Healthy Subjects Experience Bowel Changes on Enteral Diets

Background: Tube‐fed patients frequently suffer from abnormal bowel function that affects intestinal bacteria and quality of life. Dietary fiber affects laxation and can be fermented by gut bacteria to metabolites that influence gut health and fecal moisture. The aim of this study was to compare the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition 2015-03, Vol.39 (3), p.337-343
Hauptverfasser: Koecher, Katie J., Thomas, William, Slavin, Joanne L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 343
container_issue 3
container_start_page 337
container_title JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
container_volume 39
creator Koecher, Katie J.
Thomas, William
Slavin, Joanne L.
description Background: Tube‐fed patients frequently suffer from abnormal bowel function that affects intestinal bacteria and quality of life. Dietary fiber affects laxation and can be fermented by gut bacteria to metabolites that influence gut health and fecal moisture. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a fiber‐blend fortified enteral formula (FB, 15 g/L), a fiber‐free formula (FF), and habitual diet on bowel function, fecal bacteria, and quality of life. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double‐blind, crossover design, 20 healthy subjects consumed both FF and FB for 14 days with a 4‐week washout. A 5‐day fecal collection was used to assess stool output, whole‐gut transit time (WGTT), total bacteria, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia, and bacteroides. Subject gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and side effects were also measured. Results: On formula diets, 5‐day fecal output decreased by >55% from habitual diet, but was 38% higher on FB than FF (P = .0321). WGTT was approximately 1.5 times longer on formula diets than habitual diet (P < .0004). Total bacteria declined from habitual diet on FF (P < .004), but not on FB. Numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli declined from habitual diet on both formula diets, but bifidobacteria was higher on FB compared with FF (P < .0001). Bacteroides and clostridia numbers did not change between diets. GIQLI and incidence of gas symptoms did not differ between formulas. Conclusions: Addition of a fiber blend moderated changes in bowel function and gut bacteria observed in healthy subjects consuming FF. These results support adding mixed fiber sources to enteral nutrition if no contraindication exists.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0148607113510523
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1177_0148607113510523_JPEN0337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JPEN0337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c947-1d575715eace4d9bb0c438ced1d4a899cdd041f8e3dde7158c01b660971575393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj1FLwzAUhYMoWKfvPuYPVO9dkqbxTWt1G0MF9x7S5M511G40ldl_74o--XQOfIcDH2PXCDeIWt8CyjwDjSgUgpqKE5agkZhOpZSnLBlxOvJzdhHjFgBEBpCwuxm5pt8M_P2r2pLvIy-_99TV1HriD7sDNbzYuPaDIt-1vGx76lzDH2vq4yU7W7sm0tVfTtjqqVwVs3T5-jwv7pepN1KnGJRWGhU5TzKYqgIvRe4pYJAuN8aHABLXOYkQ6LjLPWCVZWCOXSthxIRlv7eHuqHB7rv603WDRbCjt_3vbRdv5QsIocUPhltLhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthy Subjects Experience Bowel Changes on Enteral Diets</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Koecher, Katie J. ; Thomas, William ; Slavin, Joanne L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koecher, Katie J. ; Thomas, William ; Slavin, Joanne L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Tube‐fed patients frequently suffer from abnormal bowel function that affects intestinal bacteria and quality of life. Dietary fiber affects laxation and can be fermented by gut bacteria to metabolites that influence gut health and fecal moisture. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a fiber‐blend fortified enteral formula (FB, 15 g/L), a fiber‐free formula (FF), and habitual diet on bowel function, fecal bacteria, and quality of life. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double‐blind, crossover design, 20 healthy subjects consumed both FF and FB for 14 days with a 4‐week washout. A 5‐day fecal collection was used to assess stool output, whole‐gut transit time (WGTT), total bacteria, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia, and bacteroides. Subject gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and side effects were also measured. Results: On formula diets, 5‐day fecal output decreased by &gt;55% from habitual diet, but was 38% higher on FB than FF (P = .0321). WGTT was approximately 1.5 times longer on formula diets than habitual diet (P &lt; .0004). Total bacteria declined from habitual diet on FF (P &lt; .004), but not on FB. Numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli declined from habitual diet on both formula diets, but bifidobacteria was higher on FB compared with FF (P &lt; .0001). Bacteroides and clostridia numbers did not change between diets. GIQLI and incidence of gas symptoms did not differ between formulas. Conclusions: Addition of a fiber blend moderated changes in bowel function and gut bacteria observed in healthy subjects consuming FF. These results support adding mixed fiber sources to enteral nutrition if no contraindication exists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-6071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0148607113510523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>enteral formula ; fiber ; gut function</subject><ispartof>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2015-03, Vol.39 (3), p.337-343</ispartof><rights>2015 by The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c947-1d575715eace4d9bb0c438ced1d4a899cdd041f8e3dde7158c01b660971575393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177%2F0148607113510523$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1177%2F0148607113510523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koecher, Katie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slavin, Joanne L.</creatorcontrib><title>Healthy Subjects Experience Bowel Changes on Enteral Diets</title><title>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition</title><description>Background: Tube‐fed patients frequently suffer from abnormal bowel function that affects intestinal bacteria and quality of life. Dietary fiber affects laxation and can be fermented by gut bacteria to metabolites that influence gut health and fecal moisture. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a fiber‐blend fortified enteral formula (FB, 15 g/L), a fiber‐free formula (FF), and habitual diet on bowel function, fecal bacteria, and quality of life. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double‐blind, crossover design, 20 healthy subjects consumed both FF and FB for 14 days with a 4‐week washout. A 5‐day fecal collection was used to assess stool output, whole‐gut transit time (WGTT), total bacteria, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia, and bacteroides. Subject gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and side effects were also measured. Results: On formula diets, 5‐day fecal output decreased by &gt;55% from habitual diet, but was 38% higher on FB than FF (P = .0321). WGTT was approximately 1.5 times longer on formula diets than habitual diet (P &lt; .0004). Total bacteria declined from habitual diet on FF (P &lt; .004), but not on FB. Numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli declined from habitual diet on both formula diets, but bifidobacteria was higher on FB compared with FF (P &lt; .0001). Bacteroides and clostridia numbers did not change between diets. GIQLI and incidence of gas symptoms did not differ between formulas. Conclusions: Addition of a fiber blend moderated changes in bowel function and gut bacteria observed in healthy subjects consuming FF. These results support adding mixed fiber sources to enteral nutrition if no contraindication exists.</description><subject>enteral formula</subject><subject>fiber</subject><subject>gut function</subject><issn>0148-6071</issn><issn>1941-2444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpdj1FLwzAUhYMoWKfvPuYPVO9dkqbxTWt1G0MF9x7S5M511G40ldl_74o--XQOfIcDH2PXCDeIWt8CyjwDjSgUgpqKE5agkZhOpZSnLBlxOvJzdhHjFgBEBpCwuxm5pt8M_P2r2pLvIy-_99TV1HriD7sDNbzYuPaDIt-1vGx76lzDH2vq4yU7W7sm0tVfTtjqqVwVs3T5-jwv7pepN1KnGJRWGhU5TzKYqgIvRe4pYJAuN8aHABLXOYkQ6LjLPWCVZWCOXSthxIRlv7eHuqHB7rv603WDRbCjt_3vbRdv5QsIocUPhltLhw</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Koecher, Katie J.</creator><creator>Thomas, William</creator><creator>Slavin, Joanne L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>Healthy Subjects Experience Bowel Changes on Enteral Diets</title><author>Koecher, Katie J. ; Thomas, William ; Slavin, Joanne L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c947-1d575715eace4d9bb0c438ced1d4a899cdd041f8e3dde7158c01b660971575393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>enteral formula</topic><topic>fiber</topic><topic>gut function</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koecher, Katie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slavin, Joanne L.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koecher, Katie J.</au><au>Thomas, William</au><au>Slavin, Joanne L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthy Subjects Experience Bowel Changes on Enteral Diets</atitle><jtitle>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition</jtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>337-343</pages><issn>0148-6071</issn><eissn>1941-2444</eissn><abstract>Background: Tube‐fed patients frequently suffer from abnormal bowel function that affects intestinal bacteria and quality of life. Dietary fiber affects laxation and can be fermented by gut bacteria to metabolites that influence gut health and fecal moisture. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a fiber‐blend fortified enteral formula (FB, 15 g/L), a fiber‐free formula (FF), and habitual diet on bowel function, fecal bacteria, and quality of life. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double‐blind, crossover design, 20 healthy subjects consumed both FF and FB for 14 days with a 4‐week washout. A 5‐day fecal collection was used to assess stool output, whole‐gut transit time (WGTT), total bacteria, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia, and bacteroides. Subject gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and side effects were also measured. Results: On formula diets, 5‐day fecal output decreased by &gt;55% from habitual diet, but was 38% higher on FB than FF (P = .0321). WGTT was approximately 1.5 times longer on formula diets than habitual diet (P &lt; .0004). Total bacteria declined from habitual diet on FF (P &lt; .004), but not on FB. Numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli declined from habitual diet on both formula diets, but bifidobacteria was higher on FB compared with FF (P &lt; .0001). Bacteroides and clostridia numbers did not change between diets. GIQLI and incidence of gas symptoms did not differ between formulas. Conclusions: Addition of a fiber blend moderated changes in bowel function and gut bacteria observed in healthy subjects consuming FF. These results support adding mixed fiber sources to enteral nutrition if no contraindication exists.</abstract><cop>Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0148607113510523</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-6071
ispartof JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2015-03, Vol.39 (3), p.337-343
issn 0148-6071
1941-2444
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1177_0148607113510523_JPEN0337
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects enteral formula
fiber
gut function
title Healthy Subjects Experience Bowel Changes on Enteral Diets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthy%20Subjects%20Experience%20Bowel%20Changes%20on%20Enteral%20Diets&rft.jtitle=JPEN.%20Journal%20of%20parenteral%20and%20enteral%20nutrition&rft.au=Koecher,%20Katie%20J.&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=337-343&rft.issn=0148-6071&rft.eissn=1941-2444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0148607113510523&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3EJPEN0337%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true