Seasonal Use of Latrines by Bobcats: Implications for Monitoring Programs
Latrines serve as important communication networks among felids for transmitting information relative to social dominance, reproductive status, and defense of hunting areas. During January 2011–August 2012, we monitored 10 bobcat (Lynx rufus) latrines in the northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) of Michiga...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2020-11, Vol.84 (8), p.1611-1616 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1616 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1611 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | HILTS, DYLAN J. GEHRING, THOMAS M. NIELSEN, CLAYTON K. ETTER, DWAYNE R. BROWN, SHELBY M. TRUAX, ROBERT R. |
description | Latrines serve as important communication networks among felids for transmitting information relative to social dominance, reproductive status, and defense of hunting areas. During January 2011–August 2012, we monitored 10 bobcat (Lynx rufus) latrines in the northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) of Michigan, USA, using motion-sensitive cameras to estimate bobcat visitation and scat deposition rates among 3 biological seasons (mating, kitten-rearing, non-mating). Bobcat visitation rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found equal number of visits during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons, and lower visitation rates during the non-mating season. Scat deposition rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found a net gain of scats deposited during the mating and non-mating seasons, whereas there was a net loss of scats during the kitten-rearing season. An artificial latrine protocol we developed yielded visitation at 4 of 12 artificial latrine sites. Monitoring natural and artificial latrines during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons could provide valuable data for managing bobcat populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jwmg.21941 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_jwmg_21941_JWMG21941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27012410</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27012410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2821-7f14bfb275b94862a7f7a4fa65489c771d50b662ff99684a7ca7673f872250523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUh4MoOKcX70JhN6Uz7zVp0qMWncrEgw69hbQm0rI1M-kY--_trO4ovss7vO97_PgRcgp0DJTiZb1efIwRMgZ7ZABZImKUIPbJoDtizBm8HZKjEGpKEwCZDsjo2ejgGj2PZsFEzkZT3fqqMSEqNtG1K0rdhmNyYPU8mJOfPSSz25uX_C6ePk3u86tpXKJEiIUFVtgCBS8yJlPUwgrNrE45k1kpBLxzWqQpWptlqWRalFqkIrFSIHLKMRmSUf936d3nyoRW1W7lu2xBIePIGM8EdNR5T5XeheCNVUtfLbTfKKBqW4LalqC-S-hg2cNrUzgbyso0pdkJlFLOUwmMbgfyqtVt5ZrcrZq2Uy_-r3Y0_NDV3Gz-iKQeXh8nv-HOeqcOrfM7BwUFZECTL76dheA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2452445971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Use of Latrines by Bobcats: Implications for Monitoring Programs</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>HILTS, DYLAN J. ; GEHRING, THOMAS M. ; NIELSEN, CLAYTON K. ; ETTER, DWAYNE R. ; BROWN, SHELBY M. ; TRUAX, ROBERT R.</creator><creatorcontrib>HILTS, DYLAN J. ; GEHRING, THOMAS M. ; NIELSEN, CLAYTON K. ; ETTER, DWAYNE R. ; BROWN, SHELBY M. ; TRUAX, ROBERT R.</creatorcontrib><description>Latrines serve as important communication networks among felids for transmitting information relative to social dominance, reproductive status, and defense of hunting areas. During January 2011–August 2012, we monitored 10 bobcat (Lynx rufus) latrines in the northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) of Michigan, USA, using motion-sensitive cameras to estimate bobcat visitation and scat deposition rates among 3 biological seasons (mating, kitten-rearing, non-mating). Bobcat visitation rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found equal number of visits during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons, and lower visitation rates during the non-mating season. Scat deposition rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found a net gain of scats deposited during the mating and non-mating seasons, whereas there was a net loss of scats during the kitten-rearing season. An artificial latrine protocol we developed yielded visitation at 4 of 12 artificial latrine sites. Monitoring natural and artificial latrines during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons could provide valuable data for managing bobcat populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>behavior ; bobcat ; Cameras ; carnivore ; Communication networks ; Deposition ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; felid ; Hunting ; latrine ; Latrines ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Lynx rufus ; Mating ; Monitoring ; motion sensitive cameras ; population monitoring ; Reproductive status ; Science & Technology ; Seasons ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-11, Vol.84 (8), p.1611-1616</ispartof><rights>2020 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>0</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000556814000001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2821-7f14bfb275b94862a7f7a4fa65489c771d50b662ff99684a7ca7673f872250523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5353-4642</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27012410$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27012410$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,28253,45579,45580,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HILTS, DYLAN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEHRING, THOMAS M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, CLAYTON K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ETTER, DWAYNE R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, SHELBY M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRUAX, ROBERT R.</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Use of Latrines by Bobcats: Implications for Monitoring Programs</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>J WILDLIFE MANAGE</addtitle><description>Latrines serve as important communication networks among felids for transmitting information relative to social dominance, reproductive status, and defense of hunting areas. During January 2011–August 2012, we monitored 10 bobcat (Lynx rufus) latrines in the northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) of Michigan, USA, using motion-sensitive cameras to estimate bobcat visitation and scat deposition rates among 3 biological seasons (mating, kitten-rearing, non-mating). Bobcat visitation rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found equal number of visits during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons, and lower visitation rates during the non-mating season. Scat deposition rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found a net gain of scats deposited during the mating and non-mating seasons, whereas there was a net loss of scats during the kitten-rearing season. An artificial latrine protocol we developed yielded visitation at 4 of 12 artificial latrine sites. Monitoring natural and artificial latrines during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons could provide valuable data for managing bobcat populations.</description><subject>behavior</subject><subject>bobcat</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>carnivore</subject><subject>Communication networks</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>felid</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>latrine</subject><subject>Latrines</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Lynx rufus</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>motion sensitive cameras</subject><subject>population monitoring</subject><subject>Reproductive status</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFLwzAUh4MoOKcX70JhN6Uz7zVp0qMWncrEgw69hbQm0rI1M-kY--_trO4ovss7vO97_PgRcgp0DJTiZb1efIwRMgZ7ZABZImKUIPbJoDtizBm8HZKjEGpKEwCZDsjo2ejgGj2PZsFEzkZT3fqqMSEqNtG1K0rdhmNyYPU8mJOfPSSz25uX_C6ePk3u86tpXKJEiIUFVtgCBS8yJlPUwgrNrE45k1kpBLxzWqQpWptlqWRalFqkIrFSIHLKMRmSUf936d3nyoRW1W7lu2xBIePIGM8EdNR5T5XeheCNVUtfLbTfKKBqW4LalqC-S-hg2cNrUzgbyso0pdkJlFLOUwmMbgfyqtVt5ZrcrZq2Uy_-r3Y0_NDV3Gz-iKQeXh8nv-HOeqcOrfM7BwUFZECTL76dheA</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>HILTS, DYLAN J.</creator><creator>GEHRING, THOMAS M.</creator><creator>NIELSEN, CLAYTON K.</creator><creator>ETTER, DWAYNE R.</creator><creator>BROWN, SHELBY M.</creator><creator>TRUAX, ROBERT R.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-4642</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Seasonal Use of Latrines by Bobcats</title><author>HILTS, DYLAN J. ; GEHRING, THOMAS M. ; NIELSEN, CLAYTON K. ; ETTER, DWAYNE R. ; BROWN, SHELBY M. ; TRUAX, ROBERT R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2821-7f14bfb275b94862a7f7a4fa65489c771d50b662ff99684a7ca7673f872250523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>behavior</topic><topic>bobcat</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>carnivore</topic><topic>Communication networks</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>felid</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>latrine</topic><topic>Latrines</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Lynx rufus</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>motion sensitive cameras</topic><topic>population monitoring</topic><topic>Reproductive status</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HILTS, DYLAN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEHRING, THOMAS M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NIELSEN, CLAYTON K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ETTER, DWAYNE R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, SHELBY M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRUAX, ROBERT R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HILTS, DYLAN J.</au><au>GEHRING, THOMAS M.</au><au>NIELSEN, CLAYTON K.</au><au>ETTER, DWAYNE R.</au><au>BROWN, SHELBY M.</au><au>TRUAX, ROBERT R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Use of Latrines by Bobcats: Implications for Monitoring Programs</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><stitle>J WILDLIFE MANAGE</stitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1611</spage><epage>1616</epage><pages>1611-1616</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Latrines serve as important communication networks among felids for transmitting information relative to social dominance, reproductive status, and defense of hunting areas. During January 2011–August 2012, we monitored 10 bobcat (Lynx rufus) latrines in the northern Lower Peninsula (NLP) of Michigan, USA, using motion-sensitive cameras to estimate bobcat visitation and scat deposition rates among 3 biological seasons (mating, kitten-rearing, non-mating). Bobcat visitation rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found equal number of visits during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons, and lower visitation rates during the non-mating season. Scat deposition rates differed among the 3 seasons. We found a net gain of scats deposited during the mating and non-mating seasons, whereas there was a net loss of scats during the kitten-rearing season. An artificial latrine protocol we developed yielded visitation at 4 of 12 artificial latrine sites. Monitoring natural and artificial latrines during the mating and kitten-rearing seasons could provide valuable data for managing bobcat populations.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.21941</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-4642</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2020-11, Vol.84 (8), p.1611-1616 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_jwmg_21941_JWMG21941 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | behavior bobcat Cameras carnivore Communication networks Deposition Ecology Environmental Sciences & Ecology felid Hunting latrine Latrines Life Sciences & Biomedicine Lynx rufus Mating Monitoring motion sensitive cameras population monitoring Reproductive status Science & Technology Seasons Wildlife Wildlife management Zoology |
title | Seasonal Use of Latrines by Bobcats: Implications for Monitoring Programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T05%3A08%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Use%20of%20Latrines%20by%20Bobcats:%20Implications%20for%20Monitoring%20Programs&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=HILTS,%20DYLAN%20J.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1611&rft.epage=1616&rft.pages=1611-1616&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.21941&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_wiley%3E27012410%3C/jstor_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2452445971&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27012410&rfr_iscdi=true |