The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis
Introduction Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protoco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2021-06, Vol.100 (6), p.1116-1123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1116 |
container_title | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Man, Yuanyuan Bian, Yuehong Zhao, Shigang Zhao, Rusong Xu, Xin Wei, Daimin Li, Lei Chen, Zi‐Jiang Zhao, Han |
description | Introduction
Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer.
Material and methods
We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth.
Results
For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071).
Conclusions
The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aogs.14058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_aogs_14058_AOGS14058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528329958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUQCMEokNhwwcgS2wQKMWP2EnYjUZQkCp1QVlHjnM94yqxB9uhCl_Dp3KnM3TBAuGFH7rnPuRTFC8ZvWC43uuwTResorJ5VKyYorSkFeOPixWllJVKVO1Z8SylW3zxumqeFmdCKKZaWa-KXzc7IGAtmEyCJYPDawSfCfghTJCj0yPZR9jrqLMLPpHgyR1GcHd5R_ZhXMySsjMk_NBxIWnxQ8Q4mf0AcRuc3xLnXT7UsTH8xESY-rgEkqP2Cbt9IGuycymH6AxCJuxCzER7PS7JpefFE6vHBC9O53nx7dPHm83n8ur68stmfVUa0YqmrAB6KTWrWKsMVbwVvGWcS8k51NZWlopaQU17BswM0kiAutG9odyIoQEhzos3x7r7GL7PkHI3uWRgHLWHMKeOVy3nDWWVQvT1X-htmCPOi5TkDXZuZYPU2yNlYkgpgu320U34RR2j3cFbd_DW3XtD-NWp5NxPMDygf0Qh0ByBO-iDTcaBN_CAoWhFa9oqTg_ONy7fy9qE2WdMfff_qUizE-1GWP4xc7e-vvx6nP43eGPHBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528329958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Man, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Yuehong ; Zhao, Shigang ; Zhao, Rusong ; Xu, Xin ; Wei, Daimin ; Li, Lei ; Chen, Zi‐Jiang ; Zhao, Han</creator><creatorcontrib>Man, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Yuehong ; Zhao, Shigang ; Zhao, Rusong ; Xu, Xin ; Wei, Daimin ; Li, Lei ; Chen, Zi‐Jiang ; Zhao, Han</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer.
Material and methods
We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth.
Results
For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071).
Conclusions
The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33616957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Cohort analysis ; Cold storage ; endometrial preparation ; frozen embryo transfer ; hormonal replacement ; Hormone replacement therapy ; In vitro fertilization ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; live birth ; natural cycle ; Obstetrics & Gynecology ; ovarian stimulation ; Ovaries ; Polycystic ovary syndrome ; Reproductive technologies ; Science & Technology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021-06, Vol.100 (6), p.1116-1123</ispartof><rights>2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><rights>2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>12</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000607096200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1812-1831 ; 0000-0001-6939-7286 ; 0000-0001-6637-6631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faogs.14058$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faogs.14058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,39262,45578,45579</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33616957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Man, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Yuehong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rusong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Daimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Han</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction
Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer.
Material and methods
We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth.
Results
For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071).
Conclusions
The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cold storage</subject><subject>endometrial preparation</subject><subject>frozen embryo transfer</subject><subject>hormonal replacement</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>live birth</subject><subject>natural cycle</subject><subject>Obstetrics & Gynecology</subject><subject>ovarian stimulation</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Polycystic ovary syndrome</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUQCMEokNhwwcgS2wQKMWP2EnYjUZQkCp1QVlHjnM94yqxB9uhCl_Dp3KnM3TBAuGFH7rnPuRTFC8ZvWC43uuwTResorJ5VKyYorSkFeOPixWllJVKVO1Z8SylW3zxumqeFmdCKKZaWa-KXzc7IGAtmEyCJYPDawSfCfghTJCj0yPZR9jrqLMLPpHgyR1GcHd5R_ZhXMySsjMk_NBxIWnxQ8Q4mf0AcRuc3xLnXT7UsTH8xESY-rgEkqP2Cbt9IGuycymH6AxCJuxCzER7PS7JpefFE6vHBC9O53nx7dPHm83n8ur68stmfVUa0YqmrAB6KTWrWKsMVbwVvGWcS8k51NZWlopaQU17BswM0kiAutG9odyIoQEhzos3x7r7GL7PkHI3uWRgHLWHMKeOVy3nDWWVQvT1X-htmCPOi5TkDXZuZYPU2yNlYkgpgu320U34RR2j3cFbd_DW3XtD-NWp5NxPMDygf0Qh0ByBO-iDTcaBN_CAoWhFa9oqTg_ONy7fy9qE2WdMfff_qUizE-1GWP4xc7e-vvx6nP43eGPHBA</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Man, Yuanyuan</creator><creator>Bian, Yuehong</creator><creator>Zhao, Shigang</creator><creator>Zhao, Rusong</creator><creator>Xu, Xin</creator><creator>Wei, Daimin</creator><creator>Li, Lei</creator><creator>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</creator><creator>Zhao, Han</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-1831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-7286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-6631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</title><author>Man, Yuanyuan ; Bian, Yuehong ; Zhao, Shigang ; Zhao, Rusong ; Xu, Xin ; Wei, Daimin ; Li, Lei ; Chen, Zi‐Jiang ; Zhao, Han</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4eeb55a14196c06293291225522e7ff4f0376e70b1e1cd5c5ee78abc02c3d8e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cold storage</topic><topic>endometrial preparation</topic><topic>frozen embryo transfer</topic><topic>hormonal replacement</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>live birth</topic><topic>natural cycle</topic><topic>Obstetrics & Gynecology</topic><topic>ovarian stimulation</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Polycystic ovary syndrome</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Man, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Yuehong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rusong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Daimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Han</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Man, Yuanyuan</au><au>Bian, Yuehong</au><au>Zhao, Shigang</au><au>Zhao, Rusong</au><au>Xu, Xin</au><au>Wei, Daimin</au><au>Li, Lei</au><au>Chen, Zi‐Jiang</au><au>Zhao, Han</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><stitle>ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN</stitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1116</spage><epage>1123</epage><pages>1116-1123</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Frozen embryo transfer is associated with a higher rate of live birth and a lower risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) compared with fresh embryo transfer. The aim of this study is to assess the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for women with PCOS undergoing frozen embryo transfer.
Material and methods
We conducted a historical cohort analysis of 1720 women with PCOS who underwent the “freeze‐all” strategy between August 2014 and August 2017 because of their high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used: natural cycle (NC; n = 191), which relies on the dominant follicle to secrete estrogen that then promotes endometrial growth; ovarian stimulation (OS; n = 96), which induces follicle growth using low doses of human menopausal gonadotropin; and hormone replacement (HRT; n = 1433), which uses exogenous estradiol to promote endometrial growth. The primary outcome was live birth.
Results
For women who received a single embryo transfer, the live birth rates for the NC, OS, and HRT groups were 62.4%, 65.0%, and 52.2%, respectively. The live birth rate in the HRT group was significantly lower than that seen in the OS and NC groups (P = .009). The clinical pregnancy rates of the three groups were 72.3%, 73.8%, and 64.9%, respectively; this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .071).
Conclusions
The rate of live birth with the NC and OS regimens was higher than with the HRT protocol in women with PCOS who undergo single‐blastocyst frozen embryo transfer.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33616957</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.14058</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-1831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-7286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6637-6631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6349 |
ispartof | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021-06, Vol.100 (6), p.1116-1123 |
issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_aogs_14058_AOGS14058 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Clinical outcomes Cohort analysis Cold storage endometrial preparation frozen embryo transfer hormonal replacement Hormone replacement therapy In vitro fertilization Life Sciences & Biomedicine live birth natural cycle Obstetrics & Gynecology ovarian stimulation Ovaries Polycystic ovary syndrome Reproductive technologies Science & Technology Womens health |
title | The effect of different endometrial preparations on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing initial frozen embryo transfer: A historical cohort analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T17%3A29%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20different%20endometrial%20preparations%20on%20women%20with%20polycystic%20ovary%20syndrome%20undergoing%20initial%20frozen%20embryo%20transfer:%20A%20historical%20cohort%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Man,%20Yuanyuan&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1116&rft.epage=1123&rft.pages=1116-1123&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.14058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2528329958%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528329958&rft_id=info:pmid/33616957&rfr_iscdi=true |