SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR
Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 39...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of pharmacology 1992-10, Vol.227 (2), p.205-214 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 214 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 205 |
container_title | European journal of pharmacology |
container_volume | 227 |
creator | MANSOUR, A MENG, F MEADORWOODRUFF, JH TAYLOR, LP CIVELLI, O AKIL, H |
description | Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992JP46400012CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1358663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwjAYgHvQIKL_QJMdPGjMtO3abo2nZRQYAUZgnJeuH8kMbGSDGP-9wxG8enqTvs_zJk8BeEDwDUHE3iHH2CUIsmeOXzhEmLvTK9C_PN-A26b5hBByxEkP9JBHA8a8PvhYx6lwh_FKRKkYOvNNGo7FQqzjtZOMnHQinMlmHi6cYbIM5_GiRbHTsmKZJqs7cG3ltjH35zkAm5FIo4k7S8ZxFM5c5fn-wbWen0MLta91LjmjHlWcBNqjWllmkbaasFwhSJGWRFomZWCQCXLImeFIUm8ASHdX1VXT1MZm-7rYyfo7QzA75WenzuzUmXGc_eZn01Z77LT9Md8Z_Sd17e3-6byXjZJbW8tSFc0Fo5QEmAYtFnTYl8kr26jClMpcqBBxjqdLwkj7uQhHxUEeiqqMqmN5aNXX_6veD3BGgAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MANSOUR, A ; MENG, F ; MEADORWOODRUFF, JH ; TAYLOR, LP ; CIVELLI, O ; AKIL, H</creator><creatorcontrib>MANSOUR, A ; MENG, F ; MEADORWOODRUFF, JH ; TAYLOR, LP ; CIVELLI, O ; AKIL, H</creatorcontrib><description>Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4106</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1358663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Sequence ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blotting, Northern ; Cell receptors ; Cell structures and functions ; Dopamine Agents - metabolism ; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine) ; Mutagenesis, Site-Directed ; Mutation ; Pharmacology & Pharmacy ; Raclopride ; Radioligand Assay ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics ; Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism ; Salicylamides - metabolism ; Science & Technology ; Sequence Alignment ; Transfection</subject><ispartof>European journal of pharmacology, 1992-10, Vol.227 (2), p.205-214</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>157</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wosA1992JP46400012</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27197,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5548258$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1358663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANSOUR, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENG, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, LP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CIVELLI, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKIL, H</creatorcontrib><title>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</title><title>European journal of pharmacology</title><addtitle>EUR J PHARM-MOLEC PH</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.</description><subject>Amino Acid Sequence</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blotting, Northern</subject><subject>Cell receptors</subject><subject>Cell structures and functions</subject><subject>Dopamine Agents - metabolism</subject><subject>Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine)</subject><subject>Mutagenesis, Site-Directed</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Pharmacology & Pharmacy</subject><subject>Raclopride</subject><subject>Radioligand Assay</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics</subject><subject>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Salicylamides - metabolism</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Sequence Alignment</subject><subject>Transfection</subject><issn>0922-4106</issn><issn>0014-2999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EZCTM</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PwjAYgHvQIKL_QJMdPGjMtO3abo2nZRQYAUZgnJeuH8kMbGSDGP-9wxG8enqTvs_zJk8BeEDwDUHE3iHH2CUIsmeOXzhEmLvTK9C_PN-A26b5hBByxEkP9JBHA8a8PvhYx6lwh_FKRKkYOvNNGo7FQqzjtZOMnHQinMlmHi6cYbIM5_GiRbHTsmKZJqs7cG3ltjH35zkAm5FIo4k7S8ZxFM5c5fn-wbWen0MLta91LjmjHlWcBNqjWllmkbaasFwhSJGWRFomZWCQCXLImeFIUm8ASHdX1VXT1MZm-7rYyfo7QzA75WenzuzUmXGc_eZn01Z77LT9Md8Z_Sd17e3-6byXjZJbW8tSFc0Fo5QEmAYtFnTYl8kr26jClMpcqBBxjqdLwkj7uQhHxUEeiqqMqmN5aNXX_6veD3BGgAM</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>MANSOUR, A</creator><creator>MENG, F</creator><creator>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</creator><creator>TAYLOR, LP</creator><creator>CIVELLI, O</creator><creator>AKIL, H</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>EZCTM</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</title><author>MANSOUR, A ; MENG, F ; MEADORWOODRUFF, JH ; TAYLOR, LP ; CIVELLI, O ; AKIL, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f37b0f0d7ddba96535c948d35dcf6f1dfd46bc1051da4af6aa8e1e8b096e91a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Sequence</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blotting, Northern</topic><topic>Cell receptors</topic><topic>Cell structures and functions</topic><topic>Dopamine Agents - metabolism</topic><topic>Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine)</topic><topic>Mutagenesis, Site-Directed</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Pharmacology & Pharmacy</topic><topic>Raclopride</topic><topic>Radioligand Assay</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics</topic><topic>Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Salicylamides - metabolism</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Sequence Alignment</topic><topic>Transfection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANSOUR, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENG, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAYLOR, LP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CIVELLI, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKIL, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANSOUR, A</au><au>MENG, F</au><au>MEADORWOODRUFF, JH</au><au>TAYLOR, LP</au><au>CIVELLI, O</au><au>AKIL, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>EUR J PHARM-MOLEC PH</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>205-214</pages><issn>0922-4106</issn><issn>0014-2999</issn><abstract>Based on amino acid sequence and computer modeling, two conflicting three-dimensional models of the dopamine D2 receptor have been proposed. One model (Dahl ct al., 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 8111) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 80 of transmembrane (TM) 2 and asparagine 390 of TM6 with the transmembranes arranged in a clockwise manner, while a second model (Hibert et al., 1991, Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8) suggests that dopamine interacts with aspartate 114 of TM3 and the serines of TM5 (194 and 197) with the transmembranes arranged in a counterclockwise manner when viewed from the extracellular space. The present study tests the latter model by selectively mutating aspartate 114 and serines 194 and 197 of the human dopamine D2 receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. In addition, two methionines (116 and 117) were mutated to evaluate whether residues near aspartate (114) of the dopamine D2 receptor arc critical in differentiating dopamine receptor agonists from adrenoceptor agonists. Removal of the negative charge with the mutation of aspartate (114) to either asparagine or glycine led to a total loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. Individual or dual methionine mutations in positions 116 and 117, to make the dopamine D2 binding pocket more closely resemble the beta-2-adrenoccptor, did not result in a change in selectivity toward noradrenergic agonists or antagonists. The serine mutations revealed interesting differences between the dopamine D2 receptor and the adrenoceptors. In particular, serine 197 appeared more important than serine 194 for agonist binding. In addition, the binding of one agonist (N-0437) was unaffected by individual serine mutations, while the binding of some antagonists, such as raclopride and spiperone, was significantly altered. These findings are discussed in relation to ligand structure and their interactions with the putative binding pocket.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>1358663</pmid><doi>10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-4106 |
ispartof | European journal of pharmacology, 1992-10, Vol.227 (2), p.205-214 |
issn | 0922-4106 0014-2999 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_A1992JP46400012CitationCount |
source | Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Amino Acid Sequence Biological and medical sciences Blotting, Northern Cell receptors Cell structures and functions Dopamine Agents - metabolism Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Molecular and cellular biology Molecular Sequence Data Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine) Mutagenesis, Site-Directed Mutation Pharmacology & Pharmacy Raclopride Radioligand Assay Receptors, Dopamine D2 - chemistry Receptors, Dopamine D2 - genetics Receptors, Dopamine D2 - metabolism Salicylamides - metabolism Science & Technology Sequence Alignment Transfection |
title | SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF THE HUMAN DOPAMINE-D2 RECEPTOR |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T12%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SITE-DIRECTED%20MUTAGENESIS%20OF%20THE%20HUMAN%20DOPAMINE-D2%20RECEPTOR&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pharmacology&rft.au=MANSOUR,%20A&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=205-214&rft.issn=0922-4106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0922-4106(92)90129-J&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_webof%3E1358663%3C/pubmed_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/1358663&rfr_iscdi=true |