SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR

Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 39...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of pharmacology 1992-10, Vol.227 (2), p.205-214
Hauptverfasser: MANSOUR, A, MENG, F, MEADORWOODRUFF, JH, TAYLOR, LP, CIVELLI, O, AKIL, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue 2
container_start_page 205
container_title European journal of pharmacology
container_volume 227
creator MANSOUR, A
MENG, F
MEADORWOODRUFF, JH
TAYLOR, LP
CIVELLI, O
AKIL, H
description Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992JP46400012CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1358663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwjAYgHvQIKL_QJMdPGjMtO3abo2nZRQYAUZgnJeuH8kMbGSDGP-9wxG8enqTvs_zJk8BeEDwDUHE3iHH2CUIsmeOXzhEmLvTK9C_PN-A26b5hBByxEkP9JBHA8a8PvhYx6lwh_FKRKkYOvNNGo7FQqzjtZOMnHQinMlmHi6cYbIM5_GiRbHTsmKZJqs7cG3ltjH35zkAm5FIo4k7S8ZxFM5c5fn-wbWen0MLta91LjmjHlWcBNqjWllmkbaasFwhSJGWRFomZWCQCXLImeFIUm8ASHdX1VXT1MZm-7rYyfo7QzA75WenzuzUmXGc_eZn01Z77LT9Md8Z_Sd17e3-6byXjZJbW8tSFc0Fo5QEmAYtFnTYl8kr26jClMpcqBBxjqdLwkj7uQhHxUEeiqqMqmN5aNXX_6veD3BGgAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MANSOUR, A ; MENG, F ; MEADORWOODRUFF, JH ; TAYLOR, LP ; CIVELLI, O ; AKIL, H</creator><creatorcontrib>MANSOUR, A ; MENG, F ; MEADORWOODRUFF, JH ; TAYLOR, LP ; CIVELLI, O ; AKIL, H</creatorcontrib><description>Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4106</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1358663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Sequence ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blotting, Northern ; Cell receptors ; Cell structures and functions ; Dopamine Agents - metabolism ; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine) ; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed ; Mutation ; Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy ; Raclopride ; Radioligand Assay ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism ; Salicylamides - metabolism ; Science &amp; Technology ; Sequence Alignment ; Transfection</subject><ispartof>European journal of pharmacology, 1992-10, Vol.227 (2), p.205-214</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>157</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wosA1992JP46400012</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27197,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5548258$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1358663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANSOUR, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENG, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, LP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CIVELLI, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKIL, H</creatorcontrib><title>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</title><title>European journal of pharmacology</title><addtitle>EUR J PHARM-MOLEC PH</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.</description><subject>Amino Acid Sequence</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blotting, Northern</subject><subject>Cell receptors</subject><subject>Cell structures and functions</subject><subject>Dopamine Agents - metabolism</subject><subject>Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine)</subject><subject>Mutagenesis, Site-Directed</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy</subject><subject>Raclopride</subject><subject>Radioligand Assay</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Salicylamides - metabolism</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>Transfection</subject><issn>0922-4106</issn><issn>0014-2999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EZCTM</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PwjAYgHvQIKL_QJMdPGjMtO3abo2nZRQYAUZgnJeuH8kMbGSDGP-9wxG8enqTvs_zJk8BeEDwDUHE3iHH2CUIsmeOXzhEmLvTK9C_PN-A26b5hBByxEkP9JBHA8a8PvhYx6lwh_FKRKkYOvNNGo7FQqzjtZOMnHQinMlmHi6cYbIM5_GiRbHTsmKZJqs7cG3ltjH35zkAm5FIo4k7S8ZxFM5c5fn-wbWen0MLta91LjmjHlWcBNqjWllmkbaasFwhSJGWRFomZWCQCXLImeFIUm8ASHdX1VXT1MZm-7rYyfo7QzA75WenzuzUmXGc_eZn01Z77LT9Md8Z_Sd17e3-6byXjZJbW8tSFc0Fo5QEmAYtFnTYl8kr26jClMpcqBBxjqdLwkj7uQhHxUEeiqqMqmN5aNXX_6veD3BGgAM</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>MANSOUR, A</creator><creator>MENG, F</creator><creator>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</creator><creator>TAYLOR, LP</creator><creator>CIVELLI, O</creator><creator>AKIL, H</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>EZCTM</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</title><author>MANSOUR, A ; MENG, F ; MEADORWOODRUFF, JH ; TAYLOR, LP ; CIVELLI, O ; AKIL, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Sequence</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blotting, Northern</topic><topic>Cell receptors</topic><topic>Cell structures and functions</topic><topic>Dopamine Agents - metabolism</topic><topic>Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine)</topic><topic>Mutagenesis, Site-Directed</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy</topic><topic>Raclopride</topic><topic>Radioligand Assay</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Salicylamides - metabolism</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>Transfection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANSOUR, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENG, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, LP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CIVELLI, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKIL, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANSOUR, A</au><au>MENG, F</au><au>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</au><au>TAYLOR, LP</au><au>CIVELLI, O</au><au>AKIL, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>EUR J PHARM-MOLEC PH</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>205-214</pages><issn>0922-4106</issn><issn>0014-2999</issn><abstract>Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>1358663</pmid><doi>10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0922-4106
ispartof European journal of pharmacology, 1992-10, Vol.227 (2), p.205-214
issn 0922-4106
0014-2999
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992JP46400012CitationCount
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amino Acid Sequence
Biological and medical sciences
Blotting, Northern
Cell receptors
Cell structures and functions
Dopamine Agents - metabolism
Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Molecular and cellular biology
Molecular Sequence Data
Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine)
Mutagenesis, Site-Directed
Mutation
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Raclopride
Radioligand Assay
Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry
Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics
Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism
Salicylamides - metabolism
Science & Technology
Sequence Alignment
Transfection
title SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T12%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SITE-DIRECTED%20MUTAGENESIS%20OF%20THE%20HUMAN%20DOPAMINE-D2%20RECEPTOR&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pharmacology&rft.au=MANSOUR,%20A&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=205-214&rft.issn=0922-4106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_webof%3E1358663%3C/pubmed_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/1358663&rfr_iscdi=true