Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together
Abstract The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Gerontologist 2022-09, Vol.62 (8), p.1097-1103 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1103 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1097 |
container_title | The Gerontologist |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Berlinger, Nancy de Medeiros, Kate Girling, Laura |
description | Abstract
The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geront/gnab186 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000756741100001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/geront/gnab186</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2614226232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERZeFK0cUiQsIpfV4HCfhgERX0CJV4rJwtZzEzrpk7cVOqPrv8TbbFXCBi63RfO9pZh4hL4CeAa3xvNfBu_G8d6qBSjwiCyiLKi-Qw2OyoBREXlPAU_I0xhuaasbKJ-QUeV2AQLYg9YX1etzYNmbKddnlvZ0ffH_3LltvdPZNDZPOvEmFdd-t67O175NAh2fkxKgh6ueHf0m-fvq4Xl3l118uP68-XOctL9iYMywLYbBCUIjCtLrpFDS0KRE7xhHR1B1w1LwCDl1jGBZ1JRQ3ouZlowGX5P3su5uare5a7cagBrkLdqvCnfTKyj87zm5k73_KmhdAYW_w-mAQ_I9Jx1FubWz1MCin_RQlE8AZEwxZQl_9hd74Kbi0nmRlOhji_l2Ss5lqg48xaHMcBqjcpyLnVOQhlSR4-fsKR_whhgS8nYFb3XgTW6tdq49Yyi3dsOQAdB9hoqv_p1d2VKP1buUnNybpm1nqp92_pv4FKaa4YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716333716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berlinger, Nancy ; de Medeiros, Kate ; Girling, Laura</creator><contributor>Meeks, Suzanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berlinger, Nancy ; de Medeiros, Kate ; Girling, Laura ; Meeks, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34951632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aging ; Bioethics ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Decision making ; Fairness ; Forum ; Geriatrics ; Geriatrics & Gerontology ; Gerontology ; Health disparities ; Health Equity ; Humanities ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Older people ; Policy analysis ; Research ethics ; Science & Technology ; Social Justice ; Social structure ; Social values</subject><ispartof>The Gerontologist, 2022-09, Vol.62 (8), p.1097-1103</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Oct 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000756741100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3995-3170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1585,27929,27930,33779,39262</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Meeks, Suzanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berlinger, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girling, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</title><title>The Gerontologist</title><addtitle>GERONTOLOGIST</addtitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><description>Abstract
The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Forum</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Geriatrics & Gerontology</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health Equity</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Social values</subject><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERZeFK0cUiQsIpfV4HCfhgERX0CJV4rJwtZzEzrpk7cVOqPrv8TbbFXCBi63RfO9pZh4hL4CeAa3xvNfBu_G8d6qBSjwiCyiLKi-Qw2OyoBREXlPAU_I0xhuaasbKJ-QUeV2AQLYg9YX1etzYNmbKddnlvZ0ffH_3LltvdPZNDZPOvEmFdd-t67O175NAh2fkxKgh6ueHf0m-fvq4Xl3l118uP68-XOctL9iYMywLYbBCUIjCtLrpFDS0KRE7xhHR1B1w1LwCDl1jGBZ1JRQ3ouZlowGX5P3su5uare5a7cagBrkLdqvCnfTKyj87zm5k73_KmhdAYW_w-mAQ_I9Jx1FubWz1MCin_RQlE8AZEwxZQl_9hd74Kbi0nmRlOhji_l2Ss5lqg48xaHMcBqjcpyLnVOQhlSR4-fsKR_whhgS8nYFb3XgTW6tdq49Yyi3dsOQAdB9hoqv_p1d2VKP1buUnNybpm1nqp92_pv4FKaa4YQ</recordid><startdate>20220907</startdate><enddate>20220907</enddate><creator>Berlinger, Nancy</creator><creator>de Medeiros, Kate</creator><creator>Girling, Laura</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-3170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220907</creationdate><title>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</title><author>Berlinger, Nancy ; de Medeiros, Kate ; Girling, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Forum</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Geriatrics & Gerontology</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health Equity</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Social values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berlinger, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girling, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berlinger, Nancy</au><au>de Medeiros, Kate</au><au>Girling, Laura</au><au>Meeks, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</atitle><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle><stitle>GERONTOLOGIST</stitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><date>2022-09-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1103</epage><pages>1097-1103</pages><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><eissn>1758-5341</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34951632</pmid><doi>10.1093/geront/gnab186</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-3170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-9013 |
ispartof | The Gerontologist, 2022-09, Vol.62 (8), p.1097-1103 |
issn | 0016-9013 1758-5341 1758-5341 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000756741100001 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aging Bioethics Biomedicine Biotechnology Decision making Fairness Forum Geriatrics Geriatrics & Gerontology Gerontology Health disparities Health Equity Humanities Humans Illnesses Life Sciences & Biomedicine Older people Policy analysis Research ethics Science & Technology Social Justice Social structure Social values |
title | Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioethics%20and%20Gerontology:%20The%20Value%20of%20Thinking%20Together&rft.jtitle=The%20Gerontologist&rft.au=Berlinger,%20Nancy&rft.date=2022-09-07&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1103&rft.pages=1097-1103&rft.issn=0016-9013&rft.eissn=1758-5341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geront/gnab186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2614226232%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716333716&rft_id=info:pmid/34951632&rft_oup_id=10.1093/geront/gnab186&rfr_iscdi=true |