TH-AB-207A-01: Contrast-Enhanced CT: Correlation of Radiation Dose and Biological Effect

Purpose: The potential risk from CT is generally characterized in terms of radiation dose. The presence of iodinated-contrast medium increases radiation dose. However, it is unclear how much of this increase is biologically relevant. The purpose of this study was to establish the contribution of dos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3859-3859
Hauptverfasser: Abadi, E, Sanders, J, Agasthya, G, Segars, P, Samei, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3859
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3859
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 43
creator Abadi, E
Sanders, J
Agasthya, G
Segars, P
Samei, E
description Purpose: The potential risk from CT is generally characterized in terms of radiation dose. The presence of iodinated-contrast medium increases radiation dose. However, it is unclear how much of this increase is biologically relevant. The purpose of this study was to establish the contribution of dose increase from iodine to biological effect. Methods: Radiation organ dose was estimated in 58 human (XCAT) phantoms “undergoing” chest CT examination (120 kVp, 9 mGy CTDI) on a simulated CT system (Definition Flash, Siemens) with and without iodinated-contrast agent (62.5 mL of iodine per subject). The dose without and with the presence of iodine was compared to the increase in foci per cell (a surrogate of DNA damage) measured before and after similar CT exams without and with contrast agent (Piechowiak et al. 2015). The data were analyzed to ascertain how the enhancement in biological effect in contrast-enhanced CTs correlated with the increase in dose due to the presence of iodine. Results: The presence of iodinated-contrast in CT increased the organ doses by 2% to 50% on average. Typical values were heart (50%±7%), kidney (19%±7%), and liver (2%±3%). The corresponding increase in the average foci per cell was 107%±19%, indicating biological effect of iodine was greater than what would be anticipated from the iodine-initiated increase in radiation dose alone. Conclusion: Mean foci per cell and organ dose both increase in the presence of contrast agent. The former, however, is at least twice as large as the latter, indicating that iodine contributes to an increase in the probability of DNA damage not only as a consequence of increased x-ray energy deposition but also from other mechanisms. Hence iodine radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, still can underestimate the biological effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4958077
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4958077_MP8077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP8077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-6804ff21de714d5909a0b81ef42b565d09ad9d955644d4300d93defb0789a3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_8GCJ4XUSTbZbLy1a7VCRZEK3kKaDxtZN7JZkP57t26vehre4eGd4UHonMCEEFJekwmTvAQhDtCIMpFjRkEeohGAZJgy4MfoJKUPAChyDiP0tlrg6QxTEFMM5CarYtO1OnV43mx0Y5zNqtVu27au1l2ITRZ99qJtGMJtTC7Tjc1mIdbxPRhdZ3PvnelO0ZHXdXJn-zlGr3fzVbXAy6f7h2q6xIYILnBRAvOeEusEYZZLkBrWJXGe0TUvuO2zlVZyXjBmWQ5gZW6dX4Mopc7dOh-ji6E3pi6oZELnzMbEpul_UJQWQlIqe-pyoEwbU2qdV19t-NTtVhFQO3GKqL24nsUD-x1qt_0bVI_Pe_5q4HfHf7X8U_4DQPl3Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>TH-AB-207A-01: Contrast-Enhanced CT: Correlation of Radiation Dose and Biological Effect</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Abadi, E ; Sanders, J ; Agasthya, G ; Segars, P ; Samei, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Abadi, E ; Sanders, J ; Agasthya, G ; Segars, P ; Samei, E</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The potential risk from CT is generally characterized in terms of radiation dose. The presence of iodinated-contrast medium increases radiation dose. However, it is unclear how much of this increase is biologically relevant. The purpose of this study was to establish the contribution of dose increase from iodine to biological effect. Methods: Radiation organ dose was estimated in 58 human (XCAT) phantoms “undergoing” chest CT examination (120 kVp, 9 mGy CTDI) on a simulated CT system (Definition Flash, Siemens) with and without iodinated-contrast agent (62.5 mL of iodine per subject). The dose without and with the presence of iodine was compared to the increase in foci per cell (a surrogate of DNA damage) measured before and after similar CT exams without and with contrast agent (Piechowiak et al. 2015). The data were analyzed to ascertain how the enhancement in biological effect in contrast-enhanced CTs correlated with the increase in dose due to the presence of iodine. Results: The presence of iodinated-contrast in CT increased the organ doses by 2% to 50% on average. Typical values were heart (50%±7%), kidney (19%±7%), and liver (2%±3%). The corresponding increase in the average foci per cell was 107%±19%, indicating biological effect of iodine was greater than what would be anticipated from the iodine-initiated increase in radiation dose alone. Conclusion: Mean foci per cell and organ dose both increase in the presence of contrast agent. The former, however, is at least twice as large as the latter, indicating that iodine contributes to an increase in the probability of DNA damage not only as a consequence of increased x-ray energy deposition but also from other mechanisms. Hence iodine radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, still can underestimate the biological effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4958077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS ; CONTRAST MEDIA ; Data analysis ; DNA ; DNA DAMAGES ; Dosimetry ; ENERGY ABSORPTION ; ENERGY LOSSES ; Heart ; IODINE ; Kidneys ; Liver ; RADIATION DOSES ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; X RADIATION ; X‐ray effects ; X‐rays</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3859-3859</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-6804ff21de714d5909a0b81ef42b565d09ad9d955644d4300d93defb0789a3eb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4958077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22679229$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abadi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agasthya, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segars, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, E</creatorcontrib><title>TH-AB-207A-01: Contrast-Enhanced CT: Correlation of Radiation Dose and Biological Effect</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: The potential risk from CT is generally characterized in terms of radiation dose. The presence of iodinated-contrast medium increases radiation dose. However, it is unclear how much of this increase is biologically relevant. The purpose of this study was to establish the contribution of dose increase from iodine to biological effect. Methods: Radiation organ dose was estimated in 58 human (XCAT) phantoms “undergoing” chest CT examination (120 kVp, 9 mGy CTDI) on a simulated CT system (Definition Flash, Siemens) with and without iodinated-contrast agent (62.5 mL of iodine per subject). The dose without and with the presence of iodine was compared to the increase in foci per cell (a surrogate of DNA damage) measured before and after similar CT exams without and with contrast agent (Piechowiak et al. 2015). The data were analyzed to ascertain how the enhancement in biological effect in contrast-enhanced CTs correlated with the increase in dose due to the presence of iodine. Results: The presence of iodinated-contrast in CT increased the organ doses by 2% to 50% on average. Typical values were heart (50%±7%), kidney (19%±7%), and liver (2%±3%). The corresponding increase in the average foci per cell was 107%±19%, indicating biological effect of iodine was greater than what would be anticipated from the iodine-initiated increase in radiation dose alone. Conclusion: Mean foci per cell and organ dose both increase in the presence of contrast agent. The former, however, is at least twice as large as the latter, indicating that iodine contributes to an increase in the probability of DNA damage not only as a consequence of increased x-ray energy deposition but also from other mechanisms. Hence iodine radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, still can underestimate the biological effects.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS</subject><subject>CONTRAST MEDIA</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA DAMAGES</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>ENERGY ABSORPTION</subject><subject>ENERGY LOSSES</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>IODINE</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><subject>X‐ray effects</subject><subject>X‐rays</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_8GCJ4XUSTbZbLy1a7VCRZEK3kKaDxtZN7JZkP57t26vehre4eGd4UHonMCEEFJekwmTvAQhDtCIMpFjRkEeohGAZJgy4MfoJKUPAChyDiP0tlrg6QxTEFMM5CarYtO1OnV43mx0Y5zNqtVu27au1l2ITRZ99qJtGMJtTC7Tjc1mIdbxPRhdZ3PvnelO0ZHXdXJn-zlGr3fzVbXAy6f7h2q6xIYILnBRAvOeEusEYZZLkBrWJXGe0TUvuO2zlVZyXjBmWQ5gZW6dX4Mopc7dOh-ji6E3pi6oZELnzMbEpul_UJQWQlIqe-pyoEwbU2qdV19t-NTtVhFQO3GKqL24nsUD-x1qt_0bVI_Pe_5q4HfHf7X8U_4DQPl3Tg</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Abadi, E</creator><creator>Sanders, J</creator><creator>Agasthya, G</creator><creator>Segars, P</creator><creator>Samei, E</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>TH-AB-207A-01: Contrast-Enhanced CT: Correlation of Radiation Dose and Biological Effect</title><author>Abadi, E ; Sanders, J ; Agasthya, G ; Segars, P ; Samei, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1757-6804ff21de714d5909a0b81ef42b565d09ad9d955644d4300d93defb0789a3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS</topic><topic>CONTRAST MEDIA</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA DAMAGES</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>ENERGY ABSORPTION</topic><topic>ENERGY LOSSES</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>IODINE</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><topic>X‐ray effects</topic><topic>X‐rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abadi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agasthya, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segars, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abadi, E</au><au>Sanders, J</au><au>Agasthya, G</au><au>Segars, P</au><au>Samei, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TH-AB-207A-01: Contrast-Enhanced CT: Correlation of Radiation Dose and Biological Effect</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3859</spage><epage>3859</epage><pages>3859-3859</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: The potential risk from CT is generally characterized in terms of radiation dose. The presence of iodinated-contrast medium increases radiation dose. However, it is unclear how much of this increase is biologically relevant. The purpose of this study was to establish the contribution of dose increase from iodine to biological effect. Methods: Radiation organ dose was estimated in 58 human (XCAT) phantoms “undergoing” chest CT examination (120 kVp, 9 mGy CTDI) on a simulated CT system (Definition Flash, Siemens) with and without iodinated-contrast agent (62.5 mL of iodine per subject). The dose without and with the presence of iodine was compared to the increase in foci per cell (a surrogate of DNA damage) measured before and after similar CT exams without and with contrast agent (Piechowiak et al. 2015). The data were analyzed to ascertain how the enhancement in biological effect in contrast-enhanced CTs correlated with the increase in dose due to the presence of iodine. Results: The presence of iodinated-contrast in CT increased the organ doses by 2% to 50% on average. Typical values were heart (50%±7%), kidney (19%±7%), and liver (2%±3%). The corresponding increase in the average foci per cell was 107%±19%, indicating biological effect of iodine was greater than what would be anticipated from the iodine-initiated increase in radiation dose alone. Conclusion: Mean foci per cell and organ dose both increase in the presence of contrast agent. The former, however, is at least twice as large as the latter, indicating that iodine contributes to an increase in the probability of DNA damage not only as a consequence of increased x-ray energy deposition but also from other mechanisms. Hence iodine radiation dose, while relevant to be included in estimating the risk associated with contrast-enhanced CT, still can underestimate the biological effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4958077</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-06, Vol.43 (6), p.3859-3859
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4958077_MP8077
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
CONTRAST MEDIA
Data analysis
DNA
DNA DAMAGES
Dosimetry
ENERGY ABSORPTION
ENERGY LOSSES
Heart
IODINE
Kidneys
Liver
RADIATION DOSES
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
X RADIATION
X‐ray effects
X‐rays
title TH-AB-207A-01: Contrast-Enhanced CT: Correlation of Radiation Dose and Biological Effect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A55%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TH-AB-207A-01:%20Contrast-Enhanced%20CT:%20Correlation%20of%20Radiation%20Dose%20and%20Biological%20Effect&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Abadi,%20E&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3859&rft.epage=3859&rft.pages=3859-3859&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4958077&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_scita%3EMP8077%3C/wiley_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true