Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD. The German ESD registry is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 2021-10, Vol.161 (4), p.1168-1178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1168 |
container_title | Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Fleischmann, Carola Probst, Andreas Ebigbo, Alanna Faiss, Siegbert Schumacher, Brigitte Allgaier, H.-P. Dumoulin, F.L. Steinbrueck, Ingo Anzinger, Michael Marienhagen, Joerg Muzalyova, Anna Messmann, Helmut |
description | Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD.
The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (>50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed.
Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD.
In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume.
[Display omitted]
Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of >20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000709368900017CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016508521031632</els_id><sourcerecordid>2546601725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCGyDkJRJK8E_-zAKpGqYFaQRSgbXl2DfFoyQOdgLqG_SxuaMMXQIre_GdY59zCHnBWc5ZKd8c8luT5hhywQTPWZWzQj0iG16KJmOMi8dkg0eVlawpz8h5SgfGmJINf0rOZMEbwZjYkPvd6EKyYfKWflnaYbEhmZ6-9ymBnX0YqR_pbolhgrf0BtLSz4mGjnI0o58gTD1-ArV7SAgnehXDQOfvQK8hDgal_7K_gVuPMe6ekSed6RM8P50X5NvV7uv2Q7b_fP1xe7nPbFEXcwZlobiQbcsaUzHeVrXikre2bmQBsnZOWCZVbTCh6owzDmTrZCtVp5qCuU5ekFer7xTDjwXSrAefLPS9GSEsSYuyqNC4FiWixYraGFKK0Okp-sHEO82ZPm6gD3rdQB830KzSuAHKXp5ewMDgHkR_SkegWYFf0IYuWQ-jhQcMi61xp6pReOP11s_mWNQ2LOOM0tf_L0X63UoDFvrTQ9QnhfMR69cu-L9H-Q0OOLwm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546601725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fleischmann, Carola ; Probst, Andreas ; Ebigbo, Alanna ; Faiss, Siegbert ; Schumacher, Brigitte ; Allgaier, H.-P. ; Dumoulin, F.L. ; Steinbrueck, Ingo ; Anzinger, Michael ; Marienhagen, Joerg ; Muzalyova, Anna ; Messmann, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Carola ; Probst, Andreas ; Ebigbo, Alanna ; Faiss, Siegbert ; Schumacher, Brigitte ; Allgaier, H.-P. ; Dumoulin, F.L. ; Steinbrueck, Ingo ; Anzinger, Michael ; Marienhagen, Joerg ; Muzalyova, Anna ; Messmann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD.
The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (>50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed.
Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD.
In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume.
[Display omitted]
Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of >20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34182002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>PHILADELPHIA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Case Volume ; Clinical Competence ; Colorectal Neoplasms - economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends ; Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ; Esophageal Neoplasms - economics ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Europe ; Female ; Gastroenterology & Hepatology ; Germany ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitals, High-Volume ; Hospitals, Low-Volume ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prospective Studies ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Registries ; Registry ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Science & Technology ; Stomach Neoplasms - economics ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2021-10, Vol.161 (4), p.1168-1178</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>54</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000709368900017</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,39263,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34182002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebigbo, Alanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faiss, Siegbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allgaier, H.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbrueck, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marienhagen, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzalyova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messmann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</title><title>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</title><addtitle>GASTROENTEROLOGY</addtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD.
The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (>50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed.
Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD.
In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume.
[Display omitted]
Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of >20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Case Volume</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends</subject><subject>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology & Hepatology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume</subject><subject>Hospitals, Low-Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Registry</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0016-5085</issn><issn>1528-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCGyDkJRJK8E_-zAKpGqYFaQRSgbXl2DfFoyQOdgLqG_SxuaMMXQIre_GdY59zCHnBWc5ZKd8c8luT5hhywQTPWZWzQj0iG16KJmOMi8dkg0eVlawpz8h5SgfGmJINf0rOZMEbwZjYkPvd6EKyYfKWflnaYbEhmZ6-9ymBnX0YqR_pbolhgrf0BtLSz4mGjnI0o58gTD1-ArV7SAgnehXDQOfvQK8hDgal_7K_gVuPMe6ekSed6RM8P50X5NvV7uv2Q7b_fP1xe7nPbFEXcwZlobiQbcsaUzHeVrXikre2bmQBsnZOWCZVbTCh6owzDmTrZCtVp5qCuU5ekFer7xTDjwXSrAefLPS9GSEsSYuyqNC4FiWixYraGFKK0Okp-sHEO82ZPm6gD3rdQB830KzSuAHKXp5ewMDgHkR_SkegWYFf0IYuWQ-jhQcMi61xp6pReOP11s_mWNQ2LOOM0tf_L0X63UoDFvrTQ9QnhfMR69cu-L9H-Q0OOLwm</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Fleischmann, Carola</creator><creator>Probst, Andreas</creator><creator>Ebigbo, Alanna</creator><creator>Faiss, Siegbert</creator><creator>Schumacher, Brigitte</creator><creator>Allgaier, H.-P.</creator><creator>Dumoulin, F.L.</creator><creator>Steinbrueck, Ingo</creator><creator>Anzinger, Michael</creator><creator>Marienhagen, Joerg</creator><creator>Muzalyova, Anna</creator><creator>Messmann, Helmut</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</title><author>Fleischmann, Carola ; Probst, Andreas ; Ebigbo, Alanna ; Faiss, Siegbert ; Schumacher, Brigitte ; Allgaier, H.-P. ; Dumoulin, F.L. ; Steinbrueck, Ingo ; Anzinger, Michael ; Marienhagen, Joerg ; Muzalyova, Anna ; Messmann, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e549123bb08a601b679131bc7834e37dd2c0397a3419fadade3bd3b39f9840df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Case Volume</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends</topic><topic>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology & Hepatology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume</topic><topic>Hospitals, Low-Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Registry</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebigbo, Alanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faiss, Siegbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allgaier, H.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinbrueck, Ingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzinger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marienhagen, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzalyova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messmann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleischmann, Carola</au><au>Probst, Andreas</au><au>Ebigbo, Alanna</au><au>Faiss, Siegbert</au><au>Schumacher, Brigitte</au><au>Allgaier, H.-P.</au><au>Dumoulin, F.L.</au><au>Steinbrueck, Ingo</au><au>Anzinger, Michael</au><au>Marienhagen, Joerg</au><au>Muzalyova, Anna</au><au>Messmann, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle><stitle>GASTROENTEROLOGY</stitle><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1168</spage><epage>1178</epage><pages>1168-1178</pages><issn>0016-5085</issn><eissn>1528-0012</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD.
The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20–50/y), and high-volume centers (>50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed.
Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76–0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067–0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD.
In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center’s yearly case volume.
[Display omitted]
Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established endoscopic treatment method in Germany. With a case volume of >20/y, satisfactory results can be achieved. Compared with Asian studies, there is room for improvement.</abstract><cop>PHILADELPHIA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34182002</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5085 |
ispartof | Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2021-10, Vol.161 (4), p.1168-1178 |
issn | 0016-5085 1528-0012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000709368900017CitationCount |
source | MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Case Volume Clinical Competence Colorectal Neoplasms - economics Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - economics Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - trends Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Esophageal Neoplasms - economics Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Europe Female Gastroenterology & Hepatology Germany Health Care Costs Hospitals, High-Volume Hospitals, Low-Volume Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Neoplasm Staging Prospective Studies Quality Indicators, Health Care Registries Registry Risk Assessment Risk Factors Science & Technology Stomach Neoplasms - economics Stomach Neoplasms - pathology Stomach Neoplasms - surgery Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T00%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopic%20Submucosal%20Dissection%20in%20Europe:%20Results%20of%201000%20Neoplastic%20Lesions%20From%20the%20German%20Endoscopic%20Submucosal%20Dissection%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201943)&rft.au=Fleischmann,%20Carola&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1168&rft.epage=1178&rft.pages=1168-1178&rft.issn=0016-5085&rft.eissn=1528-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2546601725%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546601725&rft_id=info:pmid/34182002&rft_els_id=S0016508521031632&rfr_iscdi=true |