Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis

As one of the main focuses of agricultural development research, changes in agricultural technology are a dynamic reflection of the economic environment. This paper uses the Meta-analysis method to conduct a comprehensive analysis of 77 empirical studies to reveal the influence factors, sources of h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2021-10, Vol.109, p.105622, Article 105622
Hauptverfasser: Xie, Hualin, Huang, Yingqian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105622
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 109
creator Xie, Hualin
Huang, Yingqian
description As one of the main focuses of agricultural development research, changes in agricultural technology are a dynamic reflection of the economic environment. This paper uses the Meta-analysis method to conduct a comprehensive analysis of 77 empirical studies to reveal the influence factors, sources of heterogeneity, and influence effects of farmers on the adoption behavior of pro-environmental agricultural technology over time. The results show the following: (1) Influencing factors of farmer's pro-environmental agricultural technology adoption behavior are not completely homogeneous. Among the factors, age, farming population, family income, farm income ratio, number of plots, and land transfer have a regulating effect. Most of the observed heterogeneity relates to the research areas, funding levels and models used. (2) Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation have a significantly negative impact on farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies. We find no impact on household size, farming population, and village cadres. Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness, land transfer, and government subsidies have significantly positive effects. (3) Over time, only land transfer has a significantly positive impact on the adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies by farmers, and the impact has gradually increased. The farming population, technical understanding, and number of plots have no significant impact, but their effects have weakened to varying degrees. Therefore, policymakers and other stakeholders need to consider geographical differences and farming systems, the technology needs of different farmers and affordable costs, in addition to focusing on common variables, when designing policies to encourage the adoption of agricultural technologies in China. Meanwhile, improve the development level of the land rental market, strengthen publicity, training, and subsidies, and increase farmers' information awareness. •We study farmer adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies (PEATs) in China.•Meta-analysis is used to explore the influencing factors of farmers' PEATs.•Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation are negatively related to farmers' adoption of PEATs.•Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness and land transfer have significantly positive effects.•Only land transfer has a positive effect on farmers' adoption of PEATs over time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105622
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000702765200008CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837721003458</els_id><sourcerecordid>2600350556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-57b6d3f084f5d41dd2b88ddff9ee6c4d5a66875c9bdd65df6d8f05e3379920533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P7CAUhonRxPHjPzRxcRemI4VC6d1pc_1ING50TRg4jEw6MALV-O8vkzG61BWHk_c5efMgVDV43uCGX6zmo_JmSrAJ45xg0pQ144TsoVkjOlqzjrX7aIYJb2tBu-4QHaW0whjzviEzFO68HSfw2vllZZXOIaYq2DLGNcT0p1ImbLILfrvcxFCDf3Mx-DX4rMZKLaPT05inWD4Z9IsPY1g6SJXz1fDivPpbPUBWtfJq_EgunaADq8YEp5_vMXq-_vc03Nb3jzd3w-V9rWnLc2m94IZaLFrLTNsYQxZCGGNtD8B1a5jiXHRM9wtjODOWG2ExA0q7vieYUXqMznZ3S-fXCVKWqzDFUiJJwjGmDDPGS0rsUjqGlCJYuYlureKHbLDc6pUr-a1XbvXKnd5v9B0WwSbtikP4wovfDpOOM1ImLAaX1VbiECafC3r-e7Skr3ZpKLreHET5SRgXQWdpgvu57X8n_6vP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600350556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Xie, Hualin ; Huang, Yingqian</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, Hualin ; Huang, Yingqian</creatorcontrib><description>As one of the main focuses of agricultural development research, changes in agricultural technology are a dynamic reflection of the economic environment. This paper uses the Meta-analysis method to conduct a comprehensive analysis of 77 empirical studies to reveal the influence factors, sources of heterogeneity, and influence effects of farmers on the adoption behavior of pro-environmental agricultural technology over time. The results show the following: (1) Influencing factors of farmer's pro-environmental agricultural technology adoption behavior are not completely homogeneous. Among the factors, age, farming population, family income, farm income ratio, number of plots, and land transfer have a regulating effect. Most of the observed heterogeneity relates to the research areas, funding levels and models used. (2) Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation have a significantly negative impact on farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies. We find no impact on household size, farming population, and village cadres. Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness, land transfer, and government subsidies have significantly positive effects. (3) Over time, only land transfer has a significantly positive impact on the adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies by farmers, and the impact has gradually increased. The farming population, technical understanding, and number of plots have no significant impact, but their effects have weakened to varying degrees. Therefore, policymakers and other stakeholders need to consider geographical differences and farming systems, the technology needs of different farmers and affordable costs, in addition to focusing on common variables, when designing policies to encourage the adoption of agricultural technologies in China. Meanwhile, improve the development level of the land rental market, strengthen publicity, training, and subsidies, and increase farmers' information awareness. •We study farmer adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies (PEATs) in China.•Meta-analysis is used to explore the influencing factors of farmers' PEATs.•Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation are negatively related to farmers' adoption of PEATs.•Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness and land transfer have significantly positive effects.•Only land transfer has a positive effect on farmers' adoption of PEATs over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adoption of innovations ; Agrarian structures ; Agricultural development ; Agricultural economics ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural research ; Agricultural technology ; Cadres ; Economic analysis ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Farm income ; Farmers ; Farming ; Farming systems ; Farms ; Heterogeneity ; Income ; Influencing factors ; Land ; Land use ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Meta-analysis ; Policy making ; Population policy ; Pro-environmental agricultural technology ; Publicity ; Science &amp; Technology ; Subsidies ; Technology adoption ; Technology utilization</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2021-10, Vol.109, p.105622, Article 105622</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>94</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000702765200008</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-57b6d3f084f5d41dd2b88ddff9ee6c4d5a66875c9bdd65df6d8f05e3379920533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-57b6d3f084f5d41dd2b88ddff9ee6c4d5a66875c9bdd65df6d8f05e3379920533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105622$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27871,27929,27930,39262,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, Hualin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yingqian</creatorcontrib><title>Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis</title><title>Land use policy</title><addtitle>LAND USE POLICY</addtitle><description>As one of the main focuses of agricultural development research, changes in agricultural technology are a dynamic reflection of the economic environment. This paper uses the Meta-analysis method to conduct a comprehensive analysis of 77 empirical studies to reveal the influence factors, sources of heterogeneity, and influence effects of farmers on the adoption behavior of pro-environmental agricultural technology over time. The results show the following: (1) Influencing factors of farmer's pro-environmental agricultural technology adoption behavior are not completely homogeneous. Among the factors, age, farming population, family income, farm income ratio, number of plots, and land transfer have a regulating effect. Most of the observed heterogeneity relates to the research areas, funding levels and models used. (2) Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation have a significantly negative impact on farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies. We find no impact on household size, farming population, and village cadres. Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness, land transfer, and government subsidies have significantly positive effects. (3) Over time, only land transfer has a significantly positive impact on the adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies by farmers, and the impact has gradually increased. The farming population, technical understanding, and number of plots have no significant impact, but their effects have weakened to varying degrees. Therefore, policymakers and other stakeholders need to consider geographical differences and farming systems, the technology needs of different farmers and affordable costs, in addition to focusing on common variables, when designing policies to encourage the adoption of agricultural technologies in China. Meanwhile, improve the development level of the land rental market, strengthen publicity, training, and subsidies, and increase farmers' information awareness. •We study farmer adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies (PEATs) in China.•Meta-analysis is used to explore the influencing factors of farmers' PEATs.•Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation are negatively related to farmers' adoption of PEATs.•Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness and land transfer have significantly positive effects.•Only land transfer has a positive effect on farmers' adoption of PEATs over time.</description><subject>Adoption of innovations</subject><subject>Agrarian structures</subject><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Cadres</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Studies</subject><subject>Farm income</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Influencing factors</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Pro-environmental agricultural technology</subject><subject>Publicity</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1P7CAUhonRxPHjPzRxcRemI4VC6d1pc_1ING50TRg4jEw6MALV-O8vkzG61BWHk_c5efMgVDV43uCGX6zmo_JmSrAJ45xg0pQ144TsoVkjOlqzjrX7aIYJb2tBu-4QHaW0whjzviEzFO68HSfw2vllZZXOIaYq2DLGNcT0p1ImbLILfrvcxFCDf3Mx-DX4rMZKLaPT05inWD4Z9IsPY1g6SJXz1fDivPpbPUBWtfJq_EgunaADq8YEp5_vMXq-_vc03Nb3jzd3w-V9rWnLc2m94IZaLFrLTNsYQxZCGGNtD8B1a5jiXHRM9wtjODOWG2ExA0q7vieYUXqMznZ3S-fXCVKWqzDFUiJJwjGmDDPGS0rsUjqGlCJYuYlureKHbLDc6pUr-a1XbvXKnd5v9B0WwSbtikP4wovfDpOOM1ImLAaX1VbiECafC3r-e7Skr3ZpKLreHET5SRgXQWdpgvu57X8n_6vP</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Xie, Hualin</creator><creator>Huang, Yingqian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis</title><author>Xie, Hualin ; Huang, Yingqian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-57b6d3f084f5d41dd2b88ddff9ee6c4d5a66875c9bdd65df6d8f05e3379920533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adoption of innovations</topic><topic>Agrarian structures</topic><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Cadres</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Studies</topic><topic>Farm income</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Influencing factors</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Pro-environmental agricultural technology</topic><topic>Publicity</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, Hualin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yingqian</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, Hualin</au><au>Huang, Yingqian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><stitle>LAND USE POLICY</stitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>109</volume><spage>105622</spage><pages>105622-</pages><artnum>105622</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>As one of the main focuses of agricultural development research, changes in agricultural technology are a dynamic reflection of the economic environment. This paper uses the Meta-analysis method to conduct a comprehensive analysis of 77 empirical studies to reveal the influence factors, sources of heterogeneity, and influence effects of farmers on the adoption behavior of pro-environmental agricultural technology over time. The results show the following: (1) Influencing factors of farmer's pro-environmental agricultural technology adoption behavior are not completely homogeneous. Among the factors, age, farming population, family income, farm income ratio, number of plots, and land transfer have a regulating effect. Most of the observed heterogeneity relates to the research areas, funding levels and models used. (2) Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation have a significantly negative impact on farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies. We find no impact on household size, farming population, and village cadres. Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness, land transfer, and government subsidies have significantly positive effects. (3) Over time, only land transfer has a significantly positive impact on the adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies by farmers, and the impact has gradually increased. The farming population, technical understanding, and number of plots have no significant impact, but their effects have weakened to varying degrees. Therefore, policymakers and other stakeholders need to consider geographical differences and farming systems, the technology needs of different farmers and affordable costs, in addition to focusing on common variables, when designing policies to encourage the adoption of agricultural technologies in China. Meanwhile, improve the development level of the land rental market, strengthen publicity, training, and subsidies, and increase farmers' information awareness. •We study farmer adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies (PEATs) in China.•Meta-analysis is used to explore the influencing factors of farmers' PEATs.•Age, off-farm income ratio, and land fragmentation are negatively related to farmers' adoption of PEATs.•Farm income ratio, farmland protection policy awareness and land transfer have significantly positive effects.•Only land transfer has a positive effect on farmers' adoption of PEATs over time.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105622</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2021-10, Vol.109, p.105622, Article 105622
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000702765200008CitationCount
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Adoption of innovations
Agrarian structures
Agricultural development
Agricultural economics
Agricultural land
Agricultural research
Agricultural technology
Cadres
Economic analysis
Empirical analysis
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Environmental Studies
Farm income
Farmers
Farming
Farming systems
Farms
Heterogeneity
Income
Influencing factors
Land
Land use
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Meta-analysis
Policy making
Population policy
Pro-environmental agricultural technology
Publicity
Science & Technology
Subsidies
Technology adoption
Technology utilization
title Influencing factors of farmers' adoption of pro-environmental agricultural technologies in China: Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influencing%20factors%20of%20farmers'%20adoption%20of%20pro-environmental%20agricultural%20technologies%20in%20China:%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Xie,%20Hualin&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=109&rft.spage=105622&rft.pages=105622-&rft.artnum=105622&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105622&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2600350556%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600350556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837721003458&rfr_iscdi=true