Moclobemide versus imipramine in depressed out-patients: a double-blind multi-centre study

One hundred and twenty seven patients with major depressive episode were included in a double-blind, four-week, prospective, randomized, multi-centre parallel-group trial comparing moclobemide and imipramine. The dose of moclobemide was 150–525 mg/day and that of imipramine 50–175 mg/day; the mean d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International clinical psychopharmacology 1993-01, Vol.7 (34), p.141-148
Hauptverfasser: Rimón, R, Jääskeläinen, J, Kaartinen, P, Kalli, A, Kilponen, E, Koskinen, T, Nikkilä, H, Pirttiperä, V, Seppälä, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue 34
container_start_page 141
container_title International clinical psychopharmacology
container_volume 7
creator Rimón, R
Jääskeläinen, J
Kaartinen, P
Kalli, A
Kilponen, E
Koskinen, T
Nikkilä, H
Pirttiperä, V
Seppälä, J
description One hundred and twenty seven patients with major depressive episode were included in a double-blind, four-week, prospective, randomized, multi-centre parallel-group trial comparing moclobemide and imipramine. The dose of moclobemide was 150–525 mg/day and that of imipramine 50–175 mg/day; the mean daily doses during the last week of treatment were 307 mg and 100 mg of moclobemide and imipramine, respectively. The decrease of the total scores of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) as well as the Overall Assessment of Efficacy by the Investigators showed significant amelioration of depression in both treatment groups (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the moclobemide and imipramine groups with regard to treatment outcome. The onset of the antidepressant activity was faster in the moclobemide group as measured by the Assessment of the Investigators. This difference was not observed when the therapeutic index figures calculated on the basis of the changes in the HDRS scores were scrutinized. Treatment-emergent side effects were somewhat more frequent during imipramine than during moclobemide treatment. Nevertheless, a total of only four patients discontinued the trial prematurely because of poor tolerability. imipramine-treated patients reported more anticholinergic side effects, whereas tiredness and headache were observed more frequently in the moclobemide-treated patients. Restlessness, nervousness and sleep disturbances were noted with equal incidence in both patient groups.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wolterskluwer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00004850-199300730-00004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00004850-199300730-00004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00004850-199300730-000043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjUFqwzAQRUVJoE6aO8wFBKPIru1uS0M33WWVTZCtCVEiW0YjNeT2NSEn6N98eJ_HfxGFKmstq6aqF6LA7XsjlVbVq1gxXxC3qNqyEIef0PvQ0eAswS9FzgxucFM0gxsJ3AiWpkjMZCHkJCeTHI2JP8CADbnzJDvvRgtD9snJft4iAads729ieTKeafPstSh3X_vPb3kLPs1PV59vFI9nMj6djzinbCqUqm01Yq1RPpD-p_YHOR5Mcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moclobemide versus imipramine in depressed out-patients: a double-blind multi-centre study</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Rimón, R ; Jääskeläinen, J ; Kaartinen, P ; Kalli, A ; Kilponen, E ; Koskinen, T ; Nikkilä, H ; Pirttiperä, V ; Seppälä, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rimón, R ; Jääskeläinen, J ; Kaartinen, P ; Kalli, A ; Kilponen, E ; Koskinen, T ; Nikkilä, H ; Pirttiperä, V ; Seppälä, J</creatorcontrib><description>One hundred and twenty seven patients with major depressive episode were included in a double-blind, four-week, prospective, randomized, multi-centre parallel-group trial comparing moclobemide and imipramine. The dose of moclobemide was 150–525 mg/day and that of imipramine 50–175 mg/day; the mean daily doses during the last week of treatment were 307 mg and 100 mg of moclobemide and imipramine, respectively. The decrease of the total scores of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) as well as the Overall Assessment of Efficacy by the Investigators showed significant amelioration of depression in both treatment groups (p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were found between the moclobemide and imipramine groups with regard to treatment outcome. The onset of the antidepressant activity was faster in the moclobemide group as measured by the Assessment of the Investigators. This difference was not observed when the therapeutic index figures calculated on the basis of the changes in the HDRS scores were scrutinized. Treatment-emergent side effects were somewhat more frequent during imipramine than during moclobemide treatment. Nevertheless, a total of only four patients discontinued the trial prematurely because of poor tolerability. imipramine-treated patients reported more anticholinergic side effects, whereas tiredness and headache were observed more frequently in the moclobemide-treated patients. Restlessness, nervousness and sleep disturbances were noted with equal incidence in both patient groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><ispartof>International clinical psychopharmacology, 1993-01, Vol.7 (34), p.141-148</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rimón, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jääskeläinen, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilponen, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koskinen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikkilä, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirttiperä, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seppälä, J</creatorcontrib><title>Moclobemide versus imipramine in depressed out-patients: a double-blind multi-centre study</title><title>International clinical psychopharmacology</title><description>One hundred and twenty seven patients with major depressive episode were included in a double-blind, four-week, prospective, randomized, multi-centre parallel-group trial comparing moclobemide and imipramine. The dose of moclobemide was 150–525 mg/day and that of imipramine 50–175 mg/day; the mean daily doses during the last week of treatment were 307 mg and 100 mg of moclobemide and imipramine, respectively. The decrease of the total scores of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) as well as the Overall Assessment of Efficacy by the Investigators showed significant amelioration of depression in both treatment groups (p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were found between the moclobemide and imipramine groups with regard to treatment outcome. The onset of the antidepressant activity was faster in the moclobemide group as measured by the Assessment of the Investigators. This difference was not observed when the therapeutic index figures calculated on the basis of the changes in the HDRS scores were scrutinized. Treatment-emergent side effects were somewhat more frequent during imipramine than during moclobemide treatment. Nevertheless, a total of only four patients discontinued the trial prematurely because of poor tolerability. imipramine-treated patients reported more anticholinergic side effects, whereas tiredness and headache were observed more frequently in the moclobemide-treated patients. Restlessness, nervousness and sleep disturbances were noted with equal incidence in both patient groups.</description><issn>0268-1315</issn><issn>1473-5857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqdjUFqwzAQRUVJoE6aO8wFBKPIru1uS0M33WWVTZCtCVEiW0YjNeT2NSEn6N98eJ_HfxGFKmstq6aqF6LA7XsjlVbVq1gxXxC3qNqyEIef0PvQ0eAswS9FzgxucFM0gxsJ3AiWpkjMZCHkJCeTHI2JP8CADbnzJDvvRgtD9snJft4iAads729ieTKeafPstSh3X_vPb3kLPs1PV59vFI9nMj6djzinbCqUqm01Yq1RPpD-p_YHOR5Mcw</recordid><startdate>199301</startdate><enddate>199301</enddate><creator>Rimón, R</creator><creator>Jääskeläinen, J</creator><creator>Kaartinen, P</creator><creator>Kalli, A</creator><creator>Kilponen, E</creator><creator>Koskinen, T</creator><creator>Nikkilä, H</creator><creator>Pirttiperä, V</creator><creator>Seppälä, J</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>199301</creationdate><title>Moclobemide versus imipramine in depressed out-patients: a double-blind multi-centre study</title><author>Rimón, R ; Jääskeläinen, J ; Kaartinen, P ; Kalli, A ; Kilponen, E ; Koskinen, T ; Nikkilä, H ; Pirttiperä, V ; Seppälä, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00004850-199300730-000043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rimón, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jääskeläinen, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaartinen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilponen, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koskinen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikkilä, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirttiperä, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seppälä, J</creatorcontrib><jtitle>International clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rimón, R</au><au>Jääskeläinen, J</au><au>Kaartinen, P</au><au>Kalli, A</au><au>Kilponen, E</au><au>Koskinen, T</au><au>Nikkilä, H</au><au>Pirttiperä, V</au><au>Seppälä, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moclobemide versus imipramine in depressed out-patients: a double-blind multi-centre study</atitle><jtitle>International clinical psychopharmacology</jtitle><date>1993-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>34</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>141-148</pages><issn>0268-1315</issn><eissn>1473-5857</eissn><abstract>One hundred and twenty seven patients with major depressive episode were included in a double-blind, four-week, prospective, randomized, multi-centre parallel-group trial comparing moclobemide and imipramine. The dose of moclobemide was 150–525 mg/day and that of imipramine 50–175 mg/day; the mean daily doses during the last week of treatment were 307 mg and 100 mg of moclobemide and imipramine, respectively. The decrease of the total scores of the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDRS) as well as the Overall Assessment of Efficacy by the Investigators showed significant amelioration of depression in both treatment groups (p &lt; 0.001). No significant differences were found between the moclobemide and imipramine groups with regard to treatment outcome. The onset of the antidepressant activity was faster in the moclobemide group as measured by the Assessment of the Investigators. This difference was not observed when the therapeutic index figures calculated on the basis of the changes in the HDRS scores were scrutinized. Treatment-emergent side effects were somewhat more frequent during imipramine than during moclobemide treatment. Nevertheless, a total of only four patients discontinued the trial prematurely because of poor tolerability. imipramine-treated patients reported more anticholinergic side effects, whereas tiredness and headache were observed more frequently in the moclobemide-treated patients. Restlessness, nervousness and sleep disturbances were noted with equal incidence in both patient groups.</abstract><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1315
ispartof International clinical psychopharmacology, 1993-01, Vol.7 (34), p.141-148
issn 0268-1315
1473-5857
language eng
recordid cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00004850-199300730-00004
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Moclobemide versus imipramine in depressed out-patients: a double-blind multi-centre study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A36%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wolterskluwer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moclobemide%20versus%20imipramine%20in%20depressed%20out-patients:%20a%20double-blind%20multi-centre%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20clinical%20psychopharmacology&rft.au=Rim%C3%B3n,%20R&rft.date=1993-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=34&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=141-148&rft.issn=0268-1315&rft.eissn=1473-5857&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cwolterskluwer%3E00004850-199300730-00004%3C/wolterskluwer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true