Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards
ABSTRACT Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Decision sciences 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.866-892 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 892 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 866 |
container_title | Decision sciences |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Cai, Ya‐Jun Choi, Tsan‐Ming Zhang, Juzhi |
description | ABSTRACT
Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/deci.12475 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_deci_12475_DECI12475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559971053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEEmNw4RdE4obUkTR1H9ygDDYJNCTgHHl5sI6uKUknNH493YY44ott-bMtfYScczbifVxpo6oRj5MMDsiAQ8IiKDgckgFjnEeZ4HBMTkJYMsZSSMSA2OcaO-v8ir6s29b5zuhdVW9oucCqobPWeOwq1wTad93C0NvaqQ-1G449Xv_hruk8qq5q3ik2mj45jzWd4Dd6HU7JkcU6mLPfPCRv9-PXchI9zh6m5c1jpATjEAnUiWAij9N5miLmeW7i1CaFSOc5zJMYTFYIsFag0pAVVieZ0bEuuGJpbnIQQ3Kxv9t697k2oZNLt_ZN_1LGAEWRcQaipy73lPIuBG-sbH21Qr-RnMmtR7n1KHcee5jv4a-qNpt_SHk3Lqf7nR_U-3Ty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559971053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cai, Ya‐Jun ; Choi, Tsan‐Ming ; Zhang, Juzhi</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Ya‐Jun ; Choi, Tsan‐Ming ; Zhang, Juzhi</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/deci.12475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: American Institute for Decision Sciences</publisher><subject>Blockchain ; Consumers ; Contracts ; Coordination ; Cryptography ; Marginality ; Moral dilemmas ; Moral hazard ; Moral Hazards ; Operational hazards ; Payments ; Platform as Secondary Market ; Pricing ; Sharing Economy ; Social exclusion ; Supply ; Supply chains ; Supply Contract ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Decision sciences, 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.866-892</ispartof><rights>2020 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><rights>2021 Decision Sciences Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3865-7043 ; 0000-0002-1531-2117</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdeci.12475$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdeci.12475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Ya‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Juzhi</creatorcontrib><title>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</title><title>Decision sciences</title><description>ABSTRACT
Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.</description><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Cryptography</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Moral dilemmas</subject><subject>Moral hazard</subject><subject>Moral Hazards</subject><subject>Operational hazards</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Platform as Secondary Market</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Sharing Economy</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Supply</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Supply Contract</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0011-7315</issn><issn>1540-5915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAMgCMEEmNw4RdE4obUkTR1H9ygDDYJNCTgHHl5sI6uKUknNH493YY44ott-bMtfYScczbifVxpo6oRj5MMDsiAQ8IiKDgckgFjnEeZ4HBMTkJYMsZSSMSA2OcaO-v8ir6s29b5zuhdVW9oucCqobPWeOwq1wTad93C0NvaqQ-1G449Xv_hruk8qq5q3ik2mj45jzWd4Dd6HU7JkcU6mLPfPCRv9-PXchI9zh6m5c1jpATjEAnUiWAij9N5miLmeW7i1CaFSOc5zJMYTFYIsFag0pAVVieZ0bEuuGJpbnIQQ3Kxv9t697k2oZNLt_ZN_1LGAEWRcQaipy73lPIuBG-sbH21Qr-RnMmtR7n1KHcee5jv4a-qNpt_SHk3Lqf7nR_U-3Ty</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Cai, Ya‐Jun</creator><creator>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</creator><creator>Zhang, Juzhi</creator><general>American Institute for Decision Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-7043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-2117</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</title><author>Cai, Ya‐Jun ; Choi, Tsan‐Ming ; Zhang, Juzhi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-3ad4303826b66aa888e26f4936b85b425e7935ff3acd579fd47ed2d91c068e853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Cryptography</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Moral dilemmas</topic><topic>Moral hazard</topic><topic>Moral Hazards</topic><topic>Operational hazards</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Platform as Secondary Market</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Sharing Economy</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Supply</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Supply Contract</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Ya‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Juzhi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Ya‐Jun</au><au>Choi, Tsan‐Ming</au><au>Zhang, Juzhi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards</atitle><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>866</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>866-892</pages><issn>0011-7315</issn><eissn>1540-5915</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Platform operations are very common in the sharing economy. Nowadays, retailers can sell the end‐of‐season product leftovers to platforms which offer product rental services to the market. Motivated by this observed industrial practice, we build stylized supply chain models to explore the platform supported supply chain operations. We uncover that the presence of the platform creates the “triple marginalization” problem in which supply chain coordination cannot be achieved even if the manufacturer is willing to supply at cost using the wholesale pricing contract. We show how the markdown sponsor (MS) contract can deal with the triple marginalization problem and achieve supply chain coordination. However, we illustrate that a moral hazard problem, in which the retailer has incentive to overclaim the amount of markdown sponsor, arises. We reveal that the moral hazard problem brings a loss to the manufacturer, an immoral gain for the retailer, and there is no impact on the platform and consumers. We analytically derive the impact of moral hazard (which means the loss to the manufacturer, and the gain for the retailer) and find that it relates to the markdown sponsor rate, as well as the degree of overclaiming. To overcome the moral hazard problem under MS contract, we propose measures such as the adoption of blockchain technology, and “discounted” markdown sponsor contract, to help. We also explore the implementations of other contracts to overcome the moral hazard, like virtual buyback with inventory reallocation contract, and wholesale pricing contract with side payments.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>American Institute for Decision Sciences</pub><doi>10.1111/deci.12475</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3865-7043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-2117</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-7315 |
ispartof | Decision sciences, 2021-08, Vol.52 (4), p.866-892 |
issn | 0011-7315 1540-5915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_deci_12475_DECI12475 |
source | Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Blockchain Consumers Contracts Coordination Cryptography Marginality Moral dilemmas Moral hazard Moral Hazards Operational hazards Payments Platform as Secondary Market Pricing Sharing Economy Social exclusion Supply Supply chains Supply Contract Technology |
title | Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Platform%20Supported%20Supply%20Chain%20Operations%20in%20the%20Blockchain%20Era:%20Supply%20Contracting%20and%20Moral%20Hazards&rft.jtitle=Decision%20sciences&rft.au=Cai,%20Ya%E2%80%90Jun&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=866-892&rft.issn=0011-7315&rft.eissn=1540-5915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/deci.12475&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559971053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559971053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |