Local and regional variability in utilization and allocation of hepatitis C virus–infected hearts for transplantation

With the advent of direct‐acting antiviral agents, there has been a rapid rise in hepatitis C virus–infected (HCV+) heart transplantation. We aimed to understand local and regional differences in utilization and allocation of HCV+ hearts. Using United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) de‐identified data from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2019 we compared trends in the utilization rates (hearts transplanted/donors recovered) of HCV‐uninfected (HCV−) to those of HCV+ nonviremic (HCV‐NV) and viremic (HCV‐V) hearts nationally and by UNOS region. We also evaluated allocation rates (hearts successfully allocated/donors recovered) by organ procurement organization (OPO). We found that (1) in 2019, national utilization rates for HCV‐NV and HCV‐V hearts were the same as HCV− hearts (27.6% for HCV‐NV, 30.9 for HCV‐V, and 31.7% for HCV−, P = .277); (2) utilization rates of HCV‐NV hearts were low in regions 3 and 4 and of HCV‐V hearts in regions 3, 4, and 8 even in the contemporary period since 2018; and (3) there was marked variability in allocation of HCV+ hearts at the OPO level even within the same UNOS region. We conclude that despite national strides in the utilization of HCV+ hearts for transplantation, more aggressive allocation of HCV+ hearts at the OPO level may still significantly affect the organ shortage. In spite of equivalent utilization of HCV‐uninfected, HCV‐nonviremic, and HCV‐viremic hearts at the national level by 2019, significant variability exists at the regional and organ procurement organization levels.