Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L
. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of fish diseases 1992-11, Vol.15 (6), p.485-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 485 |
container_title | Journal of fish diseases |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | LILLEHAUG, A. LUNDER, T. POPPE, T. T. |
description | . Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992KA89400003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16440646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9v1DAQxS1EJZbCd7A4cIEEO_6XcEBatt1CWcGhFRwt25kgL9m4xE67_fZ1tKs9w1xGo_m9p5mH0BtKSprrw7akTIqiUpKWtGmqMllCZE3K_TO0OK2eowWhnBRKKfECvYxxSwhVgsoFull76FucICY__Mahw6bdTvdmSNDibhqnwU19iD7ie-OcHyBiP-Bl6jPhHY6m34XhPb6Z-zyZEW9eobPO9BFeH_s5ul1f3q6-FJsfV19Xy03hWK1EobiphHVNB42RjnZKUQZtKxlllnJRQy0EsIo5AS0FaXljbCVrZSxYqSw7R28Ptndj-DvlB_TORwd9Pg3CFDWVnBPJZQY_HkA3hhhH6PTd6HdmfNSU6DlGvdVzVnrOSs8x6mOMep_F7w7iB7Chi87D4OBksJzpb8u64SQXy3T97_TKJ5N8GFZhGlKWfjpKfQ-P_3Givl5f8Fpkg-Jg4GOC_cnAjH-0VEwJ_ev7lRaqoqriP_Vn9gQgpKr3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16440646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>LILLEHAUG, A. ; LUNDER, T. ; POPPE, T. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>LILLEHAUG, A. ; LUNDER, T. ; POPPE, T. T.</creatorcontrib><description>. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-7775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aeromonas salmonicida ; Fisheries ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Marine & Freshwater Biology ; Salmo salar ; Science & Technology ; Veterinary Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of fish diseases, 1992-11, Vol.15 (6), p.485-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>61</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wosA1992KA89400003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27199,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LILLEHAUG, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDER, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPPE, T. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</title><title>Journal of fish diseases</title><addtitle>J FISH DIS</addtitle><description>. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.</description><subject>Aeromonas salmonicida</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Biology</subject><subject>Salmo salar</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Veterinary Sciences</subject><issn>0140-7775</issn><issn>1365-2761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EZCTM</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE9v1DAQxS1EJZbCd7A4cIEEO_6XcEBatt1CWcGhFRwt25kgL9m4xE67_fZ1tKs9w1xGo_m9p5mH0BtKSprrw7akTIqiUpKWtGmqMllCZE3K_TO0OK2eowWhnBRKKfECvYxxSwhVgsoFull76FucICY__Mahw6bdTvdmSNDibhqnwU19iD7ie-OcHyBiP-Bl6jPhHY6m34XhPb6Z-zyZEW9eobPO9BFeH_s5ul1f3q6-FJsfV19Xy03hWK1EobiphHVNB42RjnZKUQZtKxlllnJRQy0EsIo5AS0FaXljbCVrZSxYqSw7R28Ptndj-DvlB_TORwd9Pg3CFDWVnBPJZQY_HkA3hhhH6PTd6HdmfNSU6DlGvdVzVnrOSs8x6mOMep_F7w7iB7Chi87D4OBksJzpb8u64SQXy3T97_TKJ5N8GFZhGlKWfjpKfQ-P_3Givl5f8Fpkg-Jg4GOC_cnAjH-0VEwJ_ev7lRaqoqriP_Vn9gQgpKr3</recordid><startdate>199211</startdate><enddate>199211</enddate><creator>LILLEHAUG, A.</creator><creator>LUNDER, T.</creator><creator>POPPE, T. T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>EZCTM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199211</creationdate><title>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</title><author>LILLEHAUG, A. ; LUNDER, T. ; POPPE, T. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Aeromonas salmonicida</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Biology</topic><topic>Salmo salar</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Veterinary Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LILLEHAUG, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDER, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPPE, T. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of fish diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LILLEHAUG, A.</au><au>LUNDER, T.</au><au>POPPE, T. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fish diseases</jtitle><stitle>J FISH DIS</stitle><date>1992-11</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>485-496</pages><issn>0140-7775</issn><eissn>1365-2761</eissn><abstract>. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-7775 |
ispartof | Journal of fish diseases, 1992-11, Vol.15 (6), p.485-496 |
issn | 0140-7775 1365-2761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992KA89400003 |
source | Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Aeromonas salmonicida Fisheries Life Sciences & Biomedicine Marine & Freshwater Biology Salmo salar Science & Technology Veterinary Sciences |
title | Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20testing%20of%20adjuvanted%20furunculosis%20vaccines%20in%20Atlantic%20salmon,%20Salmo%20salar%20L&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fish%20diseases&rft.au=LILLEHAUG,%20A.&rft.date=1992-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=485-496&rft.issn=0140-7775&rft.eissn=1365-2761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E16440646%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16440646&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |