Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: Quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance
Purpose : To determine the quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance in detecting small lung nodules in pediatric CT. Methods : The study included clinical chest CT images of 30 pediatric patients (0–16 years) scanned at tube currents of 55–180 mA. Calibrated noise...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2011-05, Vol.38 (5), p.2609-2618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2618 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2609 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Li, Xiang Samei, Ehsan Barnhart, Huiman X. Gaca, Ana Maria Hollingsworth, Caroline L. Maxfield, Charles M. Carrico, Caroline W. T. Colsher, James G. Frush, Donald P. |
description | Purpose
: To determine the quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance in detecting small lung nodules in pediatric CT.
Methods
: The study included clinical chest CT images of 30 pediatric patients (0–16 years) scanned at tube currents of 55–180 mA. Calibrated noise addition software was used to simulate cases at three nominal mA settings: 70, 35, and 17.5 mA, resulting in quantum noise of 7–32 Hounsfield Unit (HU). Using a validated nodule simulation technique, lung nodules with diameters of 3–5 mm and peak contrasts of 200–500 HU were inserted into the cases, which were then randomized and rated independently by four experienced pediatric radiologists for nodule presence on a continuous scale from 0 (definitely absent) to 100 (definitely present). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data were analyzed to quantify the relationship between diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, AUC) and image quality (the product of nodule peak contrast and displayed diameter to noise ratio,
CDNR
display
).
Results
: AUC increased rapidly from 0.70 to 0.87 when
CDNR
display
increased from 60 to 130 mm, followed by a slow increase to 0.94 when
CDNR
display
further increased to 257 mm. For the average nodule diameter (4 mm) and contrast (350 HU), AUC decreased from 0.93 to 0.71 with noise increased from 7 to 28 HU.
Conclusions
: We quantified the relationship between image quality and the performance of radiologists in detecting lung nodules in pediatric CT. The relationship can guide CT protocol design to achieve the desired diagnostic performance at the lowest radiation dose.] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.3582975 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_3582975_MP2975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>878821861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4795-75396d1fced89575bcc7bfcba1d4322c5e5566f21ef97b253dc08c7d9231683b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9rFDEQx4NY7LX64D8geROEbfNjs0l8EMrRqnCiQn0O2WT2GtlLttls6_333fOuIkh9mof5zHeY-SD0mpIzSqk6p2dcKKaleIYWrJa8qhnRz9GCEF1XrCbiGJ2M409CSMMFeYGOGZWykVot0K_VFNc4Jj_1gD0UcCWkiEPEA_hgSw4OuxsYC15ev8ffJxtLKLaEO8AZeruDx5sw4BbKPcA8uLFrwLeT7UPZYhs9ztaH1Kd1mDMGyF3KGxsdvERHne1HeHWop-jH1eX18lO1-vrx8_JiVblaalFJwXXjaefAKy2kaJ2TbedaS33NGXMChGiajlHotGyZ4N4R5aTXjNNG8Zaforf73CGn22k-xGzC6KDvbYQ0jUZJpRhVDZ3JNwdyajfgzZDnY_LWPD5rBqo9cB962P7pU2J2Fgw1Bwvmy7ddmfkPe350v3-W4tMzOw1mr8E8apgD3j0VcJfyXwsH3_0P_mcbfwDeu6ya</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878821861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: Quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Xiang ; Samei, Ehsan ; Barnhart, Huiman X. ; Gaca, Ana Maria ; Hollingsworth, Caroline L. ; Maxfield, Charles M. ; Carrico, Caroline W. T. ; Colsher, James G. ; Frush, Donald P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiang ; Samei, Ehsan ; Barnhart, Huiman X. ; Gaca, Ana Maria ; Hollingsworth, Caroline L. ; Maxfield, Charles M. ; Carrico, Caroline W. T. ; Colsher, James G. ; Frush, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
: To determine the quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance in detecting small lung nodules in pediatric CT.
Methods
: The study included clinical chest CT images of 30 pediatric patients (0–16 years) scanned at tube currents of 55–180 mA. Calibrated noise addition software was used to simulate cases at three nominal mA settings: 70, 35, and 17.5 mA, resulting in quantum noise of 7–32 Hounsfield Unit (HU). Using a validated nodule simulation technique, lung nodules with diameters of 3–5 mm and peak contrasts of 200–500 HU were inserted into the cases, which were then randomized and rated independently by four experienced pediatric radiologists for nodule presence on a continuous scale from 0 (definitely absent) to 100 (definitely present). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data were analyzed to quantify the relationship between diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, AUC) and image quality (the product of nodule peak contrast and displayed diameter to noise ratio,
CDNR
display
).
Results
: AUC increased rapidly from 0.70 to 0.87 when
CDNR
display
increased from 60 to 130 mm, followed by a slow increase to 0.94 when
CDNR
display
further increased to 257 mm. For the average nodule diameter (4 mm) and contrast (350 HU), AUC decreased from 0.93 to 0.71 with noise increased from 7 to 28 HU.
Conclusions
: We quantified the relationship between image quality and the performance of radiologists in detecting lung nodules in pediatric CT. The relationship can guide CT protocol design to achieve the desired diagnostic performance at the lowest radiation dose.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3582975</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21776798</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Algorithms ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Computed tomography ; computerised tomography ; diagnostic accuracy ; dose ; dose reduction ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Female ; Humans ; image perception ; image quality ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; lesion simulation ; lung ; Lungs ; Male ; Medical image contrast ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image quality ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; noise simulation ; Observer Variation ; optimization ; paediatrics ; Professional Competence ; quantum noise ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiography, Thoracic - methods ; Radiologists ; receiver operating characteristic ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC ; sensitivity analysis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2011-05, Vol.38 (5), p.2609-2618</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4795-75396d1fced89575bcc7bfcba1d4322c5e5566f21ef97b253dc08c7d9231683b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4795-75396d1fced89575bcc7bfcba1d4322c5e5566f21ef97b253dc08c7d9231683b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.3582975$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.3582975$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21776798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnhart, Huiman X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaca, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, Caroline L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxfield, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrico, Caroline W. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colsher, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frush, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><title>Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: Quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose
: To determine the quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance in detecting small lung nodules in pediatric CT.
Methods
: The study included clinical chest CT images of 30 pediatric patients (0–16 years) scanned at tube currents of 55–180 mA. Calibrated noise addition software was used to simulate cases at three nominal mA settings: 70, 35, and 17.5 mA, resulting in quantum noise of 7–32 Hounsfield Unit (HU). Using a validated nodule simulation technique, lung nodules with diameters of 3–5 mm and peak contrasts of 200–500 HU were inserted into the cases, which were then randomized and rated independently by four experienced pediatric radiologists for nodule presence on a continuous scale from 0 (definitely absent) to 100 (definitely present). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data were analyzed to quantify the relationship between diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, AUC) and image quality (the product of nodule peak contrast and displayed diameter to noise ratio,
CDNR
display
).
Results
: AUC increased rapidly from 0.70 to 0.87 when
CDNR
display
increased from 60 to 130 mm, followed by a slow increase to 0.94 when
CDNR
display
further increased to 257 mm. For the average nodule diameter (4 mm) and contrast (350 HU), AUC decreased from 0.93 to 0.71 with noise increased from 7 to 28 HU.
Conclusions
: We quantified the relationship between image quality and the performance of radiologists in detecting lung nodules in pediatric CT. The relationship can guide CT protocol design to achieve the desired diagnostic performance at the lowest radiation dose.]</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>diagnostic accuracy</subject><subject>dose</subject><subject>dose reduction</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image perception</subject><subject>image quality</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>lesion simulation</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical image contrast</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>noise simulation</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>paediatrics</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>quantum noise</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</subject><subject>Radiologists</subject><subject>receiver operating characteristic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9rFDEQx4NY7LX64D8geROEbfNjs0l8EMrRqnCiQn0O2WT2GtlLttls6_333fOuIkh9mof5zHeY-SD0mpIzSqk6p2dcKKaleIYWrJa8qhnRz9GCEF1XrCbiGJ2M409CSMMFeYGOGZWykVot0K_VFNc4Jj_1gD0UcCWkiEPEA_hgSw4OuxsYC15ev8ffJxtLKLaEO8AZeruDx5sw4BbKPcA8uLFrwLeT7UPZYhs9ztaH1Kd1mDMGyF3KGxsdvERHne1HeHWop-jH1eX18lO1-vrx8_JiVblaalFJwXXjaefAKy2kaJ2TbedaS33NGXMChGiajlHotGyZ4N4R5aTXjNNG8Zaforf73CGn22k-xGzC6KDvbYQ0jUZJpRhVDZ3JNwdyajfgzZDnY_LWPD5rBqo9cB962P7pU2J2Fgw1Bwvmy7ddmfkPe350v3-W4tMzOw1mr8E8apgD3j0VcJfyXwsH3_0P_mcbfwDeu6ya</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Li, Xiang</creator><creator>Samei, Ehsan</creator><creator>Barnhart, Huiman X.</creator><creator>Gaca, Ana Maria</creator><creator>Hollingsworth, Caroline L.</creator><creator>Maxfield, Charles M.</creator><creator>Carrico, Caroline W. T.</creator><creator>Colsher, James G.</creator><creator>Frush, Donald P.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: Quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance</title><author>Li, Xiang ; Samei, Ehsan ; Barnhart, Huiman X. ; Gaca, Ana Maria ; Hollingsworth, Caroline L. ; Maxfield, Charles M. ; Carrico, Caroline W. T. ; Colsher, James G. ; Frush, Donald P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4795-75396d1fced89575bcc7bfcba1d4322c5e5566f21ef97b253dc08c7d9231683b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>diagnostic accuracy</topic><topic>dose</topic><topic>dose reduction</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image perception</topic><topic>image quality</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>lesion simulation</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical image contrast</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>noise simulation</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>paediatrics</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>quantum noise</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</topic><topic>Radiologists</topic><topic>receiver operating characteristic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnhart, Huiman X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaca, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, Caroline L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxfield, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrico, Caroline W. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colsher, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frush, Donald P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xiang</au><au>Samei, Ehsan</au><au>Barnhart, Huiman X.</au><au>Gaca, Ana Maria</au><au>Hollingsworth, Caroline L.</au><au>Maxfield, Charles M.</au><au>Carrico, Caroline W. T.</au><au>Colsher, James G.</au><au>Frush, Donald P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: Quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2609</spage><epage>2618</epage><pages>2609-2618</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose
: To determine the quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance in detecting small lung nodules in pediatric CT.
Methods
: The study included clinical chest CT images of 30 pediatric patients (0–16 years) scanned at tube currents of 55–180 mA. Calibrated noise addition software was used to simulate cases at three nominal mA settings: 70, 35, and 17.5 mA, resulting in quantum noise of 7–32 Hounsfield Unit (HU). Using a validated nodule simulation technique, lung nodules with diameters of 3–5 mm and peak contrasts of 200–500 HU were inserted into the cases, which were then randomized and rated independently by four experienced pediatric radiologists for nodule presence on a continuous scale from 0 (definitely absent) to 100 (definitely present). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data were analyzed to quantify the relationship between diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve, AUC) and image quality (the product of nodule peak contrast and displayed diameter to noise ratio,
CDNR
display
).
Results
: AUC increased rapidly from 0.70 to 0.87 when
CDNR
display
increased from 60 to 130 mm, followed by a slow increase to 0.94 when
CDNR
display
further increased to 257 mm. For the average nodule diameter (4 mm) and contrast (350 HU), AUC decreased from 0.93 to 0.71 with noise increased from 7 to 28 HU.
Conclusions
: We quantified the relationship between image quality and the performance of radiologists in detecting lung nodules in pediatric CT. The relationship can guide CT protocol design to achieve the desired diagnostic performance at the lowest radiation dose.]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>21776798</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.3582975</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2011-05, Vol.38 (5), p.2609-2618 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_3582975_MP2975 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Algorithms Child Child, Preschool Computed tomography computerised tomography diagnostic accuracy dose dose reduction dosimetry Dosimetry/exposure assessment Female Humans image perception image quality Infant Infant, Newborn lesion simulation lung Lungs Male Medical image contrast Medical image noise medical image processing Medical image quality Medical image reconstruction Medical imaging noise simulation Observer Variation optimization paediatrics Professional Competence quantum noise Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiography, Thoracic - methods Radiologists receiver operating characteristic Reproducibility of Results ROC sensitivity analysis Sensitivity and Specificity Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: Quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A27%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lung%20nodule%20detection%20in%20pediatric%20chest%20CT:%20Quantitative%20relationship%20between%20image%20quality%20and%20radiologist%20performance&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Li,%20Xiang&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2609&rft.epage=2618&rft.pages=2609-2618&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3582975&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E878821861%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878821861&rft_id=info:pmid/21776798&rfr_iscdi=true |