Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L

. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fish diseases 1992-11, Vol.15 (6), p.485-496
Hauptverfasser: LILLEHAUG, A., LUNDER, T., POPPE, T. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 6
container_start_page 485
container_title Journal of fish diseases
container_volume 15
creator LILLEHAUG, A.
LUNDER, T.
POPPE, T. T.
description . Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992KA89400003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16440646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9v1DAQxS1EJZbCd7A4cIEEO_6XcEBatt1CWcGhFRwt25kgL9m4xE67_fZ1tKs9w1xGo_m9p5mH0BtKSprrw7akTIqiUpKWtGmqMllCZE3K_TO0OK2eowWhnBRKKfECvYxxSwhVgsoFull76FucICY__Mahw6bdTvdmSNDibhqnwU19iD7ie-OcHyBiP-Bl6jPhHY6m34XhPb6Z-zyZEW9eobPO9BFeH_s5ul1f3q6-FJsfV19Xy03hWK1EobiphHVNB42RjnZKUQZtKxlllnJRQy0EsIo5AS0FaXljbCVrZSxYqSw7R28Ptndj-DvlB_TORwd9Pg3CFDWVnBPJZQY_HkA3hhhH6PTd6HdmfNSU6DlGvdVzVnrOSs8x6mOMep_F7w7iB7Chi87D4OBksJzpb8u64SQXy3T97_TKJ5N8GFZhGlKWfjpKfQ-P_3Givl5f8Fpkg-Jg4GOC_cnAjH-0VEwJ_ev7lRaqoqriP_Vn9gQgpKr3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16440646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>LILLEHAUG, A. ; LUNDER, T. ; POPPE, T. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>LILLEHAUG, A. ; LUNDER, T. ; POPPE, T. T.</creatorcontrib><description>. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-7775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aeromonas salmonicida ; Fisheries ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Biology ; Salmo salar ; Science &amp; Technology ; Veterinary Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of fish diseases, 1992-11, Vol.15 (6), p.485-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>61</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wosA1992KA89400003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27199,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LILLEHAUG, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDER, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPPE, T. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</title><title>Journal of fish diseases</title><addtitle>J FISH DIS</addtitle><description>. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.</description><subject>Aeromonas salmonicida</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Biology</subject><subject>Salmo salar</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Veterinary Sciences</subject><issn>0140-7775</issn><issn>1365-2761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EZCTM</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE9v1DAQxS1EJZbCd7A4cIEEO_6XcEBatt1CWcGhFRwt25kgL9m4xE67_fZ1tKs9w1xGo_m9p5mH0BtKSprrw7akTIqiUpKWtGmqMllCZE3K_TO0OK2eowWhnBRKKfECvYxxSwhVgsoFull76FucICY__Mahw6bdTvdmSNDibhqnwU19iD7ie-OcHyBiP-Bl6jPhHY6m34XhPb6Z-zyZEW9eobPO9BFeH_s5ul1f3q6-FJsfV19Xy03hWK1EobiphHVNB42RjnZKUQZtKxlllnJRQy0EsIo5AS0FaXljbCVrZSxYqSw7R28Ptndj-DvlB_TORwd9Pg3CFDWVnBPJZQY_HkA3hhhH6PTd6HdmfNSU6DlGvdVzVnrOSs8x6mOMep_F7w7iB7Chi87D4OBksJzpb8u64SQXy3T97_TKJ5N8GFZhGlKWfjpKfQ-P_3Givl5f8Fpkg-Jg4GOC_cnAjH-0VEwJ_ev7lRaqoqriP_Vn9gQgpKr3</recordid><startdate>199211</startdate><enddate>199211</enddate><creator>LILLEHAUG, A.</creator><creator>LUNDER, T.</creator><creator>POPPE, T. T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>EZCTM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199211</creationdate><title>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</title><author>LILLEHAUG, A. ; LUNDER, T. ; POPPE, T. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-74a25bc9fe9a6c1f7713edd6313b1458e855e323c5ed1e6b49ab2687abeb67b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Aeromonas salmonicida</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Biology</topic><topic>Salmo salar</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Veterinary Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LILLEHAUG, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LUNDER, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPPE, T. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of fish diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LILLEHAUG, A.</au><au>LUNDER, T.</au><au>POPPE, T. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fish diseases</jtitle><stitle>J FISH DIS</stitle><date>1992-11</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>485-496</pages><issn>0140-7775</issn><eissn>1365-2761</eissn><abstract>. Two different commercial vaccines against furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida, were tested in Atlantic salmon on seven fish farms. Both vaccines were based on formalin‐inaclivated bacterins containing aluminium salts as adjuvants. The fish were vaccinated by intraperitoneal injection in the spring approximately one month prior to transfer to sea water, and they were challenged by natural outbreaks of furunculosis. During the first year, six of the farms experienced disease outbreaks. The overall mortality was 7·14% in vaccinated fish and 21·7% in unvaccinated controls, giving a relative percentage survival (RPS) of 67%. In the seventh farm, outbreaks of furunculosis more than one year after vaccination revealed that there was still a trend towards lower mortality in vaccinated fish, though the mean RPS fell to 22%. The use of adjuvants in the vaccines resulted in local lesions in the abdominal cavity of vaccinated fish. However, the severity of the lesions declined gradually, and they did not influence fish quality at the time of slaughtering. Vaccination also had a moderately adverse impact on fish weight gain in most cases.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-7775
ispartof Journal of fish diseases, 1992-11, Vol.15 (6), p.485-496
issn 0140-7775
1365-2761
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992KA89400003
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Aeromonas salmonicida
Fisheries
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Salmo salar
Science & Technology
Veterinary Sciences
title Field testing of adjuvanted furunculosis vaccines in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20testing%20of%20adjuvanted%20furunculosis%20vaccines%20in%20Atlantic%20salmon,%20Salmo%20salar%20L&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fish%20diseases&rft.au=LILLEHAUG,%20A.&rft.date=1992-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=485-496&rft.issn=0140-7775&rft.eissn=1365-2761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00680.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E16440646%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16440646&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true