One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice
Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answere...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation physiology 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), Article 009 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Conservation physiology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Cooke, Steven J. Bergman, Jordanna N. Madliger, Christine L. Cramp, Rebecca L. Beardall, John Burness, Gary Clark, Timothy D. Dantzer, Ben de la Barrera, Erick Fangue, Nann A. Franklin, Craig E. Fuller, Andrea Hawkes, Lucy A. Hultine, Kevin R. Hunt, Kathleen E. Love, Oliver P. MacMillan, Heath A. Mandelman, John W. Mark, Felix C. Martin, Lynn B. Newman, Amy E. M. Nicotra, Adrienne B. Raby, Graham D. Robinson, Sharon A. Ropert-Coudert, Yan Rummer, Jodie L. Seebacher, Frank Todgham, Anne E. Tomlinson, Sean Chown, Steven L. |
description | Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity.
Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/conphys/coab009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>webofscience</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000776691900008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>000776691900008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007766919000083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjzFPwzAQhS0EUivo3PX2qnAmTVPPFYiNhb1ynEtilJ7DuS3KL-BvY0sMiI3pPd29-55OqaXGe42meHCBx36KSW2NaK7U_BFLvdabYnP9y8_UIsZ3RNRYlaXZzdXXKxP0Z26EGhCKZMX18HGmePKBI3iGxI4kF5sHkFt8GEI3QRsEOmKStOEOrMsBWw8EdPENsSM4hQRIueMfSBi8m8ByA6PkO0d36qa1Q6TFj96q1fPT2_5l_Ul1aKPzmXcYxR-tTIf0QVVtt0ab5HBX_C_9DVEEYhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cooke, Steven J. ; Bergman, Jordanna N. ; Madliger, Christine L. ; Cramp, Rebecca L. ; Beardall, John ; Burness, Gary ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Dantzer, Ben ; de la Barrera, Erick ; Fangue, Nann A. ; Franklin, Craig E. ; Fuller, Andrea ; Hawkes, Lucy A. ; Hultine, Kevin R. ; Hunt, Kathleen E. ; Love, Oliver P. ; MacMillan, Heath A. ; Mandelman, John W. ; Mark, Felix C. ; Martin, Lynn B. ; Newman, Amy E. M. ; Nicotra, Adrienne B. ; Raby, Graham D. ; Robinson, Sharon A. ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Rummer, Jodie L. ; Seebacher, Frank ; Todgham, Anne E. ; Tomlinson, Sean ; Chown, Steven L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J. ; Bergman, Jordanna N. ; Madliger, Christine L. ; Cramp, Rebecca L. ; Beardall, John ; Burness, Gary ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Dantzer, Ben ; de la Barrera, Erick ; Fangue, Nann A. ; Franklin, Craig E. ; Fuller, Andrea ; Hawkes, Lucy A. ; Hultine, Kevin R. ; Hunt, Kathleen E. ; Love, Oliver P. ; MacMillan, Heath A. ; Mandelman, John W. ; Mark, Felix C. ; Martin, Lynn B. ; Newman, Amy E. M. ; Nicotra, Adrienne B. ; Raby, Graham D. ; Robinson, Sharon A. ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Rummer, Jodie L. ; Seebacher, Frank ; Todgham, Anne E. ; Tomlinson, Sean ; Chown, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><description>Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity.
Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-1434</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-1434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coab009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Oxford Univ Press</publisher><subject>Biodiversity & Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Physiology ; Science & Technology</subject><ispartof>Conservation physiology, 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), Article 009</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007766919000083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2115,27929,27930,39263</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Jordanna N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madliger, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramp, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardall, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burness, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantzer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Barrera, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fangue, Nann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Craig E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Lucy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hultine, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Kathleen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Oliver P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMillan, Heath A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandelman, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Felix C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lynn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Amy E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raby, Graham D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Sharon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummer, Jodie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebacher, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todgham, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chown, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><title>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</title><title>Conservation physiology</title><addtitle>CONSERV PHYSIOL</addtitle><description>Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity.
Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.</description><subject>Biodiversity & Conservation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><issn>2051-1434</issn><issn>2051-1434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjzFPwzAQhS0EUivo3PX2qnAmTVPPFYiNhb1ynEtilJ7DuS3KL-BvY0sMiI3pPd29-55OqaXGe42meHCBx36KSW2NaK7U_BFLvdabYnP9y8_UIsZ3RNRYlaXZzdXXKxP0Z26EGhCKZMX18HGmePKBI3iGxI4kF5sHkFt8GEI3QRsEOmKStOEOrMsBWw8EdPENsSM4hQRIueMfSBi8m8ByA6PkO0d36qa1Q6TFj96q1fPT2_5l_Ul1aKPzmXcYxR-tTIf0QVVtt0ab5HBX_C_9DVEEYhs</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Cooke, Steven J.</creator><creator>Bergman, Jordanna N.</creator><creator>Madliger, Christine L.</creator><creator>Cramp, Rebecca L.</creator><creator>Beardall, John</creator><creator>Burness, Gary</creator><creator>Clark, Timothy D.</creator><creator>Dantzer, Ben</creator><creator>de la Barrera, Erick</creator><creator>Fangue, Nann A.</creator><creator>Franklin, Craig E.</creator><creator>Fuller, Andrea</creator><creator>Hawkes, Lucy A.</creator><creator>Hultine, Kevin R.</creator><creator>Hunt, Kathleen E.</creator><creator>Love, Oliver P.</creator><creator>MacMillan, Heath A.</creator><creator>Mandelman, John W.</creator><creator>Mark, Felix C.</creator><creator>Martin, Lynn B.</creator><creator>Newman, Amy E. M.</creator><creator>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</creator><creator>Raby, Graham D.</creator><creator>Robinson, Sharon A.</creator><creator>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creator><creator>Rummer, Jodie L.</creator><creator>Seebacher, Frank</creator><creator>Todgham, Anne E.</creator><creator>Tomlinson, Sean</creator><creator>Chown, Steven L.</creator><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</title><author>Cooke, Steven J. ; Bergman, Jordanna N. ; Madliger, Christine L. ; Cramp, Rebecca L. ; Beardall, John ; Burness, Gary ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Dantzer, Ben ; de la Barrera, Erick ; Fangue, Nann A. ; Franklin, Craig E. ; Fuller, Andrea ; Hawkes, Lucy A. ; Hultine, Kevin R. ; Hunt, Kathleen E. ; Love, Oliver P. ; MacMillan, Heath A. ; Mandelman, John W. ; Mark, Felix C. ; Martin, Lynn B. ; Newman, Amy E. M. ; Nicotra, Adrienne B. ; Raby, Graham D. ; Robinson, Sharon A. ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Rummer, Jodie L. ; Seebacher, Frank ; Todgham, Anne E. ; Tomlinson, Sean ; Chown, Steven L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007766919000083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity & Conservation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Jordanna N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madliger, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramp, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardall, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burness, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantzer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Barrera, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fangue, Nann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Craig E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Lucy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hultine, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Kathleen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Oliver P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMillan, Heath A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandelman, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Felix C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lynn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Amy E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raby, Graham D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Sharon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummer, Jodie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebacher, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todgham, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chown, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><jtitle>Conservation physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooke, Steven J.</au><au>Bergman, Jordanna N.</au><au>Madliger, Christine L.</au><au>Cramp, Rebecca L.</au><au>Beardall, John</au><au>Burness, Gary</au><au>Clark, Timothy D.</au><au>Dantzer, Ben</au><au>de la Barrera, Erick</au><au>Fangue, Nann A.</au><au>Franklin, Craig E.</au><au>Fuller, Andrea</au><au>Hawkes, Lucy A.</au><au>Hultine, Kevin R.</au><au>Hunt, Kathleen E.</au><au>Love, Oliver P.</au><au>MacMillan, Heath A.</au><au>Mandelman, John W.</au><au>Mark, Felix C.</au><au>Martin, Lynn B.</au><au>Newman, Amy E. M.</au><au>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</au><au>Raby, Graham D.</au><au>Robinson, Sharon A.</au><au>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</au><au>Rummer, Jodie L.</au><au>Seebacher, Frank</au><au>Todgham, Anne E.</au><au>Tomlinson, Sean</au><au>Chown, Steven L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</atitle><jtitle>Conservation physiology</jtitle><stitle>CONSERV PHYSIOL</stitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>009</artnum><issn>2051-1434</issn><eissn>2051-1434</eissn><abstract>Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity.
Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Oxford Univ Press</pub><doi>10.1093/conphys/coab009</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2051-1434 |
ispartof | Conservation physiology, 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), Article 009 |
issn | 2051-1434 2051-1434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000776691900008 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biodiversity & Conservation Ecology Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Physiology Science & Technology |
title | One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T14%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-webofscience&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20hundred%20research%20questions%20in%20conservation%20physiology%20for%20generating%20actionable%20evidence%20to%20inform%20conservation%20policy%20and%20practice&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20physiology&rft.au=Cooke,%20Steven%20J.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=009&rft.issn=2051-1434&rft.eissn=2051-1434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/conphys/coab009&rft_dat=%3Cwebofscience%3E000776691900008%3C/webofscience%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |