Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants

The integration of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit in a coal‐fired steam power plant leads to a reduction in net power output, where the largest contributors to the power loss are the heat requirement for the regeneration of the chemical solvent in the desorber of the CO2 capture unit (approx. 2/...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Greenhouse gases: science and technology 2012-04, Vol.2 (2), p.80-98
Hauptverfasser: Oexmann, Jochen, Kather, Alfons, Linnenberg, Sebastian, Liebenthal, Ulrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 2
container_start_page 80
container_title Greenhouse gases: science and technology
container_volume 2
creator Oexmann, Jochen
Kather, Alfons
Linnenberg, Sebastian
Liebenthal, Ulrich
description The integration of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit in a coal‐fired steam power plant leads to a reduction in net power output, where the largest contributors to the power loss are the heat requirement for the regeneration of the chemical solvent in the desorber of the CO2 capture unit (approx. 2/3) and the auxiliary power demand of the CO2 compressor (approx. 1/4). In this review, the layout of the overall process is explained and the interaction of the three sub‐processes power plant, CO2 capture process and CO2 compressor is discussed. The optimization of process parameters of the CO2 capture unit – such as solution flow rate and reboiler temperature – is intricate due to the complex interaction of the sub‐processes. It is shown that although the heat requirement for solvent regeneration has the largest impact on the power output of the overall process, the optimal process parameters that lead to the lowest possible heat requirement of the capture unit do not necessarily coincide with the optimal process parameters that make for the most energy efficient operation of the overall process. Therefore, when optimizing process parameters of CO2 absorption processes in power plants, one should focus on the minimization of the overall power loss instead of solely reducing the heat requirement for solvent regeneration. The described coherences are illustrated by the results of process simulations based on detailed models of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit using 7 m (30 wt.‐%) monoethanolamine (MEA), of a supercritical, hard‐coal‐fired steam power plant and of a six‐stage, intercooled CO2 compressor. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ghg.1273
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_ghg_1273_GHG1273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>GHG1273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2973-4d6a548c5e372f2f4b989f2a1c495ba8c9072832c4b17befd5c6051157b455823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KAzEUhYMoWGrBR8gLpOa3mXEnRadqaQWVgi5Ckmba6EwzJFNq396Oino35y4-DocPgHOChwRjerFar4aESnYEepQIilgms-N__ykYpPSGD8cxlVj2wOtDSC2yoTbb1PqwgeM5hVY37Ta6S2jXrvZWV1CbFGLzBTQxWJeSS9BvoA26QqWPbglT63QNm7BzETaV3rTpDJyUukpu8JN98Hxz_TSeoOm8uB1fTZGnuWSIL0da8MwKxyQtaclNnuUl1cTyXBid2RxLmjFquSHSuHIp7AgLQoQ0XIiMsj5A3707X7m9aqKvddwrglUnRR2kqE6KKiZFl3-8P2z--OV1fFcjyaRQi1mhFng2ebm7f1Q5-wT3xGW7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Oexmann, Jochen ; Kather, Alfons ; Linnenberg, Sebastian ; Liebenthal, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Oexmann, Jochen ; Kather, Alfons ; Linnenberg, Sebastian ; Liebenthal, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>The integration of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit in a coal‐fired steam power plant leads to a reduction in net power output, where the largest contributors to the power loss are the heat requirement for the regeneration of the chemical solvent in the desorber of the CO2 capture unit (approx. 2/3) and the auxiliary power demand of the CO2 compressor (approx. 1/4). In this review, the layout of the overall process is explained and the interaction of the three sub‐processes power plant, CO2 capture process and CO2 compressor is discussed. The optimization of process parameters of the CO2 capture unit – such as solution flow rate and reboiler temperature – is intricate due to the complex interaction of the sub‐processes. It is shown that although the heat requirement for solvent regeneration has the largest impact on the power output of the overall process, the optimal process parameters that lead to the lowest possible heat requirement of the capture unit do not necessarily coincide with the optimal process parameters that make for the most energy efficient operation of the overall process. Therefore, when optimizing process parameters of CO2 absorption processes in power plants, one should focus on the minimization of the overall power loss instead of solely reducing the heat requirement for solvent regeneration. The described coherences are illustrated by the results of process simulations based on detailed models of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit using 7 m (30 wt.‐%) monoethanolamine (MEA), of a supercritical, hard‐coal‐fired steam power plant and of a six‐stage, intercooled CO2 compressor. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-3878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-3878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>chemical solvents ; integration ; optimization ; overall process ; post-combustion CO2 capture ; steam power plants</subject><ispartof>Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2012-04, Vol.2 (2), p.80-98</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fghg.1273$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fghg.1273$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oexmann, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kather, Alfons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnenberg, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebenthal, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants</title><title>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</title><addtitle>Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol</addtitle><description>The integration of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit in a coal‐fired steam power plant leads to a reduction in net power output, where the largest contributors to the power loss are the heat requirement for the regeneration of the chemical solvent in the desorber of the CO2 capture unit (approx. 2/3) and the auxiliary power demand of the CO2 compressor (approx. 1/4). In this review, the layout of the overall process is explained and the interaction of the three sub‐processes power plant, CO2 capture process and CO2 compressor is discussed. The optimization of process parameters of the CO2 capture unit – such as solution flow rate and reboiler temperature – is intricate due to the complex interaction of the sub‐processes. It is shown that although the heat requirement for solvent regeneration has the largest impact on the power output of the overall process, the optimal process parameters that lead to the lowest possible heat requirement of the capture unit do not necessarily coincide with the optimal process parameters that make for the most energy efficient operation of the overall process. Therefore, when optimizing process parameters of CO2 absorption processes in power plants, one should focus on the minimization of the overall power loss instead of solely reducing the heat requirement for solvent regeneration. The described coherences are illustrated by the results of process simulations based on detailed models of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit using 7 m (30 wt.‐%) monoethanolamine (MEA), of a supercritical, hard‐coal‐fired steam power plant and of a six‐stage, intercooled CO2 compressor. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</description><subject>chemical solvents</subject><subject>integration</subject><subject>optimization</subject><subject>overall process</subject><subject>post-combustion CO2 capture</subject><subject>steam power plants</subject><issn>2152-3878</issn><issn>2152-3878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1KAzEUhYMoWGrBR8gLpOa3mXEnRadqaQWVgi5Ckmba6EwzJFNq396Oino35y4-DocPgHOChwRjerFar4aESnYEepQIilgms-N__ykYpPSGD8cxlVj2wOtDSC2yoTbb1PqwgeM5hVY37Ta6S2jXrvZWV1CbFGLzBTQxWJeSS9BvoA26QqWPbglT63QNm7BzETaV3rTpDJyUukpu8JN98Hxz_TSeoOm8uB1fTZGnuWSIL0da8MwKxyQtaclNnuUl1cTyXBid2RxLmjFquSHSuHIp7AgLQoQ0XIiMsj5A3707X7m9aqKvddwrglUnRR2kqE6KKiZFl3-8P2z--OV1fFcjyaRQi1mhFng2ebm7f1Q5-wT3xGW7</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Oexmann, Jochen</creator><creator>Kather, Alfons</creator><creator>Linnenberg, Sebastian</creator><creator>Liebenthal, Ulrich</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants</title><author>Oexmann, Jochen ; Kather, Alfons ; Linnenberg, Sebastian ; Liebenthal, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2973-4d6a548c5e372f2f4b989f2a1c495ba8c9072832c4b17befd5c6051157b455823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>chemical solvents</topic><topic>integration</topic><topic>optimization</topic><topic>overall process</topic><topic>post-combustion CO2 capture</topic><topic>steam power plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oexmann, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kather, Alfons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnenberg, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebenthal, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oexmann, Jochen</au><au>Kather, Alfons</au><au>Linnenberg, Sebastian</au><au>Liebenthal, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants</atitle><jtitle>Greenhouse gases: science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>80-98</pages><issn>2152-3878</issn><eissn>2152-3878</eissn><abstract>The integration of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit in a coal‐fired steam power plant leads to a reduction in net power output, where the largest contributors to the power loss are the heat requirement for the regeneration of the chemical solvent in the desorber of the CO2 capture unit (approx. 2/3) and the auxiliary power demand of the CO2 compressor (approx. 1/4). In this review, the layout of the overall process is explained and the interaction of the three sub‐processes power plant, CO2 capture process and CO2 compressor is discussed. The optimization of process parameters of the CO2 capture unit – such as solution flow rate and reboiler temperature – is intricate due to the complex interaction of the sub‐processes. It is shown that although the heat requirement for solvent regeneration has the largest impact on the power output of the overall process, the optimal process parameters that lead to the lowest possible heat requirement of the capture unit do not necessarily coincide with the optimal process parameters that make for the most energy efficient operation of the overall process. Therefore, when optimizing process parameters of CO2 absorption processes in power plants, one should focus on the minimization of the overall power loss instead of solely reducing the heat requirement for solvent regeneration. The described coherences are illustrated by the results of process simulations based on detailed models of a post‐combustion CO2 capture unit using 7 m (30 wt.‐%) monoethanolamine (MEA), of a supercritical, hard‐coal‐fired steam power plant and of a six‐stage, intercooled CO2 compressor. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ghg.1273</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2152-3878
ispartof Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2012-04, Vol.2 (2), p.80-98
issn 2152-3878
2152-3878
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_ghg_1273_GHG1273
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects chemical solvents
integration
optimization
overall process
post-combustion CO2 capture
steam power plants
title Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T12%3A36%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-combustion%20CO2%20capture:%20chemical%20absorption%20processes%20in%20coal-fired%20steam%20power%20plants&rft.jtitle=Greenhouse%20gases:%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Oexmann,%20Jochen&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=80-98&rft.issn=2152-3878&rft.eissn=2152-3878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ghg.1273&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_istex%3EGHG1273%3C/wiley_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true