Strengthening Governance of Social Safety Nets in ASEAN
Several Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) member states, in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, are expanding their social safety net programs. In many cases, existing delivery mechanisms for social assistance in the region tend to be basic, in line with the small size of progr...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Giannozzi, Sara Khan, Asmeen |
description | Several Association of Southeast Asian
Nation (ASEAN) member states, in the aftermath of the global
financial crisis, are expanding their social safety net
programs. In many cases, existing delivery mechanisms for
social assistance in the region tend to be basic, in line
with the small size of programs. This paper is an analytical
framework to systematically consider and include governance
aspects in the design and analysis of modern social
assistance programs. The underlying conceptual model is
simple. Programs face a set of supply-side challenges that
have to do with their institutional structure and the ways
in which accountability and incentive relationships are
shaped. However, both in the region and elsewhere in the
world there are a number of experiences with diverse
governance tools that countries can draw upon as they think
how best to design and implement more sophisticated and
comprehensive social safety net programs. Finally,
administrative capacity is likely to represent a constraint
as governments seek to deliver increasingly complex programs
to a growing number of beneficiaries over a wide
geographically dispersed area. While large investments in
administrative capacity are unlikely, it is possible to
think about context appropriate solutions that can
contribute to reduce governance risk. This report is the
first attempt to systematically apply a governance lens to
Social Safety Net (SSN) programs in the region. An
analytical framework and diagnostic resource to review
governance dimensions of SSN programs in ASEAN, the report
intends to document existing efforts and challenges and
provide guidance to World Bank staff, donors and policy
makers interested in strengthening program administration
and mitigating potential governance risks within social
assistance programs in the region. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>worldbank_VO9</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_16722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_167223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdy7EOgjAQANAuDkb9h_sBE0EDOhKDOrHUvalwrQ3NHbk2Ev7exS9wetNbq1pnQfL5jRTIw50_KGSpR2AHmvtgI2jrMC_QYU4QCBrdNt1WrZyNCXc_N-p0a5_Xx35micPL0mh4QhqJ54iDR8GJU8gsiykOl3Nliqouy-Of7QtIpz3D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype></control><display><type>book</type><title>Strengthening Governance of Social Safety Nets in ASEAN</title><source>Open Knowledge Repository</source><creator>Giannozzi, Sara ; Khan, Asmeen</creator><creatorcontrib>Giannozzi, Sara ; Khan, Asmeen</creatorcontrib><description>Several Association of Southeast Asian
Nation (ASEAN) member states, in the aftermath of the global
financial crisis, are expanding their social safety net
programs. In many cases, existing delivery mechanisms for
social assistance in the region tend to be basic, in line
with the small size of programs. This paper is an analytical
framework to systematically consider and include governance
aspects in the design and analysis of modern social
assistance programs. The underlying conceptual model is
simple. Programs face a set of supply-side challenges that
have to do with their institutional structure and the ways
in which accountability and incentive relationships are
shaped. However, both in the region and elsewhere in the
world there are a number of experiences with diverse
governance tools that countries can draw upon as they think
how best to design and implement more sophisticated and
comprehensive social safety net programs. Finally,
administrative capacity is likely to represent a constraint
as governments seek to deliver increasingly complex programs
to a growing number of beneficiaries over a wide
geographically dispersed area. While large investments in
administrative capacity are unlikely, it is possible to
think about context appropriate solutions that can
contribute to reduce governance risk. This report is the
first attempt to systematically apply a governance lens to
Social Safety Net (SSN) programs in the region. An
analytical framework and diagnostic resource to review
governance dimensions of SSN programs in ASEAN, the report
intends to document existing efforts and challenges and
provide guidance to World Bank staff, donors and policy
makers interested in strengthening program administration
and mitigating potential governance risks within social
assistance programs in the region.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>World Bank, Washington, DC</publisher><subject>ACCOUNTABILITY ; ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS ; ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET ; ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY ; ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS ; ADOLESCENTS ; AGED ; ANTI-CORRUPTION ; ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY ; ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS ; AUTHORITY ; BENEFICIARIES ; BENEFICIARY ; BENEFIT AMOUNT ; BENEFIT PACKAGE ; BLOCK GRANT ; BLOCK GRANTS ; CASH BENEFITS ; CASH GRANT ; CASH PAYMENTS ; CASH TRANSFER ; CASH TRANSFERS ; CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ; CITIZEN ; CITIZENS ; CIVIL SOCIETY ; CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION ; CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS ; CLINICS ; COMMUNITY HEALTH ; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ; CONDITIONAL CASH ; CONFLICT ; CORRUPTION ; DECENTRALIZATION ; DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS ; DECISION-MAKING ; DECREE ; DECREES ; DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS ; DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS ; DISCLOSURE ; DISCRIMINATION ; DISTRICTS ; ECONOMIC CRISIS ; ECONOMIC DOWNTURN ; ECONOMIC STRESS ; EDUCATION PROGRAMS ; ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ; ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ; ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES ; EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ; EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE ; EXECUTION ; EXPENDITURE ; EXTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY ; FEE WAIVERS ; FINANCIAL CRISES ; FINANCIAL CRISIS ; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ; FINANCIAL RESOURCES ; FINANCIAL SUPPORT ; FOOD ASSISTANCE ; FOOD DISTRIBUTION ; FREE HEALTH ; GOOD GOVERNANCE ; GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES ; GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS ; GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT ; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ; GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS ; GOVERNMENT LEVEL ; GOVERNMENT LEVELS ; GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS ; HEALTH BENEFITS ; HEALTH CARD ; HEALTH CENTERS ; HEALTH CLINIC ; HEALTH CLINICS ; HEALTH FACILITIES ; HEALTH FACILITY ; HEALTH FINANCING ; HEALTH INSURANCE ; HEALTH RESEARCH ; HEALTH SERVICE ; HEALTH SERVICES ; HOSPITALIZATION ; HOSPITALS ; HOUSEHOLD INCOME ; HUMAN CAPITAL ; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ; HUMAN RESOURCES ; IMPROVING GOVERNANCE ; INCOME ; INCOME LEVELS ; INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT ; INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ; INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS ; INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE ; INSTITUTIONALIZATION ; INSURANCE ; INSURANCE PROGRAM ; INSURANCE SCHEMES ; INTERMEDIARIES ; INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY ; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ; INTERVENTION ; JUDICIARY ; LABOR MARKET ; LABOR MARKET POLICIES ; LACK OF TRANSPARENCY ; LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ; LEGISLATURE ; LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT ; LOCAL GOVERNMENT ; LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ; LOCAL LEVELS ; LOCAL POLITICIANS ; LOW INCOME COUNTRIES ; MEANS TEST ; MEANS TESTING ; MEMBER STATES ; MIDWIFES ; MINISTRY OF FINANCE ; NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS ; NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE ; NATIONAL LEVEL ; NEAR POOR ; PARENTAL CARE ; PARTICIPATORY PLANNING ; PATIENTS ; PENSION ; PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ; POLITICAL ECONOMY ; POLITICAL ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT ; POLITICAL INFLUENCE ; POLITICAL LEADERS ; POLITICAL SUPPORT ; POLITICIANS ; POOR ; POOR PERFORMANCE ; POSTNATAL CARE ; POVERTY LINE ; POVERTY REDUCTION ; PRICE SUBSIDIES ; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ; PRIMARY SCHOOL ; PROGRAM COVERAGE ; PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY ; PROTECTION SYSTEM ; PROTECTION SYSTEMS ; PUBLIC FUNDS ; PUBLIC HOSPITALS ; PUBLIC OFFICIALS ; PUBLIC POLICY ; PUBLIC