Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together

Abstract The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Gerontologist 2022-09, Vol.62 (8), p.1097-1103
Hauptverfasser: Berlinger, Nancy, de Medeiros, Kate, Girling, Laura
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1103
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1097
container_title The Gerontologist
container_volume 62
creator Berlinger, Nancy
de Medeiros, Kate
Girling, Laura
description Abstract The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geront/gnab186
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000756741100001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/geront/gnab186</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2614226232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERZeFK0cUiQsIpfV4HCfhgERX0CJV4rJwtZzEzrpk7cVOqPrv8TbbFXCBi63RfO9pZh4hL4CeAa3xvNfBu_G8d6qBSjwiCyiLKi-Qw2OyoBREXlPAU_I0xhuaasbKJ-QUeV2AQLYg9YX1etzYNmbKddnlvZ0ffH_3LltvdPZNDZPOvEmFdd-t67O175NAh2fkxKgh6ueHf0m-fvq4Xl3l118uP68-XOctL9iYMywLYbBCUIjCtLrpFDS0KRE7xhHR1B1w1LwCDl1jGBZ1JRQ3ouZlowGX5P3su5uare5a7cagBrkLdqvCnfTKyj87zm5k73_KmhdAYW_w-mAQ_I9Jx1FubWz1MCin_RQlE8AZEwxZQl_9hd74Kbi0nmRlOhji_l2Ss5lqg48xaHMcBqjcpyLnVOQhlSR4-fsKR_whhgS8nYFb3XgTW6tdq49Yyi3dsOQAdB9hoqv_p1d2VKP1buUnNybpm1nqp92_pv4FKaa4YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716333716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berlinger, Nancy ; de Medeiros, Kate ; Girling, Laura</creator><contributor>Meeks, Suzanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berlinger, Nancy ; de Medeiros, Kate ; Girling, Laura ; Meeks, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9013</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnab186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34951632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aging ; Bioethics ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Decision making ; Fairness ; Forum ; Geriatrics ; Geriatrics &amp; Gerontology ; Gerontology ; Health disparities ; Health Equity ; Humanities ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Older people ; Policy analysis ; Research ethics ; Science &amp; Technology ; Social Justice ; Social structure ; Social values</subject><ispartof>The Gerontologist, 2022-09, Vol.62 (8), p.1097-1103</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Oct 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000756741100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3995-3170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1585,27929,27930,33779,39262</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Meeks, Suzanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berlinger, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girling, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</title><title>The Gerontologist</title><addtitle>GERONTOLOGIST</addtitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><description>Abstract The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Forum</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Geriatrics &amp; Gerontology</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health Equity</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Social values</subject><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFv1DAQhS1ERZeFK0cUiQsIpfV4HCfhgERX0CJV4rJwtZzEzrpk7cVOqPrv8TbbFXCBi63RfO9pZh4hL4CeAa3xvNfBu_G8d6qBSjwiCyiLKi-Qw2OyoBREXlPAU_I0xhuaasbKJ-QUeV2AQLYg9YX1etzYNmbKddnlvZ0ffH_3LltvdPZNDZPOvEmFdd-t67O175NAh2fkxKgh6ueHf0m-fvq4Xl3l118uP68-XOctL9iYMywLYbBCUIjCtLrpFDS0KRE7xhHR1B1w1LwCDl1jGBZ1JRQ3ouZlowGX5P3su5uare5a7cagBrkLdqvCnfTKyj87zm5k73_KmhdAYW_w-mAQ_I9Jx1FubWz1MCin_RQlE8AZEwxZQl_9hd74Kbi0nmRlOhji_l2Ss5lqg48xaHMcBqjcpyLnVOQhlSR4-fsKR_whhgS8nYFb3XgTW6tdq49Yyi3dsOQAdB9hoqv_p1d2VKP1buUnNybpm1nqp92_pv4FKaa4YQ</recordid><startdate>20220907</startdate><enddate>20220907</enddate><creator>Berlinger, Nancy</creator><creator>de Medeiros, Kate</creator><creator>Girling, Laura</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Univ Press</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-3170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220907</creationdate><title>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</title><author>Berlinger, Nancy ; de Medeiros, Kate ; Girling, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-23756f3831a336fcebda1b0b733d24333f9d143e48141dbf235986a4f6947be13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Forum</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Geriatrics &amp; Gerontology</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health Equity</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Social values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berlinger, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girling, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berlinger, Nancy</au><au>de Medeiros, Kate</au><au>Girling, Laura</au><au>Meeks, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together</atitle><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle><stitle>GERONTOLOGIST</stitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><date>2022-09-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1103</epage><pages>1097-1103</pages><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><eissn>1758-5341</eissn><abstract>Abstract The interdisciplinary field of bioethics focuses on what it means to be a person, flourish as a person, and be respected as a person in different conditions of health, illness, or disability. Bioethics and policy research considers normative questions such as how a good society, through its priorities and investments, should demonstrate its commitments to the lives of different populations. Bioethics and humanities scholarship, often known as “health humanities,” shares affinities with age studies and disability studies and with narrative-based approaches to the study of human experience. Gerontology is concerned with the many aspects of life that affect how people age, including social structures and values that influence the experience of growing old. In this article, we briefly explore the evolution of bioethics, from a discourse that emerged in relation to developments in biomedicine, bioscience, and biotechnology; to research ethics; to broader ethical questions emerging from real-world conditions, with attention to how bioethics has considered the experience of aging. Until recently, most age-focused work in bioethics has concerned age-associated illness, particularly end-of-life decision making. Given the reality of population aging and the ethical concerns accompanying the shift in age for most places in the world, the further evolution of bioethics involves greater attention to the support of flourishing in late life and to social justice and health equity in aging societies. We argue that the discourses of bioethics and critical gerontology, in dialogue, can bring a new understanding of privilege and preference, disparity and disadvantage, and reflection and respect for aging individuals.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34951632</pmid><doi>10.1093/geront/gnab186</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-3170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-9013
ispartof The Gerontologist, 2022-09, Vol.62 (8), p.1097-1103
issn 0016-9013
1758-5341
1758-5341
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000756741100001
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aging
Bioethics
Biomedicine
Biotechnology
Decision making
Fairness
Forum
Geriatrics
Geriatrics & Gerontology
Gerontology
Health disparities
Health Equity
Humanities
Humans
Illnesses
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Older people
Policy analysis
Research ethics
Science & Technology
Social Justice
Social structure
Social values
title Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioethics%20and%20Gerontology:%20The%20Value%20of%20Thinking%20Together&rft.jtitle=The%20Gerontologist&rft.au=Berlinger,%20Nancy&rft.date=2022-09-07&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1103&rft.pages=1097-1103&rft.issn=0016-9013&rft.eissn=1758-5341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geront/gnab186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2614226232%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716333716&rft_id=info:pmid/34951632&rft_oup_id=10.1093/geront/gnab186&rfr_iscdi=true