How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?
Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of accounting studies 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.570-606 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 606 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 570 |
container_title | Review of accounting studies |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Christensen, Dane M. Kenchington, David G. Laux, Rick C. |
description | Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000694800600001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670501145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LHTEUxQexUGv9Al0NdFlSb5JJJtlUysNWQRBE1yGZ3HlG3kueyTz_fHtjRxQ3xU1yIL9zbu5pmm8UflKA_rBQSjtGgFECWtKOqJ1mj4qek55yuVs1V0CkFPxz86WUG4BqE3SvISfpvvWpXacytauqjy8v2jHkdWntXQq-3djHEJftZB-wHH1tPo12VfDg5d5vrv4cXy5OyNn539PF7zMyCFATsRSYVMqhQomUO-v1QC2OdbyQnWTOOz1q8I5zJwYFnvXYCe5AI_MekO83v-bczdat0Q8Yp2xXZpPD2uZHk2ww719iuDbLdGdUx3TXqxrw_SUgp9stlsncpG2O9c-GyR4E1LpEpdhMDTmVknF8nUDBPPdq5l5N7dX869U8R7ezCYcUQ3mzKNCadyBYRdSM3KNLYxkCxgFfQQCQulP1rAroIkx2Ciku0jZO1frj49ZK85kulYhLzG9r_meDJ4BopYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670501145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Christensen, Dane M. ; Kenchington, David G. ; Laux, Rick C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Dane M. ; Kenchington, David G. ; Laux, Rick C.</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-6653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accounting/Auditing ; Business & Economics ; Business and Management ; Business, Finance ; Corporate Finance ; Cost control ; Fines & penalties ; Foreign subsidiaries ; Income taxes ; Interest groups ; Interest rates ; Multinational corporations ; Net operating losses ; Public Finance ; Public interest ; Social Sciences ; Tax havens ; Tax increases ; Tax planning ; Tax rates ; Tax shelters ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Review of accounting studies, 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.570-606</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>21</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000694800600001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7837-4489 ; 0000-0003-4556-1672 ; 0000-0003-4841-7238</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,39264,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Dane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenchington, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laux, Rick C.</creatorcontrib><title>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</title><title>Review of accounting studies</title><addtitle>Rev Account Stud</addtitle><addtitle>REV ACCOUNT STUD</addtitle><description>Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.</description><subject>Accounting/Auditing</subject><subject>Business & Economics</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business, Finance</subject><subject>Corporate Finance</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Foreign subsidiaries</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Net operating losses</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Tax havens</subject><subject>Tax increases</subject><subject>Tax planning</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax shelters</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>1380-6653</issn><issn>1573-7136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LHTEUxQexUGv9Al0NdFlSb5JJJtlUysNWQRBE1yGZ3HlG3kueyTz_fHtjRxQ3xU1yIL9zbu5pmm8UflKA_rBQSjtGgFECWtKOqJ1mj4qek55yuVs1V0CkFPxz86WUG4BqE3SvISfpvvWpXacytauqjy8v2jHkdWntXQq-3djHEJftZB-wHH1tPo12VfDg5d5vrv4cXy5OyNn539PF7zMyCFATsRSYVMqhQomUO-v1QC2OdbyQnWTOOz1q8I5zJwYFnvXYCe5AI_MekO83v-bczdat0Q8Yp2xXZpPD2uZHk2ww719iuDbLdGdUx3TXqxrw_SUgp9stlsncpG2O9c-GyR4E1LpEpdhMDTmVknF8nUDBPPdq5l5N7dX869U8R7ezCYcUQ3mzKNCadyBYRdSM3KNLYxkCxgFfQQCQulP1rAroIkx2Ciku0jZO1frj49ZK85kulYhLzG9r_meDJ4BopYA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Christensen, Dane M.</creator><creator>Kenchington, David G.</creator><creator>Laux, Rick C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-4489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-1672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-7238</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</title><author>Christensen, Dane M. ; Kenchington, David G. ; Laux, Rick C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-a102688be8e6e13bad9c1aef65356462bdb9f90db33b5c80d27e453b09e2dd0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accounting/Auditing</topic><topic>Business & Economics</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business, Finance</topic><topic>Corporate Finance</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Foreign subsidiaries</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Net operating losses</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Tax havens</topic><topic>Tax increases</topic><topic>Tax planning</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax shelters</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Dane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenchington, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laux, Rick C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Review of accounting studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Dane M.</au><au>Kenchington, David G.</au><au>Laux, Rick C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes?</atitle><jtitle>Review of accounting studies</jtitle><stitle>Rev Account Stud</stitle><stitle>REV ACCOUNT STUD</stitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>570-606</pages><issn>1380-6653</issn><eissn>1573-7136</eissn><abstract>Evidence suggests a large proportion of profitable U.S. firms have low effective tax rates (i.e., an ETR between 0 and 10%). Despite widespread interest in how firms avoid paying taxes, we do not know how most firms attain low ETRs and whether they are primarily benefiting from benign or aggressive tax positions. Using a research design that explicitly examines low ETR firms, we predict and find that the majority are primarily benefiting from a benign tax position: large net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs). We also find that large NOLs allow firms to persistently retain low ETRs year after year. In contrast, we find that multinationals and tax haven firms, which should have more opportunities for aggressive tax planning, have a lower probability of attaining a low ETR (relative to domestic and non-tax haven firms). Collectively, these findings suggest that the typical low ETR firm does not incur significant tax risk. Consistent with this, we find that low ETR firms accrue unrecognized tax benefits at a similar rate as firms that pay the statutory tax rate and do not experience higher future tax rate volatility. Overall, the results shed light on the profile of the average low ETR firm and provide evidence that the majority are utilizing large NOLs rather than aggressive tax planning.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-4489</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-1672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-7238</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1380-6653 |
ispartof | Review of accounting studies, 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.570-606 |
issn | 1380-6653 1573-7136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000694800600001CitationCount |
source | Business Source Complete; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Accounting/Auditing Business & Economics Business and Management Business, Finance Corporate Finance Cost control Fines & penalties Foreign subsidiaries Income taxes Interest groups Interest rates Multinational corporations Net operating losses Public Finance Public interest Social Sciences Tax havens Tax increases Tax planning Tax rates Tax shelters Taxation |
title | How do most low ETR firms avoid paying taxes? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T10%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20most%20low%20ETR%20firms%20avoid%20paying%20taxes?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20accounting%20studies&rft.au=Christensen,%20Dane%20M.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=570-606&rft.issn=1380-6653&rft.eissn=1573-7136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11142-021-09614-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2670501145%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670501145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |