Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Format: Buch
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Philadelphia [u.a.] Saunders 1999
Schriftenreihe:Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America 9,4
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Inhaltsverzeichnis
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000 cb4500
001 BV012906183
003 DE-604
005 19991214
007 t|
008 991213s1999 xx d||| |||| 00||| engod
035 |a (OCoLC)42720253 
035 |a (DE-599)BVBBV012906183 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger  |e rakddb 
041 0 |a eng 
049 |a DE-12 
050 0 |a RC804.E6 
245 1 0 |a Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy  |c John F. Johanson ..., guest ed. 
264 1 |a Philadelphia [u.a.]  |b Saunders  |c 1999 
300 |a XIV S., S. 559 -743  |b graph. Darst. 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America  |v 9,4 
650 2 |a Endoscopie gastrointestinale 
650 2 |a Maladie de l'appareil digestif 
650 4 |a Endoscopy 
650 4 |a Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal 
650 4 |a Gastroenterology 
650 4 |a Gastrointestinal Diseases  |x diagnosis 
650 4 |a Treatment Outcome 
650 0 7 |a Evaluation  |0 (DE-588)4071034-8  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Minimal-invasive Chirurgie  |0 (DE-588)4327907-7  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Therapieerfolg  |0 (DE-588)4126073-9  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
655 7 |0 (DE-588)4143413-4  |a Aufsatzsammlung  |2 gnd-content 
689 0 0 |a Minimal-invasive Chirurgie  |0 (DE-588)4327907-7  |D s 
689 0 1 |a Therapieerfolg  |0 (DE-588)4126073-9  |D s 
689 0 2 |a Evaluation  |0 (DE-588)4071034-8  |D s 
689 0 |5 DE-604 
700 1 |a Johanson, John F.  |e Sonstige  |4 oth 
830 0 |a Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America  |v 9,4  |w (DE-604)BV005455484  |9 9,4 
856 4 2 |m HBZ Datenaustausch  |q application/pdf  |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008784612&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA  |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 
943 1 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008784612 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1819616153253707776
adam_text OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT DM GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY CONTENTS Foreword xi Charles J. Lightdale Preface xiii John F. Johanson and Martin L. Freeman Importance of Outcomes Research in Endoscopic Practice 559 John F. Johanson The field of outcomes research has emerged in response to rising health care costs and the continued scarcity of resources. This field concerns itself with identifying the most effective and efficient use of finite resources and is a monitoring system to ensure that quality is maintained. This commitment to quality, however, must extend to the level of the individual endoscopist to ensure that patients interests are maintained. If physicians are not actively involved in data collection and measurement to improve the quality and value of their work, someone else undoubtedly will. Because quality assessment and the accountability revolution in health care has public support, individual practitioners and entire specialties increasingly will need to provide routine outcomes data. Overview of Tools for Outcomes Assessment 565 Colleen M. Schmitt Tools for outcomes research can encompass local concepts such as a compu¬ terized database of endoscopy reports, or broader concepts such as a na¬ tional database capturing similar data. Outcomes research may be defined by the investigator, but its results are important to the consumer, be it the patient or the payor. Databases, common to many endoscopy units, become outcomes research tools when the data are scrutinized for outcomes such GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA VOLUME 9 • NUMBER 4 • OCTOBER 1999 V as quality of life, mortality, and interventions that may improve cost effective care. Enhanced knowledge of methods to capture these data will benefit all gastrointestinal endoscopists. Economic Analysis of Endoscopic Procedures 573 Dawn Provenzale Economic analysis is becoming an important tool for the evaluation of new technologies. In this era of rapidly rising health care costs, we are required to demonstrate that our procedures are effective and cost efficient. This article provides a glossary of terms for the evaluation and performance of an economic analysis and outlines the steps for performing an economic evaluation of an endoscopic procedure. The reader is provided with the skills to critically evaluate economic analyses of endoscopic technologies, and to determine their relevance to their practice. Endoscopic Databases and Outcomes Research 587 Glenn M. Eisen Endoscopic databases may take several shapes and forms. They are impor¬ tant tools for the assessment of patient centered outcomes. This article discusses the obstacles to data collection and the importance of a standard endoscopic terminology and content. The strengths and shortcomings of endoscopic databases are also described. Finally, the reader is apprised of the databases currently available for the clinical practitioner. Quality Assurance in the Endoscopy Unit: An Emphasis on Outcomes 595 Russell D. Brown and Jay L. Goldstein This article identifies and reviews key elements of quality improvement programs for an endoscopy unit. The new paradigm of quality improve¬ ment seeks to improve all performance, and does not simply focus on the low outliers as in the traditional quality assurance program. The organization and key elements are emphasized, including selection of key indicators and methodologies for the development of standards of practice and benchmarks. Examples of quality improvement initiatives are dis¬ cussed, demonstrating their value in improved patient care and the process or function of an endoscopy unit. Procedure Specific Outcomes Assessment for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy 609 Colleen M. Schmitt For many, if not most, of our new technology applications, it is time for a broadening of study goals to include clinical endpoints such as health related quality of life. Similarly, effectiveness studies to evaluate the applica¬ tion of known and new technology in every day practice, are needed. Establishing uniform definitions and terminology for important constructs such as comorbidity, disease severity, endoscopic findings, and complica Vi CONTENTS tions must be undertaken in order to ensure accuracy of conclusions. Critical evaluation of how we deliver care to patients with upper GI diseases requiring endoscopy, must proceed with the knowledge that medical care is a process, and within that process, is the means to deliver care of ever increasing quality and efficiency. In this context, this article provides a brief overview of our current knowledge and potential of outcomes research in upper GI endoscopy. Procedure Specific Outcomes Assessment for Colonoscopy 625 John F. Johanson Since its origin, much of the improvement in colonoscopy has been related to technologic advancements in the endoscope itself. The pace of technologic improvement, however, has slowed and improvements affecting colonos¬ copy are occurring in new areas; one of which is patient outcomes. Using this analogy of macro and micro outcomes research (quality assessment), this article highlights key outcomes research and quality assessment issues as they apply to colonoscopy. Procedure Specific Outcomes Assessment for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography 639 Martin L. Freeman The outcome of therapeutic ERCP, or any other medical intervention, is a balance between technical success, avoidance of complications, and efficacy of the procedure in achieving its intended therapeutic goal. There is an increasing need for objective assessment of such outcomes to help physi¬ cians improve their quality of care, to enable patients to better select health care providers, and increasingly, because health care providers are demand¬ ing some kind of objective assessment. In this article, the author reviews methods for quantification of the three principal components of ERCP outcomes, and provides suggestions for data collection to facilitate quality assessment in clinical practice. Procedure Specific Outcomes Assessment for Endoscopic Ultrasonography 649 Amitabh Chak and Gregory S. Cooper Endosonography (EUS)isa relative newcomer to the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Nevertheless, two prospective studies with similar results have shown that EUS leads to a change in management in roughly two thirds of patients in whom it is performed, with many of these changes being to less invasive or less expensive management. Preliminary investigations on the use of catheter probes for performing EUS have shown similar effects. Specific investigations on the effect of EUS on the outcomes of patients with submucosal tumors, esophageal cancers, pancreatic cancers, and rectal cancers need to be performed. Selective studies have demonstrated EUS to be cost effective for the management of submucosal tumors and ampullary tumors. The complication rate of EUS appears to be comparable to that of upper endoscopy. There is little or no information regarding training in EUS, practice variation, or affect of EUS on quality of life. CONTENTS Vii Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 657 David Lieberman Endoscopy is commonly performed to evaluate patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This review focuses on outcomes related to endoscopy in GERD. There is clear evidence that patients with GERD who have dysphagia are likely to benefit from endoscopy. In the vast majority of patients without dysphagia, the benefits of endoscopy are less certain and require further study. Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Gastrointestinal Bleeding 665 Ian M. Gralnek Over the past twenty years, outcomes research has emerged as a methodol¬ ogy to systematically evaluate medical practice and outcomes of care. The assessment of outcomes in clinical practice can improve the quality of care delivered to patients. More specifically, improved quality can be realized by identifying endoscopic practices that are cost efficient, by reducing the variability of endoscopic interventions, and by eliminating those endoscopic interventions that appear to be ineffective. The aims of this article are to pro¬ vide practical information to the practicing endoscopist on which outcomes are important to measure in patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhag, and to detail methods of how to accomplish this. Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Dyspepsia 671 Michael J. Shaw and Michael K. Newcomer Dyspepsia has a high prevalence in the general population with significant health care costs. It remains one of the most common indications for upper endoscopy. This article reviews the role of endoscopy in the management of dyspepsia. In addition, this article reviews the published series of endo¬ scopic findings in subjects with dyspepsia and evidence of the effectiveness of endoscopy in dyspepsia management. This article concludes with direc¬ tions in endoscopic research and development for dyspepsia. Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Irritable Bowel Syndrome 685 Jamshid S. Kalantar and G. Richard Locke III Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder that results in many physician visits and health care costs. Because IBS is so common, patients presenting with abdominal pain, constipation, and diarrhea must be evalu¬ ated as cost effectively as possible. Little data exist to guide the clinician on how to best use endoscopy in IBS. By appropriately recognizing the cardinal symptoms of IBS, investigation can be minimized. Viii CONTENTS Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasia: From Clinical Trials to Community Practice 697 Douglas K. Rex and Reid M. Ness The value of monitoring the performance of diagnostic testing in clinical practice is emphasized through data showing that experts with apparently equal training have substantially different sensitivity for cancer and polyp detection when performing colonic imaging studies. The authors discuss the effects of variation in study population, testing methodology, and exper¬ tise of examiners on the outcomes of diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer. Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Common Bile Duct Stones 705 Anand V. Sahai Clinicians often manage patients with suspected bile duct stones. Research has focused on assessing the accuracy of diagnostic alternatives to endo scopic retrograde cholangiography or on establishing predictors for stones. Studies using costs and quality of life as primary outcomes are rare. This may be caused in part by specific challenges inherent to outcomes research in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy. It is unlikely that one strategy will be suitable for all; however, once a primary outcome is chosen, knowing what variables most affect this outcome should help clinicians objectively tailor the optimal strategy for their needs. The most important variable may be the risk of symptoms caused by untreated stones. There may be a substantial group of patients who are best managed expectantly (with no bile duct imaging). It may therefore, be useful to obtain better prospective data on the natural history of choledocholithiasis. Disease Specific Outcomes Assessment for Chronic Pancreatitis 717 Glenn M. Eisen and Richard Zubarik Outcomes assessment for individuals with chronic pancreatitis is a rela¬ tively new area of research. It is particularly important because of the lack of validated clinical assessment tools for those with this disease process. This article critically evaluates the current medical, endoscopic, and surgical interventions available for patient management. Cumulative Index 731 Subscription Information Inside back cover CONTENTS ix
any_adam_object 1
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV012906183
callnumber-first R - Medicine
callnumber-label RC804
callnumber-raw RC804.E6
callnumber-search RC804.E6
callnumber-sort RC 3804 E6
callnumber-subject RC - Internal Medicine
ctrlnum (OCoLC)42720253
(DE-599)BVBBV012906183
format Book
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01891nam a2200469 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV012906183</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19991214 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">991213s1999 xx d||| |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)42720253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV012906183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC804.E6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy</subfield><subfield code="c">John F. Johanson ..., guest ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philadelphia [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Saunders</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIV S., S. 559 -743</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America</subfield><subfield code="v">9,4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Endoscopie gastrointestinale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Maladie de l'appareil digestif</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endoscopy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastroenterology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastrointestinal Diseases</subfield><subfield code="x">diagnosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment Outcome</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071034-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Minimal-invasive Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4327907-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Therapieerfolg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4126073-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Minimal-invasive Chirurgie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4327907-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Therapieerfolg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4126073-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071034-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johanson, John F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America</subfield><subfield code="v">9,4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV005455484</subfield><subfield code="9">9,4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&amp;doc_library=BVB01&amp;local_base=BVB01&amp;doc_number=008784612&amp;sequence=000002&amp;line_number=0001&amp;func_code=DB_RECORDS&amp;service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008784612</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
genre (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content
genre_facet Aufsatzsammlung
id DE-604.BV012906183
illustrated Illustrated
indexdate 2024-12-23T15:15:25Z
institution BVB
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008784612
oclc_num 42720253
open_access_boolean
owner DE-12
owner_facet DE-12
physical XIV S., S. 559 -743 graph. Darst.
publishDate 1999
publishDateSearch 1999
publishDateSort 1999
publisher Saunders
record_format marc
series Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America
series2 Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America
spellingShingle Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America
Endoscopie gastrointestinale
Maladie de l'appareil digestif
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Diseases diagnosis
Treatment Outcome
Evaluation (DE-588)4071034-8 gnd
Minimal-invasive Chirurgie (DE-588)4327907-7 gnd
Therapieerfolg (DE-588)4126073-9 gnd
subject_GND (DE-588)4071034-8
(DE-588)4327907-7
(DE-588)4126073-9
(DE-588)4143413-4
title Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_auth Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_exact_search Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_full Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy John F. Johanson ..., guest ed.
title_fullStr Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy John F. Johanson ..., guest ed.
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy John F. Johanson ..., guest ed.
title_short Outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy
title_sort outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy
topic Endoscopie gastrointestinale
Maladie de l'appareil digestif
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Diseases diagnosis
Treatment Outcome
Evaluation (DE-588)4071034-8 gnd
Minimal-invasive Chirurgie (DE-588)4327907-7 gnd
Therapieerfolg (DE-588)4126073-9 gnd
topic_facet Endoscopie gastrointestinale
Maladie de l'appareil digestif
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Diseases diagnosis
Treatment Outcome
Evaluation
Minimal-invasive Chirurgie
Therapieerfolg
Aufsatzsammlung
url http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008784612&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
volume_link (DE-604)BV005455484
work_keys_str_mv AT johansonjohnf outcomesassessmentingastrointestinalendoscopy