The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis

Introduction Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protoco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2021-06, Vol.100 (6), p.1116-1123
Hauptverfasser: Man, Yuanyuan, Bian, Yuehong, Zhao, Shigang, Zhao, Rusong, Xu, Xin, Wei, Daimin, Li, Lei, Chen, Zi‐Jiang, Zhao, Han
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1123
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1116
container_title Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
container_volume 100
creator Man, Yuanyuan
Bian, Yuehong
Zhao, Shigang
Zhao, Rusong
Xu, Xin
Wei, Daimin
Li, Lei
Chen, Zi‐Jiang
Zhao, Han
description Introduction Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Material and methods We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth. Results For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071). Conclusions The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aogs.14058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_aogs_14058_AOGS14058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528329958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUQCMEokNhwwcgS2wQKMWP2EnYjUZQkCp1QVlHjnM94yqxB9uhCl_Dp3KnM3TBAuGFH7rnPuRTFC8ZvWC43uuwTResorJ5VKyYorSkFeOPixWllJVKVO1Z8SylW3zxumqeFmdCKKZaWa-KXzc7IGAtmEyCJYPDawSfCfghTJCj0yPZR9jrqLMLPpHgyR1GcHd5R_ZhXMySsjMk_NBxIWnxQ8Q4mf0AcRuc3xLnXT7UsTH8xESY-rgEkqP2Cbt9IGuycymH6AxCJuxCzER7PS7JpefFE6vHBC9O53nx7dPHm83n8ur68stmfVUa0YqmrAB6KTWrWKsMVbwVvGWcS8k51NZWlopaQU17BswM0kiAutG9odyIoQEhzos3x7r7GL7PkHI3uWRgHLWHMKeOVy3nDWWVQvT1X-htmCPOi5TkDXZuZYPU2yNlYkgpgu320U34RR2j3cFbd_DW3XtD-NWp5NxPMDygf0Qh0ByBO-iDTcaBN_CAoWhFa9oqTg_ONy7fy9qE2WdMfff_qUizE-1GWP4xc7e-vvx6nP43eGPHBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528329958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Man, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Yuehong ; Zhao, Shigang ; Zhao, Rusong ; Xu, Xin ; Wei, Daimin ; Li, Lei ; Chen, Zi‐Jiang ; Zhao, Han</creator><creatorcontrib>Man, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Yuehong ; Zhao, Shigang ; Zhao, Rusong ; Xu, Xin ; Wei, Daimin ; Li, Lei ; Chen, Zi‐Jiang ; Zhao, Han</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Material and methods We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth. Results For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071). Conclusions The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33616957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Cohort analysis ; Cold storage ; endometrial preparation ; frozen embryo transfer ; hormonal replacement ; Hormone replacement therapy ; In vitro fertilization ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; live birth ; natural cycle ; Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology ; ovarian stimulation ; Ovaries ; Polycystic ovary syndrome ; Reproductive technologies ; Science &amp; Technology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021-06, Vol.100 (6), p.1116-1123</ispartof><rights>2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><rights>2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>12</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000607096200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1812-1831 ; 0000-0001-6939-7286 ; 0000-0001-6637-6631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faogs.14058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faogs.14058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,39262,45578,45579</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Man, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Yuehong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rusong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Daimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Han</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Material and methods We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth. Results For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071). Conclusions The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cold storage</subject><subject>endometrial preparation</subject><subject>frozen embryo transfer</subject><subject>hormonal replacement</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>live birth</subject><subject>natural cycle</subject><subject>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</subject><subject>ovarian stimulation</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Polycystic ovary syndrome</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUQCMEokNhwwcgS2wQKMWP2EnYjUZQkCp1QVlHjnM94yqxB9uhCl_Dp3KnM3TBAuGFH7rnPuRTFC8ZvWC43uuwTResorJ5VKyYorSkFeOPixWllJVKVO1Z8SylW3zxumqeFmdCKKZaWa-KXzc7IGAtmEyCJYPDawSfCfghTJCj0yPZR9jrqLMLPpHgyR1GcHd5R_ZhXMySsjMk_NBxIWnxQ8Q4mf0AcRuc3xLnXT7UsTH8xESY-rgEkqP2Cbt9IGuycymH6AxCJuxCzER7PS7JpefFE6vHBC9O53nx7dPHm83n8ur68stmfVUa0YqmrAB6KTWrWKsMVbwVvGWcS8k51NZWlopaQU17BswM0kiAutG9odyIoQEhzos3x7r7GL7PkHI3uWRgHLWHMKeOVy3nDWWVQvT1X-htmCPOi5TkDXZuZYPU2yNlYkgpgu320U34RR2j3cFbd_DW3XtD-NWp5NxPMDygf0Qh0ByBO-iDTcaBN_CAoWhFa9oqTg_ONy7fy9qE2WdMfff_qUizE-1GWP4xc7e-vvx6nP43eGPHBA</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Man, Yuanyuan</creator><creator>Bian, Yuehong</creator><creator>Zhao, Shigang</creator><creator>Zhao, Rusong</creator><creator>Xu, Xin</creator><creator>Wei, Daimin</creator><creator>Li, Lei</creator><creator>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</creator><creator>Zhao, Han</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-1831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-7286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-6631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</title><author>Man, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Yuehong ; Zhao, Shigang ; Zhao, Rusong ; Xu, Xin ; Wei, Daimin ; Li, Lei ; Chen, Zi‐Jiang ; Zhao, Han</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cold storage</topic><topic>endometrial preparation</topic><topic>frozen embryo transfer</topic><topic>hormonal replacement</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>live birth</topic><topic>natural cycle</topic><topic>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</topic><topic>ovarian stimulation</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Polycystic ovary syndrome</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Man, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Yuehong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rusong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Daimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Han</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Man, Yuanyuan</au><au>Bian, Yuehong</au><au>Zhao, Shigang</au><au>Zhao, Rusong</au><au>Xu, Xin</au><au>Wei, Daimin</au><au>Li, Lei</au><au>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</au><au>Zhao, Han</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><stitle>ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN</stitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1116</spage><epage>1123</epage><pages>1116-1123</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer. Material and methods We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth. Results For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071). Conclusions The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33616957</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.14058</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-1831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-7286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-6631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-6349
ispartof Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021-06, Vol.100 (6), p.1116-1123
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_aogs_14058_AOGS14058
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Clinical outcomes
Cohort analysis
Cold storage
endometrial preparation
frozen embryo transfer
hormonal replacement
Hormone replacement therapy
In vitro fertilization
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
live birth
natural cycle
Obstetrics & Gynecology
ovarian stimulation
Ovaries
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Reproductive technologies
Science & Technology
Womens health
title The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T17%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20different%20endometrial%20preparations%20on%20women%20with%20polycystic%20ovary%20syndrome%20undergoing%20initial%20frozen%20embryo%20transfer:%20A%20historical%20cohort%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Man,%20Yuanyuan&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1116&rft.epage=1123&rft.pages=1116-1123&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.14058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2528329958%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528329958&rft_id=info:pmid/33616957&rfr_iscdi=true