Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model
Heliostat fields are exposed to changing climatic conditions as they are mostly erected in open environments where the wind naturally features a high unsteadiness at low altitude due to the ground effects. Much of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) content in the open literature is focused on Re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics 2021-11, Vol.218, p.104740, Article 104740 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104740 |
container_title | Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics |
container_volume | 218 |
creator | Poulain, P. Craig, K.J. Meyer, J.P. |
description | Heliostat fields are exposed to changing climatic conditions as they are mostly erected in open environments where the wind naturally features a high unsteadiness at low altitude due to the ground effects. Much of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) content in the open literature is focused on Reynolds–averaged-Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, which can only predict mean loads. This paper considers an isolated heliostat in worst-case orientation. The drag force is numerically modelled by means of a Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS) in ANSYS v19. This paper firstly deals with two different methods that generate perturbations at the inlet boundary: the spectral synthesiser and the vortex method. In an empty domain, an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) profile is modelled based on a wind tunnel experiment. Secondly, the wind tunnel test of a single heliostat model in upright orientation is replicated, aiming to model the mean and peak drag forces. Applicable for highly separated flows, the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) turbulence model is employed as it is computationally more affordable than a Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) approach. The latter would require a higher grid resolution and a reduced time step size. The SAS showed little but acceptable decay of the inlet profiles whilst achieving lateral homogeneity. The mean and root-mean-square error of the drag force signal showed a deviation with the experiment of 0.04% and 5.8%, respectively, whereas the error on the peak drag forces was around 18%, possibly mostly due to the under-prediction of the turbulent integral length scale at the model location.
•Scale-resolving simulation in the form of Scale-Adaptive Simulation is used.•The SAS turbulence model is used to model the flow over an upright heliostat.•Mean velocity, integral length scale and turbulence intensity profiles are resolved.•Comparison to wind tunnel results of mean drag force and RMSE is favourable.•Lateral and horizontal homogeneity of velocity and turbulence profiles presented. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104740 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000703442100005CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167610521002191</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0167610521002191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-77bfbf85cbb3eb9aea4e1c3cac2b584d25e719d302aec322c6068cc66f2dbc2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVooK6TX9CL7mUdfeyu1occgulHwJBD3bMYSbOxzHplJG2Mb_3pkePQ3kpPGg3vM8w8hHzmbMEZb-92i90RPSwEE7x0alWzKzLjnRJVx5fqA5mVlKpazpqP5FNKO8aYqpWckd-bCGPyOGaa_H4aIPsw0tBTGCnkfUiHLUZvqQnT6CCe6AAnjLQfwpEeIGUKdIuDDylDplPy4zPNW6Q_LQxYPTg4ZP9Svn9H5ymaacDRIt0Hh8MNue5hSHj7_s7Jr29fN6sf1frp--PqYV1ZWXe5Usr0pu8aa4xEswSEGrmVFqwwTVc70aDiSyeZALRSCNuytrO2bXvhjBVOzom8zLUxpBSx14fo9-UizZk-S9Q7_SZRnyXqi8RCfblQRzShT9afF_9Dni0yWdeCl4o1Jd39f3rl85uRVTGbC3p_QbE4ePEY9TvufESbtQv-n4u-AsUIoPM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Poulain, P. ; Craig, K.J. ; Meyer, J.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poulain, P. ; Craig, K.J. ; Meyer, J.P.</creatorcontrib><description>Heliostat fields are exposed to changing climatic conditions as they are mostly erected in open environments where the wind naturally features a high unsteadiness at low altitude due to the ground effects. Much of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) content in the open literature is focused on Reynolds–averaged-Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, which can only predict mean loads. This paper considers an isolated heliostat in worst-case orientation. The drag force is numerically modelled by means of a Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS) in ANSYS v19. This paper firstly deals with two different methods that generate perturbations at the inlet boundary: the spectral synthesiser and the vortex method. In an empty domain, an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) profile is modelled based on a wind tunnel experiment. Secondly, the wind tunnel test of a single heliostat model in upright orientation is replicated, aiming to model the mean and peak drag forces. Applicable for highly separated flows, the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) turbulence model is employed as it is computationally more affordable than a Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) approach. The latter would require a higher grid resolution and a reduced time step size. The SAS showed little but acceptable decay of the inlet profiles whilst achieving lateral homogeneity. The mean and root-mean-square error of the drag force signal showed a deviation with the experiment of 0.04% and 5.8%, respectively, whereas the error on the peak drag forces was around 18%, possibly mostly due to the under-prediction of the turbulent integral length scale at the model location.
