A Survey on Resilience in the IoT: Taxonomy, Classification, and Discussion of Resilience Mechanisms
Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems tend to grow both in scale and complexity, as they consist of a variety of heterogeneous devices that span over multiple architectural IoT layers (e.g., cloud, edge, sensors). Further, IoT systems increasingly demand the resilient operability of services, as they...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | ACM computing surveys 2022-09, Vol.54 (7), p.1-39, Article 147 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 39 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | ACM computing surveys |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Berger, Christian Eichhammer, Philipp Reiser, Hans P. Domaschka, Jörg Hauck, Franz J. Habiger, Gerhard |
| description | Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems tend to grow both in scale and complexity, as they consist of a variety of heterogeneous devices that span over multiple architectural IoT layers (e.g., cloud, edge, sensors). Further, IoT systems increasingly demand the resilient operability of services, as they become part of critical infrastructures. This leads to a broad variety of research works that aim to increase the resilience of these systems. In this article, we create a systematization of knowledge about existing scientific efforts of making IoT systems resilient. In particular, we first discuss the taxonomy and classification of resilience and resilience mechanisms and subsequently survey state-of-the-art resilience mechanisms that have been proposed by research work and are applicable to IoT. As part of the survey, we also discuss questions that focus on the practical aspects of resilience, e.g., which constraints resilience mechanisms impose on developers when designing resilient systems by incorporating a specific mechanism into IoT systems. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1145/3462513 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000697296500013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2697714302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a234t-f273a204f3f09ae33fd7ef521da94c40c406d3979db667017ecc46e122ecef983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbx7iniwYNEZz-y2z2W4EehIGg9h-1mFlPabM0mlv73rk3tWRiYOfzem3lDyCWFe0pF9sCFZBnlR2RAs0yligt6TAbAJaTAAU7JWQgLAGCCygG5HifvXfON28TXyRuGallhbTGp6qT9xGTiZ-fkxJllwIt9H5KPp8dZ_pJOX58n-XiaGsZFmzqmuGEgHHegDXLuSoUuY7Q0WlgBsWTJtdLlXEoFVKG1QiJlDC06PeJDctP7rhv_1WFoi4XvmjquLJjUSlHBgUXqtqds40No0BXrplqZZltQKH7zF_v8kbzryQ3OvQt2l-tAxwdEU6ZlFqcdPfo_nVetaStf576r2yi96qXGrg6Kvyt-AIcKch0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697714302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey on Resilience in the IoT: Taxonomy, Classification, and Discussion of Resilience Mechanisms</title><source>Access via ACM Digital Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Berger, Christian ; Eichhammer, Philipp ; Reiser, Hans P. ; Domaschka, Jörg ; Hauck, Franz J. ; Habiger, Gerhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, Christian ; Eichhammer, Philipp ; Reiser, Hans P. ; Domaschka, Jörg ; Hauck, Franz J. ; Habiger, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><description>Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems tend to grow both in scale and complexity, as they consist of a variety of heterogeneous devices that span over multiple architectural IoT layers (e.g., cloud, edge, sensors). Further, IoT systems increasingly demand the resilient operability of services, as they become part of critical infrastructures. This leads to a broad variety of research works that aim to increase the resilience of these systems. In this article, we create a systematization of knowledge about existing scientific efforts of making IoT systems resilient. In particular, we first discuss the taxonomy and classification of resilience and resilience mechanisms and subsequently survey state-of-the-art resilience mechanisms that have been proposed by research work and are applicable to IoT. As part of the survey, we also discuss questions that focus on the practical aspects of resilience, e.g., which constraints resilience mechanisms impose on developers when designing resilient systems by incorporating a specific mechanism into IoT systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/3462513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY, USA: ACM</publisher><subject>Access control ; Authorization ; Availability ; Classification ; Computer Science ; Computer Science, Theory & Methods ; Computer systems organization ; Cross-computing tools and techniques ; Dependable and fault-tolerant systems and networks ; Document types ; Extra-functional properties ; General and reference ; Internet of Things ; Intrusion/anomaly detection and malware mitigation ; Maintainability and maintenance ; Reliability ; Resilience ; Science & Technology ; Security and privacy ; Security services ; Software and its engineering ; Software fault tolerance ; Software organization and properties ; Surveys and overviews ; Taxonomy ; Technology</subject><ispartof>ACM computing surveys, 2022-09, Vol.54 (7), p.1-39, Article 147</ispartof><rights>Owner/Author</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Computing Machinery Sep 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>36</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000697296500013</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a234t-f273a204f3f09ae33fd7ef521da94c40c406d3979db667017ecc46e122ecef983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2754-9530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3462513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacm$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2283,27929,27930,39263,40201,76233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichhammer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Hans P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domaschka, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauck, Franz J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habiger, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey on Resilience in the IoT: Taxonomy, Classification, and Discussion of Resilience Mechanisms</title><title>ACM computing surveys</title><addtitle>ACM CSUR</addtitle><addtitle>ACM COMPUT SURV</addtitle><description>Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems tend to grow both in scale and complexity, as they consist of a variety of heterogeneous devices that span over multiple architectural IoT layers (e.g., cloud, edge, sensors). Further, IoT systems increasingly demand the resilient operability of services, as they become part of critical infrastructures. This leads to a broad variety of research works that aim to increase the resilience of these systems. In this article, we create a systematization of knowledge about existing scientific efforts of making IoT systems resilient. In particular, we first discuss the taxonomy and classification of resilience and resilience mechanisms and subsequently survey state-of-the-art resilience mechanisms that have been proposed by research work and are applicable to IoT. As part of the survey, we also discuss questions that focus on the practical aspects of resilience, e.g., which constraints resilience mechanisms impose on developers when designing resilient systems by incorporating a specific mechanism into IoT systems.</description><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Authorization</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer Science, Theory & Methods</subject><subject>Computer systems organization</subject><subject>Cross-computing tools and techniques</subject><subject>Dependable and fault-tolerant systems and networks</subject><subject>Document types</subject><subject>Extra-functional properties</subject><subject>General and reference</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Intrusion/anomaly detection and malware mitigation</subject><subject>Maintainability and maintenance</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Security and privacy</subject><subject>Security services</subject><subject>Software and its engineering</subject><subject>Software fault tolerance</subject><subject>Software organization and properties</subject><subject>Surveys and overviews</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0360-0300</issn><issn>1557-7341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbx7iniwYNEZz-y2z2W4EehIGg9h-1mFlPabM0mlv73rk3tWRiYOfzem3lDyCWFe0pF9sCFZBnlR2RAs0yligt6TAbAJaTAAU7JWQgLAGCCygG5HifvXfON28TXyRuGallhbTGp6qT9xGTiZ-fkxJllwIt9H5KPp8dZ_pJOX58n-XiaGsZFmzqmuGEgHHegDXLuSoUuY7Q0WlgBsWTJtdLlXEoFVKG1QiJlDC06PeJDctP7rhv_1WFoi4XvmjquLJjUSlHBgUXqtqds40No0BXrplqZZltQKH7zF_v8kbzryQ3OvQt2l-tAxwdEU6ZlFqcdPfo_nVetaStf576r2yi96qXGrg6Kvyt-AIcKch0</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Berger, Christian</creator><creator>Eichhammer, Philipp</creator><creator>Reiser, Hans P.</creator><creator>Domaschka, Jörg</creator><creator>Hauck, Franz J.</creator><creator>Habiger, Gerhard</creator><general>ACM</general><general>Assoc Computing Machinery</general><general>Association for Computing Machinery</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2754-9530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>A Survey on Resilience in the IoT</title><author>Berger, Christian ; Eichhammer, Philipp ; Reiser, Hans P. ; Domaschka, Jörg ; Hauck, Franz J. ; Habiger, Gerhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a234t-f273a204f3f09ae33fd7ef521da94c40c406d3979db667017ecc46e122ecef983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Authorization</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer Science, Theory & Methods</topic><topic>Computer systems organization</topic><topic>Cross-computing tools and techniques</topic><topic>Dependable and fault-tolerant systems and networks</topic><topic>Document types</topic><topic>Extra-functional properties</topic><topic>General and reference</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Intrusion/anomaly detection and malware mitigation</topic><topic>Maintainability and maintenance</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Security and privacy</topic><topic>Security services</topic><topic>Software and its engineering</topic><topic>Software fault tolerance</topic><topic>Software organization and properties</topic><topic>Surveys and overviews</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichhammer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Hans P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domaschka, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauck, Franz J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habiger, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>ACM computing surveys</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, Christian</au><au>Eichhammer, Philipp</au><au>Reiser, Hans P.</au><au>Domaschka, Jörg</au><au>Hauck, Franz J.</au><au>Habiger, Gerhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Survey on Resilience in the IoT: Taxonomy, Classification, and Discussion of Resilience Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>ACM computing surveys</jtitle><stitle>ACM CSUR</stitle><stitle>ACM COMPUT SURV</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>1-39</pages><artnum>147</artnum><issn>0360-0300</issn><eissn>1557-7341</eissn><abstract>Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems tend to grow both in scale and complexity, as they consist of a variety of heterogeneous devices that span over multiple architectural IoT layers (e.g., cloud, edge, sensors). Further, IoT systems increasingly demand the resilient operability of services, as they become part of critical infrastructures. This leads to a broad variety of research works that aim to increase the resilience of these systems. In this article, we create a systematization of knowledge about existing scientific efforts of making IoT systems resilient. In particular, we first discuss the taxonomy and classification of resilience and resilience mechanisms and subsequently survey state-of-the-art resilience mechanisms that have been proposed by research work and are applicable to IoT. As part of the survey, we also discuss questions that focus on the practical aspects of resilience, e.g., which constraints resilience mechanisms impose on developers when designing resilient systems by incorporating a specific mechanism into IoT systems.</abstract><cop>New York, NY, USA</cop><pub>ACM</pub><doi>10.1145/3462513</doi><tpages>39</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2754-9530</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0360-0300 |
| ispartof | ACM computing surveys, 2022-09, Vol.54 (7), p.1-39, Article 147 |
| issn | 0360-0300 1557-7341 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000697296500013 |
| source | Access via ACM Digital Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | Access control Authorization Availability Classification Computer Science Computer Science, Theory & Methods Computer systems organization Cross-computing tools and techniques Dependable and fault-tolerant systems and networks Document types Extra-functional properties General and reference Internet of Things Intrusion/anomaly detection and malware mitigation Maintainability and maintenance Reliability Resilience Science & Technology Security and privacy Security services Software and its engineering Software fault tolerance Software organization and properties Surveys and overviews Taxonomy Technology |
| title | A Survey on Resilience in the IoT: Taxonomy, Classification, and Discussion of Resilience Mechanisms |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T19%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20on%20Resilience%20in%20the%20IoT:%20Taxonomy,%20Classification,%20and%20Discussion%20of%20Resilience%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=ACM%20computing%20surveys&rft.au=Berger,%20Christian&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=1-39&rft.artnum=147&rft.issn=0360-0300&rft.eissn=1557-7341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/3462513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2697714302%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697714302&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |