WE‐D‐L100J‐05: CuATSM and FLT PET Images Stabilization Assessment

Purpose: The level of correlation of a molecular imaging marker to the underlying biological information is critical, and depends on several factors, one of them being pharmacokinetics of the radioisotope uptake. The main aim of this work to assess the level of Cu‐diacetyl‐bis(N4‐methylthiosemicarba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2007-06, Vol.34 (6), p.2596-2596
Hauptverfasser: Simoncic, U, Jeraj, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2596
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2596
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 34
creator Simoncic, U
Jeraj, R
description Purpose: The level of correlation of a molecular imaging marker to the underlying biological information is critical, and depends on several factors, one of them being pharmacokinetics of the radioisotope uptake. The main aim of this work to assess the level of Cu‐diacetyl‐bis(N4‐methylthiosemicarbazone) ([Cu‐64]‐CuATSM) and 3′‐Deoxy‐3′‐fluorothymidine ([F‐18]‐FLT) uptake stability as a function of imaging time post‐injection to find an acceptable time window for image acquisition. Method and materials: Five canine patients (three nasal carcinomas, two sarcomas) with spontaneous tumors were scanned with CuATSM (hypoxia marker) and FLT (cell proliferation marker). The FLT scans were dynamic up to 70min. The CuATSM scans were dynamic for 3h and followed with a repeat scan at 24h. Correlation coefficients were calculated between individual frames of a dynamic scan and a reference PET image. For the CuATSM scan, the reference PET image was the CuATSM scan at 24h. For the FLT scan, the reference PET image was either the last frame (70min), or the image obtained with a three‐compartment kinetic modeling. The correlation was calculated based on the volume of interest, defined as a CT‐visible tumor with a small margin. Results: Our results indicate relative stability of the CuATSM uptake after approximately 1h, when the correlation coefficient increases over 0.9. Relatively low level of interpatient variability was observed. The FLT uptake analysis shows relatively fast stabilization, typically achieved within first 30min. The stability behavior was tumor‐type dependant. Relatively high correlation between the SUV (60–70 min) and kFLT was observed, warranting further investigation of true benefit of kinetic analysis. Conclusions: This work investigates spatial and temporal stability of CuATSM and FLT uptake in several tumor types. Due to significant variation in observed time required for image stabilization, we have to be aware that spatial distribution in different tumors can last longer than the initial transient indicates.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.2761541
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_2761541_MP1541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP1541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2171-f9a8616f516800b4d08b5b83d12c712cf5cb98a2e80b241a6426acf56e8893c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AYhBdRMFYPvsFeFVL_f7O72XgrNa2VFAsNeAybZCMraSvZSKknH8Fn9EmMJlc9DAPDx8AMIZcIY0RUNzhmoUTB8Yh4jIeBzxlEx8QDiLjPOIhTcubcCwDIQIBH5k_x18fnXacEAR46B3FLp2-TdL2kelvSWZLSVZzSxUY_G0fXrc5tbd91a3dbOnHOOLcx2_acnFS6duZi8BFJZ3E6vfeTx_liOkn8gmGIfhVpJVFWAqUCyHkJKhe5CkpkRdipEkUeKc2Mgpxx1JIzqbtUGqWioAhG5KqvLZqdc42pstfGbnRzyBCynwMyzIYDOtbv2b2tzeFvMFuuBv66511h2999_5R_A0jlZy8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>WE‐D‐L100J‐05: CuATSM and FLT PET Images Stabilization Assessment</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Simoncic, U ; Jeraj, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Simoncic, U ; Jeraj, R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The level of correlation of a molecular imaging marker to the underlying biological information is critical, and depends on several factors, one of them being pharmacokinetics of the radioisotope uptake. The main aim of this work to assess the level of Cu‐diacetyl‐bis(N4‐methylthiosemicarbazone) ([Cu‐64]‐CuATSM) and 3′‐Deoxy‐3′‐fluorothymidine ([F‐18]‐FLT) uptake stability as a function of imaging time post‐injection to find an acceptable time window for image acquisition. Method and materials: Five canine patients (three nasal carcinomas, two sarcomas) with spontaneous tumors were scanned with CuATSM (hypoxia marker) and FLT (cell proliferation marker). The FLT scans were dynamic up to 70min. The CuATSM scans were dynamic for 3h and followed with a repeat scan at 24h. Correlation coefficients were calculated between individual frames of a dynamic scan and a reference PET image. For the CuATSM scan, the reference PET image was the CuATSM scan at 24h. For the FLT scan, the reference PET image was either the last frame (70min), or the image obtained with a three‐compartment kinetic modeling. The correlation was calculated based on the volume of interest, defined as a CT‐visible tumor with a small margin. Results: Our results indicate relative stability of the CuATSM uptake after approximately 1h, when the correlation coefficient increases over 0.9. Relatively low level of interpatient variability was observed. The FLT uptake analysis shows relatively fast stabilization, typically achieved within first 30min. The stability behavior was tumor‐type dependant. Relatively high correlation between the SUV (60–70 min) and kFLT was observed, warranting further investigation of true benefit of kinetic analysis. Conclusions: This work investigates spatial and temporal stability of CuATSM and FLT uptake in several tumor types. Due to significant variation in observed time required for image stabilization, we have to be aware that spatial distribution in different tumors can last longer than the initial transient indicates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.2761541</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Bioinformatics ; Biomedical modeling ; Cancer ; Cell growth ; Digital image processing ; Medical imaging ; Positron emission tomography ; Radioisotopes ; Rotational correlation time</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2007-06, Vol.34 (6), p.2596-2596</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2171-f9a8616f516800b4d08b5b83d12c712cf5cb98a2e80b241a6426acf56e8893c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.2761541$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simoncic, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeraj, R</creatorcontrib><title>WE‐D‐L100J‐05: CuATSM and FLT PET Images Stabilization Assessment</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: The level of correlation of a molecular imaging marker to the underlying biological information is critical, and depends on several factors, one of them being pharmacokinetics of the radioisotope uptake. The main aim of this work to assess the level of Cu‐diacetyl‐bis(N4‐methylthiosemicarbazone) ([Cu‐64]‐CuATSM) and 3′‐Deoxy‐3′‐fluorothymidine ([F‐18]‐FLT) uptake stability as a function of imaging time post‐injection to find an acceptable time window for image acquisition. Method and materials: Five canine patients (three nasal carcinomas, two sarcomas) with spontaneous tumors were scanned with CuATSM (hypoxia marker) and FLT (cell proliferation marker). The FLT scans were dynamic up to 70min. The CuATSM scans were dynamic for 3h and followed with a repeat scan at 24h. Correlation coefficients were calculated between individual frames of a dynamic scan and a reference PET image. For the CuATSM scan, the reference PET image was the CuATSM scan at 24h. For the FLT scan, the reference PET image was either the last frame (70min), or the image obtained with a three‐compartment kinetic modeling. The correlation was calculated based on the volume of interest, defined as a CT‐visible tumor with a small margin. Results: Our results indicate relative stability of the CuATSM uptake after approximately 1h, when the correlation coefficient increases over 0.9. Relatively low level of interpatient variability was observed. The FLT uptake analysis shows relatively fast stabilization, typically achieved within first 30min. The stability behavior was tumor‐type dependant. Relatively high correlation between the SUV (60–70 min) and kFLT was observed, warranting further investigation of true benefit of kinetic analysis. Conclusions: This work investigates spatial and temporal stability of CuATSM and FLT uptake in several tumor types. Due to significant variation in observed time required for image stabilization, we have to be aware that spatial distribution in different tumors can last longer than the initial transient indicates.</description><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>Digital image processing</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Rotational correlation time</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AYhBdRMFYPvsFeFVL_f7O72XgrNa2VFAsNeAybZCMraSvZSKknH8Fn9EmMJlc9DAPDx8AMIZcIY0RUNzhmoUTB8Yh4jIeBzxlEx8QDiLjPOIhTcubcCwDIQIBH5k_x18fnXacEAR46B3FLp2-TdL2kelvSWZLSVZzSxUY_G0fXrc5tbd91a3dbOnHOOLcx2_acnFS6duZi8BFJZ3E6vfeTx_liOkn8gmGIfhVpJVFWAqUCyHkJKhe5CkpkRdipEkUeKc2Mgpxx1JIzqbtUGqWioAhG5KqvLZqdc42pstfGbnRzyBCynwMyzIYDOtbv2b2tzeFvMFuuBv66511h2999_5R_A0jlZy8</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Simoncic, U</creator><creator>Jeraj, R</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>WE‐D‐L100J‐05: CuATSM and FLT PET Images Stabilization Assessment</title><author>Simoncic, U ; Jeraj, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2171-f9a8616f516800b4d08b5b83d12c712cf5cb98a2e80b241a6426acf56e8893c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>Digital image processing</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Rotational correlation time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simoncic, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeraj, R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simoncic, U</au><au>Jeraj, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>WE‐D‐L100J‐05: CuATSM and FLT PET Images Stabilization Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2596</spage><epage>2596</epage><pages>2596-2596</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: The level of correlation of a molecular imaging marker to the underlying biological information is critical, and depends on several factors, one of them being pharmacokinetics of the radioisotope uptake. The main aim of this work to assess the level of Cu‐diacetyl‐bis(N4‐methylthiosemicarbazone) ([Cu‐64]‐CuATSM) and 3′‐Deoxy‐3′‐fluorothymidine ([F‐18]‐FLT) uptake stability as a function of imaging time post‐injection to find an acceptable time window for image acquisition. Method and materials: Five canine patients (three nasal carcinomas, two sarcomas) with spontaneous tumors were scanned with CuATSM (hypoxia marker) and FLT (cell proliferation marker). The FLT scans were dynamic up to 70min. The CuATSM scans were dynamic for 3h and followed with a repeat scan at 24h. Correlation coefficients were calculated between individual frames of a dynamic scan and a reference PET image. For the CuATSM scan, the reference PET image was the CuATSM scan at 24h. For the FLT scan, the reference PET image was either the last frame (70min), or the image obtained with a three‐compartment kinetic modeling. The correlation was calculated based on the volume of interest, defined as a CT‐visible tumor with a small margin. Results: Our results indicate relative stability of the CuATSM uptake after approximately 1h, when the correlation coefficient increases over 0.9. Relatively low level of interpatient variability was observed. The FLT uptake analysis shows relatively fast stabilization, typically achieved within first 30min. The stability behavior was tumor‐type dependant. Relatively high correlation between the SUV (60–70 min) and kFLT was observed, warranting further investigation of true benefit of kinetic analysis. Conclusions: This work investigates spatial and temporal stability of CuATSM and FLT uptake in several tumor types. Due to significant variation in observed time required for image stabilization, we have to be aware that spatial distribution in different tumors can last longer than the initial transient indicates.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.2761541</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2007-06, Vol.34 (6), p.2596-2596
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_2761541_MP1541
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bioinformatics
Biomedical modeling
Cancer
Cell growth
Digital image processing
Medical imaging
Positron emission tomography
Radioisotopes
Rotational correlation time
title WE‐D‐L100J‐05: CuATSM and FLT PET Images Stabilization Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A33%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=WE%E2%80%90D%E2%80%90L100J%E2%80%9005:%20CuATSM%20and%20FLT%20PET%20Images%20Stabilization%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Simoncic,%20U&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2596&rft.epage=2596&rft.pages=2596-2596&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.2761541&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP1541%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true