Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: From unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration

Purpose: A novel unconditionally stable, explicit numerical method is introduced to the field of modeling brain cancer progression on a tissue level together with an inverse problem (IP) based on optimal control theory that allows for automated model calibration with respect to observations in clini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4444-4459
Hauptverfasser: Mang, Andreas, Toma, Alina, Schuetz, Tina A., Becker, Stefan, Eckey, Thomas, Mohr, Christian, Petersen, Dirk, Buzug, Thorsten M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4459
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4444
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 39
creator Mang, Andreas
Toma, Alina
Schuetz, Tina A.
Becker, Stefan
Eckey, Thomas
Mohr, Christian
Petersen, Dirk
Buzug, Thorsten M.
description Purpose: A novel unconditionally stable, explicit numerical method is introduced to the field of modeling brain cancer progression on a tissue level together with an inverse problem (IP) based on optimal control theory that allows for automated model calibration with respect to observations in clinical imaging data. Methods: Biophysical models of cancer progression on a tissue level are in general based on the assumption that the spatiotemporal spread of cancerous cells is determined by cell division and net migration. These processes are typically described in terms of a parabolic partial differential equation (PDE). In the present work a parallelized implementation of an unconditionally stable, explicit Euler (EE⋆) time integration method for the solution of this PDE is detailed. The key idea of the discussed EE⋆ method is to relax the strong stability requirement on the spectral radius of the coefficient matrix by introducing a subdivision regime for a given outer time step. The performance is related to common implicit numerical methods. To quantify the numerical error, a simplified model that has a closed form solution is considered. To allow for a systematic, phenomenological validation a novel approach for automated model calibration on the basis of observations in medical imaging data is developed. The resulting IP is based on optimal control theory and manifests as a large scale, PDE constrained optimization problem. Results: The numerical error of the EE⋆ method is at the order of standard implicit numerical methods. The computing times are well below those obtained for implicit methods and by that demonstrate efficiency. Qualitative and quantitative analysis in 12 patients demonstrates that the obtained results are in strong agreement with observations in medical imaging data. Rating simulation success in terms of the mean overlap between model predictions and manual expert segmentations yields a success rate of 75% (9 out of 12 patients). Conclusions: The discussed EE⋆ method provides desirable features for image-based model calibration or hybrid image registration algorithms in which the model serves as a biophysical prior. This is due to (i) ease of implementation, (ii) low memory requirements, (iii) efficiency, (iv) a straightforward interface for parameter updates, and (v) the fact that the method is inherently matrix-free. The explicit time integration method is confirmed via experiments for automated model calibration. Qualitative and qua
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4722749
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4722749_MP2749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1030076712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3599-490831043d811064d5fca9c0de6693037f45ff2b06bc8510d93f59065178c0023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCghdAs0RIKeOfxDE7KC1FKqILWEdO4twaOXGwnZb7WLwhTu9thYTEaqTxN-cczxDykuIJpbR-S0-EZEwK9YhsmJC8EAzVY7JBVKJgAssj8izGH4hY8RKfkiPGao5Syg35_cH6-XoXbacdjL43zk5b8AO0QdsJ0jL6AHPw22BitH56B-fBj7BMnZ96m3JHO7eDmHTrDJhfs7OdTZDsaMBOyWyDXiFIHvSUOzcmRLMKZnyEW5uuYdZBtz7PwdXHM8i6Ma3eKcKQve8yQU5n273Uc_Jk0C6aF4d6TL6fn307vSguv376fPr-suh4qVQhFNacouB9TSlWoi-HTqsOe1NViiOXgyiHgbVYtV1dUuwVH0qFVUll3SEyfkxe73Vz2J-LiakZbeyMc3oyfokNRY4oK0lX9NUBXdrR9M0c7KjDrrlfcwaKPXBrndk9vFNs1vs1tDncr_lytZbMv9nzMS_z7tcPMzc-_MXP_fA_-B8D_gcLwqsf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030076712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: From unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mang, Andreas ; Toma, Alina ; Schuetz, Tina A. ; Becker, Stefan ; Eckey, Thomas ; Mohr, Christian ; Petersen, Dirk ; Buzug, Thorsten M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mang, Andreas ; Toma, Alina ; Schuetz, Tina A. ; Becker, Stefan ; Eckey, Thomas ; Mohr, Christian ; Petersen, Dirk ; Buzug, Thorsten M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: A novel unconditionally stable, explicit numerical method is introduced to the field of modeling brain cancer progression on a tissue level together with an inverse problem (IP) based on optimal control theory that allows for automated model calibration with respect to observations in clinical imaging data. Methods: Biophysical models of cancer progression on a tissue level are in general based on the assumption that the spatiotemporal spread of cancerous cells is determined by cell division and net migration. These processes are typically described in terms of a parabolic partial differential equation (PDE). In the present work a parallelized implementation of an unconditionally stable, explicit Euler (EE⋆) time integration method for the solution of this PDE is detailed. The key idea of the discussed EE⋆ method is to relax the strong stability requirement on the spectral radius of the coefficient matrix by introducing a subdivision regime for a given outer time step. The performance is related to common implicit numerical methods. To quantify the numerical error, a simplified model that has a closed form solution is considered. To allow for a systematic, phenomenological validation a novel approach for automated model calibration on the basis of observations in medical imaging data is developed. The resulting IP is based on optimal control theory and manifests as a large scale, PDE constrained optimization problem. Results: The numerical error of the EE⋆ method is at the order of standard implicit numerical methods. The computing times are well below those obtained for implicit methods and by that demonstrate efficiency. Qualitative and quantitative analysis in 12 patients demonstrates that the obtained results are in strong agreement with observations in medical imaging data. Rating simulation success in terms of the mean overlap between model predictions and manual expert segmentations yields a success rate of 75% (9 out of 12 patients). Conclusions: The discussed EE⋆ method provides desirable features for image-based model calibration or hybrid image registration algorithms in which the model serves as a biophysical prior. This is due to (i) ease of implementation, (ii) low memory requirements, (iii) efficiency, (iv) a straightforward interface for parameter updates, and (v) the fact that the method is inherently matrix-free. The explicit time integration method is confirmed via experiments for automated model calibration. Qualitative and quantitative analysis demonstrates that the proposed framework allows for recovering observations in medical imaging data and by that phenomenological model validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4722749</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22830777</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical modeling ; brain ; Brain - pathology ; Brain - physiopathology ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain Neoplasms - physiopathology ; brain tumor growth ; calibration ; Cancer ; cellular biophysics ; Computer Simulation ; Diffusion ; fast explicit diffusion ; Glioma - pathology ; Glioma - physiopathology ; Growth and division ; Humans ; inverse problem ; inverse problems ; Medical imaging ; model calibration ; Modeling, computer simulation of cell processes ; Models, Biological ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neuroscience ; numerical methods ; Numerical modeling ; Numerical solutions ; optimal control ; partial differential equations ; PDE constrained optimization ; Tensor methods ; Tissues ; tumours ; unconditionally stable explicit method</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4444-4459</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3599-490831043d811064d5fca9c0de6693037f45ff2b06bc8510d93f59065178c0023</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4722749$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4722749$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22830777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mang, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toma, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuetz, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckey, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzug, Thorsten M.</creatorcontrib><title>Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: From unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: A novel unconditionally stable, explicit numerical method is introduced to the field of modeling brain cancer progression on a tissue level together with an inverse problem (IP) based on optimal control theory that allows for automated model calibration with respect to observations in clinical imaging data. Methods: Biophysical models of cancer progression on a tissue level are in general based on the assumption that the spatiotemporal spread of cancerous cells is determined by cell division and net migration. These processes are typically described in terms of a parabolic partial differential equation (PDE). In the present work a parallelized implementation of an unconditionally stable, explicit Euler (EE⋆) time integration method for the solution of this PDE is detailed. The key idea of the discussed EE⋆ method is to relax the strong stability requirement on the spectral radius of the coefficient matrix by introducing a subdivision regime for a given outer time step. The performance is related to common implicit numerical methods. To quantify the numerical error, a simplified model that has a closed form solution is considered. To allow for a systematic, phenomenological validation a novel approach for automated model calibration on the basis of observations in medical imaging data is developed. The resulting IP is based on optimal control theory and manifests as a large scale, PDE constrained optimization problem. Results: The numerical error of the EE⋆ method is at the order of standard implicit numerical methods. The computing times are well below those obtained for implicit methods and by that demonstrate efficiency. Qualitative and quantitative analysis in 12 patients demonstrates that the obtained results are in strong agreement with observations in medical imaging data. Rating simulation success in terms of the mean overlap between model predictions and manual expert segmentations yields a success rate of 75% (9 out of 12 patients). Conclusions: The discussed EE⋆ method provides desirable features for image-based model calibration or hybrid image registration algorithms in which the model serves as a biophysical prior. This is due to (i) ease of implementation, (ii) low memory requirements, (iii) efficiency, (iv) a straightforward interface for parameter updates, and (v) the fact that the method is inherently matrix-free. The explicit time integration method is confirmed via experiments for automated model calibration. Qualitative and quantitative analysis demonstrates that the proposed framework allows for recovering observations in medical imaging data and by that phenomenological model validity.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>brain</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>brain tumor growth</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cellular biophysics</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>fast explicit diffusion</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Glioma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Growth and division</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inverse problem</subject><subject>inverse problems</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>model calibration</subject><subject>Modeling, computer simulation of cell processes</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>numerical methods</subject><subject>Numerical modeling</subject><subject>Numerical solutions</subject><subject>optimal control</subject><subject>partial differential equations</subject><subject>PDE constrained optimization</subject><subject>Tensor methods</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>tumours</subject><subject>unconditionally stable explicit method</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCghdAs0RIKeOfxDE7KC1FKqILWEdO4twaOXGwnZb7WLwhTu9thYTEaqTxN-cczxDykuIJpbR-S0-EZEwK9YhsmJC8EAzVY7JBVKJgAssj8izGH4hY8RKfkiPGao5Syg35_cH6-XoXbacdjL43zk5b8AO0QdsJ0jL6AHPw22BitH56B-fBj7BMnZ96m3JHO7eDmHTrDJhfs7OdTZDsaMBOyWyDXiFIHvSUOzcmRLMKZnyEW5uuYdZBtz7PwdXHM8i6Ma3eKcKQve8yQU5n273Uc_Jk0C6aF4d6TL6fn307vSguv376fPr-suh4qVQhFNacouB9TSlWoi-HTqsOe1NViiOXgyiHgbVYtV1dUuwVH0qFVUll3SEyfkxe73Vz2J-LiakZbeyMc3oyfokNRY4oK0lX9NUBXdrR9M0c7KjDrrlfcwaKPXBrndk9vFNs1vs1tDncr_lytZbMv9nzMS_z7tcPMzc-_MXP_fA_-B8D_gcLwqsf</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Mang, Andreas</creator><creator>Toma, Alina</creator><creator>Schuetz, Tina A.</creator><creator>Becker, Stefan</creator><creator>Eckey, Thomas</creator><creator>Mohr, Christian</creator><creator>Petersen, Dirk</creator><creator>Buzug, Thorsten M.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: From unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration</title><author>Mang, Andreas ; Toma, Alina ; Schuetz, Tina A. ; Becker, Stefan ; Eckey, Thomas ; Mohr, Christian ; Petersen, Dirk ; Buzug, Thorsten M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3599-490831043d811064d5fca9c0de6693037f45ff2b06bc8510d93f59065178c0023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>brain</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>brain tumor growth</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cellular biophysics</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>fast explicit diffusion</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Glioma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Growth and division</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inverse problem</topic><topic>inverse problems</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>model calibration</topic><topic>Modeling, computer simulation of cell processes</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>numerical methods</topic><topic>Numerical modeling</topic><topic>Numerical solutions</topic><topic>optimal control</topic><topic>partial differential equations</topic><topic>PDE constrained optimization</topic><topic>Tensor methods</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>tumours</topic><topic>unconditionally stable explicit method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mang, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toma, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuetz, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckey, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzug, Thorsten M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mang, Andreas</au><au>Toma, Alina</au><au>Schuetz, Tina A.</au><au>Becker, Stefan</au><au>Eckey, Thomas</au><au>Mohr, Christian</au><au>Petersen, Dirk</au><au>Buzug, Thorsten M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: From unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4444</spage><epage>4459</epage><pages>4444-4459</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: A novel unconditionally stable, explicit numerical method is introduced to the field of modeling brain cancer progression on a tissue level together with an inverse problem (IP) based on optimal control theory that allows for automated model calibration with respect to observations in clinical imaging data. Methods: Biophysical models of cancer progression on a tissue level are in general based on the assumption that the spatiotemporal spread of cancerous cells is determined by cell division and net migration. These processes are typically described in terms of a parabolic partial differential equation (PDE). In the present work a parallelized implementation of an unconditionally stable, explicit Euler (EE⋆) time integration method for the solution of this PDE is detailed. The key idea of the discussed EE⋆ method is to relax the strong stability requirement on the spectral radius of the coefficient matrix by introducing a subdivision regime for a given outer time step. The performance is related to common implicit numerical methods. To quantify the numerical error, a simplified model that has a closed form solution is considered. To allow for a systematic, phenomenological validation a novel approach for automated model calibration on the basis of observations in medical imaging data is developed. The resulting IP is based on optimal control theory and manifests as a large scale, PDE constrained optimization problem. Results: The numerical error of the EE⋆ method is at the order of standard implicit numerical methods. The computing times are well below those obtained for implicit methods and by that demonstrate efficiency. Qualitative and quantitative analysis in 12 patients demonstrates that the obtained results are in strong agreement with observations in medical imaging data. Rating simulation success in terms of the mean overlap between model predictions and manual expert segmentations yields a success rate of 75% (9 out of 12 patients). Conclusions: The discussed EE⋆ method provides desirable features for image-based model calibration or hybrid image registration algorithms in which the model serves as a biophysical prior. This is due to (i) ease of implementation, (ii) low memory requirements, (iii) efficiency, (iv) a straightforward interface for parameter updates, and (v) the fact that the method is inherently matrix-free. The explicit time integration method is confirmed via experiments for automated model calibration. Qualitative and quantitative analysis demonstrates that the proposed framework allows for recovering observations in medical imaging data and by that phenomenological model validity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>22830777</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4722749</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-07, Vol.39 (7), p.4444-4459
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_4722749_MP2749
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biomedical modeling
brain
Brain - pathology
Brain - physiopathology
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Brain Neoplasms - physiopathology
brain tumor growth
calibration
Cancer
cellular biophysics
Computer Simulation
Diffusion
fast explicit diffusion
Glioma - pathology
Glioma - physiopathology
Growth and division
Humans
inverse problem
inverse problems
Medical imaging
model calibration
Modeling, computer simulation of cell processes
Models, Biological
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neuroscience
numerical methods
Numerical modeling
Numerical solutions
optimal control
partial differential equations
PDE constrained optimization
Tensor methods
Tissues
tumours
unconditionally stable explicit method
title Biophysical modeling of brain tumor progression: From unconditionally stable explicit time integration to an inverse problem with parabolic PDE constraints for model calibration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T07%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biophysical%20modeling%20of%20brain%20tumor%20progression:%20From%20unconditionally%20stable%20explicit%20time%20integration%20to%20an%20inverse%20problem%20with%20parabolic%20PDE%20constraints%20for%20model%20calibration&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Mang,%20Andreas&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4444&rft.epage=4459&rft.pages=4444-4459&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4722749&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1030076712%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030076712&rft_id=info:pmid/22830777&rfr_iscdi=true