Students' Close Reading of Science Texts

A question being asked by teachers across the country is, How can I teach students to acquire both the skills and knowledge demanded by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) while simultaneously guiding them to read challenging texts such as those presented in Appendix B of the CCSS? Answering this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Reading teacher 2013-10, Vol.67 (2), p.109-119
Hauptverfasser: Lapp, Diane, Grant, Maria, Moss, Barbara, Johnson, Kelly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 119
container_issue 2
container_start_page 109
container_title The Reading teacher
container_volume 67
creator Lapp, Diane
Grant, Maria
Moss, Barbara
Johnson, Kelly
description A question being asked by teachers across the country is, How can I teach students to acquire both the skills and knowledge demanded by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) while simultaneously guiding them to read challenging texts such as those presented in Appendix B of the CCSS? Answering this invites the integration of ideas and the innovation of novel instructional plans. Illustrating close reading procedures in two classrooms‐ one 1st grade and one 5th grade‐ this article provides an answer by detailing the manner in which a student might approach a challenging science text using annotated reading, partner talk, text‐based questioning and reflective writing to build competence and a capacity for reading, writing, listening, and speaking about informational texts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/TRTR.1191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_TRTR_1191_TRTR1191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>TRTR1191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1181-67f01248086a7a914fcfbc030e4fe70da7e85a2d97edd43a0db5888fd53458f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j8FOwzAQRC0EEqFw4A9yg4vb3diJnSOKoIAqUNOgHi03XqNASFEdRPv3NBQxl5nLG-kxdokwRoBkUpVVOUbM8YhFmIuMJwrlMYsAhOSQZnjKzkJ4g320hohdL_ovR10fruKiXQeKS7Ku6V7jtY8XdUNdTXFF2z6csxNv20AXfz1iL3e3VXHPZ8_Th-JmxmtEjTxTHjCRGnRmlc1R-tqvahBA0pMCZxXp1CYuV-ScFBbcKtVae5cKmWqfiRGbHH6_m5Z25nPTfNjNziCYwc8Mfmbw-13D2BP8QDShp-0_YTfvJlNCpWb5NDXJ47LK83lp5uIHf1hShQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Students' Close Reading of Science Texts</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Lapp, Diane ; Grant, Maria ; Moss, Barbara ; Johnson, Kelly</creator><creatorcontrib>Lapp, Diane ; Grant, Maria ; Moss, Barbara ; Johnson, Kelly</creatorcontrib><description>A question being asked by teachers across the country is, How can I teach students to acquire both the skills and knowledge demanded by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) while simultaneously guiding them to read challenging texts such as those presented in Appendix B of the CCSS? Answering this invites the integration of ideas and the innovation of novel instructional plans. Illustrating close reading procedures in two classrooms‐ one 1st grade and one 5th grade‐ this article provides an answer by detailing the manner in which a student might approach a challenging science text using annotated reading, partner talk, text‐based questioning and reflective writing to build competence and a capacity for reading, writing, listening, and speaking about informational texts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-0561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/TRTR.1191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>and materials ; as inquiry ; Assessment ; Childhood ; Comprehension ; Comprehension monitoring ; Constructivism ; Content literacy ; Depth of (higher level ; Depth of (higher level, literal level, etc.) ; Discussion ; etc. ; Information processing ; Informational text ; Instructional intervention ; Instructional models ; Instructional strategies ; Instructional strategies, teaching strategies ; Learning strategies ; Listening ; literal level ; Literature ; Making inferences ; Metacognition ; Metacognitive strategies ; methods ; Nonfiction ; Oral language ; Qualitative ; Questioning ; Reading strategies ; Research methodology ; Specific subject areas (math ; Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.) ; Strategies ; Strategies, methods, and materials ; Struggling learners ; Summarizing ; teaching strategies ; Theoretical perspectives ; To inform instruction ; To inform instruction, as inquiry ; To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply? ; Writing ; Writing across the curriculum ; Writing to learn</subject><ispartof>The Reading teacher, 2013-10, Vol.67 (2), p.109-119</ispartof><rights>2013 International Reading Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1181-67f01248086a7a914fcfbc030e4fe70da7e85a2d97edd43a0db5888fd53458f63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2FTRTR.1191$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2FTRTR.1191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lapp, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelly</creatorcontrib><title>Students' Close Reading of Science Texts</title><title>The Reading teacher</title><addtitle>Read Teach</addtitle><description>A question being asked by teachers across the country is, How can I teach students to acquire both the skills and knowledge demanded by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) while simultaneously guiding them to read challenging texts such as those presented in Appendix B of the CCSS? Answering this invites the integration of ideas and the innovation of novel instructional plans. Illustrating close reading procedures in two classrooms‐ one 1st grade and one 5th grade‐ this article provides an answer by detailing the manner in which a student might approach a challenging science text using annotated reading, partner talk, text‐based questioning and reflective writing to build competence and a capacity for reading, writing, listening, and speaking about informational texts.</description><subject>and materials</subject><subject>as inquiry</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Comprehension monitoring</subject><subject>Constructivism</subject><subject>Content literacy</subject><subject>Depth of (higher level</subject><subject>Depth of (higher level, literal level, etc.)</subject><subject>Discussion</subject><subject>etc.</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Informational text</subject><subject>Instructional intervention</subject><subject>Instructional models</subject><subject>Instructional strategies</subject><subject>Instructional strategies, teaching strategies</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>literal level</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Making inferences</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Metacognitive strategies</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><subject>Oral language</subject><subject>Qualitative</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Reading strategies</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Specific subject areas (math</subject><subject>Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.)</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Strategies, methods, and materials</subject><subject>Struggling learners</subject><subject>Summarizing</subject><subject>teaching strategies</subject><subject>Theoretical perspectives</subject><subject>To inform instruction</subject><subject>To inform instruction, as inquiry</subject><subject>To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply?</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing across the curriculum</subject><subject>Writing to learn</subject><issn>0034-0561</issn><issn>1936-2714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j8FOwzAQRC0EEqFw4A9yg4vb3diJnSOKoIAqUNOgHi03XqNASFEdRPv3NBQxl5nLG-kxdokwRoBkUpVVOUbM8YhFmIuMJwrlMYsAhOSQZnjKzkJ4g320hohdL_ovR10fruKiXQeKS7Ku6V7jtY8XdUNdTXFF2z6csxNv20AXfz1iL3e3VXHPZ8_Th-JmxmtEjTxTHjCRGnRmlc1R-tqvahBA0pMCZxXp1CYuV-ScFBbcKtVae5cKmWqfiRGbHH6_m5Z25nPTfNjNziCYwc8Mfmbw-13D2BP8QDShp-0_YTfvJlNCpWb5NDXJ47LK83lp5uIHf1hShQ</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Lapp, Diane</creator><creator>Grant, Maria</creator><creator>Moss, Barbara</creator><creator>Johnson, Kelly</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Students' Close Reading of Science Texts</title><author>Lapp, Diane ; Grant, Maria ; Moss, Barbara ; Johnson, Kelly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1181-67f01248086a7a914fcfbc030e4fe70da7e85a2d97edd43a0db5888fd53458f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>and materials</topic><topic>as inquiry</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Comprehension monitoring</topic><topic>Constructivism</topic><topic>Content literacy</topic><topic>Depth of (higher level</topic><topic>Depth of (higher level, literal level, etc.)</topic><topic>Discussion</topic><topic>etc.</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Informational text</topic><topic>Instructional intervention</topic><topic>Instructional models</topic><topic>Instructional strategies</topic><topic>Instructional strategies, teaching strategies</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>literal level</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Making inferences</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Metacognitive strategies</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><topic>Oral language</topic><topic>Qualitative</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Reading strategies</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Specific subject areas (math</topic><topic>Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.)</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Strategies, methods, and materials</topic><topic>Struggling learners</topic><topic>Summarizing</topic><topic>teaching strategies</topic><topic>Theoretical perspectives</topic><topic>To inform instruction</topic><topic>To inform instruction, as inquiry</topic><topic>To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply?</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing across the curriculum</topic><topic>Writing to learn</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lapp, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelly</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>The Reading teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lapp, Diane</au><au>Grant, Maria</au><au>Moss, Barbara</au><au>Johnson, Kelly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Students' Close Reading of Science Texts</atitle><jtitle>The Reading teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Read Teach</addtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>109-119</pages><issn>0034-0561</issn><eissn>1936-2714</eissn><abstract>A question being asked by teachers across the country is, How can I teach students to acquire both the skills and knowledge demanded by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) while simultaneously guiding them to read challenging texts such as those presented in Appendix B of the CCSS? Answering this invites the integration of ideas and the innovation of novel instructional plans. Illustrating close reading procedures in two classrooms‐ one 1st grade and one 5th grade‐ this article provides an answer by detailing the manner in which a student might approach a challenging science text using annotated reading, partner talk, text‐based questioning and reflective writing to build competence and a capacity for reading, writing, listening, and speaking about informational texts.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/TRTR.1191</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-0561
ispartof The Reading teacher, 2013-10, Vol.67 (2), p.109-119
issn 0034-0561
1936-2714
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1002_TRTR_1191_TRTR1191
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects and materials
as inquiry
Assessment
Childhood
Comprehension
Comprehension monitoring
Constructivism
Content literacy
Depth of (higher level
Depth of (higher level, literal level, etc.)
Discussion
etc.
Information processing
Informational text
Instructional intervention
Instructional models
Instructional strategies
Instructional strategies, teaching strategies
Learning strategies
Listening
literal level
Literature
Making inferences
Metacognition
Metacognitive strategies
methods
Nonfiction
Oral language
Qualitative
Questioning
Reading strategies
Research methodology
Specific subject areas (math
Specific subject areas (math, art, etc.)
Strategies
Strategies, methods, and materials
Struggling learners
Summarizing
teaching strategies
Theoretical perspectives
To inform instruction
To inform instruction, as inquiry
To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply?
Writing
Writing across the curriculum
Writing to learn
title Students' Close Reading of Science Texts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Students'%20Close%20Reading%20of%20Science%20Texts&rft.jtitle=The%20Reading%20teacher&rft.au=Lapp,%20Diane&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=109-119&rft.issn=0034-0561&rft.eissn=1936-2714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/TRTR.1191&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_istex%3ETRTR1191%3C/wiley_istex%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true