Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa

The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with "golden rice," whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Lee Ann, Anderson, Kym
Format: Buch
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 3411
creator Jackson, Lee Ann
Anderson, Kym
description The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with "golden rice," which has been genetically engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are potentially very large, especially from nutritionally enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are diminished only slightly by the presence of the European Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the small economic gain for these farmers from greater market access to the EU.
format Book
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>worldbank_VO9</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_14223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_142233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdy88KgkAQgHEvHaJ6h3kBIf8QdYzI6hAEepfVndXFaUZ2N8S3z0NP0OmDD37rqHq8R7KtClbYgxi4IWNYBtEMT9HWWNRQiGiosO1ZSLoZXrIYix6MOCg_TVyqXjnFcDZusdtoZRR53P26ifLiWl3u8SSOdKN4qGVEHlgmQt2hw1G8DeLmOtmfjoc6ydM0y_5kX9e9SQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype></control><display><type>book</type><title>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</title><source>Open Knowledge Repository</source><creator>Jackson, Lee Ann ; Anderson, Kym</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lee Ann ; Anderson, Kym</creatorcontrib><description>The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with "golden rice," which has been genetically engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are potentially very large, especially from nutritionally enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are diminished only slightly by the presence of the European Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the small economic gain for these farmers from greater market access to the EU.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>World Bank, Washington, D.C</publisher><subject>ADVERSE IMPACTS ; AFRICAN FARMERS ; AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY ; AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS ; AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ; AGRICULTURE ; ANIMALS ; BILATERAL TRADE ; BIOSAFETY ; BIOTECHNOLOGY ; CANCER ; CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS ; COARSE GRAINS ; COMMODITIES ; COMPETITIVENESS ; CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE ; CONSUMER PREFERENCES ; CONSUMERS ; COST SAVINGS ; COTTON ; CROP PRODUCTION ; CROP VARIETIES ; CULTIVARS ; DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ; DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ; ECONOMIC EFFECTS ; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ; ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS ; ECONOMIC LOSS ; ECONOMIC PROGRESS ; ECONOMIC STRUCTURES ; ECONOMIC WELFARE ; ELASTICITIES ; ELASTICITY ; EMPLOYMENT ; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ; EQUILIBRIUM ; EXCHANGE RATES ; EXPORTS ; FAO ; FARMERS ; FARMS ; FOOD CROPS ; FOOD PRICES ; FOOD PRODUCTION ; FOOD PRODUCTS ; FULL EMPLOYMENT ; GDP ; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL ; GENETIC ENGINEERING ; GENETIC MODIFICATION ; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS ; GRAIN ; GRAIN PRODUCTION ; GRAINS ; GREEN REVOLUTION ; IDENTITY ; IMPORTS ; INCOME ; INCOME DISTRIBUTION ; INNOVATION ; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS ; IRRIGATION ; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY ; LIVESTOCK ; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS ; MAIZE ; MALNUTRITION ; MARGINAL COST ; NATURAL RESOURCES ; NET IMPORTS ; OILSEED CROPS ; OILSEEDS ; PERFECT COMPETITION ; PESTICIDES ; PLANT BREEDING ; POVERTY ALLEVIATION ; PRODUCERS ; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION ; PRODUCT MARKETS ; PRODUCTIVITY ; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH ; PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES ; PROTECTIONISM ; RESOURCE ALLOCATION ; RICE ; RICE VARIETIES ; ROOT CROPS ; ROOTS ; SEED ; SOYBEAN ; TECHNICAL CHANGE ; TERMS OF TRADE ; UNITED NATIONS ; VALUATION ; WAGES ; WELFARE EFFECTS ; WELFARE GAINS ; WHEAT ; WILLINGNESS TO PAY ; WTO ; YIELDS</subject><creationdate>2004</creationdate><rights>CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Policy Research Working Paper</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>307,776,780,783,18961</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/14223$$EView_record_in_World_Bank$$FView_record_in_$$GWorld_Bank$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lee Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Kym</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</title><description>The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with "golden rice," which has been genetically engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are potentially very large, especially from nutritionally enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are diminished only slightly by the presence of the European Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the small economic gain for these farmers from greater market access to the EU.</description><subject>ADVERSE IMPACTS</subject><subject>AFRICAN FARMERS</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>AGRICULTURE</subject><subject>ANIMALS</subject><subject>BILATERAL TRADE</subject><subject>BIOSAFETY</subject><subject>BIOTECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>CANCER</subject><subject>CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>COARSE GRAINS</subject><subject>COMMODITIES</subject><subject>COMPETITIVENESS</subject><subject>CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE</subject><subject>CONSUMER PREFERENCES</subject><subject>CONSUMERS</subject><subject>COST SAVINGS</subject><subject>COTTON</subject><subject>CROP PRODUCTION</subject><subject>CROP VARIETIES</subject><subject>CULTIVARS</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH</subject><subject>ECONOMIC ANALYSIS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC EFFECTS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY</subject><subject>ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC LOSS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC PROGRESS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC STRUCTURES</subject><subject>ECONOMIC WELFARE</subject><subject>ELASTICITIES</subject><subject>ELASTICITY</subject><subject>EMPLOYMENT</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH</subject><subject>EQUILIBRIUM</subject><subject>EXCHANGE RATES</subject><subject>EXPORTS</subject><subject>FAO</subject><subject>FARMERS</subject><subject>FARMS</subject><subject>FOOD CROPS</subject><subject>FOOD PRICES</subject><subject>FOOD PRODUCTION</subject><subject>FOOD PRODUCTS</subject><subject>FULL EMPLOYMENT</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL</subject><subject>GENETIC ENGINEERING</subject><subject>GENETIC MODIFICATION</subject><subject>GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS</subject><subject>GRAIN</subject><subject>GRAIN PRODUCTION</subject><subject>GRAINS</subject><subject>GREEN REVOLUTION</subject><subject>IDENTITY</subject><subject>IMPORTS</subject><subject>INCOME</subject><subject>INCOME DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>INNOVATION</subject><subject>INTERMEDIATE INPUTS</subject><subject>IRRIGATION</subject><subject>LABOR PRODUCTIVITY</subject><subject>LIVESTOCK</subject><subject>LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS</subject><subject>MAIZE</subject><subject>MALNUTRITION</subject><subject>MARGINAL COST</subject><subject>NATURAL RESOURCES</subject><subject>NET IMPORTS</subject><subject>OILSEED CROPS</subject><subject>OILSEEDS</subject><subject>PERFECT COMPETITION</subject><subject>PESTICIDES</subject><subject>PLANT BREEDING</subject><subject>POVERTY ALLEVIATION</subject><subject>PRODUCERS</subject><subject>PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION</subject><subject>PRODUCT MARKETS</subject><subject>PRODUCTIVITY</subject><subject>PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH</subject><subject>PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES</subject><subject>PROTECTIONISM</subject><subject>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</subject><subject>RICE</subject><subject>RICE VARIETIES</subject><subject>ROOT CROPS</subject><subject>ROOTS</subject><subject>SEED</subject><subject>SOYBEAN</subject><subject>TECHNICAL CHANGE</subject><subject>TERMS OF TRADE</subject><subject>UNITED NATIONS</subject><subject>VALUATION</subject><subject>WAGES</subject><subject>WELFARE EFFECTS</subject><subject>WELFARE GAINS</subject><subject>WHEAT</subject><subject>WILLINGNESS TO PAY</subject><subject>WTO</subject><subject>YIELDS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>VO9</sourceid><recordid>eNqdy88KgkAQgHEvHaJ6h3kBIf8QdYzI6hAEepfVndXFaUZ2N8S3z0NP0OmDD37rqHq8R7KtClbYgxi4IWNYBtEMT9HWWNRQiGiosO1ZSLoZXrIYix6MOCg_TVyqXjnFcDZusdtoZRR53P26ifLiWl3u8SSOdKN4qGVEHlgmQt2hw1G8DeLmOtmfjoc6ydM0y_5kX9e9SQg</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Jackson, Lee Ann</creator><creator>Anderson, Kym</creator><general>World Bank, Washington, D.C</general><scope>VO9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</title><author>Jackson, Lee Ann ; Anderson, Kym</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_142233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>ADVERSE IMPACTS</topic><topic>AFRICAN FARMERS</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>AGRICULTURE</topic><topic>ANIMALS</topic><topic>BILATERAL TRADE</topic><topic>BIOSAFETY</topic><topic>BIOTECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>CANCER</topic><topic>CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>COARSE GRAINS</topic><topic>COMMODITIES</topic><topic>COMPETITIVENESS</topic><topic>CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE</topic><topic>CONSUMER PREFERENCES</topic><topic>CONSUMERS</topic><topic>COST SAVINGS</topic><topic>COTTON</topic><topic>CROP PRODUCTION</topic><topic>CROP VARIETIES</topic><topic>CULTIVARS</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH</topic><topic>ECONOMIC ANALYSIS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC EFFECTS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY</topic><topic>ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC LOSS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC PROGRESS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC STRUCTURES</topic><topic>ECONOMIC WELFARE</topic><topic>ELASTICITIES</topic><topic>ELASTICITY</topic><topic>EMPLOYMENT</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH</topic><topic>EQUILIBRIUM</topic><topic>EXCHANGE RATES</topic><topic>EXPORTS</topic><topic>FAO</topic><topic>FARMERS</topic><topic>FARMS</topic><topic>FOOD CROPS</topic><topic>FOOD PRICES</topic><topic>FOOD PRODUCTION</topic><topic>FOOD PRODUCTS</topic><topic>FULL EMPLOYMENT</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL</topic><topic>GENETIC ENGINEERING</topic><topic>GENETIC MODIFICATION</topic><topic>GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS</topic><topic>GRAIN</topic><topic>GRAIN PRODUCTION</topic><topic>GRAINS</topic><topic>GREEN REVOLUTION</topic><topic>IDENTITY</topic><topic>IMPORTS</topic><topic>INCOME</topic><topic>INCOME DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>INNOVATION</topic><topic>INTERMEDIATE INPUTS</topic><topic>IRRIGATION</topic><topic>LABOR PRODUCTIVITY</topic><topic>LIVESTOCK</topic><topic>LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS</topic><topic>MAIZE</topic><topic>MALNUTRITION</topic><topic>MARGINAL COST</topic><topic>NATURAL RESOURCES</topic><topic>NET IMPORTS</topic><topic>OILSEED CROPS</topic><topic>OILSEEDS</topic><topic>PERFECT COMPETITION</topic><topic>PESTICIDES</topic><topic>PLANT BREEDING</topic><topic>POVERTY ALLEVIATION</topic><topic>PRODUCERS</topic><topic>PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION</topic><topic>PRODUCT MARKETS</topic><topic>PRODUCTIVITY</topic><topic>PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH</topic><topic>PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES</topic><topic>PROTECTIONISM</topic><topic>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</topic><topic>RICE</topic><topic>RICE VARIETIES</topic><topic>ROOT CROPS</topic><topic>ROOTS</topic><topic>SEED</topic><topic>SOYBEAN</topic><topic>TECHNICAL CHANGE</topic><topic>TERMS OF TRADE</topic><topic>UNITED NATIONS</topic><topic>VALUATION</topic><topic>WAGES</topic><topic>WELFARE EFFECTS</topic><topic>WELFARE GAINS</topic><topic>WHEAT</topic><topic>WILLINGNESS TO PAY</topic><topic>WTO</topic><topic>YIELDS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lee Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Kym</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Knowledge Repository</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Lee Ann</au><au>Anderson, Kym</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</btitle><seriestitle>Policy Research Working Paper</seriestitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>3411</volume><abstract>The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with "golden rice," which has been genetically engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are potentially very large, especially from nutritionally enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are diminished only slightly by the presence of the European Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the small economic gain for these farmers from greater market access to the EU.</abstract><pub>World Bank, Washington, D.C</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_14223
source Open Knowledge Repository
subjects ADVERSE IMPACTS
AFRICAN FARMERS
AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
AGRICULTURE
ANIMALS
BILATERAL TRADE
BIOSAFETY
BIOTECHNOLOGY
CANCER
CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS
COARSE GRAINS
COMMODITIES
COMPETITIVENESS
CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
CONSUMERS
COST SAVINGS
COTTON
CROP PRODUCTION
CROP VARIETIES
CULTIVARS
DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC EFFECTS
ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS
ECONOMIC LOSS
ECONOMIC PROGRESS
ECONOMIC STRUCTURES
ECONOMIC WELFARE
ELASTICITIES
ELASTICITY
EMPLOYMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
EQUILIBRIUM
EXCHANGE RATES
EXPORTS
FAO
FARMERS
FARMS
FOOD CROPS
FOOD PRICES
FOOD PRODUCTION
FOOD PRODUCTS
FULL EMPLOYMENT
GDP
GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL
GENETIC ENGINEERING
GENETIC MODIFICATION
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
GRAIN
GRAIN PRODUCTION
GRAINS
GREEN REVOLUTION
IDENTITY
IMPORTS
INCOME
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INNOVATION
INTERMEDIATE INPUTS
IRRIGATION
LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
LIVESTOCK
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
MAIZE
MALNUTRITION
MARGINAL COST
NATURAL RESOURCES
NET IMPORTS
OILSEED CROPS
OILSEEDS
PERFECT COMPETITION
PESTICIDES
PLANT BREEDING
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PRODUCERS
PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION
PRODUCT MARKETS
PRODUCTIVITY
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES
PROTECTIONISM
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
RICE
RICE VARIETIES
ROOT CROPS
ROOTS
SEED
SOYBEAN
TECHNICAL CHANGE
TERMS OF TRADE
UNITED NATIONS
VALUATION
WAGES
WELFARE EFFECTS
WELFARE GAINS
WHEAT
WILLINGNESS TO PAY
WTO
YIELDS
title Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T18%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-worldbank_VO9&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Implications%20of%20Genetically%20Modified%20Food%20Technology%20Policies%20for%20Sub-Saharan%20Africa&rft.au=Jackson,%20Lee%20Ann&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=3411&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cworldbank_VO9%3Eoai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14223%3C/worldbank_VO9%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true