Abstract 16209: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Groin Access Closure vs. Surgical Cutdown for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

IntroductionThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) necessitate large-bore arterial access for stent/valve delivery. With improvement of device delivery technology, percutaneous access has become the standard. This may be associated with fewer co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A16209-A16209
Hauptverfasser: Carroll, Adam M, Reece, T B, Ghincea, Christian V, Ikeno, Yuki, Roth, Kaitlin, Wiktor, Dominik M, Messenger, John C, Carroll, John D, Cleveland, Joseph C, Fullerton, David A, Aftab, Muhammad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A16209
container_issue Suppl_1 Suppl 1
container_start_page A16209
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 140
creator Carroll, Adam M
Reece, T B
Ghincea, Christian V
Ikeno, Yuki
Roth, Kaitlin
Wiktor, Dominik M
Messenger, John C
Carroll, John D
Cleveland, Joseph C
Fullerton, David A
Aftab, Muhammad
description IntroductionThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) necessitate large-bore arterial access for stent/valve delivery. With improvement of device delivery technology, percutaneous access has become the standard. This may be associated with fewer complications, though literature is conflicting. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of open vs. percutaneous large bore arterial access at a single institution.HypothesisPercutaneous arterial access for device delivery is associated with fewer complications than surgical cutdown.MethodsIncluded were 746 patients who underwent TEVAR or TAVR between over 13 years. Only groins accessed for delivery sheath were included for analysis, with size ranging from 12-28 French (Fr.). Complications assessed included bleeding (hematoma, perforation, rupture, pseudoaneurysm), infection, seroma, dissection, and embolization.ResultsPatient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Sheath diameter was predictive of conversion to open with a median of 20Fr. (IQR 16-22) vs. 16 Fr. (IQR 14-20) in cases that were completed percutaneously (p
doi_str_mv 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.16209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wolterskluwer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-03614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00003017-201911191-03614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-036143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkE1OwzAQhS0EEuXnCmgukGAnaap0F0UFllVbsa2MO2kMxo48dqvelONgKsQBWIxG78379KRh7EHwXIhaPCrtVS4qnlMcR7MVuagL3lywiZgWVVZNy-aSTTjnTTYri-Ka3RC9J1mXs-mEfbVvFLxUAc7UHNayx3ACaXew6HutpDqB62GJXsUgLbpI8OydttAqhUTQGUfRIxwoh3X0-4QY6GLYuaOF3nnYDC4VaAULu3MHSSoa6aF1PiRvhaPU_ly38dKSkmHAgH_3V2kO-JMyUuEn2jCHFtba7g1mXZIpucLgHY2ogk7R1kpzIk137KqXhvD-d9-y6mmx6V6yozOJog8Tj-i3A0oThm36By-5mGUFF40QaTJe1qIq_4l9A_2EgRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abstract 16209: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Groin Access Closure vs. Surgical Cutdown for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis</title><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Carroll, Adam M ; Reece, T B ; Ghincea, Christian V ; Ikeno, Yuki ; Roth, Kaitlin ; Wiktor, Dominik M ; Messenger, John C ; Carroll, John D ; Cleveland, Joseph C ; Fullerton, David A ; Aftab, Muhammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Adam M ; Reece, T B ; Ghincea, Christian V ; Ikeno, Yuki ; Roth, Kaitlin ; Wiktor, Dominik M ; Messenger, John C ; Carroll, John D ; Cleveland, Joseph C ; Fullerton, David A ; Aftab, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) necessitate large-bore arterial access for stent/valve delivery. With improvement of device delivery technology, percutaneous access has become the standard. This may be associated with fewer complications, though literature is conflicting. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of open vs. percutaneous large bore arterial access at a single institution.HypothesisPercutaneous arterial access for device delivery is associated with fewer complications than surgical cutdown.MethodsIncluded were 746 patients who underwent TEVAR or TAVR between over 13 years. Only groins accessed for delivery sheath were included for analysis, with size ranging from 12-28 French (Fr.). Complications assessed included bleeding (hematoma, perforation, rupture, pseudoaneurysm), infection, seroma, dissection, and embolization.ResultsPatient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Sheath diameter was predictive of conversion to open with a median of 20Fr. (IQR 16-22) vs. 16 Fr. (IQR 14-20) in cases that were completed percutaneously (p&lt;=0.004). There was a significantly higher rate of total complications (24.6% vs. 9.4%; p=0.001), infection, and bleeding in open compared to percutaneous cases. No significant differences were observed in seroma, dissection, and embolization.Total complications and infection remained significant after propensity matching. Delivery sites were successfully closed using a median of 2 percutaneous closure devices.ConclusionsPercutaneous access is associated with significantly lower rates of total complications, infection, and bleeding compared to surgical cutdown. Delivery sheath size was predictive of conversion to open, but the overall incidence was low. Large-bore arterial access closure can be safely achieved using a percutaneous strategy, with fewer complications than the open approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.16209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A16209-A16209</ispartof><rights>2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Adam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, T B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghincea, Christian V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeno, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiktor, Dominik M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aftab, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><title>Abstract 16209: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Groin Access Closure vs. Surgical Cutdown for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>IntroductionThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) necessitate large-bore arterial access for stent/valve delivery. With improvement of device delivery technology, percutaneous access has become the standard. This may be associated with fewer complications, though literature is conflicting. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of open vs. percutaneous large bore arterial access at a single institution.HypothesisPercutaneous arterial access for device delivery is associated with fewer complications than surgical cutdown.MethodsIncluded were 746 patients who underwent TEVAR or TAVR between over 13 years. Only groins accessed for delivery sheath were included for analysis, with size ranging from 12-28 French (Fr.). Complications assessed included bleeding (hematoma, perforation, rupture, pseudoaneurysm), infection, seroma, dissection, and embolization.ResultsPatient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Sheath diameter was predictive of conversion to open with a median of 20Fr. (IQR 16-22) vs. 16 Fr. (IQR 14-20) in cases that were completed percutaneously (p&lt;=0.004). There was a significantly higher rate of total complications (24.6% vs. 9.4%; p=0.001), infection, and bleeding in open compared to percutaneous cases. No significant differences were observed in seroma, dissection, and embolization.Total complications and infection remained significant after propensity matching. Delivery sites were successfully closed using a median of 2 percutaneous closure devices.ConclusionsPercutaneous access is associated with significantly lower rates of total complications, infection, and bleeding compared to surgical cutdown. Delivery sheath size was predictive of conversion to open, but the overall incidence was low. Large-bore arterial access closure can be safely achieved using a percutaneous strategy, with fewer complications than the open approach.</description><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqdkE1OwzAQhS0EEuXnCmgukGAnaap0F0UFllVbsa2MO2kMxo48dqvelONgKsQBWIxG78379KRh7EHwXIhaPCrtVS4qnlMcR7MVuagL3lywiZgWVVZNy-aSTTjnTTYri-Ka3RC9J1mXs-mEfbVvFLxUAc7UHNayx3ACaXew6HutpDqB62GJXsUgLbpI8OydttAqhUTQGUfRIxwoh3X0-4QY6GLYuaOF3nnYDC4VaAULu3MHSSoa6aF1PiRvhaPU_ly38dKSkmHAgH_3V2kO-JMyUuEn2jCHFtba7g1mXZIpucLgHY2ogk7R1kpzIk137KqXhvD-d9-y6mmx6V6yozOJog8Tj-i3A0oThm36By-5mGUFF40QaTJe1qIq_4l9A_2EgRU</recordid><startdate>20191119</startdate><enddate>20191119</enddate><creator>Carroll, Adam M</creator><creator>Reece, T B</creator><creator>Ghincea, Christian V</creator><creator>Ikeno, Yuki</creator><creator>Roth, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Wiktor, Dominik M</creator><creator>Messenger, John C</creator><creator>Carroll, John D</creator><creator>Cleveland, Joseph C</creator><creator>Fullerton, David A</creator><creator>Aftab, Muhammad</creator><general>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20191119</creationdate><title>Abstract 16209: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Groin Access Closure vs. Surgical Cutdown for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis</title><author>Carroll, Adam M ; Reece, T B ; Ghincea, Christian V ; Ikeno, Yuki ; Roth, Kaitlin ; Wiktor, Dominik M ; Messenger, John C ; Carroll, John D ; Cleveland, Joseph C ; Fullerton, David A ; Aftab, Muhammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-036143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Adam M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, T B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghincea, Christian V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeno, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiktor, Dominik M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, John D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleveland, Joseph C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullerton, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aftab, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carroll, Adam M</au><au>Reece, T B</au><au>Ghincea, Christian V</au><au>Ikeno, Yuki</au><au>Roth, Kaitlin</au><au>Wiktor, Dominik M</au><au>Messenger, John C</au><au>Carroll, John D</au><au>Cleveland, Joseph C</au><au>Fullerton, David A</au><au>Aftab, Muhammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abstract 16209: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Groin Access Closure vs. Surgical Cutdown for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2019-11-19</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>Suppl_1 Suppl 1</issue><spage>A16209</spage><epage>A16209</epage><pages>A16209-A16209</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>IntroductionThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) necessitate large-bore arterial access for stent/valve delivery. With improvement of device delivery technology, percutaneous access has become the standard. This may be associated with fewer complications, though literature is conflicting. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of open vs. percutaneous large bore arterial access at a single institution.HypothesisPercutaneous arterial access for device delivery is associated with fewer complications than surgical cutdown.MethodsIncluded were 746 patients who underwent TEVAR or TAVR between over 13 years. Only groins accessed for delivery sheath were included for analysis, with size ranging from 12-28 French (Fr.). Complications assessed included bleeding (hematoma, perforation, rupture, pseudoaneurysm), infection, seroma, dissection, and embolization.ResultsPatient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Sheath diameter was predictive of conversion to open with a median of 20Fr. (IQR 16-22) vs. 16 Fr. (IQR 14-20) in cases that were completed percutaneously (p&lt;=0.004). There was a significantly higher rate of total complications (24.6% vs. 9.4%; p=0.001), infection, and bleeding in open compared to percutaneous cases. No significant differences were observed in seroma, dissection, and embolization.Total complications and infection remained significant after propensity matching. Delivery sites were successfully closed using a median of 2 percutaneous closure devices.ConclusionsPercutaneous access is associated with significantly lower rates of total complications, infection, and bleeding compared to surgical cutdown. Delivery sheath size was predictive of conversion to open, but the overall incidence was low. Large-bore arterial access closure can be safely achieved using a percutaneous strategy, with fewer complications than the open approach.</abstract><pub>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</pub><doi>10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.16209</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A16209-A16209
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-03614
source American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
title Abstract 16209: Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Groin Access Closure vs. Surgical Cutdown for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-09T19%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wolterskluwer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abstract%2016209:%20Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20Percutaneous%20Groin%20Access%20Closure%20vs.%20Surgical%20Cutdown%20for%20Thoracic%20Endovascular%20Aortic%20Repair%20and%20Transcatheter%20Aortic%20Valve%20Replacement:%20A%20Single-Center%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Carroll,%20Adam%20M&rft.date=2019-11-19&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=Suppl_1%20Suppl%201&rft.spage=A16209&rft.epage=A16209&rft.pages=A16209-A16209&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.16209&rft_dat=%3Cwolterskluwer%3E00003017-201911191-03614%3C/wolterskluwer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true