Judicial lawmaking and administrative law
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Antwerpen [u.a.]
Intersentia [u.a.]
2005
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Ius commune europaeum
52 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV021491412 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200910 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 060227s2005 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9050954634 |9 90-5095-463-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)237027741 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021491412 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-91 | ||
| 084 | |a JUR 702 |2 stub | ||
| 084 | |a JUR 036 |2 stub | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial lawmaking and administrative law |c eds: Frits Stroink ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Antwerpen [u.a.] |b Intersentia [u.a.] |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a XXVIII, 328 S. |b Ill. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Ius commune europaeum |v 52 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Administrative courts |z Netherlands | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judge-made law |z Netherlands | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z Netherlands |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Richterrecht |0 (DE-588)4125213-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verwaltungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4063351-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Niederlande | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Verwaltungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4063351-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Richterrecht |0 (DE-588)4125213-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stroink, Frederik A. M. |d 1948- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)133734803 |4 oth | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Ius commune europaeum |v 52 |w (DE-604)BV010118502 |9 52 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014708235&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014708235 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-TUM_call_number | 0002/JUR 036 2020 A 3871 |
|---|---|
| DE-BY-TUM_katkey | 2496939 |
| DE-BY-TUM_media_number | 040008802902 |
| _version_ | 1816714618970570753 |
| adam_text | EDITORS: FRITS STROINK EVELINE VAN DER LINDEN JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW INTERSENTIA METRO TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
V FRITS STROINK INTRODUCTION XIII 1. THETHEME XIII 2. THE DUTCH
SITUATION XV 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ESSAYS XIX LIST OF AUTHORS
XXVII PART I: INFLUENCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ROB WIDDERSHOVEN THE
PRINCIPLE OF LOYAL COOPERATION. LAWMAKING BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF
JUSTICE AND THE DUTCH COURTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. THE PRINCIPLE OF
LOYAL COOPERATION 5 3. DIRECT EFFECT AND CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION 8
3.1. INTRODUCTION 8 3.2. DIRECT EFFECT AND CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION:
POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITS 8 3.3. LAWMAKING BY THE ECJ . 11 3.4. THE
NATIONAL COURTS 12 4. LEGAL PROTECTION IN EC CASES BEFORE THE NATIONAL
COURTS 16 4.1. GENERAL ASPECTS 16 4.2. THE ECJ S CREATION OF NATIONAL
MEANS OF LEGAL REDRESS 17 4.3. LAWMAKING BY THE ECJ 21 4.4. THE NATIONAL
COURTS 23 5. LOYAL COOPERATION IN THE COMMUNITY LEGAL ORDER 27 5.1.
INTRODUCTION 27 5.2. LOYAL COOPERATION BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES AND THE
COMMUNITY 27 5.3. LOYAL COOPERATION BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES 29 TABLE
OF CONTENTS 5.4. LAWMAKING BY THE ECJ AND THE NATIONAL COURTS 33 6.
CONCLUSION 34 SANDER JANSEN TOWARDS AN ADJUSTMENT OF THE TRIAS POLITICA:
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS AS (PROCEDURAL) LAWMAKER; A STUDY OF THE
INFLUENCE OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION AND THE CASE LAW BY
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE TRJAS POLITICA, IN PARTICULAR
THE POSITION OF DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN RELATION TO THE
ADMINISTRATION 37 1. INTRODUCTION 37 2. REASONS FOR THE STUDY 38 3.
BACKGROUND 38 4. BOTTLENECKS 39 4.1. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
39 4.1.1. THE CONVENTION AND THE TRIAS 39 4.1.2. RELEVANT JUDGMENTS 41
4.2. WHAT CHANGES ARE NEEDED AT NATIONAL LEVEL? 47 5. CONCLUSIONS 52
MARJAN PEETERS THE CONCEPT OF PRECAUTION AS SHAPED BY THE COURTS 57 1.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES 57
2. THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE 61 3. DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN
RELATION TO THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE.. 63 3.1. THE IMPACT OF THE
EUROPEAN PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ON THE DUTCH LEGAL ORDER 63 3.2. CASES
DECIDED BY THE DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 65 3.2.1. PRECAUTION IN
POLICY LEADS TO JUDICIAL REVIEW 65 3.2.2. UNCERTAIN RISK AND REVIEW
CRITERIA 67 3.2.3. THE ABSENCE OF INSIGHT INTO THE EFFECTS BARS THE
GRANTING OF A LICENCE 67 3.3. ANALYSIS 73 4. PRECAUTION IN EUROPEAN
COMMUNITY LAW 74 4.1. INTRODUCTION 74 4.2. CASE LAW 75 4.3. ANALYSIS 79
5. FINAL OBSERVATIONS 79 ALEIDUS WOLTJER FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE
EUROPEAN UNION - THE EVOLUTIVE APPROACH OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE EC 81 1.
INTRODUCTION 81 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 81 3. FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS:
THE COURT OF JUSTICE S APPROACH 83 3.1. WORKE/ 83 VT TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.2. PUBLIC POLICY 84 3.3. EFFET UTILE ( PRINCIPLE OF
EFFECTIVENESS ) 84 3.4. UNION CITIZENSHIP 90 3.5. APPLICATION OF
ARTICLE 8 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 93 4. EPILOGUE 95 PART II:
SEPARATION OF POWERS AALT-WILLEM HERINGA JUDICIAL LAWMAKING (UN)LIMITED
99 1. INTRODUCTION 99 2. TRIAS POLITICA 100 3. CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL
MANDATE: A RIGHT TO REVIEW? 101 4. CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUE 104 5.
CONSENSUS 106 6. TYPE OF COURT 107 7. THIRD PARTIES: INTERPRETATION
AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC 109 8. CONFLICTING PRINCIPLES 114 9. CASE LAW AND
JUDICIAL LAWMAKING: A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH 115 10. THE INFLUENCE OF THE
EUROPEAN COURTS: THE ECJ AND THE ECHR AS LEGITIMISATION FOR THE NATIONAL
COURTS 116 11. OTHER VARIABLES 117 12. IN CONCLUSION 118 LUC VERHEY
PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RLGHTS: INTERACTION BETWEEN THE LEGISLATURE
AND THE JUDICIARY. JUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE UNITED KLNGDOM
AND THE NETHERLANDS 121 1. INTRODUCTION 121 2. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN
THE UNITED KINGDOM 122 2.1. THE SITUATION PRIOR TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
1998 122 2.2. THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 125 2.3. DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 131 3. THE NETHERLANDS 137 3.1. CONSTITUTIONAL
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 137 3.2. JUDICIAL REVIEW ON THE BASIS OF TREATY
RIGHTS 140 3.3. THE PROHIBITION AGAINST CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL REVIEW
144 4. COMPARATIVE REFLECTIONS 146 5. CONCLUSION 150 TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARIE JANSSE BOK JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS BY THE DUTCH
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS: RECOURS OBJECTIF OR RECOURS SUBJECTIF? A SURVEY
INCLUDING FRENCH ANDGERMANLAW 153 1. INTRODUCTION 153 2. FRANCE 154 2.1.
TWO MAIN FORMS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 154 2.2. PERSONS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL
REVIEW 156 2.3. PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 157 2.4.
JUDGE-DIRECTED OR PARTY-DIRECTED PROCEEDINGS? 158 2.5. JUDGMENTS 159
2.6. INTERIM MEASURES 161 RAYMOND SCHLOESSEIS LLABILITY FOR LAWFUL
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. OBSERVATIONS ON COMMON PRINCIPLES OF LAW,
JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND NATIONAL COURTS 163 1. INTRODUCTION 163 2. THE
NETHERLANDS: THE MAGICAL TIGHTROPE 164 2.1. HISTORICAL OUTLINE 164 2.2.
DEVELOPMENTS FROM 1990 UNTIL THE PRESENT 166 3. FRANCE: BIRTHPLACE OF
EGALITE 167 3.1. APPLICATION CRITERIA: PROPORTIONALITY AND EQUALITY 168
3.2. LEGISLATION 169 4. GERMANY: THEORY AND DOGMA 170 4.1. THE CIVIL
COURT S MOVE: 1794-1981 170 4.2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT S MOVE:
1981-PRESENT 171 5. ENGLAND: THE RULE OF LAW? 172 5.1. THE LEGISLATURE S
PRIMACY 172 5.2. EQUALITY BEFORE PUBLIC BUERDEN NONETHELESS? 173 6.
STRASBOURG AND EQUALITY BEFORE PUBLIC BURDENS 174 7. IN CONCLUSION:
LAWFUL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION AND JUDICIAL LAWMAKING 175 7.1. JUDICIAL
LAWMAKING: INTERMEZZO 176 7.2. JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
LIABILITY 178 7.3. EGALITE DEVANT LES CHARGES PUBLIQUES: LAWMAKING AND
IUS COMMUNE ? 179 EVELINE VAN DER LINDEN THE WILL OF THE JUDICIARY. THE
ALIENS COURTS ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE 183 1. LAWMAKING AND THE LAW RELATING
TO ALIENS 183 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF LAWMAKING IN THE AREA OF ALIENS LAW
184 3. THE ALIENS COURTS ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE AND LEGAL PROTECTION BY THE
ALIENS COURTS 187 4. THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ALIENS COURTS ROOM FOR
MANOEUVRE 191 4.1. THE REMIT OF THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 191
4.2. THE REMIT OF THE APPELLATE ALIENS COURT 193 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.3. COMPARISON BETWEEN JUDICIAL APPEAL IN ALIENS CASES AND GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL APPEAL 198 5. THE DESIGN OF THE ALIENS COURTS
ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE 202 6. CONCLUSION 205 TON DUIJKERSLOOT DO COURTS
ENGAGE IN LAWMAKING IN RELATION TO SUPERVISION OF THE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY? REFLECTIONS ON SUPERVISION IN THE NETHERLANDS AND GERMANY 207
1. INTRODUCTION 207 2. INSURANCE SUPERVISION IN THE NETHERLANDS AND
GERMANY: A BRIEF ORIENTATION 208 3. VAGUE NORMS IN INSURANCE SUPERVISION
209 4. JUDICIAL REVIEW 211 5. CONCLUSION 216 KARIANNE ALBERS THE
FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE. JUDICIAL LAWMAKING OR A GENERAL RECHTSSTAAT
PRINCIPLE? 217 1. INTRODUCTION 217 2. THE FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE
UNDER THE DUTCH LEGAL SYSTEM 219 2.1. GENERAL PART: RESTORATION
SANCTIONS AS ENFORCEMENT POWERS 219 2.2. A FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE
219 2.2.1. CONDONING AS OPPOSED TO ENFORCING 219 2.2.2. THE EMERGENCE
OF CASE LAW ON A FUNDAMENTAL ENFORCEMENT DUTY - GENERAL PART 224 2.2.3.
FURTHER REFINEMENT 227 2.2.4. IN CONCLUSION 229 2.3. VIEWS OF SCHOLARLY
WRITERS 229 3. THE FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE IN THE GERMAN LEGAL
SYSTEM 231 4. JUDICIAL LAWMAKING? 233 GIO TEN BERGE AND PHILIP LANGBROEK
TOWARDSINTEGRATED LAWMAKING BY ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS AND PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES. ON INSTRUMENTS AND POSSIBILITIES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE
INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN
RELATION TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING, ADMINISTRATIVE OBJECTION AND
APPEAL 237 1. INTRODUCTION 237 2. FROM THE JURIDIFICATION DEBATE TOWARDS
A DIALOGUE ON LAWMAKING 238 3. INSTRUMENTS FOR PROPER INTERACTION ON THE
PART OF THE ADMINISTRATION .... 241 3.1. WELL-REASONED AND KNOWABLE
POLITICAL LAWMAKING BY THE ADMINISTRATION 241 3.2. THE ORGANISATION OF
THE ADMINISTRATION 242 4. POSSIBILITIES OF PROPER INTERACTION ON THE
PART OF JUDGES AND THE COURTS. 244 4.1. FORMAL COMPONENTS OF
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 244 IX TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2. SUBSTANTIVE
COMPONENTS OF PROCEDURAL LAW 245 4.3. ORGANISATIONAL MEASURES IN
RELATION TO THE JUDICIARY 247 5. IN CONCLUSION 248 PART III: OMBUDSMEN
HENK ADDINK THE OMBUDSMAN AS THE FOURTH POWER. ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF
OMBUDSMAN LAW FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE 251 1. INTRODUCTION:
REASONS FOR THE ARTICLE AND CENTRAL QUESTIONS 251 2. THE CONCEPT OF
FOURTH POWER , THE OMBUDSMAN AS PART OF THE FOURTH POWER AND THE
RELATION TO THE OTHER THREE POWERS 255 3. FOUNDATIONS OF OMBUDSMAN LAW:
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF DUTIES AND POWERS, ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND
IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS 259 4. COMPARATIVE
APPROACH: BOTH HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY, WITHIN AND WITHOUT EUROPE
260 5. THE POSITION OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF HIS
COMPETENCE 262 5.1. THE OMBUDSMAN S POSITION AND THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF
HIS POWERS.... 262 5.2. SWEDEN AND DENMARK 263 5.3. PORTUGAL AND SPAIN
264 5.4. THE NETHERLANDS: AT PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE 265 6. THE
OMBUDSMAN S ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 266 6.1. SUBSTANCE AND EXTENT OF
ASSESSMENT BY THE OMBUDSMAN 266 6.2. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF THE
OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS IN SWEDEN, DENMARK AND GREAT BRITAIN 267 6.3.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA EMPLOYED BY THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN 268 6.4. THE
NETHERLANDS: AT PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE 271 7. COMPLIANCE WITH AND
ENFORCEMENT OF THE OMBUDSMAN S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 271 7.1.
ASPECTS OF COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT 271 7.2. ASPECTS OF COMPLIANCE AND
ENFORCEMENT IN EUROPEAN AND NON- EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 272 7.3. THE
NETHERLANDS: AT PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE 273 8. CONCLUSIONS 273 NICOLE
NIESSEN LAWMAKING BY THE NATIONAL OMBUDSMAN? 285 1. INTRODUCTION 285 2.
THESIS 286 3. ACCESS TO THE OMBUDSMAN 286 4. THE CRITERIA
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACT 287 X TABLE OF
CONTENTS 5. ADDITIONAL LEGAL PROTECTION 288 6. AUTHORITATIVE OPINION 289
7. THE PROPRIETY TEST 290 8. THE RELATION CITIZEN-ADMINISTRATION: TWO
PERSPECTIVES 292 8.1. LEGAL RELATION 292 8.2. SOCIAL RELATION 294 9. IS
THE PROPRIETY ASSESSMENT OF THE OMBUDSMAN OF A LAWMAKING NATURE? 295 10.
LAWMAKING METHODS 298 10.1. THE PROPRIETY STANDARD AND THE GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF PROPER ADMINISTRATION 298 10.2. THE PROPRIETY STANDARD AND
IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE 300 10.3. TRANSLATING THE PROPRIETY STANDARD
INTO LEGISLATION? 302 11. LAWMAKING IN PRACTICE 303 11.1. PROMPTNESS 303
11.2. THE OMBUDSMAN AS SUPERVISOR OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNAL
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE 306 12. CONCLUSION 309 XI
|
| adam_txt |
EDITORS: FRITS STROINK EVELINE VAN DER LINDEN JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW INTERSENTIA METRO TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
V FRITS STROINK INTRODUCTION XIII 1. THETHEME XIII 2. THE DUTCH
SITUATION XV 3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ESSAYS XIX LIST OF AUTHORS
XXVII PART I: INFLUENCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ROB WIDDERSHOVEN THE
PRINCIPLE OF LOYAL COOPERATION. LAWMAKING BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF
JUSTICE AND THE DUTCH COURTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. THE PRINCIPLE OF
LOYAL COOPERATION 5 3. DIRECT EFFECT AND CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION 8
3.1. INTRODUCTION 8 3.2. DIRECT EFFECT AND CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION:
POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITS 8 3.3. LAWMAKING BY THE ECJ '. 11 3.4. THE
NATIONAL COURTS 12 4. LEGAL PROTECTION IN EC CASES BEFORE THE NATIONAL
COURTS 16 4.1. GENERAL ASPECTS 16 4.2. THE ECJ'S CREATION OF NATIONAL
MEANS OF LEGAL REDRESS 17 4.3. LAWMAKING BY THE ECJ 21 4.4. THE NATIONAL
COURTS 23 5. LOYAL COOPERATION IN THE COMMUNITY LEGAL ORDER 27 5.1.
INTRODUCTION 27 5.2. LOYAL COOPERATION BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES AND THE
COMMUNITY 27 5.3. LOYAL COOPERATION BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES 29 TABLE
OF CONTENTS 5.4. LAWMAKING BY THE ECJ AND THE NATIONAL COURTS 33 6.
CONCLUSION 34 SANDER JANSEN TOWARDS AN ADJUSTMENT OF THE TRIAS POLITICA:
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS AS (PROCEDURAL) LAWMAKER; A STUDY OF THE
INFLUENCE OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION AND THE CASE LAW BY
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE TRJAS POLITICA, IN PARTICULAR
THE POSITION OF DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN RELATION TO THE
ADMINISTRATION 37 1. INTRODUCTION 37 2. REASONS FOR THE STUDY 38 3.
BACKGROUND 38 4. BOTTLENECKS 39 4.1. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
39 4.1.1. THE CONVENTION AND THE TRIAS 39 4.1.2. RELEVANT JUDGMENTS 41
4.2. WHAT CHANGES ARE NEEDED AT NATIONAL LEVEL? 47 5. CONCLUSIONS 52
MARJAN PEETERS THE CONCEPT OF PRECAUTION AS SHAPED BY THE COURTS 57 1.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES 57
2. THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE 61 3. DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN
RELATION TO THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE. 63 3.1. THE IMPACT OF THE
EUROPEAN PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE ON THE DUTCH LEGAL ORDER 63 3.2. CASES
DECIDED BY THE DUTCH ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 65 3.2.1. PRECAUTION IN
POLICY LEADS TO JUDICIAL REVIEW 65 3.2.2. UNCERTAIN RISK AND REVIEW
CRITERIA 67 3.2.3. THE ABSENCE OF INSIGHT INTO THE EFFECTS BARS THE
GRANTING OF A LICENCE 67 3.3. ANALYSIS 73 4. PRECAUTION IN EUROPEAN
COMMUNITY LAW 74 4.1. INTRODUCTION 74 4.2. CASE LAW 75 4.3. ANALYSIS 79
5. FINAL OBSERVATIONS 79 ALEIDUS WOLTJER FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE
EUROPEAN UNION - THE EVOLUTIVE APPROACH OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE EC 81 1.
INTRODUCTION 81 2. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 81 3. FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS:
THE COURT OF JUSTICE'S APPROACH 83 3.1. 'WORKE/ 83 VT TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.2. 'PUBLIC POLICY' 84 3.3. 'EFFET UTILE' ('PRINCIPLE OF
EFFECTIVENESS') 84 3.4. 'UNION CITIZENSHIP' 90 3.5. APPLICATION OF
ARTICLE 8 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 93 4. EPILOGUE 95 PART II:
SEPARATION OF POWERS AALT-WILLEM HERINGA JUDICIAL LAWMAKING (UN)LIMITED
99 1. INTRODUCTION 99 2. TRIAS POLITICA 100 3. CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL
MANDATE: A RIGHT TO REVIEW? 101 4. CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUE 104 5.
CONSENSUS 106 6. 'TYPE' OF COURT 107 7. THIRD PARTIES: INTERPRETATION
AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC 109 8. CONFLICTING PRINCIPLES 114 9. CASE LAW AND
JUDICIAL LAWMAKING: A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH 115 10. THE INFLUENCE OF THE
EUROPEAN COURTS: THE ECJ AND THE ECHR AS LEGITIMISATION FOR THE NATIONAL
COURTS 116 11. OTHER VARIABLES 117 12. IN CONCLUSION 118 LUC VERHEY
PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RLGHTS: INTERACTION BETWEEN THE LEGISLATURE
AND THE JUDICIARY. JUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE UNITED KLNGDOM
AND THE NETHERLANDS 121 1. INTRODUCTION 121 2. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN
THE UNITED KINGDOM 122 2.1. THE SITUATION PRIOR TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
1998 122 2.2. THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 125 2.3. DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 131 3. THE NETHERLANDS 137 3.1. CONSTITUTIONAL
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 137 3.2. JUDICIAL REVIEW ON THE BASIS OF TREATY
RIGHTS 140 3.3. THE PROHIBITION AGAINST CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL REVIEW
144 4. COMPARATIVE REFLECTIONS 146 5. CONCLUSION 150 TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARIE JANSSE BOK JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS BY THE DUTCH
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS: RECOURS OBJECTIF OR RECOURS SUBJECTIF? A SURVEY
INCLUDING FRENCH ANDGERMANLAW 153 1. INTRODUCTION 153 2. FRANCE 154 2.1.
TWO MAIN FORMS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW 154 2.2. PERSONS ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL
REVIEW 156 2.3. PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 157 2.4.
JUDGE-DIRECTED OR PARTY-DIRECTED PROCEEDINGS? 158 2.5. JUDGMENTS 159
2.6. INTERIM MEASURES 161 RAYMOND SCHLOESSEIS LLABILITY FOR LAWFUL
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION. OBSERVATIONS ON COMMON PRINCIPLES OF LAW,
JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND NATIONAL COURTS 163 1. INTRODUCTION 163 2. THE
NETHERLANDS: THE MAGICAL TIGHTROPE 164 2.1. HISTORICAL OUTLINE 164 2.2.
DEVELOPMENTS FROM 1990 UNTIL THE PRESENT 166 3. FRANCE: BIRTHPLACE OF
EGALITE 167 3.1. APPLICATION CRITERIA: PROPORTIONALITY AND EQUALITY 168
3.2. LEGISLATION 169 4. GERMANY: THEORY AND DOGMA 170 4.1. THE CIVIL
COURT'S MOVE: 1794-1981 170 4.2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S MOVE:
1981-PRESENT 171 5. ENGLAND: THE RULE OF LAW? 172 5.1. THE LEGISLATURE'S
PRIMACY 172 5.2. 'EQUALITY BEFORE PUBLIC BUERDEN' NONETHELESS? 173 6.
STRASBOURG AND 'EQUALITY BEFORE PUBLIC BURDENS' 174 7. IN CONCLUSION:
LAWFUL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION AND JUDICIAL LAWMAKING 175 7.1. JUDICIAL
LAWMAKING: INTERMEZZO 176 7.2. JUDICIAL LAWMAKING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
LIABILITY 178 7.3. EGALITE DEVANT LES CHARGES PUBLIQUES: LAWMAKING AND
'IUS COMMUNE'? 179 EVELINE VAN DER LINDEN THE WILL OF THE JUDICIARY. THE
ALIENS COURTS' ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE 183 1. LAWMAKING AND THE LAW RELATING
TO ALIENS 183 2. CHARACTERISTICS OF LAWMAKING IN THE AREA OF ALIENS LAW
184 3. THE ALIENS COURTS' ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE AND LEGAL PROTECTION BY THE
ALIENS COURTS 187 4. THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ALIENS COURTS' ROOM FOR
MANOEUVRE 191 4.1. THE REMIT OF THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 191
4.2. THE REMIT OF THE APPELLATE ALIENS COURT 193 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.3. COMPARISON BETWEEN JUDICIAL APPEAL IN ALIENS CASES AND GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL APPEAL 198 5. THE DESIGN OF THE ALIENS COURTS'
ROOM FOR MANOEUVRE 202 6. CONCLUSION 205 TON DUIJKERSLOOT DO COURTS
ENGAGE IN LAWMAKING IN RELATION TO SUPERVISION OF THE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY? REFLECTIONS ON SUPERVISION IN THE NETHERLANDS AND GERMANY 207
1. INTRODUCTION 207 2. INSURANCE SUPERVISION IN THE NETHERLANDS AND
GERMANY: A BRIEF ORIENTATION 208 3. VAGUE NORMS IN INSURANCE SUPERVISION
209 4. JUDICIAL REVIEW 211 5. CONCLUSION 216 KARIANNE ALBERS THE
FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE. JUDICIAL LAWMAKING OR A GENERAL RECHTSSTAAT
PRINCIPLE? 217 1. INTRODUCTION 217 2. THE FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE
UNDER THE DUTCH LEGAL SYSTEM 219 2.1. GENERAL PART: RESTORATION
SANCTIONS AS ENFORCEMENT POWERS 219 2.2. A FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE
219 2.2.1. CONDONING AS OPPOSED TO ENFORCING 219 2.2.2. THE 'EMERGENCE'
OF CASE LAW ON A FUNDAMENTAL ENFORCEMENT DUTY - GENERAL PART 224 2.2.3.
