Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine

ABSTRACT Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of perinatology 1992-05, Vol.9 (3), p.214-218
Hauptverfasser: Spencer, David M., Miller, Kimball A., O'Quin, Michael, Tomsovic, Jacqueline P., Anderson, Bradley, Wong, Donna, Williams, William E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 3
container_start_page 214
container_title American journal of perinatology
container_volume 9
creator Spencer, David M.
Miller, Kimball A.
O'Quin, Michael
Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.
Anderson, Bradley
Wong, Donna
Williams, William E.
description ABSTRACT Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2007-999324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72917802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72917802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-c8ae630af80dda4494e33266bc1c683720279417e2cb216d7b836c850ee7871f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLxDAQh4Mouj6OHoUexJPVPJvEm65PWFTwcQ3ZdIrRttFkK_jfG-miJ0_DzO9jZvgQ2iX4iGAhjlNJMZal1ppRvoImBGtVKqnEKppgyURJKkY20GZKrxgTqrBaR-tESKF4NUEP5yEm2xb30PsWiluIn1CctcG9Fb7PbejtIsdTH93QOZ986E-K6UsbYniPwVnfQ_EMMQ2pmPl6HGyjtca2CXaWdQs9XV48Tq_L2d3VzfR0Vjom-KJ0ykLFsG0UrmvLuebAGK2quSOuUkxSTKXmRAJ1c0qqWs4Vq5wSGEAqSRq2hQ7GvfmTjwHSwnQ-OWhb20MYkpFUE6kwzWA5gi6GlCI05j36zsYvQ7D5kWiS-ZFoRomZ31suHuYd1H_0aC3n-8vcJmfbJto-q_nFBCdac5yxwxFbvHjowLyGIfZZyD9XvwGlEoZe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72917802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Spencer, David M. ; Miller, Kimball A. ; O'Quin, Michael ; Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. ; Anderson, Bradley ; Wong, Donna ; Williams, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David M. ; Miller, Kimball A. ; O'Quin, Michael ; Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. ; Anderson, Bradley ; Wong, Donna ; Williams, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-8785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-999324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1575846</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Thieme</publisher><subject>Anesthetics, Local ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Autonomic Nerve Block ; Biological and medical sciences ; Circumcision, Male ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Lidocaine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Penis - innervation ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Procaine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Stress, Physiological - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>American journal of perinatology, 1992-05, Vol.9 (3), p.214-218</ispartof><rights>1992 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-c8ae630af80dda4494e33266bc1c683720279417e2cb216d7b836c850ee7871f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2007-999324.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2007-999324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3017,3018,27924,27925,54559,54560</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5419940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1575846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kimball A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Quin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</title><title>American journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.</description><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Autonomic Nerve Block</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Circumcision, Male</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Penis - innervation</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Procaine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0735-1631</issn><issn>1098-8785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLxDAQh4Mouj6OHoUexJPVPJvEm65PWFTwcQ3ZdIrRttFkK_jfG-miJ0_DzO9jZvgQ2iX4iGAhjlNJMZal1ppRvoImBGtVKqnEKppgyURJKkY20GZKrxgTqrBaR-tESKF4NUEP5yEm2xb30PsWiluIn1CctcG9Fb7PbejtIsdTH93QOZ986E-K6UsbYniPwVnfQ_EMMQ2pmPl6HGyjtca2CXaWdQs9XV48Tq_L2d3VzfR0Vjom-KJ0ykLFsG0UrmvLuebAGK2quSOuUkxSTKXmRAJ1c0qqWs4Vq5wSGEAqSRq2hQ7GvfmTjwHSwnQ-OWhb20MYkpFUE6kwzWA5gi6GlCI05j36zsYvQ7D5kWiS-ZFoRomZ31suHuYd1H_0aC3n-8vcJmfbJto-q_nFBCdac5yxwxFbvHjowLyGIfZZyD9XvwGlEoZe</recordid><startdate>19920501</startdate><enddate>19920501</enddate><creator>Spencer, David M.</creator><creator>Miller, Kimball A.</creator><creator>O'Quin, Michael</creator><creator>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</creator><creator>Anderson, Bradley</creator><creator>Wong, Donna</creator><creator>Williams, William E.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920501</creationdate><title>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</title><author>Spencer, David M. ; Miller, Kimball A. ; O'Quin, Michael ; Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. ; Anderson, Bradley ; Wong, Donna ; Williams, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-c8ae630af80dda4494e33266bc1c683720279417e2cb216d7b836c850ee7871f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Autonomic Nerve Block</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Circumcision, Male</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Penis - innervation</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Procaine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kimball A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Quin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, David M.</au><au>Miller, Kimball A.</au><au>O'Quin, Michael</au><au>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</au><au>Anderson, Bradley</au><au>Wong, Donna</au><au>Williams, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</atitle><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><date>1992-05-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>214-218</pages><issn>0735-1631</issn><eissn>1098-8785</eissn><coden>AJPEEK</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>1575846</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2007-999324</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1631
ispartof American journal of perinatology, 1992-05, Vol.9 (3), p.214-218
issn 0735-1631
1098-8785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72917802
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Anesthetics, Local
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Autonomic Nerve Block
Biological and medical sciences
Circumcision, Male
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Lidocaine
Male
Medical sciences
Neuropharmacology
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Penis - innervation
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Procaine - analogs & derivatives
Stress, Physiological - prevention & control
title Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A37%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dorsal%20Penile%20Nerve%20Block%20in%20Neonatal%20Circumcision:%20Chloroprocaine%20Versus%20Lidocaine&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Spencer,%20David%20M.&rft.date=1992-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=214-218&rft.issn=0735-1631&rft.eissn=1098-8785&rft.coden=AJPEEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2007-999324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72917802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72917802&rft_id=info:pmid/1575846&rfr_iscdi=true