Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD. The German ESD registry is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 2021-10, Vol.161 (4), p.1168-1178
Hauptverfasser: Fleischmann, Carola, Probst, Andreas, Ebigbo, Alanna, Faiss, Siegbert, Schumacher, Brigitte, Allgaier, H.-P., Dumoulin, F.L., Steinbrueck, Ingo, Anzinger, Michael, Marienhagen, Joerg, Muzalyova, Anna, Messmann, Helmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1178
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1168
container_title Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)
container_volume 161
creator Fleischmann, Carola
Probst, Andreas
Ebigbo, Alanna
Faiss, Siegbert
Schumacher, Brigitte
Allgaier, H.-P.
Dumoulin, F.L.
Steinbrueck, Ingo
Anzinger, Michael
Marienhagen, Joerg
Muzalyova, Anna
Messmann, Helmut
description Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD. The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (>50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed. Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD. In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume. [Display omitted] Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of >20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000709368900017CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016508521031632</els_id><sourcerecordid>2546601725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCGyDkJRJK8E_-zAKpGqYFaQRSgbXl2DfFoyQOdgLqG_SxuaMMXQIre_GdY59zCHnBWc5ZKd8c8luT5hhywQTPWZWzQj0iG16KJmOMi8dkg0eVlawpz8h5SgfGmJINf0rOZMEbwZjYkPvd6EKyYfKWflnaYbEhmZ6-9ymBnX0YqR_pbolhgrf0BtLSz4mGjnI0o58gTD1-ArV7SAgnehXDQOfvQK8hDgal_7K_gVuPMe6ekSed6RM8P50X5NvV7uv2Q7b_fP1xe7nPbFEXcwZlobiQbcsaUzHeVrXikre2bmQBsnZOWCZVbTCh6owzDmTrZCtVp5qCuU5ekFer7xTDjwXSrAefLPS9GSEsSYuyqNC4FiWixYraGFKK0Okp-sHEO82ZPm6gD3rdQB830KzSuAHKXp5ewMDgHkR_SkegWYFf0IYuWQ-jhQcMi61xp6pReOP11s_mWNQ2LOOM0tf_L0X63UoDFvrTQ9QnhfMR69cu-L9H-Q0OOLwm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546601725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fleischmann, Carola ; Probst, Andreas ; Ebigbo, Alanna ; Faiss, Siegbert ; Schumacher, Brigitte ; Allgaier, H.-P. ; Dumoulin, F.L. ; Steinbrueck, Ingo ; Anzinger, Michael ; Marienhagen, Joerg ; Muzalyova, Anna ; Messmann, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Carola ; Probst, Andreas ; Ebigbo, Alanna ; Faiss, Siegbert ; Schumacher, Brigitte ; Allgaier, H.-P. ; Dumoulin, F.L. ; Steinbrueck, Ingo ; Anzinger, Michael ; Marienhagen, Joerg ; Muzalyova, Anna ; Messmann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD. The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (&gt;50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed. Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD. In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume. [Display omitted] Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of &gt;20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34182002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>PHILADELPHIA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Case Volume ; Clinical Competence ; Colorectal Neoplasms - economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends ; Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ; Esophageal Neoplasms - economics ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Europe ; Female ; Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology ; Germany ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitals, High-Volume ; Hospitals, Low-Volume ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prospective Studies ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Registries ; Registry ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Science &amp; Technology ; Stomach Neoplasms - economics ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2021-10, Vol.161 (4), p.1168-1178</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>54</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000709368900017</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,39263,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34182002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebigbo, Alanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faiss, Siegbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allgaier, H.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbrueck, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marienhagen, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzalyova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messmann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</title><title>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</title><addtitle>GASTROENTEROLOGY</addtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD. The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (&gt;50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed. Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD. In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume. [Display omitted] Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of &gt;20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Case Volume</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends</subject><subject>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume</subject><subject>Hospitals, Low-Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Registry</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0016-5085</issn><issn>1528-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCGyDkJRJK8E_-zAKpGqYFaQRSgbXl2DfFoyQOdgLqG_SxuaMMXQIre_GdY59zCHnBWc5ZKd8c8luT5hhywQTPWZWzQj0iG16KJmOMi8dkg0eVlawpz8h5SgfGmJINf0rOZMEbwZjYkPvd6EKyYfKWflnaYbEhmZ6-9ymBnX0YqR_pbolhgrf0BtLSz4mGjnI0o58gTD1-ArV7SAgnehXDQOfvQK8hDgal_7K_gVuPMe6ekSed6RM8P50X5NvV7uv2Q7b_fP1xe7nPbFEXcwZlobiQbcsaUzHeVrXikre2bmQBsnZOWCZVbTCh6owzDmTrZCtVp5qCuU5ekFer7xTDjwXSrAefLPS9GSEsSYuyqNC4FiWixYraGFKK0Okp-sHEO82ZPm6gD3rdQB830KzSuAHKXp5ewMDgHkR_SkegWYFf0IYuWQ-jhQcMi61xp6pReOP11s_mWNQ2LOOM0tf_L0X63UoDFvrTQ9QnhfMR69cu-L9H-Q0OOLwm</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Fleischmann, Carola</creator><creator>Probst, Andreas</creator><creator>Ebigbo, Alanna</creator><creator>Faiss, Siegbert</creator><creator>Schumacher, Brigitte</creator><creator>Allgaier, H.-P.</creator><creator>Dumoulin, F.L.</creator><creator>Steinbrueck, Ingo</creator><creator>Anzinger, Michael</creator><creator>Marienhagen, Joerg</creator><creator>Muzalyova, Anna</creator><creator>Messmann, Helmut</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</title><author>Fleischmann, Carola ; Probst, Andreas ; Ebigbo, Alanna ; Faiss, Siegbert ; Schumacher, Brigitte ; Allgaier, H.-P. ; Dumoulin, F.L. ; Steinbrueck, Ingo ; Anzinger, Michael ; Marienhagen, Joerg ; Muzalyova, Anna ; Messmann, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Case Volume</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends</topic><topic>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume</topic><topic>Hospitals, Low-Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Registry</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebigbo, Alanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faiss, Siegbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allgaier, H.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbrueck, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marienhagen, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzalyova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messmann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleischmann, Carola</au><au>Probst, Andreas</au><au>Ebigbo, Alanna</au><au>Faiss, Siegbert</au><au>Schumacher, Brigitte</au><au>Allgaier, H.-P.</au><au>Dumoulin, F.L.</au><au>Steinbrueck, Ingo</au><au>Anzinger, Michael</au><au>Marienhagen, Joerg</au><au>Muzalyova, Anna</au><au>Messmann, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle><stitle>GASTROENTEROLOGY</stitle><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1168</spage><epage>1178</epage><pages>1168-1178</pages><issn>0016-5085</issn><eissn>1528-0012</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD. The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (&gt;50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed. Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD. In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume. [Display omitted] Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of &gt;20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.</abstract><cop>PHILADELPHIA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34182002</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5085
ispartof Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2021-10, Vol.161 (4), p.1168-1178
issn 0016-5085
1528-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000709368900017CitationCount
source MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Case Volume
Clinical Competence
Colorectal Neoplasms - economics
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Esophageal Neoplasms - economics
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Europe
Female
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Germany
Health Care Costs
Hospitals, High-Volume
Hospitals, Low-Volume
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Registries
Registry
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Science & Technology
Stomach Neoplasms - economics
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T00%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopic%20Submucosal%20Dissection%20in%20Europe:%20Results%20of%201000%20Neoplastic%20Lesions%20From%20the%20German%20Endoscopic%20Submucosal%20Dissection%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201943)&rft.au=Fleischmann,%20Carola&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1168&rft.epage=1178&rft.pages=1168-1178&rft.issn=0016-5085&rft.eissn=1528-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2546601725%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546601725&rft_id=info:pmid/34182002&rft_els_id=S0016508521031632&rfr_iscdi=true