Progression modelling of cognitive decline and associated FDG‐PET imaging features in Alzheimer’s disease

Background Prognosis for Alzheimer’s disease is difficult, with rates of disease progression varying widely. Despite the extensive use of clinical dementia severity assessment scales to determine dementia diagnosis and to monitor progression, there is no consensus on which imaging factors may accura...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2020-12, Vol.16, p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Prosser, Angus, Evenden, Dave, Holmes, Robin, Kipps, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 16
creator Prosser, Angus
Evenden, Dave
Holmes, Robin
Kipps, Christopher
description Background Prognosis for Alzheimer’s disease is difficult, with rates of disease progression varying widely. Despite the extensive use of clinical dementia severity assessment scales to determine dementia diagnosis and to monitor progression, there is no consensus on which imaging factors may accurately predict future decline trajectories on these measures. Determination of baseline imaging patterns that are related to slower, or faster, decline rates could be used to identify those at highest risk of worse outcomes and inform care planning. Method Decline trajectories were estimated from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset which contains clinical, imaging, and biological assessment records for 1,736 patients followed‐up over 8 years at 3, 6, or 12 month intervals. Clusters of similar decline trajectories were identified for patients with relevant baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) imaging data (N=530) using mini‐mental state examination (MMSE), clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR‐SB), Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS‐13), and functional activities questionnaire (FAQ) assessment scores. Decline trajectories allocated to slow, intermediate, and fast clusters were further analysed to find significant associations with PET imaging features using statistical parametric mapping (SPM12). Result When compared to cognitively normal non‐decliners, slow, intermediate and fast cluster groups showed similar topographic patterns of hypometabolism on FDG‐PET for all four clinical assessments (p
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alz.045900
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_alz_045900_ALZ045900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ALZ045900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1190-f24905c9691b0e76076cd3efdb5f1ac1fdab988c1002110e20a9e6665f829aed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UEtOwzAUtBBIlMKGE_gCKe-ltRsvq9IWpEh0UTZsIsd-Dkb5oLiA2lWPwJbr9SSkCmI1o5FmNDOM3SKMECC-0-V-BBOhAM7YAIWIIxFP1fk_l3DJrkJ4A5hAgmLAqnXbFC2F4JuaV42lsvR1wRvHTVPUfus_iVsynUhc15brEBrj9ZYsX96vjofv9WLDfaWLk8uR3n50YdzXfFbuX8lX1B4PP4FbH0gHumYXTpeBbv5wyJ6Xi838IUqfVo_zWRoZRAWRiycKhFFSYQ40lTCVxo7J2Vw41Aad1blKEnOajAgUg1YkpRQuiZUmOx4y7HO_fEm77L3tGra7DCE7WbLupax_KZulLz0b_wJWfGAl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progression modelling of cognitive decline and associated FDG‐PET imaging features in Alzheimer’s disease</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Prosser, Angus ; Evenden, Dave ; Holmes, Robin ; Kipps, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Prosser, Angus ; Evenden, Dave ; Holmes, Robin ; Kipps, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prognosis for Alzheimer’s disease is difficult, with rates of disease progression varying widely. Despite the extensive use of clinical dementia severity assessment scales to determine dementia diagnosis and to monitor progression, there is no consensus on which imaging factors may accurately predict future decline trajectories on these measures. Determination of baseline imaging patterns that are related to slower, or faster, decline rates could be used to identify those at highest risk of worse outcomes and inform care planning. Method Decline trajectories were estimated from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset which contains clinical, imaging, and biological assessment records for 1,736 patients followed‐up over 8 years at 3, 6, or 12 month intervals. Clusters of similar decline trajectories were identified for patients with relevant baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) imaging data (N=530) using mini‐mental state examination (MMSE), clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR‐SB), Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS‐13), and functional activities questionnaire (FAQ) assessment scores. Decline trajectories allocated to slow, intermediate, and fast clusters were further analysed to find significant associations with PET imaging features using statistical parametric mapping (SPM12). Result When compared to cognitively normal non‐decliners, slow, intermediate and fast cluster groups showed similar topographic patterns of hypometabolism on FDG‐PET for all four clinical assessments (p&lt;0.05 family‐wise error corrected). Slow progressors showed focal hippocampal hypometabolism, which extended into parietotemporal, inferior parietal and precuneal regions for intermediate progressors. Fast progressors showed more extensive hypometabolism in similar regions with additional superior frontal hypometabolism. Although locational deficits were similar on cognitive measures for decline groups, CDR‐SB showed the greatest hypometabolism extent for slow progressors, followed by FAQ, then ADAS‐13, with MMSE showing the least. Conclusion Our results suggest a single pattern of pathological progression of functional degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease, with slow, intermediate and fast progressors at different time points on the same decline trajectory. This progression begins with focal medial temporal regional abnormalities, extending to parietotemporal, inferior parietal and precuneus regions, before finally involving the superior frontal lobe. CDR‐SB was the most sensitive in detecting slow progressor abnormality, with MMSE being the least sensitive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alz.045900</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2020-12, Vol.16, p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 the Alzheimer's Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1190-f24905c9691b0e76076cd3efdb5f1ac1fdab988c1002110e20a9e6665f829aed3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falz.045900$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falz.045900$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prosser, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evenden, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kipps, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Progression modelling of cognitive decline and associated FDG‐PET imaging features in Alzheimer’s disease</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><description>Background Prognosis for Alzheimer’s disease is difficult, with rates of disease progression varying widely. Despite the extensive use of clinical dementia severity assessment scales to determine dementia diagnosis and to monitor progression, there is no consensus on which imaging factors may accurately predict future decline trajectories on these measures. Determination of baseline imaging patterns that are related to slower, or faster, decline rates could be used to identify those at highest risk of worse outcomes and inform care planning. Method Decline trajectories were estimated from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset which contains clinical, imaging, and biological assessment records for 1,736 patients followed‐up over 8 years at 3, 6, or 12 month intervals. Clusters of similar decline trajectories were identified for patients with relevant baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) imaging data (N=530) using mini‐mental state examination (MMSE), clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR‐SB), Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS‐13), and functional activities questionnaire (FAQ) assessment scores. Decline trajectories allocated to slow, intermediate, and fast clusters were further analysed to find significant associations with PET imaging features using statistical parametric mapping (SPM12). Result When compared to cognitively normal non‐decliners, slow, intermediate and fast cluster groups showed similar topographic patterns of hypometabolism on FDG‐PET for all four clinical assessments (p&lt;0.05 family‐wise error corrected). Slow progressors showed focal hippocampal hypometabolism, which extended into parietotemporal, inferior parietal and precuneal regions for intermediate progressors. Fast progressors showed more extensive hypometabolism in similar regions with additional superior frontal hypometabolism. Although locational deficits were similar on cognitive measures for decline groups, CDR‐SB showed the greatest hypometabolism extent for slow progressors, followed by FAQ, then ADAS‐13, with MMSE showing the least. Conclusion Our results suggest a single pattern of pathological progression of functional degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease, with slow, intermediate and fast progressors at different time points on the same decline trajectory. This progression begins with focal medial temporal regional abnormalities, extending to parietotemporal, inferior parietal and precuneus regions, before finally involving the superior frontal lobe. CDR‐SB was the most sensitive in detecting slow progressor abnormality, with MMSE being the least sensitive.</description><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo9UEtOwzAUtBBIlMKGE_gCKe-ltRsvq9IWpEh0UTZsIsd-Dkb5oLiA2lWPwJbr9SSkCmI1o5FmNDOM3SKMECC-0-V-BBOhAM7YAIWIIxFP1fk_l3DJrkJ4A5hAgmLAqnXbFC2F4JuaV42lsvR1wRvHTVPUfus_iVsynUhc15brEBrj9ZYsX96vjofv9WLDfaWLk8uR3n50YdzXfFbuX8lX1B4PP4FbH0gHumYXTpeBbv5wyJ6Xi838IUqfVo_zWRoZRAWRiycKhFFSYQ40lTCVxo7J2Vw41Aad1blKEnOajAgUg1YkpRQuiZUmOx4y7HO_fEm77L3tGra7DCE7WbLupax_KZulLz0b_wJWfGAl</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Prosser, Angus</creator><creator>Evenden, Dave</creator><creator>Holmes, Robin</creator><creator>Kipps, Christopher</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Progression modelling of cognitive decline and associated FDG‐PET imaging features in Alzheimer’s disease</title><author>Prosser, Angus ; Evenden, Dave ; Holmes, Robin ; Kipps, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1190-f24905c9691b0e76076cd3efdb5f1ac1fdab988c1002110e20a9e6665f829aed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prosser, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evenden, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kipps, Christopher</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prosser, Angus</au><au>Evenden, Dave</au><au>Holmes, Robin</au><au>Kipps, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progression modelling of cognitive decline and associated FDG‐PET imaging features in Alzheimer’s disease</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Background Prognosis for Alzheimer’s disease is difficult, with rates of disease progression varying widely. Despite the extensive use of clinical dementia severity assessment scales to determine dementia diagnosis and to monitor progression, there is no consensus on which imaging factors may accurately predict future decline trajectories on these measures. Determination of baseline imaging patterns that are related to slower, or faster, decline rates could be used to identify those at highest risk of worse outcomes and inform care planning. Method Decline trajectories were estimated from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset which contains clinical, imaging, and biological assessment records for 1,736 patients followed‐up over 8 years at 3, 6, or 12 month intervals. Clusters of similar decline trajectories were identified for patients with relevant baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) imaging data (N=530) using mini‐mental state examination (MMSE), clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR‐SB), Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS‐13), and functional activities questionnaire (FAQ) assessment scores. Decline trajectories allocated to slow, intermediate, and fast clusters were further analysed to find significant associations with PET imaging features using statistical parametric mapping (SPM12). Result When compared to cognitively normal non‐decliners, slow, intermediate and fast cluster groups showed similar topographic patterns of hypometabolism on FDG‐PET for all four clinical assessments (p&lt;0.05 family‐wise error corrected). Slow progressors showed focal hippocampal hypometabolism, which extended into parietotemporal, inferior parietal and precuneal regions for intermediate progressors. Fast progressors showed more extensive hypometabolism in similar regions with additional superior frontal hypometabolism. Although locational deficits were similar on cognitive measures for decline groups, CDR‐SB showed the greatest hypometabolism extent for slow progressors, followed by FAQ, then ADAS‐13, with MMSE showing the least. Conclusion Our results suggest a single pattern of pathological progression of functional degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease, with slow, intermediate and fast progressors at different time points on the same decline trajectory. This progression begins with focal medial temporal regional abnormalities, extending to parietotemporal, inferior parietal and precuneus regions, before finally involving the superior frontal lobe. CDR‐SB was the most sensitive in detecting slow progressor abnormality, with MMSE being the least sensitive.</abstract><doi>10.1002/alz.045900</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2020-12, Vol.16, p.n/a
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_alz_045900_ALZ045900
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Progression modelling of cognitive decline and associated FDG‐PET imaging features in Alzheimer’s disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A49%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progression%20modelling%20of%20cognitive%20decline%20and%20associated%20FDG%E2%80%90PET%20imaging%20features%20in%20Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20disease&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Prosser,%20Angus&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=16&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alz.045900&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3EALZ045900%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true