One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice

Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation physiology 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), Article 009
Hauptverfasser: Cooke, Steven J., Bergman, Jordanna N., Madliger, Christine L., Cramp, Rebecca L., Beardall, John, Burness, Gary, Clark, Timothy D., Dantzer, Ben, de la Barrera, Erick, Fangue, Nann A., Franklin, Craig E., Fuller, Andrea, Hawkes, Lucy A., Hultine, Kevin R., Hunt, Kathleen E., Love, Oliver P., MacMillan, Heath A., Mandelman, John W., Mark, Felix C., Martin, Lynn B., Newman, Amy E. M., Nicotra, Adrienne B., Raby, Graham D., Robinson, Sharon A., Ropert-Coudert, Yan, Rummer, Jodie L., Seebacher, Frank, Todgham, Anne E., Tomlinson, Sean, Chown, Steven L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Conservation physiology
container_volume 9
creator Cooke, Steven J.
Bergman, Jordanna N.
Madliger, Christine L.
Cramp, Rebecca L.
Beardall, John
Burness, Gary
Clark, Timothy D.
Dantzer, Ben
de la Barrera, Erick
Fangue, Nann A.
Franklin, Craig E.
Fuller, Andrea
Hawkes, Lucy A.
Hultine, Kevin R.
Hunt, Kathleen E.
Love, Oliver P.
MacMillan, Heath A.
Mandelman, John W.
Mark, Felix C.
Martin, Lynn B.
Newman, Amy E. M.
Nicotra, Adrienne B.
Raby, Graham D.
Robinson, Sharon A.
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
Rummer, Jodie L.
Seebacher, Frank
Todgham, Anne E.
Tomlinson, Sean
Chown, Steven L.
description Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity. Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/conphys/coab009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>webofscience</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000776691900008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>000776691900008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007766919000083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjzFPwzAQhS0EUivo3PX2qnAmTVPPFYiNhb1ynEtilJ7DuS3KL-BvY0sMiI3pPd29-55OqaXGe42meHCBx36KSW2NaK7U_BFLvdabYnP9y8_UIsZ3RNRYlaXZzdXXKxP0Z26EGhCKZMX18HGmePKBI3iGxI4kF5sHkFt8GEI3QRsEOmKStOEOrMsBWw8EdPENsSM4hQRIueMfSBi8m8ByA6PkO0d36qa1Q6TFj96q1fPT2_5l_Ul1aKPzmXcYxR-tTIf0QVVtt0ab5HBX_C_9DVEEYhs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cooke, Steven J. ; Bergman, Jordanna N. ; Madliger, Christine L. ; Cramp, Rebecca L. ; Beardall, John ; Burness, Gary ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Dantzer, Ben ; de la Barrera, Erick ; Fangue, Nann A. ; Franklin, Craig E. ; Fuller, Andrea ; Hawkes, Lucy A. ; Hultine, Kevin R. ; Hunt, Kathleen E. ; Love, Oliver P. ; MacMillan, Heath A. ; Mandelman, John W. ; Mark, Felix C. ; Martin, Lynn B. ; Newman, Amy E. M. ; Nicotra, Adrienne B. ; Raby, Graham D. ; Robinson, Sharon A. ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Rummer, Jodie L. ; Seebacher, Frank ; Todgham, Anne E. ; Tomlinson, Sean ; Chown, Steven L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J. ; Bergman, Jordanna N. ; Madliger, Christine L. ; Cramp, Rebecca L. ; Beardall, John ; Burness, Gary ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Dantzer, Ben ; de la Barrera, Erick ; Fangue, Nann A. ; Franklin, Craig E. ; Fuller, Andrea ; Hawkes, Lucy A. ; Hultine, Kevin R. ; Hunt, Kathleen E. ; Love, Oliver P. ; MacMillan, Heath A. ; Mandelman, John W. ; Mark, Felix C. ; Martin, Lynn B. ; Newman, Amy E. M. ; Nicotra, Adrienne B. ; Raby, Graham D. ; Robinson, Sharon A. ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Rummer, Jodie L. ; Seebacher, Frank ; Todgham, Anne E. ; Tomlinson, Sean ; Chown, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><description>Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity. Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-1434</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-1434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coab009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Oxford Univ Press</publisher><subject>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Physiology ; Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Conservation physiology, 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), Article 009</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007766919000083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2115,27929,27930,39263</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Jordanna N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madliger, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramp, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardall, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burness, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantzer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Barrera, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fangue, Nann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Craig E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Lucy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hultine, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Kathleen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Oliver P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMillan, Heath A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandelman, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Felix C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lynn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Amy E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raby, Graham D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Sharon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummer, Jodie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebacher, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todgham, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chown, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><title>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</title><title>Conservation physiology</title><addtitle>CONSERV PHYSIOL</addtitle><description>Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity. Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.</description><subject>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>2051-1434</issn><issn>2051-1434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjzFPwzAQhS0EUivo3PX2qnAmTVPPFYiNhb1ynEtilJ7DuS3KL-BvY0sMiI3pPd29-55OqaXGe42meHCBx36KSW2NaK7U_BFLvdabYnP9y8_UIsZ3RNRYlaXZzdXXKxP0Z26EGhCKZMX18HGmePKBI3iGxI4kF5sHkFt8GEI3QRsEOmKStOEOrMsBWw8EdPENsSM4hQRIueMfSBi8m8ByA6PkO0d36qa1Q6TFj96q1fPT2_5l_Ul1aKPzmXcYxR-tTIf0QVVtt0ab5HBX_C_9DVEEYhs</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Cooke, Steven J.</creator><creator>Bergman, Jordanna N.</creator><creator>Madliger, Christine L.</creator><creator>Cramp, Rebecca L.</creator><creator>Beardall, John</creator><creator>Burness, Gary</creator><creator>Clark, Timothy D.</creator><creator>Dantzer, Ben</creator><creator>de la Barrera, Erick</creator><creator>Fangue, Nann A.</creator><creator>Franklin, Craig E.</creator><creator>Fuller, Andrea</creator><creator>Hawkes, Lucy A.</creator><creator>Hultine, Kevin R.</creator><creator>Hunt, Kathleen E.</creator><creator>Love, Oliver P.</creator><creator>MacMillan, Heath A.</creator><creator>Mandelman, John W.</creator><creator>Mark, Felix C.</creator><creator>Martin, Lynn B.</creator><creator>Newman, Amy E. M.</creator><creator>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</creator><creator>Raby, Graham D.</creator><creator>Robinson, Sharon A.</creator><creator>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creator><creator>Rummer, Jodie L.</creator><creator>Seebacher, Frank</creator><creator>Todgham, Anne E.</creator><creator>Tomlinson, Sean</creator><creator>Chown, Steven L.</creator><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</title><author>Cooke, Steven J. ; Bergman, Jordanna N. ; Madliger, Christine L. ; Cramp, Rebecca L. ; Beardall, John ; Burness, Gary ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Dantzer, Ben ; de la Barrera, Erick ; Fangue, Nann A. ; Franklin, Craig E. ; Fuller, Andrea ; Hawkes, Lucy A. ; Hultine, Kevin R. ; Hunt, Kathleen E. ; Love, Oliver P. ; MacMillan, Heath A. ; Mandelman, John W. ; Mark, Felix C. ; Martin, Lynn B. ; Newman, Amy E. M. ; Nicotra, Adrienne B. ; Raby, Graham D. ; Robinson, Sharon A. ; Ropert-Coudert, Yan ; Rummer, Jodie L. ; Seebacher, Frank ; Todgham, Anne E. ; Tomlinson, Sean ; Chown, Steven L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007766919000083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Jordanna N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madliger, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramp, Rebecca L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardall, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burness, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantzer, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Barrera, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fangue, Nann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Craig E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Lucy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hultine, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Kathleen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Oliver P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMillan, Heath A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandelman, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Felix C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lynn B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Amy E. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raby, Graham D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Sharon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rummer, Jodie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seebacher, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todgham, Anne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomlinson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chown, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><jtitle>Conservation physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooke, Steven J.</au><au>Bergman, Jordanna N.</au><au>Madliger, Christine L.</au><au>Cramp, Rebecca L.</au><au>Beardall, John</au><au>Burness, Gary</au><au>Clark, Timothy D.</au><au>Dantzer, Ben</au><au>de la Barrera, Erick</au><au>Fangue, Nann A.</au><au>Franklin, Craig E.</au><au>Fuller, Andrea</au><au>Hawkes, Lucy A.</au><au>Hultine, Kevin R.</au><au>Hunt, Kathleen E.</au><au>Love, Oliver P.</au><au>MacMillan, Heath A.</au><au>Mandelman, John W.</au><au>Mark, Felix C.</au><au>Martin, Lynn B.</au><au>Newman, Amy E. M.</au><au>Nicotra, Adrienne B.</au><au>Raby, Graham D.</au><au>Robinson, Sharon A.</au><au>Ropert-Coudert, Yan</au><au>Rummer, Jodie L.</au><au>Seebacher, Frank</au><au>Todgham, Anne E.</au><au>Tomlinson, Sean</au><au>Chown, Steven L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice</atitle><jtitle>Conservation physiology</jtitle><stitle>CONSERV PHYSIOL</stitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>009</artnum><issn>2051-1434</issn><eissn>2051-1434</eissn><abstract>Conservation physiology has emerged as an integrative action-oriented discipline. Yet, there remain many ways in which conservation physiology could further contribute to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We share a list of 100 research questions related to conservation physiology that, if answered, would enhance the conservation of biodiversity. Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Oxford Univ Press</pub><doi>10.1093/conphys/coab009</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2051-1434
ispartof Conservation physiology, 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), Article 009
issn 2051-1434
2051-1434
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000776691900008
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Biodiversity & Conservation
Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physiology
Science & Technology
title One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T14%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-webofscience&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20hundred%20research%20questions%20in%20conservation%20physiology%20for%20generating%20actionable%20evidence%20to%20inform%20conservation%20policy%20and%20practice&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20physiology&rft.au=Cooke,%20Steven%20J.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=009&rft.issn=2051-1434&rft.eissn=2051-1434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/conphys/coab009&rft_dat=%3Cwebofscience%3E000776691900008%3C/webofscience%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true