Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Trial of Liquid Sodium PhosphateVersusTablet Sodium Phosphate

The aim of this study was to compare the colon-cleansing effectiveness, ease of consumption, and side effect profiles of two commercially available preparations of sodium phosphateliquid Fleet Phospho-soda and Visicol tablets. Outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy were sequentially randomized...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of gastroenterology 2003-04, Vol.98 (4), p.827-832
Hauptverfasser: Balaban, David H, Leavell, Byrd S, Oblinger, Michael J, Thompson, William O, Bolton, Nancy D, Pambianco, Daniel J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 832
container_issue 4
container_start_page 827
container_title The American journal of gastroenterology
container_volume 98
creator Balaban, David H
Leavell, Byrd S
Oblinger, Michael J
Thompson, William O
Bolton, Nancy D
Pambianco, Daniel J
description The aim of this study was to compare the colon-cleansing effectiveness, ease of consumption, and side effect profiles of two commercially available preparations of sodium phosphateliquid Fleet Phospho-soda and Visicol tablets. Outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy were sequentially randomized to one of two preparation groupsliquid45 ml at 7:00 PM, 45 ml 3 h before colonoscopy; or tablet20 tablets at 7:00 PM, 20 tablets 3–5 h before colonoscopy. Subjects rated preparation tolerability on a 5-point Likert scale. A Residual Stool Score was calculated for each subject based on the amount of stool, consistency of residual stool, and percent of bowel visualized (range 0–11, 0 = best). The endoscopists were blinded to the preparation used. A total of 101 subjects were enrolled (43 male, 58 female, mean age 58.2 yr). The groups were similar in age and indications for colonoscopy. Overall, bowel cleansing was rated “Excellent” or “Good” in 92% of liquid preparation subjects, compared with 74% of tablet preparation subjects (p= 0.03). Subjects in the liquid group demonstrated significantly less residual stool than did tablet subjects (Residual Stool Scoresliquid 1.3 ± 1.2 vs tablet 1.9 ± 1.5, p < 0.05). Subjects rated the liquid preparation easier to swallow (p < 0.005) and more convenient to take (p < 0.005) than tablets. Among liquid subjects, 45 of 50 reported a willingness to take their preparation for future colonoscopies, compared with 36 of 49 who took tablet sodium phosphate (p < 0.04). Liquid sodium phosphate is better tolerated and more effective at colon cleansing when compared with sodium phosphate in tablet form.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wolterskluwer</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00000434-200304000-00021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00000434-200304000-00021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00000434-200304000-000213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdT7tOwzAU9QAS5fEP9wNwuHYSBRhbFTF0qCDqWhl8o7g4ucV2FOAX-GkSiY2Ns5yXznCEAIWZmnBzyFRZaYm6UJlGzDOs8lvMPk7EAhG1vNMVnonzGA-IqtRVuRDfGx5hx37oCJY8kodtoKMJJjnuoeEAK_bcc3zl4-c9PJnecue-yF7DepJz7GKSS-96Sxbq4IwHbmDj3gdn4ZmtGzrYthyPrUm0oxCHWJsXT-lPeSlOG-MjXf3yhSge1vXqUY7s0zR888NIYd-S8and44wiL-T8FIvJyPmkyv85-wFupWMT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Trial of Liquid Sodium PhosphateVersusTablet Sodium Phosphate</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Balaban, David H ; Leavell, Byrd S ; Oblinger, Michael J ; Thompson, William O ; Bolton, Nancy D ; Pambianco, Daniel J</creator><creatorcontrib>Balaban, David H ; Leavell, Byrd S ; Oblinger, Michael J ; Thompson, William O ; Bolton, Nancy D ; Pambianco, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare the colon-cleansing effectiveness, ease of consumption, and side effect profiles of two commercially available preparations of sodium phosphateliquid Fleet Phospho-soda and Visicol tablets. Outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy were sequentially randomized to one of two preparation groupsliquid45 ml at 7:00 PM, 45 ml 3 h before colonoscopy; or tablet20 tablets at 7:00 PM, 20 tablets 3–5 h before colonoscopy. Subjects rated preparation tolerability on a 5-point Likert scale. A Residual Stool Score was calculated for each subject based on the amount of stool, consistency of residual stool, and percent of bowel visualized (range 0–11, 0 = best). The endoscopists were blinded to the preparation used. A total of 101 subjects were enrolled (43 male, 58 female, mean age 58.2 yr). The groups were similar in age and indications for colonoscopy. Overall, bowel cleansing was rated “Excellent” or “Good” in 92% of liquid preparation subjects, compared with 74% of tablet preparation subjects (p= 0.03). Subjects in the liquid group demonstrated significantly less residual stool than did tablet subjects (Residual Stool Scoresliquid 1.3 ± 1.2 vs tablet 1.9 ± 1.5, p &lt; 0.05). Subjects rated the liquid preparation easier to swallow (p &lt; 0.005) and more convenient to take (p &lt; 0.005) than tablets. Among liquid subjects, 45 of 50 reported a willingness to take their preparation for future colonoscopies, compared with 36 of 49 who took tablet sodium phosphate (p &lt; 0.04). Liquid sodium phosphate is better tolerated and more effective at colon cleansing when compared with sodium phosphate in tablet form.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>.</publisher><ispartof>The American journal of gastroenterology, 2003-04, Vol.98 (4), p.827-832</ispartof><rights>All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balaban, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leavell, Byrd S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oblinger, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, William O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, Nancy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pambianco, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><title>Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Trial of Liquid Sodium PhosphateVersusTablet Sodium Phosphate</title><title>The American journal of gastroenterology</title><description>The aim of this study was to compare the colon-cleansing effectiveness, ease of consumption, and side effect profiles of two commercially available preparations of sodium phosphateliquid Fleet Phospho-soda and Visicol tablets. Outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy were sequentially randomized to one of two preparation groupsliquid45 ml at 7:00 PM, 45 ml 3 h before colonoscopy; or tablet20 tablets at 7:00 PM, 20 tablets 3–5 h before colonoscopy. Subjects rated preparation tolerability on a 5-point Likert scale. A Residual Stool Score was calculated for each subject based on the amount of stool, consistency of residual stool, and percent of bowel visualized (range 0–11, 0 = best). The endoscopists were blinded to the preparation used. A total of 101 subjects were enrolled (43 male, 58 female, mean age 58.2 yr). The groups were similar in age and indications for colonoscopy. Overall, bowel cleansing was rated “Excellent” or “Good” in 92% of liquid preparation subjects, compared with 74% of tablet preparation subjects (p= 0.03). Subjects in the liquid group demonstrated significantly less residual stool than did tablet subjects (Residual Stool Scoresliquid 1.3 ± 1.2 vs tablet 1.9 ± 1.5, p &lt; 0.05). Subjects rated the liquid preparation easier to swallow (p &lt; 0.005) and more convenient to take (p &lt; 0.005) than tablets. Among liquid subjects, 45 of 50 reported a willingness to take their preparation for future colonoscopies, compared with 36 of 49 who took tablet sodium phosphate (p &lt; 0.04). Liquid sodium phosphate is better tolerated and more effective at colon cleansing when compared with sodium phosphate in tablet form.</description><issn>0002-9270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqdT7tOwzAU9QAS5fEP9wNwuHYSBRhbFTF0qCDqWhl8o7g4ucV2FOAX-GkSiY2Ns5yXznCEAIWZmnBzyFRZaYm6UJlGzDOs8lvMPk7EAhG1vNMVnonzGA-IqtRVuRDfGx5hx37oCJY8kodtoKMJJjnuoeEAK_bcc3zl4-c9PJnecue-yF7DepJz7GKSS-96Sxbq4IwHbmDj3gdn4ZmtGzrYthyPrUm0oxCHWJsXT-lPeSlOG-MjXf3yhSge1vXqUY7s0zR888NIYd-S8and44wiL-T8FIvJyPmkyv85-wFupWMT</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Balaban, David H</creator><creator>Leavell, Byrd S</creator><creator>Oblinger, Michael J</creator><creator>Thompson, William O</creator><creator>Bolton, Nancy D</creator><creator>Pambianco, Daniel J</creator><general>.</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Trial of Liquid Sodium PhosphateVersusTablet Sodium Phosphate</title><author>Balaban, David H ; Leavell, Byrd S ; Oblinger, Michael J ; Thompson, William O ; Bolton, Nancy D ; Pambianco, Daniel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wolterskluwer_health_00000434-200304000-000213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balaban, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leavell, Byrd S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oblinger, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, William O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, Nancy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pambianco, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The American journal of gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balaban, David H</au><au>Leavell, Byrd S</au><au>Oblinger, Michael J</au><au>Thompson, William O</au><au>Bolton, Nancy D</au><au>Pambianco, Daniel J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Trial of Liquid Sodium PhosphateVersusTablet Sodium Phosphate</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of gastroenterology</jtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>827</spage><epage>832</epage><pages>827-832</pages><issn>0002-9270</issn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare the colon-cleansing effectiveness, ease of consumption, and side effect profiles of two commercially available preparations of sodium phosphateliquid Fleet Phospho-soda and Visicol tablets. Outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy were sequentially randomized to one of two preparation groupsliquid45 ml at 7:00 PM, 45 ml 3 h before colonoscopy; or tablet20 tablets at 7:00 PM, 20 tablets 3–5 h before colonoscopy. Subjects rated preparation tolerability on a 5-point Likert scale. A Residual Stool Score was calculated for each subject based on the amount of stool, consistency of residual stool, and percent of bowel visualized (range 0–11, 0 = best). The endoscopists were blinded to the preparation used. A total of 101 subjects were enrolled (43 male, 58 female, mean age 58.2 yr). The groups were similar in age and indications for colonoscopy. Overall, bowel cleansing was rated “Excellent” or “Good” in 92% of liquid preparation subjects, compared with 74% of tablet preparation subjects (p= 0.03). Subjects in the liquid group demonstrated significantly less residual stool than did tablet subjects (Residual Stool Scoresliquid 1.3 ± 1.2 vs tablet 1.9 ± 1.5, p &lt; 0.05). Subjects rated the liquid preparation easier to swallow (p &lt; 0.005) and more convenient to take (p &lt; 0.005) than tablets. Among liquid subjects, 45 of 50 reported a willingness to take their preparation for future colonoscopies, compared with 36 of 49 who took tablet sodium phosphate (p &lt; 0.04). Liquid sodium phosphate is better tolerated and more effective at colon cleansing when compared with sodium phosphate in tablet form.</abstract><pub>.</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9270
ispartof The American journal of gastroenterology, 2003-04, Vol.98 (4), p.827-832
issn 0002-9270
language eng
recordid cdi_wolterskluwer_health_00000434-200304000-00021
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Trial of Liquid Sodium PhosphateVersusTablet Sodium Phosphate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A06%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wolterskluwer&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20Volume%20Bowel%20Preparation%20for%20Colonoscopy:%20Randomized,%20Endoscopist-Blinded%20Trial%20of%20Liquid%20Sodium%20PhosphateVersusTablet%20Sodium%20Phosphate&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20gastroenterology&rft.au=Balaban,%20David%20H&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=827&rft.epage=832&rft.pages=827-832&rft.issn=0002-9270&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07380.x&rft_dat=%3Cwolterskluwer%3E00000434-200304000-00021%3C/wolterskluwer%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true