Y Stakeholder influence on global warming potential of reinforced concrete structure

Reducing the embodied carbon of reinforced concrete structures is crucial to mitigate climate change. Several stakeholders in the construction value chain can contribute to this effort. Therefore, this work quantifies the influence of various decisions made by different stakeholders on the global wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Building Engineering 2021-12, Vol.44, Article 102979
Hauptverfasser: Belizario-Silva, Fernanda, Galimshina, Alina, Reis, Daniel Costa, Quattrone, Marco, Gomes, Beatriz, Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado, Moustapha, Maliki, John, Vanderley, Habert, Guillaume
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Building Engineering
container_volume 44
creator Belizario-Silva, Fernanda
Galimshina, Alina
Reis, Daniel Costa
Quattrone, Marco
Gomes, Beatriz
Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado
Moustapha, Maliki
John, Vanderley
Habert, Guillaume
description Reducing the embodied carbon of reinforced concrete structures is crucial to mitigate climate change. Several stakeholders in the construction value chain can contribute to this effort. Therefore, this work quantifies the influence of various decisions made by different stakeholders on the global warming potential (GWP) of a reinforced concrete structure. These decisions include the structural design, material embodied impact, transportation distances, and construction practices. Herein, each decision is modelled as an uncertainty source and its contribution to the total uncertainty of the structure's GWP is assessed. Two scenarios are considered: businessas-usual, which only considers conventional concrete mix design, and an innovation scenario, which also considers the option of high-filler low-water concrete. In the business-as-usual scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 162 t CO2e to 324 t CO2e, and the most influential decision is the structural design, which accounts for 59% of the total uncertainty, followed by decisions associated with materials production and supplier selection. Meanwhile, in the innovation scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 124 t CO2e to 324 t CO(2)e(,) wherein the choice between conventional and the innovative concrete mix design is the most influential decision, contributing 59% of the total uncertainty. Overall, the relative importance of stakeholders can be identified to prioritise improvement measures, including implementing innovative technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102979
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>webofscience</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000701628400005</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>000701628400005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007016284000053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjsFuwjAQRK1KlUCUH-C094rUcQgJ56io93LpCTlmA06NF603Qv37ulI_oD3t7MyTZpRalboodbl9GYuReiyMNmU2zK7ZPai5qWqzbvI7U8uURq1zUFftdjNXhw94F_uJFwonZPBxCBNGh0ARzoF6G-Bu-erjGW4kGMVnhwZgzCixwxM4io5REJLw5GRifFKPgw0Jl793oZ73r4fubX3Hnobk_E_D8cb-avnrmOc0ebppN1npuvov3f6d7rxY8RQ7mqJU30NKXko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Y Stakeholder influence on global warming potential of reinforced concrete structure</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda ; Galimshina, Alina ; Reis, Daniel Costa ; Quattrone, Marco ; Gomes, Beatriz ; Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado ; Moustapha, Maliki ; John, Vanderley ; Habert, Guillaume</creator><creatorcontrib>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda ; Galimshina, Alina ; Reis, Daniel Costa ; Quattrone, Marco ; Gomes, Beatriz ; Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado ; Moustapha, Maliki ; John, Vanderley ; Habert, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><description>Reducing the embodied carbon of reinforced concrete structures is crucial to mitigate climate change. Several stakeholders in the construction value chain can contribute to this effort. Therefore, this work quantifies the influence of various decisions made by different stakeholders on the global warming potential (GWP) of a reinforced concrete structure. These decisions include the structural design, material embodied impact, transportation distances, and construction practices. Herein, each decision is modelled as an uncertainty source and its contribution to the total uncertainty of the structure's GWP is assessed. Two scenarios are considered: businessas-usual, which only considers conventional concrete mix design, and an innovation scenario, which also considers the option of high-filler low-water concrete. In the business-as-usual scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 162 t CO2e to 324 t CO2e, and the most influential decision is the structural design, which accounts for 59% of the total uncertainty, followed by decisions associated with materials production and supplier selection. Meanwhile, in the innovation scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 124 t CO2e to 324 t CO(2)e(,) wherein the choice between conventional and the innovative concrete mix design is the most influential decision, contributing 59% of the total uncertainty. Overall, the relative importance of stakeholders can be identified to prioritise improvement measures, including implementing innovative technologies.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2352-7102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Construction &amp; Building Technology ; Engineering ; Engineering, Civil ; Science &amp; Technology ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Building Engineering, 2021-12, Vol.44, Article 102979</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>9</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000701628400005</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007016284000053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5281-7061 ; 0000-0002-8713-5957 ; 0000-0002-4157-9317</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,39265</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galimshina, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Daniel Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quattrone, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moustapha, Maliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Vanderley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habert, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><title>Y Stakeholder influence on global warming potential of reinforced concrete structure</title><title>Journal of Building Engineering</title><addtitle>J BUILD ENG</addtitle><description>Reducing the embodied carbon of reinforced concrete structures is crucial to mitigate climate change. Several stakeholders in the construction value chain can contribute to this effort. Therefore, this work quantifies the influence of various decisions made by different stakeholders on the global warming potential (GWP) of a reinforced concrete structure. These decisions include the structural design, material embodied impact, transportation distances, and construction practices. Herein, each decision is modelled as an uncertainty source and its contribution to the total uncertainty of the structure's GWP is assessed. Two scenarios are considered: businessas-usual, which only considers conventional concrete mix design, and an innovation scenario, which also considers the option of high-filler low-water concrete. In the business-as-usual scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 162 t CO2e to 324 t CO2e, and the most influential decision is the structural design, which accounts for 59% of the total uncertainty, followed by decisions associated with materials production and supplier selection. Meanwhile, in the innovation scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 124 t CO2e to 324 t CO(2)e(,) wherein the choice between conventional and the innovative concrete mix design is the most influential decision, contributing 59% of the total uncertainty. Overall, the relative importance of stakeholders can be identified to prioritise improvement measures, including implementing innovative technologies.</description><subject>Construction &amp; Building Technology</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Civil</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>2352-7102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjsFuwjAQRK1KlUCUH-C094rUcQgJ56io93LpCTlmA06NF603Qv37ulI_oD3t7MyTZpRalboodbl9GYuReiyMNmU2zK7ZPai5qWqzbvI7U8uURq1zUFftdjNXhw94F_uJFwonZPBxCBNGh0ARzoF6G-Bu-erjGW4kGMVnhwZgzCixwxM4io5REJLw5GRifFKPgw0Jl793oZ73r4fubX3Hnobk_E_D8cb-avnrmOc0ebppN1npuvov3f6d7rxY8RQ7mqJU30NKXko</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda</creator><creator>Galimshina, Alina</creator><creator>Reis, Daniel Costa</creator><creator>Quattrone, Marco</creator><creator>Gomes, Beatriz</creator><creator>Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado</creator><creator>Moustapha, Maliki</creator><creator>John, Vanderley</creator><creator>Habert, Guillaume</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5281-7061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-5957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-9317</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Y Stakeholder influence on global warming potential of reinforced concrete structure</title><author>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda ; Galimshina, Alina ; Reis, Daniel Costa ; Quattrone, Marco ; Gomes, Beatriz ; Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado ; Moustapha, Maliki ; John, Vanderley ; Habert, Guillaume</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-webofscience_primary_0007016284000053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Construction &amp; Building Technology</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Civil</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galimshina, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Daniel Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quattrone, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moustapha, Maliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Vanderley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habert, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><jtitle>Journal of Building Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belizario-Silva, Fernanda</au><au>Galimshina, Alina</au><au>Reis, Daniel Costa</au><au>Quattrone, Marco</au><au>Gomes, Beatriz</au><au>Marin, Marcelo Cuadrado</au><au>Moustapha, Maliki</au><au>John, Vanderley</au><au>Habert, Guillaume</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Y Stakeholder influence on global warming potential of reinforced concrete structure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Building Engineering</jtitle><stitle>J BUILD ENG</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><artnum>102979</artnum><eissn>2352-7102</eissn><abstract>Reducing the embodied carbon of reinforced concrete structures is crucial to mitigate climate change. Several stakeholders in the construction value chain can contribute to this effort. Therefore, this work quantifies the influence of various decisions made by different stakeholders on the global warming potential (GWP) of a reinforced concrete structure. These decisions include the structural design, material embodied impact, transportation distances, and construction practices. Herein, each decision is modelled as an uncertainty source and its contribution to the total uncertainty of the structure's GWP is assessed. Two scenarios are considered: businessas-usual, which only considers conventional concrete mix design, and an innovation scenario, which also considers the option of high-filler low-water concrete. In the business-as-usual scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 162 t CO2e to 324 t CO2e, and the most influential decision is the structural design, which accounts for 59% of the total uncertainty, followed by decisions associated with materials production and supplier selection. Meanwhile, in the innovation scenario, the structure's GWP varies from 124 t CO2e to 324 t CO(2)e(,) wherein the choice between conventional and the innovative concrete mix design is the most influential decision, contributing 59% of the total uncertainty. Overall, the relative importance of stakeholders can be identified to prioritise improvement measures, including implementing innovative technologies.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102979</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5281-7061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-5957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-9317</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2352-7102
ispartof Journal of Building Engineering, 2021-12, Vol.44, Article 102979
issn 2352-7102
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000701628400005
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Construction & Building Technology
Engineering
Engineering, Civil
Science & Technology
Technology
title Y Stakeholder influence on global warming potential of reinforced concrete structure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T10%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-webofscience&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Y%20Stakeholder%20influence%20on%20global%20warming%20potential%20of%20reinforced%20concrete%20structure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Building%20Engineering&rft.au=Belizario-Silva,%20Fernanda&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=44&rft.artnum=102979&rft.eissn=2352-7102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102979&rft_dat=%3Cwebofscience%3E000701628400005%3C/webofscience%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true