Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Format: Buch
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Amsterdam IBFD 2007
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Inhaltsverzeichnis
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001 BV022445349
003 DE-604
005 20080918
007 t|
008 070530s2007 xx |||| 00||| eng d
020 |a 9789087220037  |9 978-90-8722-003-7 
035 |a (OCoLC)144685990 
035 |a (DE-599)BVBBV022445349 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger  |e rakwb 
041 0 |a eng 
049 |a DE-M382  |a DE-384  |a DE-19 
050 0 |a KJE7160 
084 |a PS 3940  |0 (DE-625)139824:  |2 rvk 
245 1 0 |a Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law  |b an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law  |c ed. by Cécile Brokelind 
264 1 |a Amsterdam  |b IBFD  |c 2007 
300 |a XX, 442 S. 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
610 2 4 |a Court of Justice of the European Communities  |v Cases 
650 7 |a Belastingrecht  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Directe belastingen  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Europees recht  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Rechtspraak  |2 gtt 
650 7 |a Unificatie  |2 gtt 
650 4 |a Europarecht 
650 4 |a Recht 
650 4 |a Steuer 
650 4 |a Direct taxation  |x Law and legislation  |z European Union countries 
650 4 |a Direct taxation  |x Law and legislation  |z European Union countries  |v Cases 
650 4 |a Taxation  |x Law and legislation  |z European Union countries 
651 7 |a EU-landen  |2 gtt 
651 4 |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten 
700 1 |a Brokelind, Cécile  |e Sonstige  |4 oth 
856 4 2 |m HBZ Datenaustausch  |q application/pdf  |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015653326&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA  |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 
943 1 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015653326 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1819653699450961920
adam_text TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword v Introduction 1 Cecile Brokelind I. The scope of the book 2 II. Purpose 2 III. Method 3 IV. Limitations 6 V. Structure 7 VI. About the reporters 8 VII. Questions for the reporters 10 A. General questions 11 B. Questions more specific to tax law 12 VIII. General overview 13 A. Too few or too many references for preliminary rulings to the ECJ? 13 B. Direct, indirect and improper influence 15 C. Does geography matter? 17 Appendix 1: Number of ECJ cases in the field of direct taxation (including inheritance taxation but excluding State aid) on 31 October 2006 24 Appendix 2: ECJ cases in the field of direct taxation relating to secondary legislation (directives) on 31 October 2006 25 Table of Contents PART ONE GENERAL REFLECTIONS ON THE ROLE OF ECJ RULINGS AND INFRINGEMENT PROCEDURES IN EC LAW The effects of ECJ rulings on Member States direct tax law Introductory speech 29 Leif Muten I. The historical perspective 29 H. TheroleoftheECJ 30 IQ. The immediate legal consequences of ECJ rulings 32 IV. The legislative consequences 34 V. Exit rules 35 VI. Exemptions for non residents 36 VII. CFC rules 37 VIII. General anti avoidance rule (GAAR) 39 IX. Conclusion 39 The role of infringements 41 Maria Elena Scoppio I. Introduction 41 II. The enforcement actions against Member States in Art. 226 of the EC Treaty The procedure 41 ni. The financial penalties for Member States who fail to comply with ECJ judgments Art. 228 of the EC Treaty 46 A. The procedure 46 B. Current examples of failures to comply with ECJ judgments by Member States in the field of taxation 49 viii Table of contents IV. Some statistics 49 A. Total number of detected infringement cases (Situation at 31December2005) 50 B. Taxation sector (Situation at 31 December 2005) 50 C. Situation in the field of taxation on 15 November 2006 51 V. Communicating infringements 51 VI. Standard form for complaints to be submitted to the European Commission for failure by a Member State to comply with Community law 52 PART TWO A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO THE ECj S RULINGS Austria 59 Georg W. Kofler I. Tax sovereignty, EC law and the Austrian constitutional framework 59 II. Procedural issues of implementing ECJ judgments 65 III. Substantive influence of the ECJ s case law on Austrian direct tax law 68 A. Inbound situations 68 1. Introduction 68 2. Taxation of non resident individuals 70 a. Subjective benefits for non residents: Schumacher and See. 1 (4) of the EStG 70 b. Objective benefits for non residents: Gerritse, Conijn, Scorpio, and the Tax Reform Act 2004 74 3. Taxation of non resident companies: Avoir Fiscal and Saint Gobain 78 B. Outbound situations 81 1. Introduction 81 2. Taxation of capital income and capital gains: Schmid, Lenz, and the Budget Supplementary Act 2003 84 3. Exit taxation: X and Y, Hughes de Lasteyrie du Saillant, N, and the Tax Reform Act 2004 88 ix Table of Contents 4. Utilization of foreign losses 91 a. Exempt losses of foreign permanent establishments and See. 2(8) of the EStG 91 b. Losses of foreign subsidiaries: The Austrian group taxation and Marks Spencer 92 5. The Austrian partieipation exemption: See. 10(1) v. See. 10(2) of the KStG 95 IV. Summary 