Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization

BACKGROUND. Focal targeted therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment for localized prostate cancer in an attempt to reduce morbidity. However, these modalities rely heavily on accurate tumor localization to achieve total tumor ablation. In the current study, we sought to examine the ability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2008-10, Vol.113 (7), p.1559-1565
Hauptverfasser: Schulte, Ryan T., Wood, David P., Daignault, Stephanie, Shah, Rajal B., Wei, John T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1565
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1559
container_title Cancer
container_volume 113
creator Schulte, Ryan T.
Wood, David P.
Daignault, Stephanie
Shah, Rajal B.
Wei, John T.
description BACKGROUND. Focal targeted therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment for localized prostate cancer in an attempt to reduce morbidity. However, these modalities rely heavily on accurate tumor localization to achieve total tumor ablation. In the current study, we sought to examine the ability of contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy to predict the location of tumors. METHODS. A total of 281 men with prostate cancer detected via a standardized extended pattern biopsy template with at least 12 cores and who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Tumor location on biopsy, stratified by laterality and by site (apex vs mid‐base prostate), was compared with corresponding locations on the prostatectomy specimen. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to assess the effects of clinical variables on pathologic agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS. Of the 281 prostate biopsies, the positive predictive value (PPV) of right and left needle biopsy was high at 97.3% and 96.7%, respectively. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) was low at 24.7% and 31.3%, respectively. When more specific locations were considered, the NPV improved at the apex. However, this came at a cost to the PPV. Tumor focality on prostatectomy specimen was the only clinical feature found to be significantly and consistently related to pathologic agreement. CONCLUSIONS. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy, although able to diagnose cancers, fails to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate. Focal therapy, which relies heavily on localization, should only be performed with this caveat in mind. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society. Positive predictive values of right and left needle biopsy were high at 97.3% and 96.7%; however, the negative predictive values were low at 24.7% and 31.3%. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsies, although able to diagnose cancers, fail to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.23781
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_23781_CNCR23781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR23781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1191-4654e15248878fea744c9526e480e35f54ce51259699ea1fba439de7f7fd1c493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKxDAYhYMoWEc3PkFeoGP-XJpkKfUywqAgDrgLmfQPRDptaSNan96Z0c0559sc-Ai5BrYExvhN6MK45EIbOCEFMKtLBpKfkoIxZkolxfs5uZimjz1qrkRB7jY5tSnPtI8UvzN2DTZ08Dnj2NFh7KfsM9Jt6ocp4URjP9L8udtn2wffph-fU99dkrPo2wmv_ntBNg_3b_WqXL88PtW36zIAWChlpSSC4tIYbSJ6LWWwilcoDUOhopIBFXBlK2vRQ9x6KWyDOurYQJBWLAj8_X6lFmc3jGnnx9kBcwd5d5B3R3lXP9evxyV-AVkHUCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schulte, Ryan T. ; Wood, David P. ; Daignault, Stephanie ; Shah, Rajal B. ; Wei, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Ryan T. ; Wood, David P. ; Daignault, Stephanie ; Shah, Rajal B. ; Wei, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND. Focal targeted therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment for localized prostate cancer in an attempt to reduce morbidity. However, these modalities rely heavily on accurate tumor localization to achieve total tumor ablation. In the current study, we sought to examine the ability of contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy to predict the location of tumors. METHODS. A total of 281 men with prostate cancer detected via a standardized extended pattern biopsy template with at least 12 cores and who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Tumor location on biopsy, stratified by laterality and by site (apex vs mid‐base prostate), was compared with corresponding locations on the prostatectomy specimen. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to assess the effects of clinical variables on pathologic agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS. Of the 281 prostate biopsies, the positive predictive value (PPV) of right and left needle biopsy was high at 97.3% and 96.7%, respectively. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) was low at 24.7% and 31.3%, respectively. When more specific locations were considered, the NPV improved at the apex. However, this came at a cost to the PPV. Tumor focality on prostatectomy specimen was the only clinical feature found to be significantly and consistently related to pathologic agreement. CONCLUSIONS. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy, although able to diagnose cancers, fails to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate. Focal therapy, which relies heavily on localization, should only be performed with this caveat in mind. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society. Positive predictive values of right and left needle biopsy were high at 97.3% and 96.7%; however, the negative predictive values were low at 24.7% and 31.3%. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsies, although able to diagnose cancers, fail to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>focal therapy ; localization ; prostate biopsy ; prostate neoplasms</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2008-10, Vol.113 (7), p.1559-1565</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1191-4654e15248878fea744c9526e480e35f54ce51259699ea1fba439de7f7fd1c493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.23781$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.23781$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daignault, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rajal B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization</title><title>Cancer</title><description>BACKGROUND. Focal targeted therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment for localized prostate cancer in an attempt to reduce morbidity. However, these modalities rely heavily on accurate tumor localization to achieve total tumor ablation. In the current study, we sought to examine the ability of contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy to predict the location of tumors. METHODS. A total of 281 men with prostate cancer detected via a standardized extended pattern biopsy template with at least 12 cores and who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Tumor location on biopsy, stratified by laterality and by site (apex vs mid‐base prostate), was compared with corresponding locations on the prostatectomy specimen. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to assess the effects of clinical variables on pathologic agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS. Of the 281 prostate biopsies, the positive predictive value (PPV) of right and left needle biopsy was high at 97.3% and 96.7%, respectively. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) was low at 24.7% and 31.3%, respectively. When more specific locations were considered, the NPV improved at the apex. However, this came at a cost to the PPV. Tumor focality on prostatectomy specimen was the only clinical feature found to be significantly and consistently related to pathologic agreement. CONCLUSIONS. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy, although able to diagnose cancers, fails to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate. Focal therapy, which relies heavily on localization, should only be performed with this caveat in mind. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society. Positive predictive values of right and left needle biopsy were high at 97.3% and 96.7%; however, the negative predictive values were low at 24.7% and 31.3%. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsies, although able to diagnose cancers, fail to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate.</description><subject>focal therapy</subject><subject>localization</subject><subject>prostate biopsy</subject><subject>prostate neoplasms</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotj8tKxDAYhYMoWEc3PkFeoGP-XJpkKfUywqAgDrgLmfQPRDptaSNan96Z0c0559sc-Ai5BrYExvhN6MK45EIbOCEFMKtLBpKfkoIxZkolxfs5uZimjz1qrkRB7jY5tSnPtI8UvzN2DTZ08Dnj2NFh7KfsM9Jt6ocp4URjP9L8udtn2wffph-fU99dkrPo2wmv_ntBNg_3b_WqXL88PtW36zIAWChlpSSC4tIYbSJ6LWWwilcoDUOhopIBFXBlK2vRQ9x6KWyDOurYQJBWLAj8_X6lFmc3jGnnx9kBcwd5d5B3R3lXP9evxyV-AVkHUCM</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Schulte, Ryan T.</creator><creator>Wood, David P.</creator><creator>Daignault, Stephanie</creator><creator>Shah, Rajal B.</creator><creator>Wei, John T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization</title><author>Schulte, Ryan T. ; Wood, David P. ; Daignault, Stephanie ; Shah, Rajal B. ; Wei, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1191-4654e15248878fea744c9526e480e35f54ce51259699ea1fba439de7f7fd1c493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>focal therapy</topic><topic>localization</topic><topic>prostate biopsy</topic><topic>prostate neoplasms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Ryan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daignault, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rajal B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, John T.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulte, Ryan T.</au><au>Wood, David P.</au><au>Daignault, Stephanie</au><au>Shah, Rajal B.</au><au>Wei, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1559</spage><epage>1565</epage><pages>1559-1565</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND. Focal targeted therapy has been proposed as a potential treatment for localized prostate cancer in an attempt to reduce morbidity. However, these modalities rely heavily on accurate tumor localization to achieve total tumor ablation. In the current study, we sought to examine the ability of contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy to predict the location of tumors. METHODS. A total of 281 men with prostate cancer detected via a standardized extended pattern biopsy template with at least 12 cores and who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Tumor location on biopsy, stratified by laterality and by site (apex vs mid‐base prostate), was compared with corresponding locations on the prostatectomy specimen. Generalized estimating equation models were developed to assess the effects of clinical variables on pathologic agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS. Of the 281 prostate biopsies, the positive predictive value (PPV) of right and left needle biopsy was high at 97.3% and 96.7%, respectively. However, the negative predictive value (NPV) was low at 24.7% and 31.3%, respectively. When more specific locations were considered, the NPV improved at the apex. However, this came at a cost to the PPV. Tumor focality on prostatectomy specimen was the only clinical feature found to be significantly and consistently related to pathologic agreement. CONCLUSIONS. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsy, although able to diagnose cancers, fails to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate. Focal therapy, which relies heavily on localization, should only be performed with this caveat in mind. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society. Positive predictive values of right and left needle biopsy were high at 97.3% and 96.7%; however, the negative predictive values were low at 24.7% and 31.3%. Contemporary extended pattern prostate biopsies, although able to diagnose cancers, fail to provide reliable localization of tumors to specific areas of the prostate.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/cncr.23781</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2008-10, Vol.113 (7), p.1559-1565
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_cncr_23781_CNCR23781
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects focal therapy
localization
prostate biopsy
prostate neoplasms
title Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A02%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20extended%20pattern%20prostate%20biopsies%20for%20tumor%20localization&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Schulte,%20Ryan%20T.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1559&rft.epage=1565&rft.pages=1559-1565&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.23781&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3ECNCR23781%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true