Abstract 9682: Experience of Three Years of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in a Single Centre: Safety and Short Term Results

Introductionballoon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has recently been developed as an alternative and less-invasive treatment strategy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but therapeutic efficacy and technical safety of the technique have to be established.Hypothesisto examine the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A9682-A9682
Hauptverfasser: Palazzini, Massimiliano, Saia, Francesco, Gotti, Enrico, Taglieri, Nevio, Dardi, Fabio, Zuffa, Elisa, De Lorenzis, Alessandro, Pasca, Filippo, Guarino, Daniele, Magnani, Ilenia, Rinaldi, Andrea, Manes, Alessandra, Galiè, Nazzareno
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A9682
container_issue Suppl_1 Suppl 1
container_start_page A9682
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 140
creator Palazzini, Massimiliano
Saia, Francesco
Gotti, Enrico
Taglieri, Nevio
Dardi, Fabio
Zuffa, Elisa
De Lorenzis, Alessandro
Pasca, Filippo
Guarino, Daniele
Magnani, Ilenia
Rinaldi, Andrea
Manes, Alessandra
Galiè, Nazzareno
description Introductionballoon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has recently been developed as an alternative and less-invasive treatment strategy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but therapeutic efficacy and technical safety of the technique have to be established.Hypothesisto examine the effects of BPA on patients with inoperable disease or residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA).Methodsfrom June 2015 to January 2019 we enrolled symptomatic (WHO-FC ≥II) inoperable CTEPH patients and patients with residual PH after PEA. At baseline and 3 months after last BPA session all patients underwent clinical evaluation, six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and right heart catheterization. For comparisons Friedman test (with Bonferroni post-hoc pairwise analysis) was used.Resultsforty-one patients [male 49%, median age 65 (52-75) years, 34 inoperable and 7 with residual PH after PEA] were treated for a total of 111 sessions (median number of sessions for each patient2); during each session we treated 2 (2.0-2.5) vessels. Results are shown in the Table.Forty patients were treated with medical therapy before BPA (16 with combination therapy). Four pulmonary artery dissection and 2 haemoptysis with clinical impairment were documented during the procedures; 27 patients had lung injury (radiographic opacity with/without hemoptysis and/or hypoxemia), none had renal dysfunction, 6 patients had access site complications. Five patients died during follow-up (none within 30 days from the procedure) because of sepsis (1), heart failure (1), cancer (1), arrhythmic storm (1) and sudden death in a patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis (1).ConclusionsBPA is a safe and effective treatment able to improve symptoms and hemodynamic profile in inoperable CTEPH patients and in patients with residual PH after PEA.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.9682
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wolterskluwer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-00055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00003017-201911191-00055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-000553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjs1KxEAQhAdRMP48gtAvkDidX7O3dVnxKCYXT2GMnU20dybMTFgXX95Z8Ak8FEVV8UEJcYcyQSzxvp9sn2AuE7fMM3eY1OVDeiYiLNI8zousPheRlLKOqyxNL8WVc58hlllVROJn_e68Vb2HE7SC7fdMdiLdE5gB2tESwRsp607xUTEbo-Fl4b3Ryh5hrXeTmVk5f4RJg4Jm0jsm2JD2llbQqIHCpPQHNKOxHlqye3glt7B3N-JiUOzo9s-vRf60bTfP8cGwJ-u-eDmQ7UZS7McuXJaZxCpOJdaIQXFoiiL7J_YLtWFeCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abstract 9682: Experience of Three Years of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in a Single Centre: Safety and Short Term Results</title><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Palazzini, Massimiliano ; Saia, Francesco ; Gotti, Enrico ; Taglieri, Nevio ; Dardi, Fabio ; Zuffa, Elisa ; De Lorenzis, Alessandro ; Pasca, Filippo ; Guarino, Daniele ; Magnani, Ilenia ; Rinaldi, Andrea ; Manes, Alessandra ; Galiè, Nazzareno</creator><creatorcontrib>Palazzini, Massimiliano ; Saia, Francesco ; Gotti, Enrico ; Taglieri, Nevio ; Dardi, Fabio ; Zuffa, Elisa ; De Lorenzis, Alessandro ; Pasca, Filippo ; Guarino, Daniele ; Magnani, Ilenia ; Rinaldi, Andrea ; Manes, Alessandra ; Galiè, Nazzareno</creatorcontrib><description>Introductionballoon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has recently been developed as an alternative and less-invasive treatment strategy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but therapeutic efficacy and technical safety of the technique have to be established.Hypothesisto examine the effects of BPA on patients with inoperable disease or residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA).Methodsfrom June 2015 to January 2019 we enrolled symptomatic (WHO-FC ≥II) inoperable CTEPH patients and patients with residual PH after PEA. At baseline and 3 months after last BPA session all patients underwent clinical evaluation, six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and right heart catheterization. For comparisons Friedman test (with Bonferroni post-hoc pairwise analysis) was used.Resultsforty-one patients [male 49%, median age 65 (52-75) years, 34 inoperable and 7 with residual PH after PEA] were treated for a total of 111 sessions (median number of sessions for each patient2); during each session we treated 2 (2.0-2.5) vessels. Results are shown in the Table.Forty patients were treated with medical therapy before BPA (16 with combination therapy). Four pulmonary artery dissection and 2 haemoptysis with clinical impairment were documented during the procedures; 27 patients had lung injury (radiographic opacity with/without hemoptysis and/or hypoxemia), none had renal dysfunction, 6 patients had access site complications. Five patients died during follow-up (none within 30 days from the procedure) because of sepsis (1), heart failure (1), cancer (1), arrhythmic storm (1) and sudden death in a patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis (1).ConclusionsBPA is a safe and effective treatment able to improve symptoms and hemodynamic profile in inoperable CTEPH patients and in patients with residual PH after PEA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.9682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A9682-A9682</ispartof><rights>2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palazzini, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotti, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taglieri, Nevio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dardi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuffa, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lorenzis, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasca, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarino, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Ilenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manes, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galiè, Nazzareno</creatorcontrib><title>Abstract 9682: Experience of Three Years of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in a Single Centre: Safety and Short Term Results</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Introductionballoon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has recently been developed as an alternative and less-invasive treatment strategy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but therapeutic efficacy and technical safety of the technique have to be established.Hypothesisto examine the effects of BPA on patients with inoperable disease or residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA).Methodsfrom June 2015 to January 2019 we enrolled symptomatic (WHO-FC ≥II) inoperable CTEPH patients and patients with residual PH after PEA. At baseline and 3 months after last BPA session all patients underwent clinical evaluation, six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and right heart catheterization. For comparisons Friedman test (with Bonferroni post-hoc pairwise analysis) was used.Resultsforty-one patients [male 49%, median age 65 (52-75) years, 34 inoperable and 7 with residual PH after PEA] were treated for a total of 111 sessions (median number of sessions for each patient2); during each session we treated 2 (2.0-2.5) vessels. Results are shown in the Table.Forty patients were treated with medical therapy before BPA (16 with combination therapy). Four pulmonary artery dissection and 2 haemoptysis with clinical impairment were documented during the procedures; 27 patients had lung injury (radiographic opacity with/without hemoptysis and/or hypoxemia), none had renal dysfunction, 6 patients had access site complications. Five patients died during follow-up (none within 30 days from the procedure) because of sepsis (1), heart failure (1), cancer (1), arrhythmic storm (1) and sudden death in a patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis (1).ConclusionsBPA is a safe and effective treatment able to improve symptoms and hemodynamic profile in inoperable CTEPH patients and in patients with residual PH after PEA.</description><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqdjs1KxEAQhAdRMP48gtAvkDidX7O3dVnxKCYXT2GMnU20dybMTFgXX95Z8Ak8FEVV8UEJcYcyQSzxvp9sn2AuE7fMM3eY1OVDeiYiLNI8zousPheRlLKOqyxNL8WVc58hlllVROJn_e68Vb2HE7SC7fdMdiLdE5gB2tESwRsp607xUTEbo-Fl4b3Ryh5hrXeTmVk5f4RJg4Jm0jsm2JD2llbQqIHCpPQHNKOxHlqye3glt7B3N-JiUOzo9s-vRf60bTfP8cGwJ-u-eDmQ7UZS7McuXJaZxCpOJdaIQXFoiiL7J_YLtWFeCg</recordid><startdate>20191119</startdate><enddate>20191119</enddate><creator>Palazzini, Massimiliano</creator><creator>Saia, Francesco</creator><creator>Gotti, Enrico</creator><creator>Taglieri, Nevio</creator><creator>Dardi, Fabio</creator><creator>Zuffa, Elisa</creator><creator>De Lorenzis, Alessandro</creator><creator>Pasca, Filippo</creator><creator>Guarino, Daniele</creator><creator>Magnani, Ilenia</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Andrea</creator><creator>Manes, Alessandra</creator><creator>Galiè, Nazzareno</creator><general>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20191119</creationdate><title>Abstract 9682: Experience of Three Years of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in a Single Centre: Safety and Short Term Results</title><author>Palazzini, Massimiliano ; Saia, Francesco ; Gotti, Enrico ; Taglieri, Nevio ; Dardi, Fabio ; Zuffa, Elisa ; De Lorenzis, Alessandro ; Pasca, Filippo ; Guarino, Daniele ; Magnani, Ilenia ; Rinaldi, Andrea ; Manes, Alessandra ; Galiè, Nazzareno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-000553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palazzini, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gotti, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taglieri, Nevio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dardi, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuffa, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lorenzis, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasca, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarino, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnani, Ilenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manes, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galiè, Nazzareno</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palazzini, Massimiliano</au><au>Saia, Francesco</au><au>Gotti, Enrico</au><au>Taglieri, Nevio</au><au>Dardi, Fabio</au><au>Zuffa, Elisa</au><au>De Lorenzis, Alessandro</au><au>Pasca, Filippo</au><au>Guarino, Daniele</au><au>Magnani, Ilenia</au><au>Rinaldi, Andrea</au><au>Manes, Alessandra</au><au>Galiè, Nazzareno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abstract 9682: Experience of Three Years of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in a Single Centre: Safety and Short Term Results</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2019-11-19</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>Suppl_1 Suppl 1</issue><spage>A9682</spage><epage>A9682</epage><pages>A9682-A9682</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><abstract>Introductionballoon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has recently been developed as an alternative and less-invasive treatment strategy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) but therapeutic efficacy and technical safety of the technique have to be established.Hypothesisto examine the effects of BPA on patients with inoperable disease or residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA).Methodsfrom June 2015 to January 2019 we enrolled symptomatic (WHO-FC ≥II) inoperable CTEPH patients and patients with residual PH after PEA. At baseline and 3 months after last BPA session all patients underwent clinical evaluation, six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and right heart catheterization. For comparisons Friedman test (with Bonferroni post-hoc pairwise analysis) was used.Resultsforty-one patients [male 49%, median age 65 (52-75) years, 34 inoperable and 7 with residual PH after PEA] were treated for a total of 111 sessions (median number of sessions for each patient2); during each session we treated 2 (2.0-2.5) vessels. Results are shown in the Table.Forty patients were treated with medical therapy before BPA (16 with combination therapy). Four pulmonary artery dissection and 2 haemoptysis with clinical impairment were documented during the procedures; 27 patients had lung injury (radiographic opacity with/without hemoptysis and/or hypoxemia), none had renal dysfunction, 6 patients had access site complications. Five patients died during follow-up (none within 30 days from the procedure) because of sepsis (1), heart failure (1), cancer (1), arrhythmic storm (1) and sudden death in a patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis (1).ConclusionsBPA is a safe and effective treatment able to improve symptoms and hemodynamic profile in inoperable CTEPH patients and in patients with residual PH after PEA.</abstract><pub>by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc</pub><doi>10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.9682</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2019-11, Vol.140 (Suppl_1 Suppl 1), p.A9682-A9682
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00003017-201911191-00055
source American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
title Abstract 9682: Experience of Three Years of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in a Single Centre: Safety and Short Term Results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T08%3A27%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wolterskluwer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abstract%209682:%20Experience%20of%20Three%20Years%20of%20Balloon%20Pulmonary%20Angioplasty%20in%20a%20Single%20Centre:%20Safety%20and%20Short%20Term%20Results&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Palazzini,%20Massimiliano&rft.date=2019-11-19&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=Suppl_1%20Suppl%201&rft.spage=A9682&rft.epage=A9682&rft.pages=A9682-A9682&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.9682&rft_dat=%3Cwolterskluwer%3E00003017-201911191-00055%3C/wolterskluwer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true