European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context
The task of the European Court of Justice is to ensure that the law is observed in interpreting and applying the Treaties. This duty is carried out in a transnational constitutional environment where interpretation and application are to a large extent divorced from each other. An array of approache...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Groningen
Europa Law Publ.
2013
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041658137 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20140314 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 140219s2013 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2013362130 | ||
| 020 | |a 9089521178 |9 90-8952-117-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789089521170 |9 978-90-8952-117-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)794706985 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV75666036X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJE5461 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 349.497 | |
| 084 | |a 86.86 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sankari, Suvi |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1048501663 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context |c Suvi Sankari |
| 264 | 1 | |a Groningen |b Europa Law Publ. |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a VII, 275 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 1 | |a The task of the European Court of Justice is to ensure that the law is observed in interpreting and applying the Treaties. This duty is carried out in a transnational constitutional environment where interpretation and application are to a large extent divorced from each other. An array of approaches to assessing the Court's work already exists. The distinct underlying assumptions of each perspective affect how Court practice is interpreted and evaluated. In terms of legal interpretation, at the one extreme would be those who subscribe to a historical-originalist - or conserving - approach and at the other those subscribing to an uncritically teleological or dynamic approach premised on furthering integration. Neither extreme necessarily reflects in either descriptive or normative terms a fair or realistic understanding of the Court, its work, and the outcomes of legal interpretation. Even if in reality the differences were more a matter of degree, developing a better balanced approach is useful.The approach advocated here is called Court of Justice legal reasoning. The approach is critical towards offering generalisations concerning the Court's work based on purposively chosen case-law, downplaying the role of law in not only facilitating but also restraining the Court's choices, and overemphasising teleology or integration as pre-designated and permanent explanatory factors of legal evolution. The Court of Justice legal reasoning approach is firmly anchored to actual case-law analysis, instead of abstract legal theory, which ensures it does not become wholly disconnected from the everyday of courts. Moreover, the approach takes into account how the Court keeps applying its relatively conventional self-assumed criteria of legal interpretation, considers interpretations offered in preliminary rulings in their systemic and factual context, and generally views the Court as the constitutional court of a legal order. Finally, the approach builds on sincerely lis | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Juristische Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4129291-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Juristische Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4129291-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | |m DE-601 |q pdf/application |u http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/toc/75666036X.pdf |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027098606 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804151890524504064 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Sankari, Suvi |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1048501663 |
| author_facet | Sankari, Suvi |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Sankari, Suvi |
| author_variant | s s ss |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041658137 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJE5461 |
| callnumber-raw | KJE5461 |
| callnumber-search | KJE5461 |
| callnumber-sort | KJE 45461 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)794706985 (DE-599)GBV75666036X |
| dewey-full | 349.497 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 349 - Law of specific jurisdictions & areas |
| dewey-raw | 349.497 |
| dewey-search | 349.497 |
| dewey-sort | 3349.497 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03290nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041658137</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20140314 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140219s2013 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2013362130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9089521178</subfield><subfield code="9">90-8952-117-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789089521170</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-8952-117-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)794706985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV75666036X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE5461</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">349.497</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">86.86</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sankari, Suvi</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1048501663</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context</subfield><subfield code="c">Suvi Sankari</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Groningen</subfield><subfield code="b">Europa Law Publ.</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VII, 275 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The task of the European Court of Justice is to ensure that the law is observed in interpreting and applying the Treaties. This duty is carried out in a transnational constitutional environment where interpretation and application are to a large extent divorced from each other. An array of approaches to assessing the Court's work already exists. The distinct underlying assumptions of each perspective affect how Court practice is interpreted and evaluated. In terms of legal interpretation, at the one extreme would be those who subscribe to a historical-originalist - or conserving - approach and at the other those subscribing to an uncritically teleological or dynamic approach premised on furthering integration. Neither extreme necessarily reflects in either descriptive or normative terms a fair or realistic understanding of the Court, its work, and the outcomes of legal interpretation. Even if in reality the differences were more a matter of degree, developing a better balanced approach is useful.The approach advocated here is called Court of Justice legal reasoning. The approach is critical towards offering generalisations concerning the Court's work based on purposively chosen case-law, downplaying the role of law in not only facilitating but also restraining the Court's choices, and overemphasising teleology or integration as pre-designated and permanent explanatory factors of legal evolution. The Court of Justice legal reasoning approach is firmly anchored to actual case-law analysis, instead of abstract legal theory, which ensures it does not become wholly disconnected from the everyday of courts. Moreover, the approach takes into account how the Court keeps applying its relatively conventional self-assumed criteria of legal interpretation, considers interpretations offered in preliminary rulings in their systemic and factual context, and generally views the Court as the constitutional court of a legal order. Finally, the approach builds on sincerely lis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Juristische Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129291-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Juristische Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4129291-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="m">DE-601</subfield><subfield code="q">pdf/application</subfield><subfield code="u">http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/toc/75666036X.pdf</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027098606</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV041658137 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:02:00Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9089521178 9789089521170 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2013362130 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027098606 |
| oclc_num | 794706985 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | VII, 275 S. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Europa Law Publ. |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Sankari, Suvi Verfasser (DE-588)1048501663 aut European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context Suvi Sankari Groningen Europa Law Publ. 2013 VII, 275 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The task of the European Court of Justice is to ensure that the law is observed in interpreting and applying the Treaties. This duty is carried out in a transnational constitutional environment where interpretation and application are to a large extent divorced from each other. An array of approaches to assessing the Court's work already exists. The distinct underlying assumptions of each perspective affect how Court practice is interpreted and evaluated. In terms of legal interpretation, at the one extreme would be those who subscribe to a historical-originalist - or conserving - approach and at the other those subscribing to an uncritically teleological or dynamic approach premised on furthering integration. Neither extreme necessarily reflects in either descriptive or normative terms a fair or realistic understanding of the Court, its work, and the outcomes of legal interpretation. Even if in reality the differences were more a matter of degree, developing a better balanced approach is useful.The approach advocated here is called Court of Justice legal reasoning. The approach is critical towards offering generalisations concerning the Court's work based on purposively chosen case-law, downplaying the role of law in not only facilitating but also restraining the Court's choices, and overemphasising teleology or integration as pre-designated and permanent explanatory factors of legal evolution. The Court of Justice legal reasoning approach is firmly anchored to actual case-law analysis, instead of abstract legal theory, which ensures it does not become wholly disconnected from the everyday of courts. Moreover, the approach takes into account how the Court keeps applying its relatively conventional self-assumed criteria of legal interpretation, considers interpretations offered in preliminary rulings in their systemic and factual context, and generally views the Court as the constitutional court of a legal order. Finally, the approach builds on sincerely lis Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd rswk-swf Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 b Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 s DE-604 DE-601 pdf/application http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/toc/75666036X.pdf Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Sankari, Suvi European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5103273-9 (DE-588)4129291-1 |
| title | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context |
| title_auth | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context |
| title_exact_search | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context |
| title_full | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context Suvi Sankari |
| title_fullStr | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context Suvi Sankari |
| title_full_unstemmed | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context Suvi Sankari |
| title_short | European Court of Justice legal reasoning in context |
| title_sort | european court of justice legal reasoning in context |
| topic | Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Juristische Argumentation (DE-588)4129291-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäischer Gerichtshof Juristische Argumentation |
| url | http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/toc/75666036X.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sankarisuvi europeancourtofjusticelegalreasoningincontext |