Randomized Trial of Scrambler Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Crossover Analysis
Preliminary trials report that Scrambler Therapy, a form of electroanalgesia, may improve discomfort from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The objective of this phase II, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Scrambler therapy vs. transcutaneous electrical ner...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2021-06, Vol.61 (6), p.1247-1253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1247 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Childs, Daniel S. Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G. McMurray, Ryan Bendel, Markus O'Neill, Carrie Smith, Thomas J. Loprinzi, Charles L. |
description | Preliminary trials report that Scrambler Therapy, a form of electroanalgesia, may improve discomfort from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).
The objective of this phase II, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Scrambler therapy vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in treating CIPN.
Fifty patients were accrued for the first half of this two-part, crossover trial consisting of a 2-week treatment period with either Scrambler or TENS, followed by an 8-week observation period, and then crossover treatment. Twenty-two patients proceeded to the crossover phase. The primary means of assessment was patient-reported outcomes, including symptom severity scales and Global Impression of Change questionnaires. Symptoms were assessed daily during the treatment period and weekly during an 8-week observation period.
A 50% or greater reduction in primary symptom (pain or tingling) score on the last day of treatment was achieved by 6 of 10 Scrambler-treated patients (60%) and 3 of 12 TENS-treated patients (25%) after crossover (P = 0.11). By day 4 of treatment, the two arms diverged with respect to mean change in primary symptom score; this effect was largely carried through to the end of the two-week treatment period. Similarly, Scrambler therapy appeared better than TENS when assessed by Global Impression of Change for neuropathy, pain, and overall quality of life.
Similar findings from the initial randomization and crossover phases of this study support further evaluation of the efficacy of Scrambler therapy in alleviating CIPN symptoms. Evaluation in a larger, randomized controlled trial with standardized treatment is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000681625600017CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392420308952</els_id><sourcerecordid>2465753487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-403cb9f25b9019b7390603eb96c3fd5ca9f804678f5729bb19f550d3551a67433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9r1TAYxoM43PHoV5CKN4PRY_638W4Up4MxRY_XIU0TTkrb1KSd1E-_HHocsqtdJTz8njd5nweA9wjuEET8Y7trR-WGuPS9GnYY4qSjHcTsBdigsiA5Z4i8BBtYliwnAtNz8DrGFkLICCevwDkhmApYog04_FBD43v31zTZPjjVZd5mP3VQfd2ZkO0PJqhxyawPWXUwvZ9WIb8Zmlknz3cT3HjUuuzOzMGPajosn7Iq-Bj9fZpwNahuiS6-AWdWddG8PZ1b8Ov68776mt9--3JTXd3mmjI-5RQSXQuLWS0gEnVBBOSQmFpwTWzDtBK2hJQXpWUFFnWNhGUMNoQxpHhBCdmCi3XuGPzv2cRJ9i5q03VqMH6OElPOCkZoimkLPjxBWz-H9N9EMco5LTgWiRIrpY87BWPlGFyvwiIRlMc6ZCv_q0Me65AIyVRH8r47vTDXvWkenf_yT0C5An9M7W3UzgzaPGKpMF4ijhlPN1RUblKT80Pl52FK1svnWxNdrbRJ2d87E-TJ0bhg9CQb756xzwPJZcJ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2546647629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Trial of Scrambler Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Crossover Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Childs, Daniel S. ; Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G. ; McMurray, Ryan ; Bendel, Markus ; O'Neill, Carrie ; Smith, Thomas J. ; Loprinzi, Charles L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Childs, Daniel S. ; Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G. ; McMurray, Ryan ; Bendel, Markus ; O'Neill, Carrie ; Smith, Thomas J. ; Loprinzi, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><description>Preliminary trials report that Scrambler Therapy, a form of electroanalgesia, may improve discomfort from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).
The objective of this phase II, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Scrambler therapy vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in treating CIPN.
Fifty patients were accrued for the first half of this two-part, crossover trial consisting of a 2-week treatment period with either Scrambler or TENS, followed by an 8-week observation period, and then crossover treatment. Twenty-two patients proceeded to the crossover phase. The primary means of assessment was patient-reported outcomes, including symptom severity scales and Global Impression of Change questionnaires. Symptoms were assessed daily during the treatment period and weekly during an 8-week observation period.
A 50% or greater reduction in primary symptom (pain or tingling) score on the last day of treatment was achieved by 6 of 10 Scrambler-treated patients (60%) and 3 of 12 TENS-treated patients (25%) after crossover (P = 0.11). By day 4 of treatment, the two arms diverged with respect to mean change in primary symptom score; this effect was largely carried through to the end of the two-week treatment period. Similarly, Scrambler therapy appeared better than TENS when assessed by Global Impression of Change for neuropathy, pain, and overall quality of life.
Similar findings from the initial randomization and crossover phases of this study support further evaluation of the efficacy of Scrambler therapy in alleviating CIPN symptoms. Evaluation in a larger, randomized controlled trial with standardized treatment is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33249081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects ; Chemotherapy ; chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy ; Clinical Neurology ; Clinical trials ; Cross-Over Studies ; Discomfort ; Efficacy ; General & Internal Medicine ; Health Care Sciences & Services ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Neurosciences & Neurology ; Pain ; Pain Management ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy ; Peripheral neuropathy ; Quality of Life ; Science & Technology ; Scrambler therapy ; transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation ; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021-06, Vol.61 (6), p.1247-1253</ispartof><rights>2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>12</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000681625600017</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-403cb9f25b9019b7390603eb96c3fd5ca9f804678f5729bb19f550d3551a67433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-403cb9f25b9019b7390603eb96c3fd5ca9f804678f5729bb19f550d3551a67433</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9226-7404 ; 0000-0001-7643-2836</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,31004,39263,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249081$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childs, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurray, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendel, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loprinzi, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Trial of Scrambler Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Crossover Analysis</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG</addtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Preliminary trials report that Scrambler Therapy, a form of electroanalgesia, may improve discomfort from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).
The objective of this phase II, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Scrambler therapy vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in treating CIPN.
Fifty patients were accrued for the first half of this two-part, crossover trial consisting of a 2-week treatment period with either Scrambler or TENS, followed by an 8-week observation period, and then crossover treatment. Twenty-two patients proceeded to the crossover phase. The primary means of assessment was patient-reported outcomes, including symptom severity scales and Global Impression of Change questionnaires. Symptoms were assessed daily during the treatment period and weekly during an 8-week observation period.
A 50% or greater reduction in primary symptom (pain or tingling) score on the last day of treatment was achieved by 6 of 10 Scrambler-treated patients (60%) and 3 of 12 TENS-treated patients (25%) after crossover (P = 0.11). By day 4 of treatment, the two arms diverged with respect to mean change in primary symptom score; this effect was largely carried through to the end of the two-week treatment period. Similarly, Scrambler therapy appeared better than TENS when assessed by Global Impression of Change for neuropathy, pain, and overall quality of life.
Similar findings from the initial randomization and crossover phases of this study support further evaluation of the efficacy of Scrambler therapy in alleviating CIPN symptoms. Evaluation in a larger, randomized controlled trial with standardized treatment is warranted.</description><subject>antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy</subject><subject>Clinical Neurology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>General & Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Health Care Sciences & Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medicine, General & Internal</subject><subject>Neurosciences & Neurology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</subject><subject>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Peripheral neuropathy</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Scrambler therapy</subject><subject>transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation</subject><subject>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9r1TAYxoM43PHoV5CKN4PRY_638W4Up4MxRY_XIU0TTkrb1KSd1E-_HHocsqtdJTz8njd5nweA9wjuEET8Y7trR-WGuPS9GnYY4qSjHcTsBdigsiA5Z4i8BBtYliwnAtNz8DrGFkLICCevwDkhmApYog04_FBD43v31zTZPjjVZd5mP3VQfd2ZkO0PJqhxyawPWXUwvZ9WIb8Zmlknz3cT3HjUuuzOzMGPajosn7Iq-Bj9fZpwNahuiS6-AWdWddG8PZ1b8Ov68776mt9--3JTXd3mmjI-5RQSXQuLWS0gEnVBBOSQmFpwTWzDtBK2hJQXpWUFFnWNhGUMNoQxpHhBCdmCi3XuGPzv2cRJ9i5q03VqMH6OElPOCkZoimkLPjxBWz-H9N9EMco5LTgWiRIrpY87BWPlGFyvwiIRlMc6ZCv_q0Me65AIyVRH8r47vTDXvWkenf_yT0C5An9M7W3UzgzaPGKpMF4ijhlPN1RUblKT80Pl52FK1svnWxNdrbRJ2d87E-TJ0bhg9CQb756xzwPJZcJ8</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Childs, Daniel S.</creator><creator>Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G.</creator><creator>McMurray, Ryan</creator><creator>Bendel, Markus</creator><creator>O'Neill, Carrie</creator><creator>Smith, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Loprinzi, Charles L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9226-7404</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-2836</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Randomized Trial of Scrambler Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Crossover Analysis</title><author>Childs, Daniel S. ; Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G. ; McMurray, Ryan ; Bendel, Markus ; O'Neill, Carrie ; Smith, Thomas J. ; Loprinzi, Charles L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-403cb9f25b9019b7390603eb96c3fd5ca9f804678f5729bb19f550d3551a67433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy</topic><topic>Clinical Neurology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>General & Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Health Care Sciences & Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medicine, General & Internal</topic><topic>Neurosciences & Neurology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</topic><topic>Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Peripheral neuropathy</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Scrambler therapy</topic><topic>transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation</topic><topic>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childs, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurray, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendel, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loprinzi, Charles L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childs, Daniel S.</au><au>Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G.</au><au>McMurray, Ryan</au><au>Bendel, Markus</au><au>O'Neill, Carrie</au><au>Smith, Thomas J.</au><au>Loprinzi, Charles L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Trial of Scrambler Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Crossover Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><stitle>J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG</stitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1247</spage><epage>1253</epage><pages>1247-1253</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Preliminary trials report that Scrambler Therapy, a form of electroanalgesia, may improve discomfort from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).
The objective of this phase II, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Scrambler therapy vs. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in treating CIPN.
Fifty patients were accrued for the first half of this two-part, crossover trial consisting of a 2-week treatment period with either Scrambler or TENS, followed by an 8-week observation period, and then crossover treatment. Twenty-two patients proceeded to the crossover phase. The primary means of assessment was patient-reported outcomes, including symptom severity scales and Global Impression of Change questionnaires. Symptoms were assessed daily during the treatment period and weekly during an 8-week observation period.
A 50% or greater reduction in primary symptom (pain or tingling) score on the last day of treatment was achieved by 6 of 10 Scrambler-treated patients (60%) and 3 of 12 TENS-treated patients (25%) after crossover (P = 0.11). By day 4 of treatment, the two arms diverged with respect to mean change in primary symptom score; this effect was largely carried through to the end of the two-week treatment period. Similarly, Scrambler therapy appeared better than TENS when assessed by Global Impression of Change for neuropathy, pain, and overall quality of life.
Similar findings from the initial randomization and crossover phases of this study support further evaluation of the efficacy of Scrambler therapy in alleviating CIPN symptoms. Evaluation in a larger, randomized controlled trial with standardized treatment is warranted.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33249081</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.025</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9226-7404</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7643-2836</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021-06, Vol.61 (6), p.1247-1253 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000681625600017CitationCount |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | antineoplastic agents Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects Chemotherapy chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy Clinical Neurology Clinical trials Cross-Over Studies Discomfort Efficacy General & Internal Medicine Health Care Sciences & Services Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, General & Internal Neurosciences & Neurology Pain Pain Management Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - therapy Peripheral neuropathy Quality of Life Science & Technology Scrambler therapy transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS |
title | Randomized Trial of Scrambler Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Crossover Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T12%3A59%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Trial%20of%20Scrambler%20Therapy%20for%20Chemotherapy-Induced%20Peripheral%20Neuropathy:%20Crossover%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Childs,%20Daniel%20S.&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1247&rft.epage=1253&rft.pages=1247-1253&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2465753487%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2546647629&rft_id=info:pmid/33249081&rft_els_id=S0885392420308952&rfr_iscdi=true |