A new green revolution or agribusiness as usual? Uncovering alignment issues and potential transition complications in agri-food system transitions

Agri-food system transitions are a considerable challenge requiring stakeholder alignment on what changes need to be made and how. When stakeholders do not agree on the goals or methods of a transition, this can be a serious obstacle to success. This paper analyzes 42 vision documents for the future...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy for sustainable development 2021-12, Vol.41 (6), Article 77
Hauptverfasser: Wojtynia, Niko, van Dijk, Jerry, Derks, Marjolein, Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G., Hekkert, Marko P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Agronomy for sustainable development
container_volume 41
creator Wojtynia, Niko
van Dijk, Jerry
Derks, Marjolein
Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G.
Hekkert, Marko P.
description Agri-food system transitions are a considerable challenge requiring stakeholder alignment on what changes need to be made and how. When stakeholders do not agree on the goals or methods of a transition, this can be a serious obstacle to success. This paper analyzes 42 vision documents for the future of Dutch agriculture from a broad range of stakeholders to determine stakeholder alignment using an inductive coding approach. We identified 23 issues as the main challenges for the transition in these documents. We are the first to categorize them according to a recently proposed problem-solution space for wicked problems. Stakeholders were fully aligned in recognizing the problem for the majority of issues, but showed agreement on solutions for less than a quarter. For the issues of international orientation, sector size, and farm business models, we found a lack of consensus on the problem, indicating fundamental disagreement about the type of agricultural sector desired by stakeholders. The apparent consensus on environmental and social issues provides clear societal expectations for agronomic development and innovation, while the divergence on economic issues highlights the rift between growth-oriented paradigms and more holistic paradigms like agroecology. The crucial empirical novelty of this paper is that progress on environmental and social matters is restricted by divergent views on the economic characteristics of a future agri-food system, adding further complexity to mission-oriented transition and innovation policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13593-021-00734-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000727311300002CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607329500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9b1b14f1781e75573177fde75efdc41176cdd35648aebc243d62d9f2461818953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxiMEEqXwApwscUIoxRM7_05otSoUaSUu9Gw5jrO4ytrB42zV5-gLM0lQ4YQ4efzp941m5suyt8CvgPP6I4IoW5HzAnL6Cpk3z7ILqGuSoCyfr7XMeS2rl9krxDvO5aJcZI875u09O0ZrPYv2HMY5ueBZiEwfo-tmdN4iMo1sxlmPn9itN-Fso_NHpkd39CfrE3OIsyXK92wKiRSnR5ai9ujWdiacptEZvXyQOb82z4cQeoYPmOzpLxhfZy8GPaJ98_u9zG4_X3_f3-SHb1--7neH3EhZpbztoAM5QN2ArcuyFrTR0FNph95IgLoyfS_KSjbadqaQoq-Kvh0KWUEDTVuKy-z91veHHtUU3UnHBxW0Uze7g1o0LppWtC2cgdh3GzvF8JNWTeouzNHTeKqo6OJFW3JOVLFRJgbEaIentsDVEpTaglIUlFqDUg2Zms10b7swoHHWG_tk5IQVtBsIqnixd2k94j7MPpH1w_9biRYbjdMSn41_dvjHeL8Ao2O5NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607329500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new green revolution or agribusiness as usual? Uncovering alignment issues and potential transition complications in agri-food system transitions</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Wojtynia, Niko ; van Dijk, Jerry ; Derks, Marjolein ; Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G. ; Hekkert, Marko P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wojtynia, Niko ; van Dijk, Jerry ; Derks, Marjolein ; Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G. ; Hekkert, Marko P.</creatorcontrib><description>Agri-food system transitions are a considerable challenge requiring stakeholder alignment on what changes need to be made and how. When stakeholders do not agree on the goals or methods of a transition, this can be a serious obstacle to success. This paper analyzes 42 vision documents for the future of Dutch agriculture from a broad range of stakeholders to determine stakeholder alignment using an inductive coding approach. We identified 23 issues as the main challenges for the transition in these documents. We are the first to categorize them according to a recently proposed problem-solution space for wicked problems. Stakeholders were fully aligned in recognizing the problem for the majority of issues, but showed agreement on solutions for less than a quarter. For the issues of international orientation, sector size, and farm business models, we found a lack of consensus on the problem, indicating fundamental disagreement about the type of agricultural sector desired by stakeholders. The apparent consensus on environmental and social issues provides clear societal expectations for agronomic development and innovation, while the divergence on economic issues highlights the rift between growth-oriented paradigms and more holistic paradigms like agroecology. The crucial empirical novelty of this paper is that progress on environmental and social matters is restricted by divergent views on the economic characteristics of a future agri-food system, adding further complexity to mission-oriented transition and innovation policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1774-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1773-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13593-021-00734-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Agribusiness ; Agricultural economics ; Agricultural industry ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; Agriculture, economy and politics ; Agroecology ; Agronomy ; Alignment ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Complications ; Economics and Finance ; Empirical analysis ; Farms ; Food ; Food systems ; Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Green revolution ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Innovations ; Life Sciences ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Research Article ; Science & Technology ; Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Solution space ; Stakeholders ; Sustainable Development]]></subject><ispartof>Agronomy for sustainable development, 2021-12, Vol.41 (6), Article 77</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>20</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000727311300002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9b1b14f1781e75573177fde75efdc41176cdd35648aebc243d62d9f2461818953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9b1b14f1781e75573177fde75efdc41176cdd35648aebc243d62d9f2461818953</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6091-622X ; 0000-0002-8899-5764 ; 0000-0002-1945-9415</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-021-00734-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13593-021-00734-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,39262,39263,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03893991$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wojtynia, Niko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derks, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hekkert, Marko P.</creatorcontrib><title>A new green revolution or agribusiness as usual? Uncovering alignment issues and potential transition complications in agri-food system transitions</title><title>Agronomy for sustainable development</title><addtitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</addtitle><addtitle>AGRON SUSTAIN DEV</addtitle><description>Agri-food system transitions are a considerable challenge requiring stakeholder alignment on what changes need to be made and how. When stakeholders do not agree on the goals or methods of a transition, this can be a serious obstacle to success. This paper analyzes 42 vision documents for the future of Dutch agriculture from a broad range of stakeholders to determine stakeholder alignment using an inductive coding approach. We identified 23 issues as the main challenges for the transition in these documents. We are the first to categorize them according to a recently proposed problem-solution space for wicked problems. Stakeholders were fully aligned in recognizing the problem for the majority of issues, but showed agreement on solutions for less than a quarter. For the issues of international orientation, sector size, and farm business models, we found a lack of consensus on the problem, indicating fundamental disagreement about the type of agricultural sector desired by stakeholders. The apparent consensus on environmental and social issues provides clear societal expectations for agronomic development and innovation, while the divergence on economic issues highlights the rift between growth-oriented paradigms and more holistic paradigms like agroecology. The crucial empirical novelty of this paper is that progress on environmental and social matters is restricted by divergent views on the economic characteristics of a future agri-food system, adding further complexity to mission-oriented transition and innovation policies.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agriculture, economy and politics</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food systems</subject><subject>Green &amp; Sustainable Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Green revolution</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Solution space</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>1774-0746</issn><issn>1773-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxiMEEqXwApwscUIoxRM7_05otSoUaSUu9Gw5jrO4ytrB42zV5-gLM0lQ4YQ4efzp941m5suyt8CvgPP6I4IoW5HzAnL6Cpk3z7ILqGuSoCyfr7XMeS2rl9krxDvO5aJcZI875u09O0ZrPYv2HMY5ueBZiEwfo-tmdN4iMo1sxlmPn9itN-Fso_NHpkd39CfrE3OIsyXK92wKiRSnR5ai9ujWdiacptEZvXyQOb82z4cQeoYPmOzpLxhfZy8GPaJ98_u9zG4_X3_f3-SHb1--7neH3EhZpbztoAM5QN2ArcuyFrTR0FNph95IgLoyfS_KSjbadqaQoq-Kvh0KWUEDTVuKy-z91veHHtUU3UnHBxW0Uze7g1o0LppWtC2cgdh3GzvF8JNWTeouzNHTeKqo6OJFW3JOVLFRJgbEaIentsDVEpTaglIUlFqDUg2Zms10b7swoHHWG_tk5IQVtBsIqnixd2k94j7MPpH1w_9biRYbjdMSn41_dvjHeL8Ao2O5NQ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Wojtynia, Niko</creator><creator>van Dijk, Jerry</creator><creator>Derks, Marjolein</creator><creator>Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G.</creator><creator>Hekkert, Marko P.</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-622X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8899-5764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-9415</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>A new green revolution or agribusiness as usual? Uncovering alignment issues and potential transition complications in agri-food system transitions</title><author>Wojtynia, Niko ; van Dijk, Jerry ; Derks, Marjolein ; Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G. ; Hekkert, Marko P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-9b1b14f1781e75573177fde75efdc41176cdd35648aebc243d62d9f2461818953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agriculture, economy and politics</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food systems</topic><topic>Green &amp; Sustainable Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Green revolution</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Solution space</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wojtynia, Niko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derks, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hekkert, Marko P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wojtynia, Niko</au><au>van Dijk, Jerry</au><au>Derks, Marjolein</au><au>Groot Koerkamp, Peter W. G.</au><au>Hekkert, Marko P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new green revolution or agribusiness as usual? Uncovering alignment issues and potential transition complications in agri-food system transitions</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy for sustainable development</jtitle><stitle>Agron. Sustain. Dev</stitle><stitle>AGRON SUSTAIN DEV</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><artnum>77</artnum><issn>1774-0746</issn><eissn>1773-0155</eissn><abstract>Agri-food system transitions are a considerable challenge requiring stakeholder alignment on what changes need to be made and how. When stakeholders do not agree on the goals or methods of a transition, this can be a serious obstacle to success. This paper analyzes 42 vision documents for the future of Dutch agriculture from a broad range of stakeholders to determine stakeholder alignment using an inductive coding approach. We identified 23 issues as the main challenges for the transition in these documents. We are the first to categorize them according to a recently proposed problem-solution space for wicked problems. Stakeholders were fully aligned in recognizing the problem for the majority of issues, but showed agreement on solutions for less than a quarter. For the issues of international orientation, sector size, and farm business models, we found a lack of consensus on the problem, indicating fundamental disagreement about the type of agricultural sector desired by stakeholders. The apparent consensus on environmental and social issues provides clear societal expectations for agronomic development and innovation, while the divergence on economic issues highlights the rift between growth-oriented paradigms and more holistic paradigms like agroecology. The crucial empirical novelty of this paper is that progress on environmental and social matters is restricted by divergent views on the economic characteristics of a future agri-food system, adding further complexity to mission-oriented transition and innovation policies.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><doi>10.1007/s13593-021-00734-8</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-622X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8899-5764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-9415</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1774-0746
ispartof Agronomy for sustainable development, 2021-12, Vol.41 (6), Article 77
issn 1774-0746
1773-0155
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000727311300002CitationCount
source SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Agribusiness
Agricultural economics
Agricultural industry
Agricultural production
Agricultural sciences
Agriculture
Agriculture, economy and politics
Agroecology
Agronomy
Alignment
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Complications
Economics and Finance
Empirical analysis
Farms
Food
Food systems
Green & Sustainable Science & Technology
Green revolution
Humanities and Social Sciences
Innovations
Life Sciences
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Research Article
Science & Technology
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Soil Science & Conservation
Solution space
Stakeholders
Sustainable Development
title A new green revolution or agribusiness as usual? Uncovering alignment issues and potential transition complications in agri-food system transitions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T12%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20green%20revolution%20or%20agribusiness%20as%20usual?%20Uncovering%20alignment%20issues%20and%20potential%20transition%20complications%20in%20agri-food%20system%20transitions&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20for%20sustainable%20development&rft.au=Wojtynia,%20Niko&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.artnum=77&rft.issn=1774-0746&rft.eissn=1773-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13593-021-00734-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2607329500%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607329500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true