Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial
This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials 2021-09, Vol.14 (19), p.5618, Article 5618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 5618 |
container_title | Materials |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Lee, So-Ra Jang, Tae-Sik Seo, Chang-Su Choi, In-Oh Lee, Won-Pyo |
description | This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who wished to undergo implant surgery combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) after extraction of a single maxillary anterior tooth were randomly assigned to two groups depending on the type of collagen membrane used, additionally with the 3D-PFTM-test (n = 14, cross-linked collagen membrane; CCM) and control (n = 14, non-cross-linked collagen membrane; NCCM) groups. Each implant was evaluated radiographically using CBCT at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 6 months postoperatively. The relative position and distances from the bony envelope to the outlines of the augmented ridge were further determined immediately after GBR and 6 months after healing. At the platform level, the mean horizontal hard tissue gain (HG) at all the sites was 2.35 +/- 0.68 mm at 6 months postoperatively. The mean HG rate was 84.25% +/- 14.19% in the CCM group and 82.56% +/- 13.04% in the NCCM group, but the difference was not significant between the groups. In all cases, HG was maintained beyond the bony envelope even after 6 months of GBR. This study suggests that 3D-PFTM should be considered a valuable option for GBR for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. In addition, 3D-PFTM may confer predictable hard tissue volume stability even after the healing period of hard tissue augmented outside the bony envelope by GBR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ma14195618 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000792964400017CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581050147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-260cc652a9c4afddecc55897ec46cbf3922b6dad0c2b6cc84863136ca211e1883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEolXphiewxAaBBuw48dgskKaZQisVUcHANnKck8ZVYk9tp8Pw1rwBZ5iqXFZ4cyz7O7_-c8myp4y-4lzR16NmBVOlYPJBdsiUEjOmiuLhH_eD7DjGa4qHcyZz9Tg74IUoKGXqMPtxpkNLVjbGCchXP0wjkM9JN3awaUtOuw5MIg1svWtJ6oGceIfP7hYGvwbiO6LJqg8As6UdwUXrnR7IZYDOhxF2wkk7O43kA8SebGzqyWrjydKicACXSOWHQV-BIyc6BAsBwbEJ2kEk3pFLCHZ2Pq4HjegSehsNOAN43fmKxLpfphYuIegxWX-zqPeGLMgn7Vo_2u9oohqsswZ9rYLVw5PsUaeHCMd38Sj78u50VZ3NLj6-P68WFzPDJU-zXFBjRJlrZQrdtS0YU5ZSzcEUwjQdV3neiFa31GA0RhZScMaF0TljwKTkR9nbve56arAVaDwFPdTrYEcdtrXXtv77x9m-vvK3tSwZzVmOAs_vBIK_mSCmetzVj_U58FOs81IyyeaCCUSf_YNe-yngKPYULSkr5ki92FMm-BhxRvdmGK13y1T_XiaE5R7eQOO7aOyu8fcJuExzlStR4BpRNq9wzAlnX_nJJUx9-f-p_CeIyeBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581050147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Lee, So-Ra ; Jang, Tae-Sik ; Seo, Chang-Su ; Choi, In-Oh ; Lee, Won-Pyo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, So-Ra ; Jang, Tae-Sik ; Seo, Chang-Su ; Choi, In-Oh ; Lee, Won-Pyo</creatorcontrib><description>This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who wished to undergo implant surgery combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) after extraction of a single maxillary anterior tooth were randomly assigned to two groups depending on the type of collagen membrane used, additionally with the 3D-PFTM-test (n = 14, cross-linked collagen membrane; CCM) and control (n = 14, non-cross-linked collagen membrane; NCCM) groups. Each implant was evaluated radiographically using CBCT at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 6 months postoperatively. The relative position and distances from the bony envelope to the outlines of the augmented ridge were further determined immediately after GBR and 6 months after healing. At the platform level, the mean horizontal hard tissue gain (HG) at all the sites was 2.35 +/- 0.68 mm at 6 months postoperatively. The mean HG rate was 84.25% +/- 14.19% in the CCM group and 82.56% +/- 13.04% in the NCCM group, but the difference was not significant between the groups. In all cases, HG was maintained beyond the bony envelope even after 6 months of GBR. This study suggests that 3D-PFTM should be considered a valuable option for GBR for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. In addition, 3D-PFTM may confer predictable hard tissue volume stability even after the healing period of hard tissue augmented outside the bony envelope by GBR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma14195618</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34640019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject>Analgesics ; Chemistry ; Chemistry, Physical ; Clinical trials ; Collagen ; Crosslinking ; Defects ; Dental implants ; Healing ; Materials Science ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary ; Membranes ; Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering ; Patients ; Physical Sciences ; Physics ; Physics, Applied ; Physics, Condensed Matter ; Regeneration (physiology) ; Science & Technology ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Stability analysis ; Stability augmentation ; Surgery ; Technology ; Teeth ; Titanium ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2021-09, Vol.14 (19), p.5618, Article 5618</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000792964400017</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-260cc652a9c4afddecc55897ec46cbf3922b6dad0c2b6cc84863136ca211e1883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-260cc652a9c4afddecc55897ec46cbf3922b6dad0c2b6cc84863136ca211e1883</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1911-3454 ; 0000-0003-3540-0525</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510212/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8510212/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,39263,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, So-Ra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Tae-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Chang-Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, In-Oh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Won-Pyo</creatorcontrib><title>Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>MATERIALS</addtitle><description>This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who wished to undergo implant surgery combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) after extraction of a single maxillary anterior tooth were randomly assigned to two groups depending on the type of collagen membrane used, additionally with the 3D-PFTM-test (n = 14, cross-linked collagen membrane; CCM) and control (n = 14, non-cross-linked collagen membrane; NCCM) groups. Each implant was evaluated radiographically using CBCT at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 6 months postoperatively. The relative position and distances from the bony envelope to the outlines of the augmented ridge were further determined immediately after GBR and 6 months after healing. At the platform level, the mean horizontal hard tissue gain (HG) at all the sites was 2.35 +/- 0.68 mm at 6 months postoperatively. The mean HG rate was 84.25% +/- 14.19% in the CCM group and 82.56% +/- 13.04% in the NCCM group, but the difference was not significant between the groups. In all cases, HG was maintained beyond the bony envelope even after 6 months of GBR. This study suggests that 3D-PFTM should be considered a valuable option for GBR for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. In addition, 3D-PFTM may confer predictable hard tissue volume stability even after the healing period of hard tissue augmented outside the bony envelope by GBR.</description><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry, Physical</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Crosslinking</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics, Applied</subject><subject>Physics, Condensed Matter</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Stability augmentation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEolXphiewxAaBBuw48dgskKaZQisVUcHANnKck8ZVYk9tp8Pw1rwBZ5iqXFZ4cyz7O7_-c8myp4y-4lzR16NmBVOlYPJBdsiUEjOmiuLhH_eD7DjGa4qHcyZz9Tg74IUoKGXqMPtxpkNLVjbGCchXP0wjkM9JN3awaUtOuw5MIg1svWtJ6oGceIfP7hYGvwbiO6LJqg8As6UdwUXrnR7IZYDOhxF2wkk7O43kA8SebGzqyWrjydKicACXSOWHQV-BIyc6BAsBwbEJ2kEk3pFLCHZ2Pq4HjegSehsNOAN43fmKxLpfphYuIegxWX-zqPeGLMgn7Vo_2u9oohqsswZ9rYLVw5PsUaeHCMd38Sj78u50VZ3NLj6-P68WFzPDJU-zXFBjRJlrZQrdtS0YU5ZSzcEUwjQdV3neiFa31GA0RhZScMaF0TljwKTkR9nbve56arAVaDwFPdTrYEcdtrXXtv77x9m-vvK3tSwZzVmOAs_vBIK_mSCmetzVj_U58FOs81IyyeaCCUSf_YNe-yngKPYULSkr5ki92FMm-BhxRvdmGK13y1T_XiaE5R7eQOO7aOyu8fcJuExzlStR4BpRNq9wzAlnX_nJJUx9-f-p_CeIyeBE</recordid><startdate>20210927</startdate><enddate>20210927</enddate><creator>Lee, So-Ra</creator><creator>Jang, Tae-Sik</creator><creator>Seo, Chang-Su</creator><creator>Choi, In-Oh</creator><creator>Lee, Won-Pyo</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-3454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-0525</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210927</creationdate><title>Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Lee, So-Ra ; Jang, Tae-Sik ; Seo, Chang-Su ; Choi, In-Oh ; Lee, Won-Pyo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-260cc652a9c4afddecc55897ec46cbf3922b6dad0c2b6cc84863136ca211e1883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry, Physical</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Crosslinking</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics, Applied</topic><topic>Physics, Condensed Matter</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Stability augmentation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, So-Ra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Tae-Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Chang-Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, In-Oh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Won-Pyo</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, So-Ra</au><au>Jang, Tae-Sik</au><au>Seo, Chang-Su</au><au>Choi, In-Oh</au><au>Lee, Won-Pyo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><stitle>MATERIALS</stitle><date>2021-09-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>5618</spage><pages>5618-</pages><artnum>5618</artnum><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>This single-blinded, randomized, controlled study aimed to clinically and radiographically evaluate hard tissue volume stability beyond the bony envelope using three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh (3D-PFTM) for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. A total of 28 patients who wished to undergo implant surgery combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) after extraction of a single maxillary anterior tooth were randomly assigned to two groups depending on the type of collagen membrane used, additionally with the 3D-PFTM-test (n = 14, cross-linked collagen membrane; CCM) and control (n = 14, non-cross-linked collagen membrane; NCCM) groups. Each implant was evaluated radiographically using CBCT at baseline, immediately after surgery, and at 6 months postoperatively. The relative position and distances from the bony envelope to the outlines of the augmented ridge were further determined immediately after GBR and 6 months after healing. At the platform level, the mean horizontal hard tissue gain (HG) at all the sites was 2.35 +/- 0.68 mm at 6 months postoperatively. The mean HG rate was 84.25% +/- 14.19% in the CCM group and 82.56% +/- 13.04% in the NCCM group, but the difference was not significant between the groups. In all cases, HG was maintained beyond the bony envelope even after 6 months of GBR. This study suggests that 3D-PFTM should be considered a valuable option for GBR for peri-implant dehiscence defects in the anterior maxilla. In addition, 3D-PFTM may confer predictable hard tissue volume stability even after the healing period of hard tissue augmented outside the bony envelope by GBR.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><pmid>34640019</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma14195618</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-3454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-0525</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1944 |
ispartof | Materials, 2021-09, Vol.14 (19), p.5618, Article 5618 |
issn | 1996-1944 1996-1944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000792964400017CitationCount |
source | PubMed (Medline); MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Analgesics Chemistry Chemistry, Physical Clinical trials Collagen Crosslinking Defects Dental implants Healing Materials Science Materials Science, Multidisciplinary Membranes Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering Patients Physical Sciences Physics Physics, Applied Physics, Condensed Matter Regeneration (physiology) Science & Technology Skin & tissue grafts Stability analysis Stability augmentation Surgery Technology Teeth Titanium Transplants & implants |
title | Hard Tissue Volume Stability Effect beyond the Bony Envelope of a Three-Dimensional Preformed Titanium Mesh with Two Different Collagen Barrier Membranes on Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T17%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hard%20Tissue%20Volume%20Stability%20Effect%20beyond%20the%20Bony%20Envelope%20of%20a%20Three-Dimensional%20Preformed%20Titanium%20Mesh%20with%20Two%20Different%20Collagen%20Barrier%20Membranes%20on%20Peri-Implant%20Dehiscence%20Defects%20in%20the%20Anterior%20Maxilla:%20A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Lee,%20So-Ra&rft.date=2021-09-27&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=5618&rft.pages=5618-&rft.artnum=5618&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma14195618&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2581050147%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581050147&rft_id=info:pmid/34640019&rfr_iscdi=true |