Theta‐gamma coupling and ApoE genotype in patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia

Background Theta‐gamma coupling (TGC) is an electroencephalography (EEG) marker of working memory and depends on robust synaptic plasticity within the recurrent prefrontal cortical networks (Rajji et al. 2017, Buszaski et al. 2012). ApoE4 allele has deleterious effects on synaptic plasticity (Teter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2020-12, Vol.16, p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Patterson, Rachel A, Brooks, Heather J, Zomorrodi, Reza, Kumar, Sanjeev, Blumberger, Daniel M, Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel, Fischer, Corinne E, Flint, Alastair, Herrmann, Nathan, Kennedy, James L, Lanctot, Krista L, Mah, Linda, Mulsant, Benoit H, Pollock, Bruce G, Rajji, Tarek K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 16
creator Patterson, Rachel A
Brooks, Heather J
Zomorrodi, Reza
Kumar, Sanjeev
Blumberger, Daniel M
Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel
Fischer, Corinne E
Flint, Alastair
Herrmann, Nathan
Kennedy, James L
Lanctot, Krista L
Mah, Linda
Mulsant, Benoit H
Pollock, Bruce G
Rajji, Tarek K
description Background Theta‐gamma coupling (TGC) is an electroencephalography (EEG) marker of working memory and depends on robust synaptic plasticity within the recurrent prefrontal cortical networks (Rajji et al. 2017, Buszaski et al. 2012). ApoE4 allele has deleterious effects on synaptic plasticity (Teter et al. 2004). Thus, the primary objective of this analysis is to determine whether there is a relationship between ApoE4 genotype and TGC during the performance of a working memory task (N‐back). Method We used baseline data from a large Alzheimer’s dementia prevention trial. Participants were diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), past history of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), or both (MCI+MDD) and had completed N‐back‐EEG and ApoE genotyping. TGC was measured across right and left frontal electrodes. Participants were grouped based on E4 presence (ApoE2/E3 or ApoE3/E3 [noncarriers] vs. ApoE3/E4 or ApoE4/E4 [carriers]). Result We included 248 participants (MCI= 125; MDD= 44, MCI+MDD= 79; 153 females/95 males). There were 182 ApoE4 noncarriers (age= 71±6.5; Theta power= 16,290±14,764; Gamma power= 5793±5663; TGC= 0.00251±0.00227; PiB frontal amyloid=1.4371±0.32) and 66 noncarriers (age=71±5.0; Theta power= 17,235±14,312; Gamma power= 6473±5287; TGC= 0.002184±0.001622; PiB frontal amyloid= 2.09±0.78). Multiple linear regression results show that ApoE4 carriers had reduced TGC (β= 0.205, p= 0.042, Cohen’s d= 0.28) after controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, theta power, gamma power, and PiB frontal amyloid. Gamma power was also a significant predictor of TGC. Conclusion Our results suggest that presence of ApoE4 allele contributes to the modulation of TGC during a working memory task. As ApoE impacts synaptic plasticity, our findings suggest that synaptic plasticity or other ApoE‐related mechanisms underlie TGC. Rajji, T.K., et al., Ordering Information in Working Memory and Modulation of Gamma by Theta Oscillations in Humans. Cerebral Cortex, 2017. 27(2): p. 1482‐1490. Buzsaki, G. and X.J. Wang, Mechanisms of Gamma Oscillations, in Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol 35, S.E. Hyman, Editor. 2012. p. 203‐225. Teter, B., ApoE‐dependent plasticity in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 2004. 23(3): p. 167‐179.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alz.047573
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_alz_047573_ALZ047573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ALZ047573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1193-689b1302b51503e35537975a1d3f5bb80f37ecd4fc8a0e1ed9893c5ddc0495d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFY3PsG8QOqdTG6SWYZStRBwUxHcDJPMTTqaP5KIpKs-gltfr09ipeLqO4uPsziM3QpYCAD_zlS7BQQRRvKMzQSi76EfqfN_DuGSXQ3DG0AAscAZe9lsaTSH_Vdp6trwvP3oKteU3DSWJ1274iU17Th1xF3DOzM6asaBm5H3bnjnRdvzpNptydXUH_bfA7dUHx_OXLOLwlQD3fztnD3frzbLRy99elgvk9TLhVDSC2OVCQl-hgJBkkSUkYrQCCsLzLIYChlRboMijw2QIKtiJXO0NodAoQ3lnImT99NVNOmud7XpJy1A__bQxx761EMn6euJ5A8Ly1eq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theta‐gamma coupling and ApoE genotype in patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Patterson, Rachel A ; Brooks, Heather J ; Zomorrodi, Reza ; Kumar, Sanjeev ; Blumberger, Daniel M ; Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel ; Fischer, Corinne E ; Flint, Alastair ; Herrmann, Nathan ; Kennedy, James L ; Lanctot, Krista L ; Mah, Linda ; Mulsant, Benoit H ; Pollock, Bruce G ; Rajji, Tarek K</creator><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel A ; Brooks, Heather J ; Zomorrodi, Reza ; Kumar, Sanjeev ; Blumberger, Daniel M ; Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel ; Fischer, Corinne E ; Flint, Alastair ; Herrmann, Nathan ; Kennedy, James L ; Lanctot, Krista L ; Mah, Linda ; Mulsant, Benoit H ; Pollock, Bruce G ; Rajji, Tarek K</creatorcontrib><description>Background Theta‐gamma coupling (TGC) is an electroencephalography (EEG) marker of working memory and depends on robust synaptic plasticity within the recurrent prefrontal cortical networks (Rajji et al. 2017, Buszaski et al. 2012). ApoE4 allele has deleterious effects on synaptic plasticity (Teter et al. 2004). Thus, the primary objective of this analysis is to determine whether there is a relationship between ApoE4 genotype and TGC during the performance of a working memory task (N‐back). Method We used baseline data from a large Alzheimer’s dementia prevention trial. Participants were diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), past history of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), or both (MCI+MDD) and had completed N‐back‐EEG and ApoE genotyping. TGC was measured across right and left frontal electrodes. Participants were grouped based on E4 presence (ApoE2/E3 or ApoE3/E3 [noncarriers] vs. ApoE3/E4 or ApoE4/E4 [carriers]). Result We included 248 participants (MCI= 125; MDD= 44, MCI+MDD= 79; 153 females/95 males). There were 182 ApoE4 noncarriers (age= 71±6.5; Theta power= 16,290±14,764; Gamma power= 5793±5663; TGC= 0.00251±0.00227; PiB frontal amyloid=1.4371±0.32) and 66 noncarriers (age=71±5.0; Theta power= 17,235±14,312; Gamma power= 6473±5287; TGC= 0.002184±0.001622; PiB frontal amyloid= 2.09±0.78). Multiple linear regression results show that ApoE4 carriers had reduced TGC (β= 0.205, p= 0.042, Cohen’s d= 0.28) after controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, theta power, gamma power, and PiB frontal amyloid. Gamma power was also a significant predictor of TGC. Conclusion Our results suggest that presence of ApoE4 allele contributes to the modulation of TGC during a working memory task. As ApoE impacts synaptic plasticity, our findings suggest that synaptic plasticity or other ApoE‐related mechanisms underlie TGC. Rajji, T.K., et al., Ordering Information in Working Memory and Modulation of Gamma by Theta Oscillations in Humans. Cerebral Cortex, 2017. 27(2): p. 1482‐1490. Buzsaki, G. and X.J. Wang, Mechanisms of Gamma Oscillations, in Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol 35, S.E. Hyman, Editor. 2012. p. 203‐225. Teter, B., ApoE‐dependent plasticity in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 2004. 23(3): p. 167‐179.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alz.047573</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2020-12, Vol.16, p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 the Alzheimer's Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1193-689b1302b51503e35537975a1d3f5bb80f37ecd4fc8a0e1ed9893c5ddc0495d63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falz.047573$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falz.047573$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Heather J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zomorrodi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberger, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Corinne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flint, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanctot, Krista L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mah, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulsant, Benoit H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajji, Tarek K</creatorcontrib><title>Theta‐gamma coupling and ApoE genotype in patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><description>Background Theta‐gamma coupling (TGC) is an electroencephalography (EEG) marker of working memory and depends on robust synaptic plasticity within the recurrent prefrontal cortical networks (Rajji et al. 2017, Buszaski et al. 2012). ApoE4 allele has deleterious effects on synaptic plasticity (Teter et al. 2004). Thus, the primary objective of this analysis is to determine whether there is a relationship between ApoE4 genotype and TGC during the performance of a working memory task (N‐back). Method We used baseline data from a large Alzheimer’s dementia prevention trial. Participants were diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), past history of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), or both (MCI+MDD) and had completed N‐back‐EEG and ApoE genotyping. TGC was measured across right and left frontal electrodes. Participants were grouped based on E4 presence (ApoE2/E3 or ApoE3/E3 [noncarriers] vs. ApoE3/E4 or ApoE4/E4 [carriers]). Result We included 248 participants (MCI= 125; MDD= 44, MCI+MDD= 79; 153 females/95 males). There were 182 ApoE4 noncarriers (age= 71±6.5; Theta power= 16,290±14,764; Gamma power= 5793±5663; TGC= 0.00251±0.00227; PiB frontal amyloid=1.4371±0.32) and 66 noncarriers (age=71±5.0; Theta power= 17,235±14,312; Gamma power= 6473±5287; TGC= 0.002184±0.001622; PiB frontal amyloid= 2.09±0.78). Multiple linear regression results show that ApoE4 carriers had reduced TGC (β= 0.205, p= 0.042, Cohen’s d= 0.28) after controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, theta power, gamma power, and PiB frontal amyloid. Gamma power was also a significant predictor of TGC. Conclusion Our results suggest that presence of ApoE4 allele contributes to the modulation of TGC during a working memory task. As ApoE impacts synaptic plasticity, our findings suggest that synaptic plasticity or other ApoE‐related mechanisms underlie TGC. Rajji, T.K., et al., Ordering Information in Working Memory and Modulation of Gamma by Theta Oscillations in Humans. Cerebral Cortex, 2017. 27(2): p. 1482‐1490. Buzsaki, G. and X.J. Wang, Mechanisms of Gamma Oscillations, in Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol 35, S.E. Hyman, Editor. 2012. p. 203‐225. Teter, B., ApoE‐dependent plasticity in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 2004. 23(3): p. 167‐179.</description><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFY3PsG8QOqdTG6SWYZStRBwUxHcDJPMTTqaP5KIpKs-gltfr09ipeLqO4uPsziM3QpYCAD_zlS7BQQRRvKMzQSi76EfqfN_DuGSXQ3DG0AAscAZe9lsaTSH_Vdp6trwvP3oKteU3DSWJ1274iU17Th1xF3DOzM6asaBm5H3bnjnRdvzpNptydXUH_bfA7dUHx_OXLOLwlQD3fztnD3frzbLRy99elgvk9TLhVDSC2OVCQl-hgJBkkSUkYrQCCsLzLIYChlRboMijw2QIKtiJXO0NodAoQ3lnImT99NVNOmud7XpJy1A__bQxx761EMn6euJ5A8Ly1eq</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Patterson, Rachel A</creator><creator>Brooks, Heather J</creator><creator>Zomorrodi, Reza</creator><creator>Kumar, Sanjeev</creator><creator>Blumberger, Daniel M</creator><creator>Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel</creator><creator>Fischer, Corinne E</creator><creator>Flint, Alastair</creator><creator>Herrmann, Nathan</creator><creator>Kennedy, James L</creator><creator>Lanctot, Krista L</creator><creator>Mah, Linda</creator><creator>Mulsant, Benoit H</creator><creator>Pollock, Bruce G</creator><creator>Rajji, Tarek K</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Theta‐gamma coupling and ApoE genotype in patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia</title><author>Patterson, Rachel A ; Brooks, Heather J ; Zomorrodi, Reza ; Kumar, Sanjeev ; Blumberger, Daniel M ; Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel ; Fischer, Corinne E ; Flint, Alastair ; Herrmann, Nathan ; Kennedy, James L ; Lanctot, Krista L ; Mah, Linda ; Mulsant, Benoit H ; Pollock, Bruce G ; Rajji, Tarek K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1193-689b1302b51503e35537975a1d3f5bb80f37ecd4fc8a0e1ed9893c5ddc0495d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Heather J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zomorrodi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blumberger, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Corinne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flint, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrmann, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, James L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanctot, Krista L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mah, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulsant, Benoit H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Bruce G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajji, Tarek K</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patterson, Rachel A</au><au>Brooks, Heather J</au><au>Zomorrodi, Reza</au><au>Kumar, Sanjeev</au><au>Blumberger, Daniel M</au><au>Graff‐Guerrero, Ariel</au><au>Fischer, Corinne E</au><au>Flint, Alastair</au><au>Herrmann, Nathan</au><au>Kennedy, James L</au><au>Lanctot, Krista L</au><au>Mah, Linda</au><au>Mulsant, Benoit H</au><au>Pollock, Bruce G</au><au>Rajji, Tarek K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theta‐gamma coupling and ApoE genotype in patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Background Theta‐gamma coupling (TGC) is an electroencephalography (EEG) marker of working memory and depends on robust synaptic plasticity within the recurrent prefrontal cortical networks (Rajji et al. 2017, Buszaski et al. 2012). ApoE4 allele has deleterious effects on synaptic plasticity (Teter et al. 2004). Thus, the primary objective of this analysis is to determine whether there is a relationship between ApoE4 genotype and TGC during the performance of a working memory task (N‐back). Method We used baseline data from a large Alzheimer’s dementia prevention trial. Participants were diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), past history of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), or both (MCI+MDD) and had completed N‐back‐EEG and ApoE genotyping. TGC was measured across right and left frontal electrodes. Participants were grouped based on E4 presence (ApoE2/E3 or ApoE3/E3 [noncarriers] vs. ApoE3/E4 or ApoE4/E4 [carriers]). Result We included 248 participants (MCI= 125; MDD= 44, MCI+MDD= 79; 153 females/95 males). There were 182 ApoE4 noncarriers (age= 71±6.5; Theta power= 16,290±14,764; Gamma power= 5793±5663; TGC= 0.00251±0.00227; PiB frontal amyloid=1.4371±0.32) and 66 noncarriers (age=71±5.0; Theta power= 17,235±14,312; Gamma power= 6473±5287; TGC= 0.002184±0.001622; PiB frontal amyloid= 2.09±0.78). Multiple linear regression results show that ApoE4 carriers had reduced TGC (β= 0.205, p= 0.042, Cohen’s d= 0.28) after controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, theta power, gamma power, and PiB frontal amyloid. Gamma power was also a significant predictor of TGC. Conclusion Our results suggest that presence of ApoE4 allele contributes to the modulation of TGC during a working memory task. As ApoE impacts synaptic plasticity, our findings suggest that synaptic plasticity or other ApoE‐related mechanisms underlie TGC. Rajji, T.K., et al., Ordering Information in Working Memory and Modulation of Gamma by Theta Oscillations in Humans. Cerebral Cortex, 2017. 27(2): p. 1482‐1490. Buzsaki, G. and X.J. Wang, Mechanisms of Gamma Oscillations, in Annual Review of Neuroscience, Vol 35, S.E. Hyman, Editor. 2012. p. 203‐225. Teter, B., ApoE‐dependent plasticity in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 2004. 23(3): p. 167‐179.</abstract><doi>10.1002/alz.047573</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2020-12, Vol.16, p.n/a
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_alz_047573_ALZ047573
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Theta‐gamma coupling and ApoE genotype in patients at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A21%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theta%E2%80%90gamma%20coupling%20and%20ApoE%20genotype%20in%20patients%20at%20risk%20for%20Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20dementia&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Patterson,%20Rachel%20A&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=16&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alz.047573&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3EALZ047573%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true