Establishing Motivation

This chapter presents the key findings from the SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study and analyzes with respect to best practices in implementing a scorecard system to achieve significant benefits. The SHAPs study results indicate that organizations want to use their scorecard...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 19
container_title
container_volume
description This chapter presents the key findings from the SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study and analyzes with respect to best practices in implementing a scorecard system to achieve significant benefits. The SHAPs study results indicate that organizations want to use their scorecard systems to motivate employees and most have achieved some success in doing so. The vast majority agree with the idea that their scorecard measures motivate employees to work in congruence with the organization's objectives. The use of targets in a scorecard system can have a motivating or de‐motivating effect on employees and management, depending on how they are created and used. A great de‐motivator for employees is the use of measures unrelated to the strategy of the organization. When measures used to evaluate performance do not relate to strategy, employees have the impression that their efforts are not related to the strategy and, therefore, they are not important to the company–a despondent feeling, to be sure.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/9781119197799.ch3
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch3_ch3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.1002/9781119197799.ch3</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch3_ch33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNDAw0rc0tzA0NLQ0tDQ3t7TUS84wZmTgRRFjZuAyMDE3MDSyNDGz4GDgLS7OMgABc3MLM0tOBnHX4pLEpJzM4ozMvHQF3_ySzLLEksz8PB4G1rTEnOJUXijNzWDo5hri7KFbnpmTWhmfmpSfn10cb2gQD3JFPIqN8UBXgLAxeXp0sehBVVuVWQBWX5CSZgwAikdHug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Establishing Motivation</title><source>O'Reilly Online Learning: Academic/Public Library Edition</source><contributor>Hatch, Toby ; Desroches, Denis ; Lawson, Raef</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Toby ; Desroches, Denis ; Lawson, Raef</creatorcontrib><description>This chapter presents the key findings from the SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study and analyzes with respect to best practices in implementing a scorecard system to achieve significant benefits. The SHAPs study results indicate that organizations want to use their scorecard systems to motivate employees and most have achieved some success in doing so. The vast majority agree with the idea that their scorecard measures motivate employees to work in congruence with the organization's objectives. The use of targets in a scorecard system can have a motivating or de‐motivating effect on employees and management, depending on how they are created and used. A great de‐motivator for employees is the use of measures unrelated to the strategy of the organization. When measures used to evaluate performance do not relate to strategy, employees have the impression that their efforts are not related to the strategy and, therefore, they are not important to the company–a despondent feeling, to be sure.</description><identifier>ISBN: 0470129468</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780470129463</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781119197799</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1119197791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/9781119197799.ch3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>benefits ; de‐motivation ; Hyperion and Pepperdine scorecard ; motivation ; scorecard system ; SUNY</subject><ispartof>Scorecard Best Practices, 2012, p.19-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>779,780,784,793,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hatch, Toby</contributor><contributor>Desroches, Denis</contributor><contributor>Lawson, Raef</contributor><title>Establishing Motivation</title><title>Scorecard Best Practices</title><description>This chapter presents the key findings from the SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study and analyzes with respect to best practices in implementing a scorecard system to achieve significant benefits. The SHAPs study results indicate that organizations want to use their scorecard systems to motivate employees and most have achieved some success in doing so. The vast majority agree with the idea that their scorecard measures motivate employees to work in congruence with the organization's objectives. The use of targets in a scorecard system can have a motivating or de‐motivating effect on employees and management, depending on how they are created and used. A great de‐motivator for employees is the use of measures unrelated to the strategy of the organization. When measures used to evaluate performance do not relate to strategy, employees have the impression that their efforts are not related to the strategy and, therefore, they are not important to the company–a despondent feeling, to be sure.</description><subject>benefits</subject><subject>de‐motivation</subject><subject>Hyperion and Pepperdine scorecard</subject><subject>motivation</subject><subject>scorecard system</subject><subject>SUNY</subject><isbn>0470129468</isbn><isbn>9780470129463</isbn><isbn>9781119197799</isbn><isbn>1119197791</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNDAw0rc0tzA0NLQ0tDQ3t7TUS84wZmTgRRFjZuAyMDE3MDSyNDGz4GDgLS7OMgABc3MLM0tOBnHX4pLEpJzM4ozMvHQF3_ySzLLEksz8PB4G1rTEnOJUXijNzWDo5hri7KFbnpmTWhmfmpSfn10cb2gQD3JFPIqN8UBXgLAxeXp0sehBVVuVWQBWX5CSZgwAikdHug</recordid><startdate>20120102</startdate><enddate>20120102</enddate><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20120102</creationdate><title>Establishing Motivation</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch3_ch33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>benefits</topic><topic>de‐motivation</topic><topic>Hyperion and Pepperdine scorecard</topic><topic>motivation</topic><topic>scorecard system</topic><topic>SUNY</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatch, Toby</au><au>Desroches, Denis</au><au>Lawson, Raef</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Establishing Motivation</atitle><btitle>Scorecard Best Practices</btitle><date>2012-01-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>19</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>19-31</pages><isbn>0470129468</isbn><isbn>9780470129463</isbn><eisbn>9781119197799</eisbn><eisbn>1119197791</eisbn><abstract>This chapter presents the key findings from the SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study and analyzes with respect to best practices in implementing a scorecard system to achieve significant benefits. The SHAPs study results indicate that organizations want to use their scorecard systems to motivate employees and most have achieved some success in doing so. The vast majority agree with the idea that their scorecard measures motivate employees to work in congruence with the organization's objectives. The use of targets in a scorecard system can have a motivating or de‐motivating effect on employees and management, depending on how they are created and used. A great de‐motivator for employees is the use of measures unrelated to the strategy of the organization. When measures used to evaluate performance do not relate to strategy, employees have the impression that their efforts are not related to the strategy and, therefore, they are not important to the company–a despondent feeling, to be sure.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/9781119197799.ch3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 0470129468
ispartof Scorecard Best Practices, 2012, p.19-31
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch3_ch3
source O'Reilly Online Learning: Academic/Public Library Edition
subjects benefits
de‐motivation
Hyperion and Pepperdine scorecard
motivation
scorecard system
SUNY
title Establishing Motivation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A42%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Establishing%20Motivation&rft.btitle=Scorecard%20Best%20Practices&rft.au=Hatch,%20Toby&rft.date=2012-01-02&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=19-31&rft.isbn=0470129468&rft.isbn_list=9780470129463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/9781119197799.ch3&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3E10.1002/9781119197799.ch3%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781119197799&rft.eisbn_list=1119197791&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true