•Scale-resolving simulation in the form of Scale-Adaptive Simulation is used.•The SAS turbulence model is used to model the flow over an upright heliostat.•Mean velocity, integral length scale and turbulence intensity profiles are resolved.•Comparison to wind tunnel results of mean drag force and RMSE is favourable.•Lateral and horizontal homogeneity of velocity and turbulence profiles presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) ; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) ; Engineering ; Engineering, Civil ; Heliostat ; Mechanics ; Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) ; Science & Technology ; Technology ; Turbulence power spectrum</subject><ispartof>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2021-11, Vol.218, p.104740, Article 104740</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>7</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000703442100005</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-77bfbf85cbb3eb9aea4e1c3cac2b584d25e719d302aec322c6068cc66f2dbc2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-77bfbf85cbb3eb9aea4e1c3cac2b584d25e719d302aec322c6068cc66f2dbc2d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3675-5494 ; 0000-0002-8451-3414 ; 0000-0002-7960-2148</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104740$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,39263,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poulain, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, J.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model</title><title>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</title><addtitle>J WIND ENG IND AEROD</addtitle><description>Heliostat fields are exposed to changing climatic conditions as they are mostly erected in open environments where the wind naturally features a high unsteadiness at low altitude due to the ground effects. Much of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) content in the open literature is focused on Reynolds–averaged-Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, which can only predict mean loads. This paper considers an isolated heliostat in worst-case orientation. The drag force is numerically modelled by means of a Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS) in ANSYS v19. This paper firstly deals with two different methods that generate perturbations at the inlet boundary: the spectral synthesiser and the vortex method. In an empty domain, an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) profile is modelled based on a wind tunnel experiment. Secondly, the wind tunnel test of a single heliostat model in upright orientation is replicated, aiming to model the mean and peak drag forces. Applicable for highly separated flows, the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) turbulence model is employed as it is computationally more affordable than a Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) approach. The latter would require a higher grid resolution and a reduced time step size. The SAS showed little but acceptable decay of the inlet profiles whilst achieving lateral homogeneity. The mean and root-mean-square error of the drag force signal showed a deviation with the experiment of 0.04% and 5.8%, respectively, whereas the error on the peak drag forces was around 18%, possibly mostly due to the under-prediction of the turbulent integral length scale at the model location.
•Scale-resolving simulation in the form of Scale-Adaptive Simulation is used.•The SAS turbulence model is used to model the flow over an upright heliostat.•Mean velocity, integral length scale and turbulence intensity profiles are resolved.•Comparison to wind tunnel results of mean drag force and RMSE is favourable.•Lateral and horizontal homogeneity of velocity and turbulence profiles presented.</description><subject>Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL)</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Civil</subject><subject>Heliostat</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS)</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Turbulence power spectrum</subject><issn>0167-6105</issn><issn>1872-8197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1rGzEQhkVooK6TX9CL7mUdfeyu1occgulHwJBD3bMYSbOxzHplJG2Mb_3pkePQ3kpPGg3vM8w8hHzmbMEZb-92i90RPSwEE7x0alWzKzLjnRJVx5fqA5mVlKpazpqP5FNKO8aYqpWckd-bCGPyOGaa_H4aIPsw0tBTGCnkfUiHLUZvqQnT6CCe6AAnjLQfwpEeIGUKdIuDDylDplPy4zPNW6Q_LQxYPTg4ZP9Svn9H5ymaacDRIt0Hh8MNue5hSHj7_s7Jr29fN6sf1frp--PqYV1ZWXe5Usr0pu8aa4xEswSEGrmVFqwwTVc70aDiSyeZALRSCNuytrO2bXvhjBVOzom8zLUxpBSx14fo9-UizZk-S9Q7_SZRnyXqi8RCfblQRzShT9afF_9Dni0yWdeCl4o1Jd39f3rl85uRVTGbC3p_QbE4ePEY9TvufESbtQv-n4u-AsUIoPM</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Poulain, P.</creator><creator>Craig, K.J.</creator><creator>Meyer, J.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-5494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-3414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-2148</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model</title><author>Poulain, P. ; Craig, K.J. ; Meyer, J.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-77bfbf85cbb3eb9aea4e1c3cac2b584d25e719d302aec322c6068cc66f2dbc2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL)</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Civil</topic><topic>Heliostat</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS)</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Turbulence power spectrum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poulain, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, K.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, J.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poulain, P.</au><au>Craig, K.J.</au><au>Meyer, J.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics</jtitle><stitle>J WIND ENG IND AEROD</stitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>218</volume><spage>104740</spage><pages>104740-</pages><artnum>104740</artnum><issn>0167-6105</issn><eissn>1872-8197</eissn><abstract>Heliostat fields are exposed to changing climatic conditions as they are mostly erected in open environments where the wind naturally features a high unsteadiness at low altitude due to the ground effects. Much of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) content in the open literature is focused on Reynolds–averaged-Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations, which can only predict mean loads. This paper considers an isolated heliostat in worst-case orientation. The drag force is numerically modelled by means of a Scale-Resolving Simulation (SRS) in ANSYS v19. This paper firstly deals with two different methods that generate perturbations at the inlet boundary: the spectral synthesiser and the vortex method. In an empty domain, an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) profile is modelled based on a wind tunnel experiment. Secondly, the wind tunnel test of a single heliostat model in upright orientation is replicated, aiming to model the mean and peak drag forces. Applicable for highly separated flows, the Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) turbulence model is employed as it is computationally more affordable than a Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) approach. The latter would require a higher grid resolution and a reduced time step size. The SAS showed little but acceptable decay of the inlet profiles whilst achieving lateral homogeneity. The mean and root-mean-square error of the drag force signal showed a deviation with the experiment of 0.04% and 5.8%, respectively, whereas the error on the peak drag forces was around 18%, possibly mostly due to the under-prediction of the turbulent integral length scale at the model location.
•Scale-resolving simulation in the form of Scale-Adaptive Simulation is used.•The SAS turbulence model is used to model the flow over an upright heliostat.•Mean velocity, integral length scale and turbulence intensity profiles are resolved.•Comparison to wind tunnel results of mean drag force and RMSE is favourable.•Lateral and horizontal homogeneity of velocity and turbulence profiles presented.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104740</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3675-5494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-3414</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7960-2148</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6105 |
ispartof | Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 2021-11, Vol.218, p.104740, Article 104740 |
issn | 0167-6105 1872-8197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000703442100005CitationCount |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Engineering Engineering, Civil Heliostat Mechanics Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS) Science & Technology Technology Turbulence power spectrum |
title | Transient simulation of an atmospheric boundary layer flow past a heliostat using the Scale-Adaptive Simulation turbulence model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T07%3A00%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transient%20simulation%20of%20an%20atmospheric%20boundary%20layer%20flow%20past%20a%20heliostat%20using%20the%20Scale-Adaptive%20Simulation%20turbulence%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20wind%20engineering%20and%20industrial%20aerodynamics&rft.au=Poulain,%20P.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=218&rft.spage=104740&rft.pages=104740-&rft.artnum=104740&rft.issn=0167-6105&rft.eissn=1872-8197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104740&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_webof%3ES0167610521002191%3C/elsevier_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167610521002191&rfr_iscdi=true |