Survival of patients in a Phase 1 clinic

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2009-03, Vol.115 (5), p.1091-1099
Hauptverfasser: Wheler, Jennifer, Tsimberidou, Apostolia M., Hong, David, Naing, Aung, Jackson, Tiffiny, Liu, Suyu, Feng, Lei, Kurzrock, Razelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1099
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1091
container_title Cancer
container_volume 115
creator Wheler, Jennifer
Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
Hong, David
Naing, Aung
Jackson, Tiffiny
Liu, Suyu
Feng, Lei
Kurzrock, Razelle
description BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patients who were referred to a phase 1 clinic focused primarily on targeted agents. METHODS: The medical records of 200 sequential patients who presented to the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed, and their characteristics and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (range, 12‐85 years), and 57% of patients were men. The median number of prior therapies was 4. Of 200 patients, 182 were treated on at least 1 phase 1 clinical trial. The median follow‐up of surviving patients was 21 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4‐10.8). In univariate analysis, the factors that predicted shorter survival were primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract; a history of thrombosis, liver metastases, and elevated levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase; platelet count; carbohydrate antigen 9 (Ca19‐9) and Ca‐125 levels; aspartate aminotransferase levels, and alkaline phosphatase levels (P < .05 for each). In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.29‐4.39; P = .005), platelets ≥440 × 109/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12‐2.65; P = .014), and the presence of liver metastases (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09‐2.09; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were referred to phase 1 studies had a short median survival (9 months). Patients with thrombocytosis, liver metastases, and a history of thromboembolism had worse outcomes. A prognostic score is proposed. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. In this analysis of patients who were seen in the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, overall survival and risk factors that were predictive of survival were identified. In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism, a platelet count ≥440 × 109/L, and the presence of liver metastases. These factors can be used to identify specific risk groups, to compare results among different phase 1 clinical trials, and to improve patient selection for these trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.24018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_24018_CNCR24018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR24018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1198-e8c58a32e97cc95142b2b6ac56edd12fac5b956086a046c775e58af28ac8206f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEYhIMouFYv_oIcvWx932TzdZRFrVBa8QO8hezbBCPrWnZrpf_ebfU0MzDM8DB2iTBFAHFNHfVTUQHaI1YgOFMCVuKYFQBgS1XJt1N2NgwfYzRCyYJdPX_327wNLf9KfB02OXabgeeOB_74HobIkVObu0zn7CSFdogX_zphr3e3L_WsnC_vH-qbeUmIzpbRkrJBiugMkVPjeSMaHUjpuFqhSKNrnNJgdYBKkzEqjv0kbCArQCc5Yfi3-5PbuPPrPn-GfucR_B7Q7wH9AdDXi_rp4OQvlD1Ebw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival of patients in a Phase 1 clinic</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wheler, Jennifer ; Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. ; Hong, David ; Naing, Aung ; Jackson, Tiffiny ; Liu, Suyu ; Feng, Lei ; Kurzrock, Razelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Wheler, Jennifer ; Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. ; Hong, David ; Naing, Aung ; Jackson, Tiffiny ; Liu, Suyu ; Feng, Lei ; Kurzrock, Razelle</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patients who were referred to a phase 1 clinic focused primarily on targeted agents. METHODS: The medical records of 200 sequential patients who presented to the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed, and their characteristics and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (range, 12‐85 years), and 57% of patients were men. The median number of prior therapies was 4. Of 200 patients, 182 were treated on at least 1 phase 1 clinical trial. The median follow‐up of surviving patients was 21 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4‐10.8). In univariate analysis, the factors that predicted shorter survival were primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract; a history of thrombosis, liver metastases, and elevated levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase; platelet count; carbohydrate antigen 9 (Ca19‐9) and Ca‐125 levels; aspartate aminotransferase levels, and alkaline phosphatase levels (P &lt; .05 for each). In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.29‐4.39; P = .005), platelets ≥440 × 109/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12‐2.65; P = .014), and the presence of liver metastases (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09‐2.09; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were referred to phase 1 studies had a short median survival (9 months). Patients with thrombocytosis, liver metastases, and a history of thromboembolism had worse outcomes. A prognostic score is proposed. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. In this analysis of patients who were seen in the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, overall survival and risk factors that were predictive of survival were identified. In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism, a platelet count ≥440 × 109/L, and the presence of liver metastases. These factors can be used to identify specific risk groups, to compare results among different phase 1 clinical trials, and to improve patient selection for these trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>biologic agents ; liver metastases ; phase 1 ; platelets ; predictive factors ; survival ; targeted therapies ; thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2009-03, Vol.115 (5), p.1091-1099</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1198-e8c58a32e97cc95142b2b6ac56edd12fac5b956086a046c775e58af28ac8206f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.24018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.24018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wheler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naing, Aung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Tiffiny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Suyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzrock, Razelle</creatorcontrib><title>Survival of patients in a Phase 1 clinic</title><title>Cancer</title><description>BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patients who were referred to a phase 1 clinic focused primarily on targeted agents. METHODS: The medical records of 200 sequential patients who presented to the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed, and their characteristics and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (range, 12‐85 years), and 57% of patients were men. The median number of prior therapies was 4. Of 200 patients, 182 were treated on at least 1 phase 1 clinical trial. The median follow‐up of surviving patients was 21 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4‐10.8). In univariate analysis, the factors that predicted shorter survival were primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract; a history of thrombosis, liver metastases, and elevated levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase; platelet count; carbohydrate antigen 9 (Ca19‐9) and Ca‐125 levels; aspartate aminotransferase levels, and alkaline phosphatase levels (P &lt; .05 for each). In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.29‐4.39; P = .005), platelets ≥440 × 109/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12‐2.65; P = .014), and the presence of liver metastases (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09‐2.09; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were referred to phase 1 studies had a short median survival (9 months). Patients with thrombocytosis, liver metastases, and a history of thromboembolism had worse outcomes. A prognostic score is proposed. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. In this analysis of patients who were seen in the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, overall survival and risk factors that were predictive of survival were identified. In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism, a platelet count ≥440 × 109/L, and the presence of liver metastases. These factors can be used to identify specific risk groups, to compare results among different phase 1 clinical trials, and to improve patient selection for these trials.</description><subject>biologic agents</subject><subject>liver metastases</subject><subject>phase 1</subject><subject>platelets</subject><subject>predictive factors</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>targeted therapies</subject><subject>thromboembolism</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotj01LAzEYhIMouFYv_oIcvWx932TzdZRFrVBa8QO8hezbBCPrWnZrpf_ebfU0MzDM8DB2iTBFAHFNHfVTUQHaI1YgOFMCVuKYFQBgS1XJt1N2NgwfYzRCyYJdPX_327wNLf9KfB02OXabgeeOB_74HobIkVObu0zn7CSFdogX_zphr3e3L_WsnC_vH-qbeUmIzpbRkrJBiugMkVPjeSMaHUjpuFqhSKNrnNJgdYBKkzEqjv0kbCArQCc5Yfi3-5PbuPPrPn-GfucR_B7Q7wH9AdDXi_rp4OQvlD1Ebw</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Wheler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.</creator><creator>Hong, David</creator><creator>Naing, Aung</creator><creator>Jackson, Tiffiny</creator><creator>Liu, Suyu</creator><creator>Feng, Lei</creator><creator>Kurzrock, Razelle</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Survival of patients in a Phase 1 clinic</title><author>Wheler, Jennifer ; Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. ; Hong, David ; Naing, Aung ; Jackson, Tiffiny ; Liu, Suyu ; Feng, Lei ; Kurzrock, Razelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1198-e8c58a32e97cc95142b2b6ac56edd12fac5b956086a046c775e58af28ac8206f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>biologic agents</topic><topic>liver metastases</topic><topic>phase 1</topic><topic>platelets</topic><topic>predictive factors</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>targeted therapies</topic><topic>thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wheler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naing, Aung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Tiffiny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Suyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurzrock, Razelle</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wheler, Jennifer</au><au>Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.</au><au>Hong, David</au><au>Naing, Aung</au><au>Jackson, Tiffiny</au><au>Liu, Suyu</au><au>Feng, Lei</au><au>Kurzrock, Razelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival of patients in a Phase 1 clinic</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1091</spage><epage>1099</epage><pages>1091-1099</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced malignancies for whom standard therapy is ineffective may participate in phase 1 trials. To gain a better understanding of the clinical features that could influence benefit versus risk, the authors of this report assessed prognostic factors and survival for patients who were referred to a phase 1 clinic focused primarily on targeted agents. METHODS: The medical records of 200 sequential patients who presented to the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed, and their characteristics and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (range, 12‐85 years), and 57% of patients were men. The median number of prior therapies was 4. Of 200 patients, 182 were treated on at least 1 phase 1 clinical trial. The median follow‐up of surviving patients was 21 months, and the median overall survival was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4‐10.8). In univariate analysis, the factors that predicted shorter survival were primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract; a history of thrombosis, liver metastases, and elevated levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase; platelet count; carbohydrate antigen 9 (Ca19‐9) and Ca‐125 levels; aspartate aminotransferase levels, and alkaline phosphatase levels (P &lt; .05 for each). In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% CI, 1.29‐4.39; P = .005), platelets ≥440 × 109/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12‐2.65; P = .014), and the presence of liver metastases (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09‐2.09; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were referred to phase 1 studies had a short median survival (9 months). Patients with thrombocytosis, liver metastases, and a history of thromboembolism had worse outcomes. A prognostic score is proposed. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society. In this analysis of patients who were seen in the Phase 1 Clinic at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, overall survival and risk factors that were predictive of survival were identified. In multivariate analysis, independent factors that predicted shorter survival were a history of thromboembolism, a platelet count ≥440 × 109/L, and the presence of liver metastases. These factors can be used to identify specific risk groups, to compare results among different phase 1 clinical trials, and to improve patient selection for these trials.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/cncr.24018</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2009-03, Vol.115 (5), p.1091-1099
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_24018_CNCR24018
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects biologic agents
liver metastases
phase 1
platelets
predictive factors
survival
targeted therapies
thromboembolism
title Survival of patients in a Phase 1 clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A29%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20of%20patients%20in%20a%20Phase%201%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Wheler,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1091&rft.epage=1099&rft.pages=1091-1099&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.24018&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3ECNCR24018%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true