Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel
The 21st century U.S. military seldom operates alone. Except for initial entry and organizational training, it works almost always with and through foreign partners. Yet over the past decade, anecdotal evidence suggests that U.S. military organizations and personnel have trouble understanding, influ...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Carlisle Barracks, PA
Strategic Studies Institute
2013
|
Schriftenreihe: | Letort paper
|
Schlagworte: | |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV041158478 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20130926 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 130722s2013 xx a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781584875598 |c pbk. |9 978-1-58487-559-8 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)856834957 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041158478 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Outzen, Richard H. M. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1037326113 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Talking past each other? |b how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel |c Richard H.M. Outzen |
264 | 1 | |a Carlisle Barracks, PA |b Strategic Studies Institute |c 2013 | |
300 | |a X, 56 S. |b Ill. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Letort paper | |
500 | |a "February 2013.". - Format not distributed to depository libraries | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 47-48) | ||
500 | |a Background theory : the academic study of anti-Americanism. Primary explanations for a growing phenomenon -- Transitory explanation -- Reflexive or "pathological" explanations -- Other survey data relevant to "anti-Americanism" -- Interpreting results of the survey. Areas of convergence and divergence -- Focus group review of preliminary observations -- International officer opinion in light of Pew and Gallup polling data -- Implications and conclusions. Implications for anti-Americanism theory -- Implications for U.S. policy and operations -- Recommended mitigation measures | ||
520 | |a The 21st century U.S. military seldom operates alone. Except for initial entry and organizational training, it works almost always with and through foreign partners. Yet over the past decade, anecdotal evidence suggests that U.S. military organizations and personnel have trouble understanding, influencing, and cooperating with international partners. This evidence includes high-profile incidents from Iraq and Afghanistan: civilian deaths, Koran burnings, blue-on-blue or green-on-blue lethal attacks. It also includes more numerous, lower profile bits of friction that follow U.S. service members around the globe in the form of protests, lawsuits, criminal cases, and difficult military-to-military relations from Iraq and Afghanistan to Turkey and Pakistan. In some instances, the U.S. military may be entirely without fault, suffering friction driven by problematic local attitudes or political dynamics. On the other hand, it is possible that certain characteristics of thought or behavior within the U.S. military culture increase the likelihood of severe friction. Against this backdrop, the gap between the U.S. military's self-image and its image in the eyes of an international military audience is examined. When considering U.S. power, do response patterns indicate great difference between how U.S. military officers view themselves, and how they are viewed by their international peers? If so, is there anything that the United States can do about it, or does a fundamental and pathological anti-Americanism predetermine outcomes? Based on a survey administered at the National Defense University, this study offers observations and recommendations about the increasingly central question of how U.S. forces can form better and stronger ties with partners | ||
650 | 4 | |a Anti-Americanism | |
650 | 4 | |a Soldiers / United States / Attitudes / Statistics | |
650 | 4 | |a Außenpolitik | |
650 | 4 | |a Politik | |
650 | 4 | |a Statistik | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Selbstbild |0 (DE-588)4077349-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Militär |0 (DE-588)4039305-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Antiamerikanismus |0 (DE-588)4122802-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Politik |0 (DE-588)4072885-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Öffentliche Meinung |0 (DE-588)4043152-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Fremdbild |0 (DE-588)4127240-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Militärpolitik |0 (DE-588)4065004-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a United States / Armed Forces / Foreign service | |
651 | 4 | |a United States / Military policy / Public opinion | |
651 | 4 | |a United States / Foreign relations / 21st century | |
651 | 4 | |a United States / Military relations / 21st century | |
651 | 4 | |a United States / Politics and government / 21st century | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Militär |0 (DE-588)4039305-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Militärpolitik |0 (DE-588)4065004-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Internationale Politik |0 (DE-588)4072885-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Selbstbild |0 (DE-588)4077349-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | 5 | |a Fremdbild |0 (DE-588)4127240-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 6 | |a Öffentliche Meinung |0 (DE-588)4043152-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 7 | |a Antiamerikanismus |0 (DE-588)4122802-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
710 | 2 | |a Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.) |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1046371-9 |4 oth | |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026133782 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1819290762466033664 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Outzen, Richard H. M. |
author_GND | (DE-588)1037326113 |
author_facet | Outzen, Richard H. M. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Outzen, Richard H. M. |
author_variant | r h m o rhm rhmo |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV041158478 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)856834957 (DE-599)BVBBV041158478 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04982nam a2200661 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041158478</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20130926 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130722s2013 xx a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781584875598</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-58487-559-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)856834957</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041158478</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Outzen, Richard H. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1037326113</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Talking past each other?</subfield><subfield code="b">how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel</subfield><subfield code="c">Richard H.M. Outzen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Carlisle Barracks, PA</subfield><subfield code="b">Strategic Studies Institute</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 56 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Letort paper</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"February 2013.". - Format not distributed to depository libraries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 47-48)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background theory : the academic study of anti-Americanism. Primary explanations for a growing phenomenon -- Transitory explanation -- Reflexive or "pathological" explanations -- Other survey data relevant to "anti-Americanism" -- Interpreting results of the survey. Areas of convergence and divergence -- Focus group review of preliminary observations -- International officer opinion in light of Pew and Gallup polling data -- Implications and conclusions. Implications for anti-Americanism theory -- Implications for U.S. policy and operations -- Recommended mitigation measures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The 21st century U.S. military seldom operates alone. Except for initial entry and organizational training, it works almost always with and through foreign partners. Yet over the past decade, anecdotal evidence suggests that U.S. military organizations and personnel have trouble understanding, influencing, and cooperating with international partners. This evidence includes high-profile incidents from Iraq and Afghanistan: civilian deaths, Koran burnings, blue-on-blue or green-on-blue lethal attacks. It also includes more numerous, lower profile bits of friction that follow U.S. service members around the globe in the form of protests, lawsuits, criminal cases, and difficult military-to-military relations from Iraq and Afghanistan to Turkey and Pakistan. In some instances, the U.S. military may be entirely without fault, suffering friction driven by problematic local attitudes or political dynamics. On the other hand, it is possible that certain characteristics of thought or behavior within the U.S. military culture increase the likelihood of severe friction. Against this backdrop, the gap between the U.S. military's self-image and its image in the eyes of an international military audience is examined. When considering U.S. power, do response patterns indicate great difference between how U.S. military officers view themselves, and how they are viewed by their international peers? If so, is there anything that the United States can do about it, or does a fundamental and pathological anti-Americanism predetermine outcomes? Based on a survey administered at the National Defense University, this study offers observations and recommendations about the increasingly central question of how U.S. forces can form better and stronger ties with partners</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anti-Americanism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soldiers / United States / Attitudes / Statistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Statistik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Selbstbild</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077349-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Militär</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4039305-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antiamerikanismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122802-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4072885-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Öffentliche Meinung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4043152-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Fremdbild</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127240-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Militärpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4065004-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Armed Forces / Foreign service</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Military policy / Public opinion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Foreign relations / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Military relations / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Politics and government / 21st century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Militär</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4039305-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Militärpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4065004-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4072885-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Selbstbild</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4077349-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Fremdbild</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127240-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Öffentliche Meinung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4043152-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antiamerikanismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122802-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.)</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1046371-9</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026133782</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States / Armed Forces / Foreign service United States / Military policy / Public opinion United States / Foreign relations / 21st century United States / Military relations / 21st century United States / Politics and government / 21st century USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | United States / Armed Forces / Foreign service United States / Military policy / Public opinion United States / Foreign relations / 21st century United States / Military relations / 21st century United States / Politics and government / 21st century USA |
id | DE-604.BV041158478 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-12-24T03:27:54Z |
institution | BVB |
institution_GND | (DE-588)1046371-9 |
isbn | 9781584875598 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026133782 |
oclc_num | 856834957 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | X, 56 S. Ill. |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | Strategic Studies Institute |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Letort paper |
spelling | Outzen, Richard H. M. Verfasser (DE-588)1037326113 aut Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel Richard H.M. Outzen Carlisle Barracks, PA Strategic Studies Institute 2013 X, 56 S. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Letort paper "February 2013.". - Format not distributed to depository libraries Includes bibliographical references (pages 47-48) Background theory : the academic study of anti-Americanism. Primary explanations for a growing phenomenon -- Transitory explanation -- Reflexive or "pathological" explanations -- Other survey data relevant to "anti-Americanism" -- Interpreting results of the survey. Areas of convergence and divergence -- Focus group review of preliminary observations -- International officer opinion in light of Pew and Gallup polling data -- Implications and conclusions. Implications for anti-Americanism theory -- Implications for U.S. policy and operations -- Recommended mitigation measures The 21st century U.S. military seldom operates alone. Except for initial entry and organizational training, it works almost always with and through foreign partners. Yet over the past decade, anecdotal evidence suggests that U.S. military organizations and personnel have trouble understanding, influencing, and cooperating with international partners. This evidence includes high-profile incidents from Iraq and Afghanistan: civilian deaths, Koran burnings, blue-on-blue or green-on-blue lethal attacks. It also includes more numerous, lower profile bits of friction that follow U.S. service members around the globe in the form of protests, lawsuits, criminal cases, and difficult military-to-military relations from Iraq and Afghanistan to Turkey and Pakistan. In some instances, the U.S. military may be entirely without fault, suffering friction driven by problematic local attitudes or political dynamics. On the other hand, it is possible that certain characteristics of thought or behavior within the U.S. military culture increase the likelihood of severe friction. Against this backdrop, the gap between the U.S. military's self-image and its image in the eyes of an international military audience is examined. When considering U.S. power, do response patterns indicate great difference between how U.S. military officers view themselves, and how they are viewed by their international peers? If so, is there anything that the United States can do about it, or does a fundamental and pathological anti-Americanism predetermine outcomes? Based on a survey administered at the National Defense University, this study offers observations and recommendations about the increasingly central question of how U.S. forces can form better and stronger ties with partners Anti-Americanism Soldiers / United States / Attitudes / Statistics Außenpolitik Politik Statistik Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 gnd rswk-swf Militär (DE-588)4039305-7 gnd rswk-swf Antiamerikanismus (DE-588)4122802-9 gnd rswk-swf Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd rswk-swf Öffentliche Meinung (DE-588)4043152-6 gnd rswk-swf Fremdbild (DE-588)4127240-7 gnd rswk-swf Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 gnd rswk-swf United States / Armed Forces / Foreign service United States / Military policy / Public opinion United States / Foreign relations / 21st century United States / Military relations / 21st century United States / Politics and government / 21st century USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Militär (DE-588)4039305-7 s Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 s Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 s Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 s Fremdbild (DE-588)4127240-7 s Öffentliche Meinung (DE-588)4043152-6 s Antiamerikanismus (DE-588)4122802-9 s DE-604 Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.) Sonstige (DE-588)1046371-9 oth |
spellingShingle | Outzen, Richard H. M. Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel Anti-Americanism Soldiers / United States / Attitudes / Statistics Außenpolitik Politik Statistik Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 gnd Militär (DE-588)4039305-7 gnd Antiamerikanismus (DE-588)4122802-9 gnd Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd Öffentliche Meinung (DE-588)4043152-6 gnd Fremdbild (DE-588)4127240-7 gnd Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4077349-8 (DE-588)4039305-7 (DE-588)4122802-9 (DE-588)4072885-7 (DE-588)4043152-6 (DE-588)4127240-7 (DE-588)4065004-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel |
title_auth | Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel |
title_exact_search | Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel |
title_full | Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel Richard H.M. Outzen |
title_fullStr | Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel Richard H.M. Outzen |
title_full_unstemmed | Talking past each other? how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel Richard H.M. Outzen |
title_short | Talking past each other? |
title_sort | talking past each other how views of u s power vary between u s and international military personnel |
title_sub | how views of U.S. power vary between U.S. and international military personnel |
topic | Anti-Americanism Soldiers / United States / Attitudes / Statistics Außenpolitik Politik Statistik Selbstbild (DE-588)4077349-8 gnd Militär (DE-588)4039305-7 gnd Antiamerikanismus (DE-588)4122802-9 gnd Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd Öffentliche Meinung (DE-588)4043152-6 gnd Fremdbild (DE-588)4127240-7 gnd Militärpolitik (DE-588)4065004-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Anti-Americanism Soldiers / United States / Attitudes / Statistics Außenpolitik Politik Statistik Selbstbild Militär Antiamerikanismus Internationale Politik Öffentliche Meinung Fremdbild Militärpolitik United States / Armed Forces / Foreign service United States / Military policy / Public opinion United States / Foreign relations / 21st century United States / Military relations / 21st century United States / Politics and government / 21st century USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT outzenrichardhm talkingpasteachotherhowviewsofuspowervarybetweenusandinternationalmilitarypersonnel AT strategicstudiesinstitutecarlislebarrackspa talkingpasteachotherhowviewsofuspowervarybetweenusandinternationalmilitarypersonnel |