99 The Netherlands 101 Otto Marres I. Introduction 101 II. Referral policy 101 III. Potential incompatibilities with EC law 104 A. General 104 B. Personal income tax 104 1. Personal allowances 104 2. Exit taxes 106 C. Corporate income tax 107 1. Corporate interest deduetion 107 2. Exit taxes 109 3. Fiscal unity/cross border loss set off 110 D. Dividend tax (and credit of foreign withholding tax) 111 1. Outbound dividends (dividend withholding tax) 111 2. Inbound dividends (credit for foreign tax) 113 3. Tax sparing/most favoured nation 115 IV. Legislative changes per 2007 115 x Table of Contents PART THREE THE ATTITÜDE OF TWO ORIGINAL MEMBER STATES TOWARDS THE ECJ S RULINGS Germany 119 Dr Axel Cordewener, LLM I. Introduction 119 II. EC law and the German legal system: The constitutional framework 121 A. The general constitutional perspective 121 1. Traditional international treaties 121 2. EC law as a Special case 123 B. Identifying the (limited) areas of Opposition by German courts 126 1. The fundamental rights debate: Bundesverfassungsgericht versus ECJ? 127 2. The direct effect issue: Bundesfinanzhof Versus ECJ? 130 C. The constitutional Obligation to respect and apply EC law 131 III. The ECJ s decisions and their influence on the German tax judiciary 133 A. The structure of the German (tax) judiciary 133 B. The increasing importance of EC law 135 1. Historical development 135 2. Current Status 138 C. The treatment of EC law by the different instances today 140 IV. Reactions on the part of the German legislature and tax administration: Some recent examples 147 A. The German legislature 147 B. The German tax administration 151 V. Conclusions 155 xi Table of Contents France 157 Cecile Brokelind I. Introduction 157 n. Constitutional framework 157 III. Influence of ECJ case law on direct taxation 160 A. General 160 B. The legislator s responses to ECJ case law 161 C. The domestic judges attitude 163 IV. Conclusion 167 PARTFOUR THE SCANDINAVIAN APPROACH TO THE ECJ S RULINGS Finland 171 Kristiina Alma I. General remarks 171 A. Constitutional framework 171 B. Procedural aspects 171 C. Obligation to apply EC law 172 D. Comparative law traditions 172 n. A leave to appeal for review of appeal cases to Supreme Courts? 173 A. General 173 B. Appeals in tax cases 174 C. Advance rulings 176 m. Preliminary rulings in the Finnish court System 176 IV. The notion of acte clair and the CILFTT doctrine 178 V. The attitude of the State authorities toward EC tax law 179 A. Judicial authorities 179 B. Legislator 179 xii ¦ Table of Contents C. Tax administration 182 D. State liability in tax cases 184 E. Record of the courts 185 F. Practice with regard to indirect taxes 185 G. Practice with regard to direct taxes 188 H. The impact of neighbouring tax law on the legislator 188 I. Dividend taxation 189 J. Interaction between IFRS and taxation 190 K. Group taxation 191 L. Group relief or group contribution? 192 M. Transfer pricing 195 N. Do tax judges take the ECJ s case law into account before the legislator does? 196 0. ThelevelofknowledgeofECtaxlaw 197 P. The tax treatment of non resident taxpayers 198 VI. Further areas of potential conflict 201 A. In general 201 B. Capital duty 201 C. Luxembourg SICAVs 203 D. New securities 205 E. Valuation of assets 205 VII. Primary Community law 205 A. In general 205 B. Expatriate expenses 206 C. Household deduction 207 D. Exemption on capital gains tax 207 E. Exit taxes 208 F. Transfer of habitual abode 209 G. Capital gains tax 210 H. Transfer of a real seat 210 1. Companies 210 2. A foreign Company s PE 211 3. SEandSCE 211 1. CFC rules 212 J. Dividend taxation 213 K. Exempt dividend income 213 L. Valuation of foreign shares 214 M. Method for elimination of double taxation 214 N. Reverse discrimination 215 xiii Table of Contents VIII. Conclusion 216 A. General court practice 216 B. Preliminary rulings 217 C. The other State authorities approach 218 D. Future scenarios on the enforcement of EC tax law 219 Sweden 223 Cecile Brokelind and Marc Kanter I. Introduction 223 A. Purpose 223 B. Method 223 C. Eleven years of EU membership 225 D. The Swedish courts involved in tax matters 226 1. Courts and tribunals 226 2. Swedish Board for Advance Rulings 227 II. General comments on the effects of EC law on Swedish tax law 229 A. Constitutional framework for recognition of the supremacy of EC law over Swedish law 229 B. Procedural changes in order to implement Art. 234 of the EC Treaty 230 C. The duty for courts to apply EC law of their own motion 231 D. Reference to notable foreign case law in copy cat cases 232 E. The leave to appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court and the effective application of EC law 232 F. Too few cases referred to the ECJ? 233 G. A peculiar way to understand ECJ case law: Some examples 234 H. The acte clair doctrine in Swedish tax case law 236 III. Domestic tax case law 238 A. Income tax cases dealt with by Swedish courts 238 1. A small number of cases 238 2. Areas of income tax law at issue in Swedish cases 240 3. Some examples of potential challenges of internal Swedish law provisions 252 B. Some examples of State liability in tax cases 253 | C. Teaching tax judges 255 xiv Table of contents D. Challenging internal source taxation rules 255 IV. Conclusion 257 Norway 261 Andreas Bullen I. Legal background 261 A. The European Economic Area and its fundamental freedoms 261 B. Competent courts and administrative bodies in tax matters 262 II. General questions 263 A. Changes in the national constitution to recognize supremacy of EEA law over domestic law 263 B. Changes in domestic procedural rules in order to adapt to Art. 234 of the EC Treaty (Art. 34 SCA) 264 C. Duty for domestic judges to apply EEA law on their own motion 265 D. Domestic judges reference to and use of arguments from foreign case law 266 E. Leave to appeal requirements for appeals to the Supreme Court 271 F. Whether the EEA authorities have criticized Norway for Norwegian courts referring too few cases to the EFTA Court 272 G. Whether Norwegian judges have exhibited a peculiar approach to the reading of ECJ/EFTA Court case law 275 H. Acte clair and the CILFIT doctrine 278 III. Questions more specific to tax law 279 A. Norwegian tax judges attitude towards EEA law in general 279 1. The attitude of the courts 279 2. The attitude of the administrative tax authorities 284 B. State liability in tax cases 289 C. Comparison of Norwegian judges attitude towards EEA law in direct tax and indirect tax cases 291 D. The Norwegian tax legislator s attitude towards the case law of the ECJ and the EFTA Court 293 xv Table of Contents E. Whether Norwegian tax judges consider pending cases before the ECJ/EFTA Court 299 F. Level of knowledge about EC/EEA tax law among domestic judges and tax authorities 302 G. Amendments of domestic and bilateral tax provisions initiated by the case law of the ECJ/EFTA Court; reflections on trends in the case law of the Courts 304 Denmark 309 S0ren Friis Hansen and Jeppe Rune Stokholm I. Introduction 309 A. The Vestergaard case as a breakthrough 309 B. The Danish debate on the effect of Community law 310 C. Indirect taxes 311 II. Overview of Danish cases 312 A. Preliminary rulings from Denmark 312 B. Pending Danish cases 314 III. General questions 314 IV. The practical use of Community law in Danish tax law 316 A. The Danish court system and Community law 316 B. The Danish government and ECJ case law on direct taxation 318 C. State liability and procedural remedies 320 V. Final remarks 322 PART FIVE THE MEDtTERRANEAN APPRO ACH TO THE ECJ S RULINGS Italy 325 Prof. Dr Pasquale Pistone I. Introduction 325 xvi i Table of Contents II. Categorizing the type of influence ECJ decisions have on direct taxes in the European Union 326 A. Direct influence 326 B. Indirect influence 327 C. Improper influence 329 HI. The influence of ECJ decisions on Italian tax law 330 A. The effects of ECJ rulings on Italian tax courts 331 B. The missing influence of the rulings of the ECJ on Italian direct taxes 332 1. Issues of compatibility concerning the 2004 Tax Reform Act 332 2. Issues of compatibility not addressed by the 2004 Tax Reform Act 336 Portugal 341 Prof. Dr Ana Paula Dourado I. Introduction 341 A. The principle of primacy of EC Law 341 B. Cooperation between national tax courts and the ECJ 343 II. The influence of the ECJ decisions on Portuguese tax law 346 A The eighties and nineties a general attitude of indifference 346 B. The new Century a diligent domestic legislator 350 C. The Denkavit decision and the various relevant conditions for qualifying as a subsidiary or as parent Company 351 D. Taxation of pension funds 352 E. Double economic taxation of dividends paid to individuals 354 F. Thin capitalization 355 G. Exit taxes 355 H. Withholding taxes 355 III. Conclusions 356 xvii Table of Contents Greece 357 Dr Georgios Matsos, LIM I. EC law and Greek law 357 A. Introduction 357 B. The general approach of Greek courts to EC law 359 C. Two controversial examples of Greek jurisprudence on EC law 361 1. The judgment on Greek secondary establishments of foreign universities 361 2. The judgment on the public procurement ban for media enterprises 362 II. Tax law and EC law in Greece 364 A. Particularities of Greek tax law 364 B. The Greek approach to EC tax law 367 C. Implementation of ECJ decisions in Greek tax law 369 D. State liability in EC tax matters 371 DI. The Greek jurisprudence on EC tax law matters 372 A. Jurisdiction on tax matters 372 B. Frequency and quality of referrals to the ECJ 373 C. Examples from Greek case law 375 1. The judgment on the regularizing tax: A political judgment 376 2. The bananas judgment: An example of procedural impediments 377 3. An interesting judgment on mergers 378 IV. Conclusion 380 PART SIX NEW MEMBER STATES APPROACH TO THE ECJ S RULINGS: THE EXAMPLE OF POLAND Poland 383 Dr Adam Zalasinski I. Introduction 383 ; xviii I Tabte of Contents II. Polish constitutional framework concerning the EU law s effectiveness in the Polish legal order 384 HI. The Polish System of remedies applicable in the case of taxation in violation of EC tax law 387 A. Legal framework 387 B. Attitüde of the Polish judiciary 389 IV. Fields of possible conflicts between the internal market requirements (as interpreted by the ECJ) and Polish direct tax law 393 V. Attitüde of the lawmaker 398 VI. Conclusions 400 Setting out the contours of future research 401 Cecile Brokelind Tableofcases 407 xix
any_adam_object 1
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV022445349
callnumber-first K - Law
callnumber-label KJE7160
callnumber-raw KJE7160
callnumber-search KJE7160
callnumber-sort KJE 47160
classification_rvk PS 3940
ctrlnum (OCoLC)144685990
(DE-599)BVBBV022445349
discipline Rechtswissenschaft
format Book
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01815nam a2200469 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022445349</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080918 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070530s2007 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789087220037</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-8722-003-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)144685990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022445349</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE7160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3940</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139824:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law</subfield><subfield code="b">an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by Cécile Brokelind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="b">IBFD</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XX, 442 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of Justice of the European Communities</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Belastingrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Directe belastingen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europees recht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtspraak</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unificatie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europarecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Steuer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct taxation</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Direct taxation</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Taxation</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EU-landen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brokelind, Cécile</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&amp;doc_library=BVB01&amp;local_base=BVB01&amp;doc_number=015653326&amp;sequence=000002&amp;line_number=0001&amp;func_code=DB_RECORDS&amp;service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015653326</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
geographic EU-landen gtt
Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten
geographic_facet EU-landen
Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten
id DE-604.BV022445349
illustrated Not Illustrated
indexdate 2024-12-23T20:05:16Z
institution BVB
isbn 9789087220037
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015653326
oclc_num 144685990
open_access_boolean
owner DE-M382
DE-384
DE-19
DE-BY-UBM
owner_facet DE-M382
DE-384
DE-19
DE-BY-UBM
physical XX, 442 S.
publishDate 2007
publishDateSearch 2007
publishDateSort 2007
publisher IBFD
record_format marc
spellingShingle Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law
Court of Justice of the European Communities Cases
Belastingrecht gtt
Directe belastingen gtt
Europees recht gtt
Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen gtt
Rechtspraak gtt
Unificatie gtt
Europarecht
Recht
Steuer
Direct taxation Law and legislation European Union countries
Direct taxation Law and legislation European Union countries Cases
Taxation Law and legislation European Union countries
title Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law
title_auth Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law
title_exact_search Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law
title_full Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law ed. by Cécile Brokelind
title_fullStr Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law ed. by Cécile Brokelind
title_full_unstemmed Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law ed. by Cécile Brokelind
title_short Towards a homogeneous EC direct tax law
title_sort towards a homogeneous ec direct tax law an assessment of the member states responses to the ecj s case law
title_sub an assessment of the member states' responses to the ECJ's case law
topic Court of Justice of the European Communities Cases
Belastingrecht gtt
Directe belastingen gtt
Europees recht gtt
Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen gtt
Rechtspraak gtt
Unificatie gtt
Europarecht
Recht
Steuer
Direct taxation Law and legislation European Union countries
Direct taxation Law and legislation European Union countries Cases
Taxation Law and legislation European Union countries
topic_facet Court of Justice of the European Communities Cases
Belastingrecht
Directe belastingen
Europees recht
Hof van Justitie van de Europese Gemeenschappen
Rechtspraak
Unificatie
Europarecht
Recht
Steuer
Direct taxation Law and legislation European Union countries
Direct taxation Law and legislation European Union countries Cases
Taxation Law and legislation European Union countries
EU-landen
Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten
url http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015653326&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv AT brokelindcecile towardsahomogeneousecdirecttaxlawanassessmentofthememberstatesresponsestotheecjscaselaw