RESOURCES ; PUBLIC SECTOR ; PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE ; PUBLIC WORKS ; PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS ; QUALITY CONTROL ; REGIONAL INTEGRATION ; REPRESENTATIVES ; RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS ; RISK OF FRAUD ; RULE OF LAW ; SAFETY NET PROGRAMS ; SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ; SCHOOL FEEDING ; SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS ; SCREENING ; SERVICE DELIVERY ; SERVICE PROVIDER ; SERVICE PROVIDERS ; SINGLE PARENTS ; SOCIAL ASSISTANCE ; SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ; SOCIAL IMPACTS ; SOCIAL MARKETING ; SOCIAL PROGRAMS ; SOCIAL PROTECTION ; SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM ; SOCIAL SAFETY ; SOCIAL SAFETY NET ; SOCIAL SAFETY NETS ; SOCIAL SECURITY ; SOCIAL SERVICES ; SOCIAL TRANSFER ; SOCIAL WELFARE ; SOCIAL WORKERS ; SOCIALIZATION ; SSN ; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION ; TARGETING ; TARGETING MECHANISMS ; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ; TRANSFER PROGRAM ; TRANSFER PROGRAMS ; TRANSPARENCY ; TRANSPARENT MECHANISMS ; UNIVERSAL HEALTH ; VOUCHERS ; VULNERABLE GROUPS ; VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS ; WORK PROJECTS ; WORKERS ; WORKFARE ; WORKS PROJECT ; WORKS PROJECTS</subject><creationdate>2013</creationdate><rights>CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>307,780,784,787,4048,18982</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/16722$$EView_record_in_World_Bank$$FView_record_in_$$GWorld_Bank$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giannozzi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Asmeen</creatorcontrib><title>Strengthening Governance of Social Safety Nets in ASEAN</title><description>Several Association of Southeast Asian
Nation (ASEAN) member states, in the aftermath of the global
financial crisis, are expanding their social safety net
programs. In many cases, existing delivery mechanisms for
social assistance in the region tend to be basic, in line
with the small size of programs. This paper is an analytical
framework to systematically consider and include governance
aspects in the design and analysis of modern social
assistance programs. The underlying conceptual model is
simple. Programs face a set of supply-side challenges that
have to do with their institutional structure and the ways
in which accountability and incentive relationships are
shaped. However, both in the region and elsewhere in the
world there are a number of experiences with diverse
governance tools that countries can draw upon as they think
how best to design and implement more sophisticated and
comprehensive social safety net programs. Finally,
administrative capacity is likely to represent a constraint
as governments seek to deliver increasingly complex programs
to a growing number of beneficiaries over a wide
geographically dispersed area. While large investments in
administrative capacity are unlikely, it is possible to
think about context appropriate solutions that can
contribute to reduce governance risk. This report is the
first attempt to systematically apply a governance lens to
Social Safety Net (SSN) programs in the region. An
analytical framework and diagnostic resource to review
governance dimensions of SSN programs in ASEAN, the report
intends to document existing efforts and challenges and
provide guidance to World Bank staff, donors and policy
makers interested in strengthening program administration
and mitigating potential governance risks within social
assistance programs in the region.</description><subject>ACCOUNTABILITY</subject><subject>ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS</subject><subject>ADOLESCENTS</subject><subject>AGED</subject><subject>ANTI-CORRUPTION</subject><subject>ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY</subject><subject>ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS</subject><subject>AUTHORITY</subject><subject>BENEFICIARIES</subject><subject>BENEFICIARY</subject><subject>BENEFIT AMOUNT</subject><subject>BENEFIT PACKAGE</subject><subject>BLOCK GRANT</subject><subject>BLOCK GRANTS</subject><subject>CASH BENEFITS</subject><subject>CASH GRANT</subject><subject>CASH PAYMENTS</subject><subject>CASH TRANSFER</subject><subject>CASH TRANSFERS</subject><subject>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>CITIZEN</subject><subject>CITIZENS</subject><subject>CIVIL SOCIETY</subject><subject>CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION</subject><subject>CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>CLINICS</subject><subject>COMMUNITY HEALTH</subject><subject>COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION</subject><subject>CONDITIONAL CASH</subject><subject>CONFLICT</subject><subject>CORRUPTION</subject><subject>DECENTRALIZATION</subject><subject>DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS</subject><subject>DECISION-MAKING</subject><subject>DECREE</subject><subject>DECREES</subject><subject>DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS</subject><subject>DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS</subject><subject>DISCLOSURE</subject><subject>DISCRIMINATION</subject><subject>DISTRICTS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC CRISIS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC DOWNTURN</subject><subject>ECONOMIC STRESS</subject><subject>EDUCATION PROGRAMS</subject><subject>ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</subject><subject>ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES</subject><subject>EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE</subject><subject>EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE</subject><subject>EXECUTION</subject><subject>EXPENDITURE</subject><subject>EXTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY</subject><subject>FEE WAIVERS</subject><subject>FINANCIAL CRISES</subject><subject>FINANCIAL CRISIS</subject><subject>FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>FINANCIAL RESOURCES</subject><subject>FINANCIAL SUPPORT</subject><subject>FOOD ASSISTANCE</subject><subject>FOOD DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>FREE HEALTH</subject><subject>GOOD GOVERNANCE</subject><subject>GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES</subject><subject>GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS</subject><subject>GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT AGENCIES</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT LEVEL</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT LEVELS</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS</subject><subject>HEALTH BENEFITS</subject><subject>HEALTH CARD</subject><subject>HEALTH CENTERS</subject><subject>HEALTH CLINIC</subject><subject>HEALTH CLINICS</subject><subject>HEALTH FACILITIES</subject><subject>HEALTH FACILITY</subject><subject>HEALTH FINANCING</subject><subject>HEALTH INSURANCE</subject><subject>HEALTH RESEARCH</subject><subject>HEALTH SERVICE</subject><subject>HEALTH SERVICES</subject><subject>HOSPITALIZATION</subject><subject>HOSPITALS</subject><subject>HOUSEHOLD INCOME</subject><subject>HUMAN CAPITAL</subject><subject>HUMAN DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>HUMAN RESOURCES</subject><subject>IMPROVING GOVERNANCE</subject><subject>INCOME</subject><subject>INCOME LEVELS</subject><subject>INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT</subject><subject>INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS</subject><subject>INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS</subject><subject>INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE</subject><subject>INSTITUTIONALIZATION</subject><subject>INSURANCE</subject><subject>INSURANCE PROGRAM</subject><subject>INSURANCE SCHEMES</subject><subject>INTERMEDIARIES</subject><subject>INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY</subject><subject>INTERVENTION</subject><subject>JUDICIARY</subject><subject>LABOR MARKET</subject><subject>LABOR MARKET POLICIES</subject><subject>LACK OF TRANSPARENCY</subject><subject>LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY</subject><subject>LEGISLATURE</subject><subject>LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>LOCAL GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>LOCAL GOVERNMENTS</subject><subject>LOCAL LEVELS</subject><subject>LOCAL POLITICIANS</subject><subject>LOW INCOME COUNTRIES</subject><subject>MEANS TEST</subject><subject>MEANS TESTING</subject><subject>MEMBER STATES</subject><subject>MIDWIFES</subject><subject>MINISTRY OF FINANCE</subject><subject>NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS</subject><subject>NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE</subject><subject>NATIONAL LEVEL</subject><subject>NEAR POOR</subject><subject>PARENTAL CARE</subject><subject>PARTICIPATORY PLANNING</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PENSION</subject><subject>PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES</subject><subject>POLITICAL ECONOMY</subject><subject>POLITICAL ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT</subject><subject>POLITICAL INFLUENCE</subject><subject>POLITICAL LEADERS</subject><subject>POLITICAL SUPPORT</subject><subject>POLITICIANS</subject><subject>POOR</subject><subject>POOR PERFORMANCE</subject><subject>POSTNATAL CARE</subject><subject>POVERTY LINE</subject><subject>POVERTY REDUCTION</subject><subject>PRICE SUBSIDIES</subject><subject>PRIMARY HEALTH CARE</subject><subject>PRIMARY SCHOOL</subject><subject>PROGRAM COVERAGE</subject><subject>PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY</subject><subject>PROTECTION SYSTEM</subject><subject>PROTECTION SYSTEMS</subject><subject>PUBLIC FUNDS</subject><subject>PUBLIC HOSPITALS</subject><subject>PUBLIC OFFICIALS</subject><subject>PUBLIC POLICY</subject><subject>PUBLIC RESOURCES</subject><subject>PUBLIC SECTOR</subject><subject>PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE</subject><subject>PUBLIC WORKS</subject><subject>PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS</subject><subject>QUALITY CONTROL</subject><subject>REGIONAL INTEGRATION</subject><subject>REPRESENTATIVES</subject><subject>RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS</subject><subject>RISK OF FRAUD</subject><subject>RULE OF LAW</subject><subject>SAFETY NET PROGRAMS</subject><subject>SCHOOL ATTENDANCE</subject><subject>SCHOOL FEEDING</subject><subject>SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS</subject><subject>SCREENING</subject><subject>SERVICE DELIVERY</subject><subject>SERVICE PROVIDER</subject><subject>SERVICE PROVIDERS</subject><subject>SINGLE PARENTS</subject><subject>SOCIAL ASSISTANCE</subject><subject>SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM</subject><subject>SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>SOCIAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>SOCIAL MARKETING</subject><subject>SOCIAL PROGRAMS</subject><subject>SOCIAL PROTECTION</subject><subject>SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM</subject><subject>SOCIAL SAFETY</subject><subject>SOCIAL SAFETY NET</subject><subject>SOCIAL SAFETY NETS</subject><subject>SOCIAL SECURITY</subject><subject>SOCIAL SERVICES</subject><subject>SOCIAL TRANSFER</subject><subject>SOCIAL WELFARE</subject><subject>SOCIAL WORKERS</subject><subject>SOCIALIZATION</subject><subject>SSN</subject><subject>SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION</subject><subject>TARGETING</subject><subject>TARGETING MECHANISMS</subject><subject>TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE</subject><subject>TRANSFER PROGRAM</subject><subject>TRANSFER PROGRAMS</subject><subject>TRANSPARENCY</subject><subject>TRANSPARENT MECHANISMS</subject><subject>UNIVERSAL HEALTH</subject><subject>VOUCHERS</subject><subject>VULNERABLE GROUPS</subject><subject>VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS</subject><subject>WORK PROJECTS</subject><subject>WORKERS</subject><subject>WORKFARE</subject><subject>WORKS PROJECT</subject><subject>WORKS PROJECTS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>VO9</sourceid><recordid>eNqdy7EOgjAQANAuDkb9h_sBE0EDOhKDOrHUvalwrQ3NHbk2Ev7exS9wetNbq1pnQfL5jRTIw50_KGSpR2AHmvtgI2jrMC_QYU4QCBrdNt1WrZyNCXc_N-p0a5_Xx35micPL0mh4QhqJ54iDR8GJU8gsiykOl3Nliqouy-Of7QtIpz3D</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Giannozzi, Sara</creator><creator>Khan, Asmeen</creator><general>World Bank, Washington, DC</general><scope>VO9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Strengthening Governance of Social Safety Nets in ASEAN</title><author>Giannozzi, Sara ; Khan, Asmeen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_167223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>ACCOUNTABILITY</topic><topic>ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS</topic><topic>ADOLESCENTS</topic><topic>AGED</topic><topic>ANTI-CORRUPTION</topic><topic>ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY</topic><topic>ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS</topic><topic>AUTHORITY</topic><topic>BENEFICIARIES</topic><topic>BENEFICIARY</topic><topic>BENEFIT AMOUNT</topic><topic>BENEFIT PACKAGE</topic><topic>BLOCK GRANT</topic><topic>BLOCK GRANTS</topic><topic>CASH BENEFITS</topic><topic>CASH GRANT</topic><topic>CASH PAYMENTS</topic><topic>CASH TRANSFER</topic><topic>CASH TRANSFERS</topic><topic>CENTRAL GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>CITIZEN</topic><topic>CITIZENS</topic><topic>CIVIL SOCIETY</topic><topic>CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION</topic><topic>CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>CLINICS</topic><topic>COMMUNITY HEALTH</topic><topic>COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION</topic><topic>CONDITIONAL CASH</topic><topic>CONFLICT</topic><topic>CORRUPTION</topic><topic>DECENTRALIZATION</topic><topic>DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS</topic><topic>DECISION-MAKING</topic><topic>DECREE</topic><topic>DECREES</topic><topic>DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS</topic><topic>DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS</topic><topic>DISCLOSURE</topic><topic>DISCRIMINATION</topic><topic>DISTRICTS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC CRISIS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC DOWNTURN</topic><topic>ECONOMIC STRESS</topic><topic>EDUCATION PROGRAMS</topic><topic>ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA</topic><topic>ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES</topic><topic>EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE</topic><topic>EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE</topic><topic>EXECUTION</topic><topic>EXPENDITURE</topic><topic>EXTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY</topic><topic>FEE WAIVERS</topic><topic>FINANCIAL CRISES</topic><topic>FINANCIAL CRISIS</topic><topic>FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>FINANCIAL RESOURCES</topic><topic>FINANCIAL SUPPORT</topic><topic>FOOD ASSISTANCE</topic><topic>FOOD DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>FREE HEALTH</topic><topic>GOOD GOVERNANCE</topic><topic>GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES</topic><topic>GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS</topic><topic>GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT AGENCIES</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT LEVEL</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT LEVELS</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS</topic><topic>HEALTH BENEFITS</topic><topic>HEALTH CARD</topic><topic>HEALTH CENTERS</topic><topic>HEALTH CLINIC</topic><topic>HEALTH CLINICS</topic><topic>HEALTH FACILITIES</topic><topic>HEALTH FACILITY</topic><topic>HEALTH FINANCING</topic><topic>HEALTH INSURANCE</topic><topic>HEALTH RESEARCH</topic><topic>HEALTH SERVICE</topic><topic>HEALTH SERVICES</topic><topic>HOSPITALIZATION</topic><topic>HOSPITALS</topic><topic>HOUSEHOLD INCOME</topic><topic>HUMAN CAPITAL</topic><topic>HUMAN DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>HUMAN RESOURCES</topic><topic>IMPROVING GOVERNANCE</topic><topic>INCOME</topic><topic>INCOME LEVELS</topic><topic>INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT</topic><topic>INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS</topic><topic>INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS</topic><topic>INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE</topic><topic>INSTITUTIONALIZATION</topic><topic>INSURANCE</topic><topic>INSURANCE PROGRAM</topic><topic>INSURANCE SCHEMES</topic><topic>INTERMEDIARIES</topic><topic>INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY</topic><topic>INTERVENTION</topic><topic>JUDICIARY</topic><topic>LABOR MARKET</topic><topic>LABOR MARKET POLICIES</topic><topic>LACK OF TRANSPARENCY</topic><topic>LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY</topic><topic>LEGISLATURE</topic><topic>LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>LOCAL GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>LOCAL GOVERNMENTS</topic><topic>LOCAL LEVELS</topic><topic>LOCAL POLITICIANS</topic><topic>LOW INCOME COUNTRIES</topic><topic>MEANS TEST</topic><topic>MEANS TESTING</topic><topic>MEMBER STATES</topic><topic>MIDWIFES</topic><topic>MINISTRY OF FINANCE</topic><topic>NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS</topic><topic>NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE</topic><topic>NATIONAL LEVEL</topic><topic>NEAR POOR</topic><topic>PARENTAL CARE</topic><topic>PARTICIPATORY PLANNING</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PENSION</topic><topic>PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES</topic><topic>POLITICAL ECONOMY</topic><topic>POLITICAL ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT</topic><topic>POLITICAL INFLUENCE</topic><topic>POLITICAL LEADERS</topic><topic>POLITICAL SUPPORT</topic><topic>POLITICIANS</topic><topic>POOR</topic><topic>POOR PERFORMANCE</topic><topic>POSTNATAL CARE</topic><topic>POVERTY LINE</topic><topic>POVERTY REDUCTION</topic><topic>PRICE SUBSIDIES</topic><topic>PRIMARY HEALTH CARE</topic><topic>PRIMARY SCHOOL</topic><topic>PROGRAM COVERAGE</topic><topic>PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY</topic><topic>PROTECTION SYSTEM</topic><topic>PROTECTION SYSTEMS</topic><topic>PUBLIC FUNDS</topic><topic>PUBLIC HOSPITALS</topic><topic>PUBLIC OFFICIALS</topic><topic>PUBLIC POLICY</topic><topic>PUBLIC RESOURCES</topic><topic>PUBLIC SECTOR</topic><topic>PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE</topic><topic>PUBLIC WORKS</topic><topic>PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS</topic><topic>QUALITY CONTROL</topic><topic>REGIONAL INTEGRATION</topic><topic>REPRESENTATIVES</topic><topic>RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS</topic><topic>RISK OF FRAUD</topic><topic>RULE OF LAW</topic><topic>SAFETY NET PROGRAMS</topic><topic>SCHOOL ATTENDANCE</topic><topic>SCHOOL FEEDING</topic><topic>SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS</topic><topic>SCREENING</topic><topic>SERVICE DELIVERY</topic><topic>SERVICE PROVIDER</topic><topic>SERVICE PROVIDERS</topic><topic>SINGLE PARENTS</topic><topic>SOCIAL ASSISTANCE</topic><topic>SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM</topic><topic>SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>SOCIAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>SOCIAL MARKETING</topic><topic>SOCIAL PROGRAMS</topic><topic>SOCIAL PROTECTION</topic><topic>SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM</topic><topic>SOCIAL SAFETY</topic><topic>SOCIAL SAFETY NET</topic><topic>SOCIAL SAFETY NETS</topic><topic>SOCIAL SECURITY</topic><topic>SOCIAL SERVICES</topic><topic>SOCIAL TRANSFER</topic><topic>SOCIAL WELFARE</topic><topic>SOCIAL WORKERS</topic><topic>SOCIALIZATION</topic><topic>SSN</topic><topic>SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION</topic><topic>TARGETING</topic><topic>TARGETING MECHANISMS</topic><topic>TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE</topic><topic>TRANSFER PROGRAM</topic><topic>TRANSFER PROGRAMS</topic><topic>TRANSPARENCY</topic><topic>TRANSPARENT MECHANISMS</topic><topic>UNIVERSAL HEALTH</topic><topic>VOUCHERS</topic><topic>VULNERABLE GROUPS</topic><topic>VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS</topic><topic>WORK PROJECTS</topic><topic>WORKERS</topic><topic>WORKFARE</topic><topic>WORKS PROJECT</topic><topic>WORKS PROJECTS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giannozzi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Asmeen</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Knowledge Repository</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giannozzi, Sara</au><au>Khan, Asmeen</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>Strengthening Governance of Social Safety Nets in ASEAN</btitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><abstract>Several Association of Southeast Asian
Nation (ASEAN) member states, in the aftermath of the global
financial crisis, are expanding their social safety net
programs. In many cases, existing delivery mechanisms for
social assistance in the region tend to be basic, in line
with the small size of programs. This paper is an analytical
framework to systematically consider and include governance
aspects in the design and analysis of modern social
assistance programs. The underlying conceptual model is
simple. Programs face a set of supply-side challenges that
have to do with their institutional structure and the ways
in which accountability and incentive relationships are
shaped. However, both in the region and elsewhere in the
world there are a number of experiences with diverse
governance tools that countries can draw upon as they think
how best to design and implement more sophisticated and
comprehensive social safety net programs. Finally,
administrative capacity is likely to represent a constraint
as governments seek to deliver increasingly complex programs
to a growing number of beneficiaries over a wide
geographically dispersed area. While large investments in
administrative capacity are unlikely, it is possible to
think about context appropriate solutions that can
contribute to reduce governance risk. This report is the
first attempt to systematically apply a governance lens to
Social Safety Net (SSN) programs in the region. An
analytical framework and diagnostic resource to review
governance dimensions of SSN programs in ASEAN, the report
intends to document existing efforts and challenges and
provide guidance to World Bank staff, donors and policy
makers interested in strengthening program administration
and mitigating potential governance risks within social
assistance programs in the region.</abstract><pub>World Bank, Washington, DC</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_16722 |
source | Open Knowledge Repository |
subjects | ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS ADOLESCENTS AGED ANTI-CORRUPTION ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AUTHORITY BENEFICIARIES BENEFICIARY BENEFIT AMOUNT BENEFIT PACKAGE BLOCK GRANT BLOCK GRANTS CASH BENEFITS CASH GRANT CASH PAYMENTS CASH TRANSFER CASH TRANSFERS CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CITIZEN CITIZENS CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATION CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS CLINICS COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION CONDITIONAL CASH CONFLICT CORRUPTION DECENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS DECISION-MAKING DECREE DECREES DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONS DISCLOSURE DISCRIMINATION DISTRICTS ECONOMIC CRISIS ECONOMIC DOWNTURN ECONOMIC STRESS EDUCATION PROGRAMS ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE EXECUTION EXPENDITURE EXTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY FEE WAIVERS FINANCIAL CRISES FINANCIAL CRISIS FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL RESOURCES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOOD ASSISTANCE FOOD DISTRIBUTION FREE HEALTH GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES GOVERNANCE DIMENSIONS GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS GOVERNMENT LEVEL GOVERNMENT LEVELS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS HEALTH BENEFITS HEALTH CARD HEALTH CENTERS HEALTH CLINIC HEALTH CLINICS HEALTH FACILITIES HEALTH FACILITY HEALTH FINANCING HEALTH INSURANCE HEALTH RESEARCH HEALTH SERVICE HEALTH SERVICES HOSPITALIZATION HOSPITALS HOUSEHOLD INCOME HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES IMPROVING GOVERNANCE INCOME INCOME LEVELS INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE INSTITUTIONALIZATION INSURANCE INSURANCE PROGRAM INSURANCE SCHEMES INTERMEDIARIES INTERNAL ACCOUNTABILITY INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY INTERVENTION JUDICIARY LABOR MARKET LABOR MARKET POLICIES LACK OF TRANSPARENCY LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY LEGISLATURE LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENTS LOCAL LEVELS LOCAL POLITICIANS LOW INCOME COUNTRIES MEANS TEST MEANS TESTING MEMBER STATES MIDWIFES MINISTRY OF FINANCE NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE NATIONAL LEVEL NEAR POOR PARENTAL CARE PARTICIPATORY PLANNING PATIENTS PENSION PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES POLITICAL ECONOMY POLITICAL ECONOMY ENVIRONMENT POLITICAL INFLUENCE POLITICAL LEADERS POLITICAL SUPPORT POLITICIANS POOR POOR PERFORMANCE POSTNATAL CARE POVERTY LINE POVERTY REDUCTION PRICE SUBSIDIES PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PRIMARY SCHOOL PROGRAM COVERAGE PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY PROTECTION SYSTEM PROTECTION SYSTEMS PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC HOSPITALS PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC POLICY PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAMS QUALITY CONTROL REGIONAL INTEGRATION REPRESENTATIVES RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS RISK OF FRAUD RULE OF LAW SAFETY NET PROGRAMS SCHOOL ATTENDANCE SCHOOL FEEDING SCHOOL FEEDING PROGRAMS SCREENING SERVICE DELIVERY SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICE PROVIDERS SINGLE PARENTS SOCIAL ASSISTANCE SOCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL IMPACTS SOCIAL MARKETING SOCIAL PROGRAMS SOCIAL PROTECTION SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM SOCIAL SAFETY SOCIAL SAFETY NET SOCIAL SAFETY NETS SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SERVICES SOCIAL TRANSFER SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIAL WORKERS SOCIALIZATION SSN SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION TARGETING TARGETING MECHANISMS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSFER PROGRAM TRANSFER PROGRAMS TRANSPARENCY TRANSPARENT MECHANISMS UNIVERSAL HEALTH VOUCHERS VULNERABLE GROUPS VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS WORK PROJECTS WORKERS WORKFARE WORKS PROJECT WORKS PROJECTS |
title | Strengthening Governance of Social Safety Nets in ASEAN |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A06%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-worldbank_VO9&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Strengthening%20Governance%20of%20Social%20Safety%20Nets%20in%20ASEAN&rft.au=Giannozzi,%20Sara&rft.date=2013&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cworldbank_VO9%3Eoai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/16722%3C/worldbank_VO9%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |