How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?

Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of accounting studies 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.570-606
Hauptverfasser: Christensen, Dane M., Kenchington, David G., Laux, Rick C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 606
container_issue 2
container_start_page 570
container_title Review of accounting studies
container_volume 27
creator Christensen, Dane M.
Kenchington, David G.
Laux, Rick C.
description Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000694800600001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670501145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LHTEUxQexUGv9Al0NdFlSb5JJJtlUysNWQRBE1yGZ3HlG3kueyTz_fHtjRxQ3xU1yIL9zbu5pmm8UflKA_rBQSjtGgFECWtKOqJ1mj4qek55yuVs1V0CkFPxz86WUG4BqE3SvISfpvvWpXacytauqjy8v2jHkdWntXQq-3djHEJftZB-wHH1tPo12VfDg5d5vrv4cXy5OyNn539PF7zMyCFATsRSYVMqhQomUO-v1QC2OdbyQnWTOOz1q8I5zJwYFnvXYCe5AI_MekO83v-bczdat0Q8Yp2xXZpPD2uZHk2ww719iuDbLdGdUx3TXqxrw_SUgp9stlsncpG2O9c-GyR4E1LpEpdhMDTmVknF8nUDBPPdq5l5N7dX869U8R7ezCYcUQ3mzKNCadyBYRdSM3KNLYxkCxgFfQQCQulP1rAroIkx2Ciku0jZO1frj49ZK85kulYhLzG9r_meDJ4BopYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670501145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Christensen, Dane M. ; Kenchington, David G. ; Laux, Rick C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Dane M. ; Kenchington, David G. ; Laux, Rick C.</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-6653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accounting/Auditing ; Business &amp; Economics ; Business and Management ; Business, Finance ; Corporate Finance ; Cost control ; Fines &amp; penalties ; Foreign subsidiaries ; Income taxes ; Interest groups ; Interest rates ; Multinational corporations ; Net operating losses ; Public Finance ; Public interest ; Social Sciences ; Tax havens ; Tax increases ; Tax planning ; Tax rates ; Tax shelters ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Review of accounting studies, 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.570-606</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>21</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000694800600001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7837-4489 ; 0000-0003-4556-1672 ; 0000-0003-4841-7238</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,39264,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Dane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenchington, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laux, Rick C.</creatorcontrib><title>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</title><title>Review of accounting studies</title><addtitle>Rev Account Stud</addtitle><addtitle>REV ACCOUNT STUD</addtitle><description>Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.</description><subject>Accounting/Auditing</subject><subject>Business &amp; Economics</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business, Finance</subject><subject>Corporate Finance</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Fines &amp; penalties</subject><subject>Foreign subsidiaries</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Net operating losses</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Tax havens</subject><subject>Tax increases</subject><subject>Tax planning</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax shelters</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>1380-6653</issn><issn>1573-7136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LHTEUxQexUGv9Al0NdFlSb5JJJtlUysNWQRBE1yGZ3HlG3kueyTz_fHtjRxQ3xU1yIL9zbu5pmm8UflKA_rBQSjtGgFECWtKOqJ1mj4qek55yuVs1V0CkFPxz86WUG4BqE3SvISfpvvWpXacytauqjy8v2jHkdWntXQq-3djHEJftZB-wHH1tPo12VfDg5d5vrv4cXy5OyNn539PF7zMyCFATsRSYVMqhQomUO-v1QC2OdbyQnWTOOz1q8I5zJwYFnvXYCe5AI_MekO83v-bczdat0Q8Yp2xXZpPD2uZHk2ww719iuDbLdGdUx3TXqxrw_SUgp9stlsncpG2O9c-GyR4E1LpEpdhMDTmVknF8nUDBPPdq5l5N7dX869U8R7ezCYcUQ3mzKNCadyBYRdSM3KNLYxkCxgFfQQCQulP1rAroIkx2Ciku0jZO1frj49ZK85kulYhLzG9r_meDJ4BopYA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Christensen, Dane M.</creator><creator>Kenchington, David G.</creator><creator>Laux, Rick C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-4489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-1672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-7238</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</title><author>Christensen, Dane M. ; Kenchington, David G. ; Laux, Rick C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accounting/Auditing</topic><topic>Business &amp; Economics</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business, Finance</topic><topic>Corporate Finance</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Fines &amp; penalties</topic><topic>Foreign subsidiaries</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Net operating losses</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Tax havens</topic><topic>Tax increases</topic><topic>Tax planning</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax shelters</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Dane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenchington, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laux, Rick C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Review of accounting studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Dane M.</au><au>Kenchington, David G.</au><au>Laux, Rick C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</atitle><jtitle>Review of accounting studies</jtitle><stitle>Rev Account Stud</stitle><stitle>REV ACCOUNT STUD</stitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>570-606</pages><issn>1380-6653</issn><eissn>1573-7136</eissn><abstract>Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-4489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-1672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-7238</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-6653
ispartof Review of accounting studies, 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.570-606
issn 1380-6653
1573-7136
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000694800600001CitationCount
source Business Source Complete; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Accounting/Auditing
Business & Economics
Business and Management
Business, Finance
Corporate Finance
Cost control
Fines & penalties
Foreign subsidiaries
Income taxes
Interest groups
Interest rates
Multinational corporations
Net operating losses
Public Finance
Public interest
Social Sciences
Tax havens
Tax increases
Tax planning
Tax rates
Tax shelters
Taxation
title How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T10%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20most%20low%20ETR%20firms%20avoid%20paying%20taxes?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20accounting%20studies&rft.au=Christensen,%20Dane%20M.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=570-606&rft.issn=1380-6653&rft.eissn=1573-7136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2670501145%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670501145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true