Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards

ABSTRACT Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Decision sciences 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.866-892
Hauptverfasser: Cai, Ya‐Jun, Choi, Tsan‐Ming, Zhang, Juzhi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 892
container_issue 4
container_start_page 866
container_title Decision sciences
container_volume 52
creator Cai, Ya‐Jun
Choi, Tsan‐Ming
Zhang, Juzhi
description ABSTRACT Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/deci.12475
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_deci_12475_DECI12475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559971053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEEmNw4RdE4obUkTR1H9ygDDYJNCTgHHl5sI6uKUknNH493YY44ott-bMtfYScczbifVxpo6oRj5MMDsiAQ8IiKDgckgFjnEeZ4HBMTkJYMsZSSMSA2OcaO-v8ir6s29b5zuhdVW9oucCqobPWeOwq1wTad93C0NvaqQ-1G449Xv_hruk8qq5q3ik2mj45jzWd4Dd6HU7JkcU6mLPfPCRv9-PXchI9zh6m5c1jpATjEAnUiWAij9N5miLmeW7i1CaFSOc5zJMYTFYIsFag0pAVVieZ0bEuuGJpbnIQQ3Kxv9t697k2oZNLt_ZN_1LGAEWRcQaipy73lPIuBG-sbH21Qr-RnMmtR7n1KHcee5jv4a-qNpt_SHk3Lqf7nR_U-3Ty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559971053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cai, Ya‐Jun ; Choi, Tsan‐Ming ; Zhang, Juzhi</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Ya‐Jun ; Choi, Tsan‐Ming ; Zhang, Juzhi</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/deci.12475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: American Institute for Decision Sciences</publisher><subject>Blockchain ; Consumers ; Contracts ; Coordination ; Cryptography ; Marginality ; Moral dilemmas ; Moral hazard ; Moral Hazards ; Operational hazards ; Payments ; Platform as Secondary Market ; Pricing ; Sharing Economy ; Social exclusion ; Supply ; Supply chains ; Supply Contract ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Decision sciences, 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.866-892</ispartof><rights>2020 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><rights>2021 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3865-7043 ; 0000-0002-1531-2117</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdeci.12475$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdeci.12475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Ya‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Juzhi</creatorcontrib><title>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</title><title>Decision sciences</title><description>ABSTRACT Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.</description><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Cryptography</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Moral dilemmas</subject><subject>Moral hazard</subject><subject>Moral Hazards</subject><subject>Operational hazards</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Platform as Secondary Market</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Sharing Economy</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Supply Contract</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0011-7315</issn><issn>1540-5915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEEmNw4RdE4obUkTR1H9ygDDYJNCTgHHl5sI6uKUknNH493YY44ott-bMtfYScczbifVxpo6oRj5MMDsiAQ8IiKDgckgFjnEeZ4HBMTkJYMsZSSMSA2OcaO-v8ir6s29b5zuhdVW9oucCqobPWeOwq1wTad93C0NvaqQ-1G449Xv_hruk8qq5q3ik2mj45jzWd4Dd6HU7JkcU6mLPfPCRv9-PXchI9zh6m5c1jpATjEAnUiWAij9N5miLmeW7i1CaFSOc5zJMYTFYIsFag0pAVVieZ0bEuuGJpbnIQQ3Kxv9t697k2oZNLt_ZN_1LGAEWRcQaipy73lPIuBG-sbH21Qr-RnMmtR7n1KHcee5jv4a-qNpt_SHk3Lqf7nR_U-3Ty</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Cai, Ya‐Jun</creator><creator>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</creator><creator>Zhang, Juzhi</creator><general>American Institute for Decision Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-7043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-2117</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</title><author>Cai, Ya‐Jun ; Choi, Tsan‐Ming ; Zhang, Juzhi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Cryptography</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Moral dilemmas</topic><topic>Moral hazard</topic><topic>Moral Hazards</topic><topic>Operational hazards</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Platform as Secondary Market</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Sharing Economy</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Supply Contract</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Ya‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Juzhi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Ya‐Jun</au><au>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</au><au>Zhang, Juzhi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</atitle><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>866</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>866-892</pages><issn>0011-7315</issn><eissn>1540-5915</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>American Institute for Decision Sciences</pub><doi>10.1111/deci.12475</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-7043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-2117</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-7315
ispartof Decision sciences, 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.866-892
issn 0011-7315
1540-5915
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_deci_12475_DECI12475
source Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Blockchain
Consumers
Contracts
Coordination
Cryptography
Marginality
Moral dilemmas
Moral hazard
Moral Hazards
Operational hazards
Payments
Platform as Secondary Market
Pricing
Sharing Economy
Social exclusion
Supply
Supply chains
Supply Contract
Technology
title Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Platform%20Supported%20Supply%20Chain%20Operations%20in%20the%20Blockchain%20Era:%20Supply%20Contracting%20and%20Moral%20Hazards&rft.jtitle=Decision%20sciences&rft.au=Cai,%20Ya%E2%80%90Jun&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=866-892&rft.issn=0011-7315&rft.eissn=1540-5915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/deci.12475&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559971053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559971053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true