FURTHER REFINEMENT 227 2.2.4. IN CONCLUSION 229 2.3. VIEWS OF SCHOLARLY
WRITERS 229 3. THE FUNDAMENTAL DUTY TO ENFORCE IN THE GERMAN LEGAL
SYSTEM 231 4. JUDICIAL LAWMAKING? 233 GIO TEN BERGE AND PHILIP LANGBROEK
TOWARDSINTEGRATED LAWMAKING BY ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS AND PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES. ON INSTRUMENTS AND POSSIBILITIES FOR CONSTRUCTIVE
INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN
RELATION TO ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING, ADMINISTRATIVE OBJECTION AND
APPEAL 237 1. INTRODUCTION 237 2. FROM THE JURIDIFICATION DEBATE TOWARDS
A DIALOGUE ON LAWMAKING 238 3. INSTRUMENTS FOR PROPER INTERACTION ON THE
PART OF THE ADMINISTRATION . 241 3.1. WELL-REASONED AND KNOWABLE
POLITICAL LAWMAKING BY THE ADMINISTRATION 241 3.2. THE ORGANISATION OF
THE ADMINISTRATION 242 4. POSSIBILITIES OF PROPER INTERACTION ON THE
PART OF JUDGES AND THE COURTS. 244 4.1. FORMAL COMPONENTS OF
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 244 IX TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2. SUBSTANTIVE
COMPONENTS OF PROCEDURAL LAW 245 4.3. ORGANISATIONAL MEASURES IN
RELATION TO THE JUDICIARY 247 5. IN CONCLUSION 248 PART III: OMBUDSMEN
HENK ADDINK THE OMBUDSMAN AS THE FOURTH POWER. ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF
OMBUDSMAN LAW FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE 251 1. INTRODUCTION:
REASONS FOR THE ARTICLE AND CENTRAL QUESTIONS 251 2. THE CONCEPT OF
'FOURTH POWER', THE OMBUDSMAN AS PART OF THE FOURTH POWER AND THE
RELATION TO THE OTHER THREE POWERS 255 3. FOUNDATIONS OF OMBUDSMAN LAW:
THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE OF DUTIES AND POWERS, ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND
IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS 259 4. COMPARATIVE
APPROACH: BOTH HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY, WITHIN AND WITHOUT EUROPE
260 5. THE POSITION OF THE OMBUDSMAN AND THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF HIS
COMPETENCE 262 5.1. THE OMBUDSMAN'S POSITION AND THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF
HIS POWERS. 262 5.2. SWEDEN AND DENMARK 263 5.3. PORTUGAL AND SPAIN
264 5.4. THE NETHERLANDS: AT PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE 265 6. THE
OMBUDSMAN'S ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 266 6.1. SUBSTANCE AND EXTENT OF
ASSESSMENT BY THE OMBUDSMAN 266 6.2. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF THE
OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTIONS IN SWEDEN, DENMARK AND GREAT BRITAIN 267 6.3.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA EMPLOYED BY THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN 268 6.4. THE
NETHERLANDS: AT PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE 271 7. COMPLIANCE WITH AND
ENFORCEMENT OF THE OMBUDSMAN'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 271 7.1.
ASPECTS OF COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT 271 7.2. ASPECTS OF COMPLIANCE AND
ENFORCEMENT IN EUROPEAN AND NON- EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 272 7.3. THE
NETHERLANDS: AT PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE 273 8. CONCLUSIONS 273 NICOLE
NIESSEN LAWMAKING BY THE NATIONAL OMBUDSMAN? 285 1. INTRODUCTION 285 2.
THESIS 286 3. ACCESS TO THE OMBUDSMAN 286 4. THE CRITERIA
'ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY' AND 'ADMINISTRATIVE ACT' 287 X TABLE OF
CONTENTS 5. ADDITIONAL LEGAL PROTECTION 288 6. AUTHORITATIVE OPINION 289
7. THE PROPRIETY TEST 290 8. THE RELATION CITIZEN-ADMINISTRATION: TWO
PERSPECTIVES 292 8.1. LEGAL RELATION 292 8.2. SOCIAL RELATION 294 9. IS
THE PROPRIETY ASSESSMENT OF THE OMBUDSMAN OF A LAWMAKING NATURE? 295 10.
LAWMAKING 'METHODS' 298 10.1. THE PROPRIETY STANDARD AND THE GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF PROPER ADMINISTRATION 298 10.2. THE PROPRIETY STANDARD AND
IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE 300 10.3. TRANSLATING THE PROPRIETY STANDARD
INTO LEGISLATION? 302 11. LAWMAKING IN PRACTICE 303 11.1. PROMPTNESS 303
11.2. THE OMBUDSMAN AS SUPERVISOR OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNAL
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE 306 12. CONCLUSION 309 XI |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)133734803 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV021491412 |
| classification_tum | JUR 702 JUR 036 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)237027741 (DE-599)BVBBV021491412 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01650nam a2200433 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021491412</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200910 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060227s2005 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9050954634</subfield><subfield code="9">90-5095-463-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)237027741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021491412</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JUR 702</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JUR 036</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial lawmaking and administrative law</subfield><subfield code="c">eds: Frits Stroink ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Antwerpen [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXVIII, 328 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ius commune europaeum</subfield><subfield code="v">52</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative courts</subfield><subfield code="z">Netherlands</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judge-made law</subfield><subfield code="z">Netherlands</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">Netherlands</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Richterrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125213-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063351-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063351-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Richterrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125213-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stroink, Frederik A. M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)133734803</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ius commune europaeum</subfield><subfield code="v">52</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV010118502</subfield><subfield code="9">52</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014708235&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014708235</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Niederlande |
| geographic_facet | Niederlande |
| id | DE-604.BV021491412 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T14:12:49Z |
| indexdate | 2024-11-25T17:57:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9050954634 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014708235 |
| oclc_num | 237027741 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
| physical | XXVIII, 328 S. Ill. |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSearch | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| publisher | Intersentia [u.a.] |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Ius commune europaeum |
| series2 | Ius commune europaeum |
| spellingShingle | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law Ius commune europaeum Recht Administrative courts Netherlands Judge-made law Netherlands Law Netherlands Interpretation and construction Richterrecht (DE-588)4125213-5 gnd Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4125213-5 (DE-588)4063351-2 |
| title | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law |
| title_auth | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law |
| title_exact_search | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law |
| title_full | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law eds: Frits Stroink ... |
| title_fullStr | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law eds: Frits Stroink ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law eds: Frits Stroink ... |
| title_short | Judicial lawmaking and administrative law |
| title_sort | judicial lawmaking and administrative law |
| topic | Recht Administrative courts Netherlands Judge-made law Netherlands Law Netherlands Interpretation and construction Richterrecht (DE-588)4125213-5 gnd Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Recht Administrative courts Netherlands Judge-made law Netherlands Law Netherlands Interpretation and construction Richterrecht Verwaltungsrecht Niederlande |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014708235&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV010118502 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stroinkfrederikam judiciallawmakingandadministrativelaw |