Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems
Quality in higher education is difficult to measure. Incentives to improve (or not) are often different for public and private institutions, and approaches to quality assurance have to be adapted to different situations. Poland is reforming its higher education institutional framework and the World...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Weber, Luc Mahfooz, Sara Bin Hovde, Kate |
description | Quality in higher education is difficult
to measure. Incentives to improve (or not) are often
different for public and private institutions, and
approaches to quality assurance have to be adapted to
different situations. Poland is reforming its higher
education institutional framework and the World Bank
conducted a review, comparing strategies followed by
(largely) Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) countries with regard to quality
assessment, to help the country assess educational services
at its higher education institutions. Based on the research,
some of the most comprehensive quality assessment frameworks
for public universities were found in the Irish, Scottish
and Hong Kong educational systems; for private universities,
the Austrian and Swiss systems present interesting examples. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>worldbank_VO9</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_10148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/10148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_101483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdi0EKwjAQRbtxIeod5gKCxSLVXSmRbkX3JTbTGppmQiah5PZm4Qnc_MeD97eFeERpdEjQMEcv7YCgLXR6-qAHoeIggyYLN2igpcVJrzkrjSByEuCZOODC-2IzSsN4-HFXVHfxarvjSt6ot7RzTw7tbGk1qCb06Ih1IJ_68nStL3nLqj7_efsCBzdC-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype></control><display><type>book</type><title>Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems</title><source>Open Knowledge Repository</source><creator>Weber, Luc ; Mahfooz, Sara Bin ; Hovde, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Luc ; Mahfooz, Sara Bin ; Hovde, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>Quality in higher education is difficult
to measure. Incentives to improve (or not) are often
different for public and private institutions, and
approaches to quality assurance have to be adapted to
different situations. Poland is reforming its higher
education institutional framework and the World Bank
conducted a review, comparing strategies followed by
(largely) Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) countries with regard to quality
assessment, to help the country assess educational services
at its higher education institutions. Based on the research,
some of the most comprehensive quality assessment frameworks
for public universities were found in the Irish, Scottish
and Hong Kong educational systems; for private universities,
the Austrian and Swiss systems present interesting examples.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>World Bank, Washington, DC</publisher><subject>ACCREDITATION ; AUDITS ; CALL ; EDUCATION SECTOR ; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES ; EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS ; FORMATIVE EVALUATIONS ; HIGHER EDUCATION ; HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ; HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY ; LEARNING ; LEARNING PROGRAMS ; MANUFACTURING ; PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS ; PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES ; PROGRAMS ; PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES ; QUALITY ASSESSMENT ; QUALITY ASSURANCE ; QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES ; QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS ; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE ; TEACHING ; TRANSPARENCY ; UNIVERSITY GRANTS</subject><creationdate>2010</creationdate><rights>CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Europe and Central Asia Knowledge Brief</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>307,776,780,783,18961</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/10148$$EView_record_in_World_Bank$$FView_record_in_$$GWorld_Bank$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfooz, Sara Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovde, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems</title><description>Quality in higher education is difficult
to measure. Incentives to improve (or not) are often
different for public and private institutions, and
approaches to quality assurance have to be adapted to
different situations. Poland is reforming its higher
education institutional framework and the World Bank
conducted a review, comparing strategies followed by
(largely) Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) countries with regard to quality
assessment, to help the country assess educational services
at its higher education institutions. Based on the research,
some of the most comprehensive quality assessment frameworks
for public universities were found in the Irish, Scottish
and Hong Kong educational systems; for private universities,
the Austrian and Swiss systems present interesting examples.</description><subject>ACCREDITATION</subject><subject>AUDITS</subject><subject>CALL</subject><subject>EDUCATION SECTOR</subject><subject>EDUCATIONAL SERVICES</subject><subject>EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS</subject><subject>FORMATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>HIGHER EDUCATION</subject><subject>HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS</subject><subject>HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY</subject><subject>LEARNING</subject><subject>LEARNING PROGRAMS</subject><subject>MANUFACTURING</subject><subject>PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS</subject><subject>PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES</subject><subject>PROGRAMS</subject><subject>PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES</subject><subject>QUALITY ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>QUALITY ASSURANCE</subject><subject>QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES</subject><subject>QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS</subject><subject>RESEARCH PERFORMANCE</subject><subject>TEACHING</subject><subject>TRANSPARENCY</subject><subject>UNIVERSITY GRANTS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>VO9</sourceid><recordid>eNqdi0EKwjAQRbtxIeod5gKCxSLVXSmRbkX3JTbTGppmQiah5PZm4Qnc_MeD97eFeERpdEjQMEcv7YCgLXR6-qAHoeIggyYLN2igpcVJrzkrjSByEuCZOODC-2IzSsN4-HFXVHfxarvjSt6ot7RzTw7tbGk1qCb06Ih1IJ_68nStL3nLqj7_efsCBzdC-A</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Weber, Luc</creator><creator>Mahfooz, Sara Bin</creator><creator>Hovde, Kate</creator><general>World Bank, Washington, DC</general><scope>VO9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems</title><author>Weber, Luc ; Mahfooz, Sara Bin ; Hovde, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_101483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ACCREDITATION</topic><topic>AUDITS</topic><topic>CALL</topic><topic>EDUCATION SECTOR</topic><topic>EDUCATIONAL SERVICES</topic><topic>EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS</topic><topic>FORMATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>HIGHER EDUCATION</topic><topic>HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS</topic><topic>HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY</topic><topic>LEARNING</topic><topic>LEARNING PROGRAMS</topic><topic>MANUFACTURING</topic><topic>PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS</topic><topic>PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES</topic><topic>PROGRAMS</topic><topic>PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES</topic><topic>QUALITY ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>QUALITY ASSURANCE</topic><topic>QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES</topic><topic>QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS</topic><topic>RESEARCH PERFORMANCE</topic><topic>TEACHING</topic><topic>TRANSPARENCY</topic><topic>UNIVERSITY GRANTS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahfooz, Sara Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hovde, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Knowledge Repository</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Luc</au><au>Mahfooz, Sara Bin</au><au>Hovde, Kate</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems</btitle><seriestitle>Europe and Central Asia Knowledge Brief</seriestitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>Quality in higher education is difficult
to measure. Incentives to improve (or not) are often
different for public and private institutions, and
approaches to quality assurance have to be adapted to
different situations. Poland is reforming its higher
education institutional framework and the World Bank
conducted a review, comparing strategies followed by
(largely) Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) countries with regard to quality
assessment, to help the country assess educational services
at its higher education institutions. Based on the research,
some of the most comprehensive quality assessment frameworks
for public universities were found in the Irish, Scottish
and Hong Kong educational systems; for private universities,
the Austrian and Swiss systems present interesting examples.</abstract><pub>World Bank, Washington, DC</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_worldbank_openknowledgerepository_10986_10148 |
source | Open Knowledge Repository |
subjects | ACCREDITATION AUDITS CALL EDUCATION SECTOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS FORMATIVE EVALUATIONS HIGHER EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMS MANUFACTURING PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES PROGRAMS PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES QUALITY ASSESSMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEMS RESEARCH PERFORMANCE TEACHING TRANSPARENCY UNIVERSITY GRANTS |
title | Quality Assurance in Higher Education : A Comparison of Eight Systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T13%3A18%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-worldbank_VO9&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Quality%20Assurance%20in%20Higher%20Education%20:%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Eight%20Systems&rft.au=Weber,%20Luc&rft.date=2010-11&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cworldbank_VO9%3Eoai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/10148%3C/worldbank_VO9%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |