Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa
The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with "golden rice," whi...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 3411 |
creator | Jackson, Lee Ann Anderson, Kym |
description | The first generation of genetically
modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer
profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The
next generation of GM food research is focusing also on
breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning
with "golden rice," which has been genetically
engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and
thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing
countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential
economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global
economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as
GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are
potentially very large, especially from nutritionally
enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims
of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are
diminished only slightly by the presence of the European
Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In
particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports
in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM
products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that
protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the
small economic gain for these farmers from greater market
access to the EU. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>worldbank_VO9</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_14223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_142233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdy88KgkAQgHEvHaJ6h3kBIf8QdYzI6hAEepfVndXFaUZ2N8S3z0NP0OmDD37rqHq8R7KtClbYgxi4IWNYBtEMT9HWWNRQiGiosO1ZSLoZXrIYix6MOCg_TVyqXjnFcDZusdtoZRR53P26ifLiWl3u8SSOdKN4qGVEHlgmQt2hw1G8DeLmOtmfjoc6ydM0y_5kX9e9SQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype></control><display><type>book</type><title>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</title><source>Open Knowledge Repository</source><creator>Jackson, Lee Ann ; Anderson, Kym</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lee Ann ; Anderson, Kym</creatorcontrib><description>The first generation of genetically
modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer
profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The
next generation of GM food research is focusing also on
breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning
with "golden rice," which has been genetically
engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and
thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing
countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential
economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global
economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as
GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are
potentially very large, especially from nutritionally
enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims
of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are
diminished only slightly by the presence of the European
Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In
particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports
in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM
products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that
protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the
small economic gain for these farmers from greater market
access to the EU.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>World Bank, Washington, D.C</publisher><subject>ADVERSE IMPACTS ; AFRICAN FARMERS ; AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY ; AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS ; AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ; AGRICULTURE ; ANIMALS ; BILATERAL TRADE ; BIOSAFETY ; BIOTECHNOLOGY ; CANCER ; CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS ; COARSE GRAINS ; COMMODITIES ; COMPETITIVENESS ; CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE ; CONSUMER PREFERENCES ; CONSUMERS ; COST SAVINGS ; COTTON ; CROP PRODUCTION ; CROP VARIETIES ; CULTIVARS ; DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ; DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ; ECONOMIC EFFECTS ; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ; ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS ; ECONOMIC LOSS ; ECONOMIC PROGRESS ; ECONOMIC STRUCTURES ; ECONOMIC WELFARE ; ELASTICITIES ; ELASTICITY ; EMPLOYMENT ; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ; EQUILIBRIUM ; EXCHANGE RATES ; EXPORTS ; FAO ; FARMERS ; FARMS ; FOOD CROPS ; FOOD PRICES ; FOOD PRODUCTION ; FOOD PRODUCTS ; FULL EMPLOYMENT ; GDP ; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL ; GENETIC ENGINEERING ; GENETIC MODIFICATION ; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS ; GRAIN ; GRAIN PRODUCTION ; GRAINS ; GREEN REVOLUTION ; IDENTITY ; IMPORTS ; INCOME ; INCOME DISTRIBUTION ; INNOVATION ; INTERMEDIATE INPUTS ; IRRIGATION ; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY ; LIVESTOCK ; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS ; MAIZE ; MALNUTRITION ; MARGINAL COST ; NATURAL RESOURCES ; NET IMPORTS ; OILSEED CROPS ; OILSEEDS ; PERFECT COMPETITION ; PESTICIDES ; PLANT BREEDING ; POVERTY ALLEVIATION ; PRODUCERS ; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION ; PRODUCT MARKETS ; PRODUCTIVITY ; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH ; PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES ; PROTECTIONISM ; RESOURCE ALLOCATION ; RICE ; RICE VARIETIES ; ROOT CROPS ; ROOTS ; SEED ; SOYBEAN ; TECHNICAL CHANGE ; TERMS OF TRADE ; UNITED NATIONS ; VALUATION ; WAGES ; WELFARE EFFECTS ; WELFARE GAINS ; WHEAT ; WILLINGNESS TO PAY ; WTO ; YIELDS</subject><creationdate>2004</creationdate><rights>CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Policy Research Working Paper</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>307,776,780,783,18961</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/14223$$EView_record_in_World_Bank$$FView_record_in_$$GWorld_Bank$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lee Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Kym</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</title><description>The first generation of genetically
modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer
profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The
next generation of GM food research is focusing also on
breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning
with "golden rice," which has been genetically
engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and
thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing
countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential
economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global
economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as
GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are
potentially very large, especially from nutritionally
enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims
of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are
diminished only slightly by the presence of the European
Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In
particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports
in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM
products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that
protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the
small economic gain for these farmers from greater market
access to the EU.</description><subject>ADVERSE IMPACTS</subject><subject>AFRICAN FARMERS</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS</subject><subject>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>AGRICULTURE</subject><subject>ANIMALS</subject><subject>BILATERAL TRADE</subject><subject>BIOSAFETY</subject><subject>BIOTECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>CANCER</subject><subject>CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>COARSE GRAINS</subject><subject>COMMODITIES</subject><subject>COMPETITIVENESS</subject><subject>CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE</subject><subject>CONSUMER PREFERENCES</subject><subject>CONSUMERS</subject><subject>COST SAVINGS</subject><subject>COTTON</subject><subject>CROP PRODUCTION</subject><subject>CROP VARIETIES</subject><subject>CULTIVARS</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH</subject><subject>ECONOMIC ANALYSIS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC EFFECTS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY</subject><subject>ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC LOSS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC PROGRESS</subject><subject>ECONOMIC STRUCTURES</subject><subject>ECONOMIC WELFARE</subject><subject>ELASTICITIES</subject><subject>ELASTICITY</subject><subject>EMPLOYMENT</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH</subject><subject>EQUILIBRIUM</subject><subject>EXCHANGE RATES</subject><subject>EXPORTS</subject><subject>FAO</subject><subject>FARMERS</subject><subject>FARMS</subject><subject>FOOD CROPS</subject><subject>FOOD PRICES</subject><subject>FOOD PRODUCTION</subject><subject>FOOD PRODUCTS</subject><subject>FULL EMPLOYMENT</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL</subject><subject>GENETIC ENGINEERING</subject><subject>GENETIC MODIFICATION</subject><subject>GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS</subject><subject>GRAIN</subject><subject>GRAIN PRODUCTION</subject><subject>GRAINS</subject><subject>GREEN REVOLUTION</subject><subject>IDENTITY</subject><subject>IMPORTS</subject><subject>INCOME</subject><subject>INCOME DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>INNOVATION</subject><subject>INTERMEDIATE INPUTS</subject><subject>IRRIGATION</subject><subject>LABOR PRODUCTIVITY</subject><subject>LIVESTOCK</subject><subject>LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS</subject><subject>MAIZE</subject><subject>MALNUTRITION</subject><subject>MARGINAL COST</subject><subject>NATURAL RESOURCES</subject><subject>NET IMPORTS</subject><subject>OILSEED CROPS</subject><subject>OILSEEDS</subject><subject>PERFECT COMPETITION</subject><subject>PESTICIDES</subject><subject>PLANT BREEDING</subject><subject>POVERTY ALLEVIATION</subject><subject>PRODUCERS</subject><subject>PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION</subject><subject>PRODUCT MARKETS</subject><subject>PRODUCTIVITY</subject><subject>PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH</subject><subject>PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES</subject><subject>PROTECTIONISM</subject><subject>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</subject><subject>RICE</subject><subject>RICE VARIETIES</subject><subject>ROOT CROPS</subject><subject>ROOTS</subject><subject>SEED</subject><subject>SOYBEAN</subject><subject>TECHNICAL CHANGE</subject><subject>TERMS OF TRADE</subject><subject>UNITED NATIONS</subject><subject>VALUATION</subject><subject>WAGES</subject><subject>WELFARE EFFECTS</subject><subject>WELFARE GAINS</subject><subject>WHEAT</subject><subject>WILLINGNESS TO PAY</subject><subject>WTO</subject><subject>YIELDS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>VO9</sourceid><recordid>eNqdy88KgkAQgHEvHaJ6h3kBIf8QdYzI6hAEepfVndXFaUZ2N8S3z0NP0OmDD37rqHq8R7KtClbYgxi4IWNYBtEMT9HWWNRQiGiosO1ZSLoZXrIYix6MOCg_TVyqXjnFcDZusdtoZRR53P26ifLiWl3u8SSOdKN4qGVEHlgmQt2hw1G8DeLmOtmfjoc6ydM0y_5kX9e9SQg</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Jackson, Lee Ann</creator><creator>Anderson, Kym</creator><general>World Bank, Washington, D.C</general><scope>VO9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</title><author>Jackson, Lee Ann ; Anderson, Kym</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_142233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>ADVERSE IMPACTS</topic><topic>AFRICAN FARMERS</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS</topic><topic>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>AGRICULTURE</topic><topic>ANIMALS</topic><topic>BILATERAL TRADE</topic><topic>BIOSAFETY</topic><topic>BIOTECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>CANCER</topic><topic>CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>COARSE GRAINS</topic><topic>COMMODITIES</topic><topic>COMPETITIVENESS</topic><topic>CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE</topic><topic>CONSUMER PREFERENCES</topic><topic>CONSUMERS</topic><topic>COST SAVINGS</topic><topic>COTTON</topic><topic>CROP PRODUCTION</topic><topic>CROP VARIETIES</topic><topic>CULTIVARS</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH</topic><topic>ECONOMIC ANALYSIS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC EFFECTS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY</topic><topic>ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC LOSS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC PROGRESS</topic><topic>ECONOMIC STRUCTURES</topic><topic>ECONOMIC WELFARE</topic><topic>ELASTICITIES</topic><topic>ELASTICITY</topic><topic>EMPLOYMENT</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH</topic><topic>EQUILIBRIUM</topic><topic>EXCHANGE RATES</topic><topic>EXPORTS</topic><topic>FAO</topic><topic>FARMERS</topic><topic>FARMS</topic><topic>FOOD CROPS</topic><topic>FOOD PRICES</topic><topic>FOOD PRODUCTION</topic><topic>FOOD PRODUCTS</topic><topic>FULL EMPLOYMENT</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL</topic><topic>GENETIC ENGINEERING</topic><topic>GENETIC MODIFICATION</topic><topic>GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS</topic><topic>GRAIN</topic><topic>GRAIN PRODUCTION</topic><topic>GRAINS</topic><topic>GREEN REVOLUTION</topic><topic>IDENTITY</topic><topic>IMPORTS</topic><topic>INCOME</topic><topic>INCOME DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>INNOVATION</topic><topic>INTERMEDIATE INPUTS</topic><topic>IRRIGATION</topic><topic>LABOR PRODUCTIVITY</topic><topic>LIVESTOCK</topic><topic>LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS</topic><topic>MAIZE</topic><topic>MALNUTRITION</topic><topic>MARGINAL COST</topic><topic>NATURAL RESOURCES</topic><topic>NET IMPORTS</topic><topic>OILSEED CROPS</topic><topic>OILSEEDS</topic><topic>PERFECT COMPETITION</topic><topic>PESTICIDES</topic><topic>PLANT BREEDING</topic><topic>POVERTY ALLEVIATION</topic><topic>PRODUCERS</topic><topic>PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION</topic><topic>PRODUCT MARKETS</topic><topic>PRODUCTIVITY</topic><topic>PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH</topic><topic>PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES</topic><topic>PROTECTIONISM</topic><topic>RESOURCE ALLOCATION</topic><topic>RICE</topic><topic>RICE VARIETIES</topic><topic>ROOT CROPS</topic><topic>ROOTS</topic><topic>SEED</topic><topic>SOYBEAN</topic><topic>TECHNICAL CHANGE</topic><topic>TERMS OF TRADE</topic><topic>UNITED NATIONS</topic><topic>VALUATION</topic><topic>WAGES</topic><topic>WELFARE EFFECTS</topic><topic>WELFARE GAINS</topic><topic>WHEAT</topic><topic>WILLINGNESS TO PAY</topic><topic>WTO</topic><topic>YIELDS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Lee Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Kym</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Knowledge Repository</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Lee Ann</au><au>Anderson, Kym</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa</btitle><seriestitle>Policy Research Working Paper</seriestitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>3411</volume><abstract>The first generation of genetically
modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer
profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The
next generation of GM food research is focusing also on
breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning
with "golden rice," which has been genetically
engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and
thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing
countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential
economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global
economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as
GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are
potentially very large, especially from nutritionally
enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims
of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are
diminished only slightly by the presence of the European
Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In
particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports
in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM
products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that
protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the
small economic gain for these farmers from greater market
access to the EU.</abstract><pub>World Bank, Washington, D.C</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_14223 |
source | Open Knowledge Repository |
subjects | ADVERSE IMPACTS AFRICAN FARMERS AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AGRICULTURE ANIMALS BILATERAL TRADE BIOSAFETY BIOTECHNOLOGY CANCER CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS COARSE GRAINS COMMODITIES COMPETITIVENESS CONSTANT RETURNS TO SCALE CONSUMER PREFERENCES CONSUMERS COST SAVINGS COTTON CROP PRODUCTION CROP VARIETIES CULTIVARS DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ECONOMIC EFFECTS ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS ECONOMIC LOSS ECONOMIC PROGRESS ECONOMIC STRUCTURES ECONOMIC WELFARE ELASTICITIES ELASTICITY EMPLOYMENT ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EQUILIBRIUM EXCHANGE RATES EXPORTS FAO FARMERS FARMS FOOD CROPS FOOD PRICES FOOD PRODUCTION FOOD PRODUCTS FULL EMPLOYMENT GDP GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL GENETIC ENGINEERING GENETIC MODIFICATION GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS GRAIN GRAIN PRODUCTION GRAINS GREEN REVOLUTION IDENTITY IMPORTS INCOME INCOME DISTRIBUTION INNOVATION INTERMEDIATE INPUTS IRRIGATION LABOR PRODUCTIVITY LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS MAIZE MALNUTRITION MARGINAL COST NATURAL RESOURCES NET IMPORTS OILSEED CROPS OILSEEDS PERFECT COMPETITION PESTICIDES PLANT BREEDING POVERTY ALLEVIATION PRODUCERS PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION PRODUCT MARKETS PRODUCTIVITY PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH PRODUCTIVITY INCREASES PROTECTIONISM RESOURCE ALLOCATION RICE RICE VARIETIES ROOT CROPS ROOTS SEED SOYBEAN TECHNICAL CHANGE TERMS OF TRADE UNITED NATIONS VALUATION WAGES WELFARE EFFECTS WELFARE GAINS WHEAT WILLINGNESS TO PAY WTO YIELDS |
title | Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T18%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-worldbank_VO9&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Implications%20of%20Genetically%20Modified%20Food%20Technology%20Policies%20for%20Sub-Saharan%20Africa&rft.au=Jackson,%20Lee%20Ann&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=3411&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cworldbank_VO9%3Eoai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/14223%3C/worldbank_VO9%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |