SU‐FF‐J‐66: Iso‐NTCP Dose Escalation with Image‐Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (IGART) for Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of various image‐guided target localization techniques to assist in the safe dose escalation for prostate cancer radiation therapy in the presence of geometric uncertainties. Method and Materials: Five prostate cancer patients were analyzed, retrospectively. All pat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2005-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1935-1935 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1935 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1935 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Song, W Schaly, B Bauman, G Battista, J Van Dyk, J |
description | Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of various image‐guided target localization techniques to assist in the safe dose escalation for prostate cancer radiation therapy in the presence of geometric uncertainties. Method and Materials: Five prostate cancer patients were analyzed, retrospectively. All patients were planned with an 18MV six‐field conformal technique with a 10 mm margin and an initial prescription dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. For the dose escalation study, the prescription dose was increased from 50 Gy in 2 Gy increments until the rectum normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) reached the level equal to that of the plan NTCP (i.e., iso‐NTCP). The target localization techniques simulated were (1) laser alignment to external tattoo marks, (2) alignment to bony landmarks with daily portal images, and (3) alignment to the clinical target volume (CTV) with daily CT imaging. Techniques (1) and (3) were re‐simulated with a reduced margin of 5 mm to investigate further dose escalation. Results: The selection of the target localization technique was less critical on the treatment outcome when 10 mm margin was used. Reducing the margin size from 10 to 5 mm effectively decreased the NTCP by ∼60 % for all patients. For iso‐NTCP dose escalation, to our surprise, the average dose and TCP gain for the five patients were largest with the external tattoo technique (6.4 Gy and 7.5 %, respectively) followed by the daily CTV and the bony landmarks. The variability in gain across the five patients, however, was also largest with the tattoo registration technique and smallest with the daily CTV technique. Conclusion: Based on these data, the best dose escalation strategy is to combine margin reduction (for increased normal tissue sparing) with the use of the daily CTV technique to localize the target volume (for consistent dosimetric coverage and escalation). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.1997612 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_1997612_MP7612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP7612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-29fa497735d3985f1fcbc1c967c90d1f595210c5e7f5f7b7766f58598406b40e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AYeKVKKncR2zFalF4IKVCWdI9exqVFbV3GgKhM7C8_Ik2BIVxjOZfjOd6QfgHOMuhjj5Ap3MeeM4vAAtMKYRUEcIn4IWgjxOAhjRI7BiXPPCCEaEdQCH4-zr_fP4dC3W1-UXsPMWb_d5-kE9q1TcOCkWIra2DXcmnoBs5V4Up4YvZhSlbBXik1tXhWcitI0WL5Qldjs4EU26k3zDtS2gmPrLebNH6SikmZtVwJaDeuFgpPKulrU6hQcabF06mw_22A2HOTpTTB-GGVpbxxIzFgYhFyLmDMWkTLiCdFYy7nEklMmOSqxJpyEGEmimCaazRmjVJOE8CRGdB4jFbVBp_FK_9hVShebyqxEtSswKn5SLHCxT9GzQcNuzVLt_gaLu8mev2x4J039m8Y_8m862oJf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐FF‐J‐66: Iso‐NTCP Dose Escalation with Image‐Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (IGART) for Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Song, W ; Schaly, B ; Bauman, G ; Battista, J ; Van Dyk, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, W ; Schaly, B ; Bauman, G ; Battista, J ; Van Dyk, J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of various image‐guided target localization techniques to assist in the safe dose escalation for prostate cancer radiation therapy in the presence of geometric uncertainties. Method and Materials: Five prostate cancer patients were analyzed, retrospectively. All patients were planned with an 18MV six‐field conformal technique with a 10 mm margin and an initial prescription dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. For the dose escalation study, the prescription dose was increased from 50 Gy in 2 Gy increments until the rectum normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) reached the level equal to that of the plan NTCP (i.e., iso‐NTCP). The target localization techniques simulated were (1) laser alignment to external tattoo marks, (2) alignment to bony landmarks with daily portal images, and (3) alignment to the clinical target volume (CTV) with daily CT imaging. Techniques (1) and (3) were re‐simulated with a reduced margin of 5 mm to investigate further dose escalation. Results: The selection of the target localization technique was less critical on the treatment outcome when 10 mm margin was used. Reducing the margin size from 10 to 5 mm effectively decreased the NTCP by ∼60 % for all patients. For iso‐NTCP dose escalation, to our surprise, the average dose and TCP gain for the five patients were largest with the external tattoo technique (6.4 Gy and 7.5 %, respectively) followed by the daily CTV and the bony landmarks. The variability in gain across the five patients, however, was also largest with the tattoo registration technique and smallest with the daily CTV technique. Conclusion: Based on these data, the best dose escalation strategy is to combine margin reduction (for increased normal tissue sparing) with the use of the daily CTV technique to localize the target volume (for consistent dosimetric coverage and escalation).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.1997612</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Adaptive radiation therapy ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Dosimetry ; Materials analysis ; Medical imaging ; Radiation therapy ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1935-1935</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.1997612$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaly, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battista, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dyk, J</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐FF‐J‐66: Iso‐NTCP Dose Escalation with Image‐Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (IGART) for Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of various image‐guided target localization techniques to assist in the safe dose escalation for prostate cancer radiation therapy in the presence of geometric uncertainties. Method and Materials: Five prostate cancer patients were analyzed, retrospectively. All patients were planned with an 18MV six‐field conformal technique with a 10 mm margin and an initial prescription dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. For the dose escalation study, the prescription dose was increased from 50 Gy in 2 Gy increments until the rectum normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) reached the level equal to that of the plan NTCP (i.e., iso‐NTCP). The target localization techniques simulated were (1) laser alignment to external tattoo marks, (2) alignment to bony landmarks with daily portal images, and (3) alignment to the clinical target volume (CTV) with daily CT imaging. Techniques (1) and (3) were re‐simulated with a reduced margin of 5 mm to investigate further dose escalation. Results: The selection of the target localization technique was less critical on the treatment outcome when 10 mm margin was used. Reducing the margin size from 10 to 5 mm effectively decreased the NTCP by ∼60 % for all patients. For iso‐NTCP dose escalation, to our surprise, the average dose and TCP gain for the five patients were largest with the external tattoo technique (6.4 Gy and 7.5 %, respectively) followed by the daily CTV and the bony landmarks. The variability in gain across the five patients, however, was also largest with the tattoo registration technique and smallest with the daily CTV technique. Conclusion: Based on these data, the best dose escalation strategy is to combine margin reduction (for increased normal tissue sparing) with the use of the daily CTV technique to localize the target volume (for consistent dosimetric coverage and escalation).</description><subject>Adaptive radiation therapy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Materials analysis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AYeKVKKncR2zFalF4IKVCWdI9exqVFbV3GgKhM7C8_Ik2BIVxjOZfjOd6QfgHOMuhjj5Ap3MeeM4vAAtMKYRUEcIn4IWgjxOAhjRI7BiXPPCCEaEdQCH4-zr_fP4dC3W1-UXsPMWb_d5-kE9q1TcOCkWIra2DXcmnoBs5V4Up4YvZhSlbBXik1tXhWcitI0WL5Qldjs4EU26k3zDtS2gmPrLebNH6SikmZtVwJaDeuFgpPKulrU6hQcabF06mw_22A2HOTpTTB-GGVpbxxIzFgYhFyLmDMWkTLiCdFYy7nEklMmOSqxJpyEGEmimCaazRmjVJOE8CRGdB4jFbVBp_FK_9hVShebyqxEtSswKn5SLHCxT9GzQcNuzVLt_gaLu8mev2x4J039m8Y_8m862oJf</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Song, W</creator><creator>Schaly, B</creator><creator>Bauman, G</creator><creator>Battista, J</creator><creator>Van Dyk, J</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>SU‐FF‐J‐66: Iso‐NTCP Dose Escalation with Image‐Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (IGART) for Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate</title><author>Song, W ; Schaly, B ; Bauman, G ; Battista, J ; Van Dyk, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1772-29fa497735d3985f1fcbc1c967c90d1f595210c5e7f5f7b7766f58598406b40e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptive radiation therapy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Materials analysis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaly, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battista, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dyk, J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, W</au><au>Schaly, B</au><au>Bauman, G</au><au>Battista, J</au><au>Van Dyk, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐FF‐J‐66: Iso‐NTCP Dose Escalation with Image‐Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (IGART) for Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1935</spage><epage>1935</epage><pages>1935-1935</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of various image‐guided target localization techniques to assist in the safe dose escalation for prostate cancer radiation therapy in the presence of geometric uncertainties. Method and Materials: Five prostate cancer patients were analyzed, retrospectively. All patients were planned with an 18MV six‐field conformal technique with a 10 mm margin and an initial prescription dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions. For the dose escalation study, the prescription dose was increased from 50 Gy in 2 Gy increments until the rectum normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) reached the level equal to that of the plan NTCP (i.e., iso‐NTCP). The target localization techniques simulated were (1) laser alignment to external tattoo marks, (2) alignment to bony landmarks with daily portal images, and (3) alignment to the clinical target volume (CTV) with daily CT imaging. Techniques (1) and (3) were re‐simulated with a reduced margin of 5 mm to investigate further dose escalation. Results: The selection of the target localization technique was less critical on the treatment outcome when 10 mm margin was used. Reducing the margin size from 10 to 5 mm effectively decreased the NTCP by ∼60 % for all patients. For iso‐NTCP dose escalation, to our surprise, the average dose and TCP gain for the five patients were largest with the external tattoo technique (6.4 Gy and 7.5 %, respectively) followed by the daily CTV and the bony landmarks. The variability in gain across the five patients, however, was also largest with the tattoo registration technique and smallest with the daily CTV technique. Conclusion: Based on these data, the best dose escalation strategy is to combine margin reduction (for increased normal tissue sparing) with the use of the daily CTV technique to localize the target volume (for consistent dosimetric coverage and escalation).</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.1997612</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2005-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1935-1935 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1118_1_1997612_MP7612 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adaptive radiation therapy Cancer Computed tomography Dosimetry Materials analysis Medical imaging Radiation therapy Tissues |
title | SU‐FF‐J‐66: Iso‐NTCP Dose Escalation with Image‐Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (IGART) for Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A27%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90FF%E2%80%90J%E2%80%9066:%20Iso%E2%80%90NTCP%20Dose%20Escalation%20with%20Image%E2%80%90Guided%20Adaptive%20Radiation%20Therapy%20(IGART)%20for%20Localized%20Carcinoma%20of%20the%20Prostate&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Song,%20W&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1935&rft.epage=1935&rft.pages=1935-1935&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.1997612&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP7612%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |