hypothesis
  • State of the problem
  • The right to participate : a matter of law and moral certitude
  • New Jersey : a case study in automatic felon voter restoration
  • Maryland : a case study of a state mandating 'some' permanent disenfranchisement
  • Virginia : a case study of a state mandating permanent felon disenfranchisement
  • Conclusion
  • Epilogue
  • Utilizing a field study on felons that were within one year of completing incarceration, Pinkard analyzes the legal history, constitutionality, conflicting laws, political, and life chance consequences of felon disenfranchisement laws on African American felons and the African American community. Research and data presented in this book indicate that: felon disenfranchisement is based on moralistic beliefs, modern racism, and stereotypes about human differences and that permanent political marginalization of a particular segment of American society not only negates democracy in principle by diluting voter participation and equal representation but also assures the debasement of specific segments of society and the life chances of African Americans in particular