Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine
ABSTRACT Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circum...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of perinatology 1992-05, Vol.9 (3), p.214-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 214 |
container_title | American journal of perinatology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Spencer, David M. Miller, Kimball A. O'Quin, Michael Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. Anderson, Bradley Wong, Donna Williams, William E. |
description | ABSTRACT
Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-2007-999324 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72917802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72917802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-c8ae630af80dda4494e33266bc1c683720279417e2cb216d7b836c850ee7871f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLxDAQh4Mouj6OHoUexJPVPJvEm65PWFTwcQ3ZdIrRttFkK_jfG-miJ0_DzO9jZvgQ2iX4iGAhjlNJMZal1ppRvoImBGtVKqnEKppgyURJKkY20GZKrxgTqrBaR-tESKF4NUEP5yEm2xb30PsWiluIn1CctcG9Fb7PbejtIsdTH93QOZ986E-K6UsbYniPwVnfQ_EMMQ2pmPl6HGyjtca2CXaWdQs9XV48Tq_L2d3VzfR0Vjom-KJ0ykLFsG0UrmvLuebAGK2quSOuUkxSTKXmRAJ1c0qqWs4Vq5wSGEAqSRq2hQ7GvfmTjwHSwnQ-OWhb20MYkpFUE6kwzWA5gi6GlCI05j36zsYvQ7D5kWiS-ZFoRomZ31suHuYd1H_0aC3n-8vcJmfbJto-q_nFBCdac5yxwxFbvHjowLyGIfZZyD9XvwGlEoZe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72917802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Spencer, David M. ; Miller, Kimball A. ; O'Quin, Michael ; Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. ; Anderson, Bradley ; Wong, Donna ; Williams, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David M. ; Miller, Kimball A. ; O'Quin, Michael ; Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. ; Anderson, Bradley ; Wong, Donna ; Williams, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-8785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-999324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1575846</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEEK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Thieme</publisher><subject>Anesthetics, Local ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Autonomic Nerve Block ; Biological and medical sciences ; Circumcision, Male ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Lidocaine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Penis - innervation ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Procaine - analogs & derivatives ; Stress, Physiological - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>American journal of perinatology, 1992-05, Vol.9 (3), p.214-218</ispartof><rights>1992 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-c8ae630af80dda4494e33266bc1c683720279417e2cb216d7b836c850ee7871f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2007-999324.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2007-999324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3017,3018,27924,27925,54559,54560</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5419940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1575846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kimball A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Quin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</title><title>American journal of perinatology</title><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.</description><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Autonomic Nerve Block</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Circumcision, Male</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Lidocaine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Penis - innervation</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Procaine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - prevention & control</subject><issn>0735-1631</issn><issn>1098-8785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLxDAQh4Mouj6OHoUexJPVPJvEm65PWFTwcQ3ZdIrRttFkK_jfG-miJ0_DzO9jZvgQ2iX4iGAhjlNJMZal1ppRvoImBGtVKqnEKppgyURJKkY20GZKrxgTqrBaR-tESKF4NUEP5yEm2xb30PsWiluIn1CctcG9Fb7PbejtIsdTH93QOZ986E-K6UsbYniPwVnfQ_EMMQ2pmPl6HGyjtca2CXaWdQs9XV48Tq_L2d3VzfR0Vjom-KJ0ykLFsG0UrmvLuebAGK2quSOuUkxSTKXmRAJ1c0qqWs4Vq5wSGEAqSRq2hQ7GvfmTjwHSwnQ-OWhb20MYkpFUE6kwzWA5gi6GlCI05j36zsYvQ7D5kWiS-ZFoRomZ31suHuYd1H_0aC3n-8vcJmfbJto-q_nFBCdac5yxwxFbvHjowLyGIfZZyD9XvwGlEoZe</recordid><startdate>19920501</startdate><enddate>19920501</enddate><creator>Spencer, David M.</creator><creator>Miller, Kimball A.</creator><creator>O'Quin, Michael</creator><creator>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</creator><creator>Anderson, Bradley</creator><creator>Wong, Donna</creator><creator>Williams, William E.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920501</creationdate><title>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</title><author>Spencer, David M. ; Miller, Kimball A. ; O'Quin, Michael ; Tomsovic, Jacqueline P. ; Anderson, Bradley ; Wong, Donna ; Williams, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-c8ae630af80dda4494e33266bc1c683720279417e2cb216d7b836c850ee7871f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Autonomic Nerve Block</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Circumcision, Male</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Lidocaine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Penis - innervation</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Procaine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kimball A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Quin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, David M.</au><au>Miller, Kimball A.</au><au>O'Quin, Michael</au><au>Tomsovic, Jacqueline P.</au><au>Anderson, Bradley</au><au>Wong, Donna</au><au>Williams, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine</atitle><jtitle>American journal of perinatology</jtitle><addtitle>Amer J Perinatol</addtitle><date>1992-05-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>214-218</pages><issn>0735-1631</issn><eissn>1098-8785</eissn><coden>AJPEEK</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Dorsal penile nerve blocking (DPNB) has been used with success in decreasing neonatal stress during circumcision. This study was designed to confirm the effectiveness of lidocaine in DPNB and to demonstrate that chloroprocaine, a shorter acting anesthetic, is as effective in blocking circumcision stress as lidocaine, but, because of its shorter plasma elimination half-life and time of onset of action, is safer. Five groups of 15 neonates were matched for weight, age, and Apgar scores and randomly assigned to a control group, one lidocaine group and three chloroprocaine groups with 2-, 3- and 5-minute postinjection waiting periods. Each neonate was subjected to six events during circumcision for which heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration were recorded. We found that, as in previous investigations, DPNB with lidocaine was effective in reducing neonatal stress, as was evident from decreased excursion from baseline heart rate, tissue oxygenation, and cry duration when compared with the control group (nonblocked). Furthermore, chloroprocaine DPNB approximates the effectiveness of lidocaine, as was evident from decreased change from baseline cry duration, tissue oxygenation, and heart rate during the most stressful events, particularly in the 3-minute wait chloroprocaine group. This more rapid onset of regional anesthesia decreases DPNB circumcision time and benefits patients, parents, and physicians.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>1575846</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2007-999324</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-1631 |
ispartof | American journal of perinatology, 1992-05, Vol.9 (3), p.214-218 |
issn | 0735-1631 1098-8785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72917802 |
source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents Autonomic Nerve Block Biological and medical sciences Circumcision, Male Humans Infant, Newborn Lidocaine Male Medical sciences Neuropharmacology ORIGINAL ARTICLE Penis - innervation Pharmacology. Drug treatments Procaine - analogs & derivatives Stress, Physiological - prevention & control |
title | Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Neonatal Circumcision: Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A37%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dorsal%20Penile%20Nerve%20Block%20in%20Neonatal%20Circumcision:%20Chloroprocaine%20Versus%20Lidocaine&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20perinatology&rft.au=Spencer,%20David%20M.&rft.date=1992-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=214-218&rft.issn=0735-1631&rft.eissn=1098-8785&rft.coden=AJPEEK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2007-999324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72917802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72917802&rft_id=info:pmid/1575846&rfr_iscdi=true |