Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements
Possibilities to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are rapidly growing. With the development of battery technologies, communication, navigation, surveillance, and autonomous systems in general, many UAVs are expected to operate at relatively low altitudes. Thus, the problem of UAV noise impact on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-06, Vol.18 (12), p.6202, Article 6202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 6202 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Ivosevic, Jurica Ganic, Emir Petosic, Antonio Radisic, Tomislav |
description | Possibilities to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are rapidly growing. With the development of battery technologies, communication, navigation, surveillance, and autonomous systems in general, many UAVs are expected to operate at relatively low altitudes. Thus, the problem of UAV noise impact on human health and well-being will be more pronounced. In this paper, we conducted noise measurements of two UAVs of different performance (quadrotor and hexarotor) in flying up and down, hovering, and overflight procedures. Respondents of good hearing who were confirmed by audiogram measurement and had participated in the survey during UAV noise measurement gave their subjective assessments on the UAV noise perception. UAV noise measurements and subjective respondents' assessments were analysed and related. UAV noise analysis showed that the parameters measured at the same measurement point for the hexarotor were higher than those for the quadrotor in flying up and down and flying-over procedures. Low frequency noise was present in the noise spectrum of both drones. Participants were able to distinguish between the noise of UAVs and had a generally more negative experience with the hexarotor. Regardless of the noise perception, more than 80% of the respondents believe there are more pros than cons for UAV introduction into everyday life. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph18126202 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000666569100001CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544978323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d6547c0481788b2dcdd67a7d7c04bc5c7f6b4ff0fd72b942d072a7edc32f7d333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw5RyJCxJKGX_Edi5Iq6hApVIOUK6WY0-6Xm3ixU4W9b_Hy1YV5cTJo-ffex7rEfKawjnnLbwPG0y7NdWUSQbsCTmlUkItJNCnf80n5EXOGwCuhWyfkxMuGFDa8FNy3cVxZ5Odwx6rm9WP6jqGjPVlEd1crXLGnEec5lzN6xSX23X1bUl7vKvs5I9s9QVtXhL-oV6SZ4PdZnx1f56Rm48X37vP9dXXT5fd6qp2vG3m2stGKAdCU6V1z7zzXiqr_EHrXePUIHsxDDB4xfpWMA-KWYXecTYozzk_Ix-OubulH4te3k52a3YpjDbdmWiDeXwzhbW5jXujGWsFNCXg7X1Aij8XzLMZQ3a43doJ45INa4QWwCVrC_rmH3QTlzSV7x0o0SrN2WGj8yPlUsw54fCwDAVzqMo8rqoY9NHwC_s4ZBdwcvhgAgApZSNbWiagXZhLRXHq4jLNxfru_638N8nDqEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544978323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ivosevic, Jurica ; Ganic, Emir ; Petosic, Antonio ; Radisic, Tomislav</creator><creatorcontrib>Ivosevic, Jurica ; Ganic, Emir ; Petosic, Antonio ; Radisic, Tomislav</creatorcontrib><description>Possibilities to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are rapidly growing. With the development of battery technologies, communication, navigation, surveillance, and autonomous systems in general, many UAVs are expected to operate at relatively low altitudes. Thus, the problem of UAV noise impact on human health and well-being will be more pronounced. In this paper, we conducted noise measurements of two UAVs of different performance (quadrotor and hexarotor) in flying up and down, hovering, and overflight procedures. Respondents of good hearing who were confirmed by audiogram measurement and had participated in the survey during UAV noise measurement gave their subjective assessments on the UAV noise perception. UAV noise measurements and subjective respondents' assessments were analysed and related. UAV noise analysis showed that the parameters measured at the same measurement point for the hexarotor were higher than those for the quadrotor in flying up and down and flying-over procedures. Low frequency noise was present in the noise spectrum of both drones. Participants were able to distinguish between the noise of UAVs and had a generally more negative experience with the hexarotor. Regardless of the noise perception, more than 80% of the respondents believe there are more pros than cons for UAV introduction into everyday life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34201153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Aircraft ; Autonomous navigation ; COVID-19 ; Drones ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Experiments ; LF noise ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Listening ; Medical research ; Noise ; Noise assessments ; Noise measurement ; Outdoors ; Perception ; Polls & surveys ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Science & Technology ; Security management ; Sound ; Subjective assessment ; Traffic ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (12), p.6202, Article 6202</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>9</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000666569100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d6547c0481788b2dcdd67a7d7c04bc5c7f6b4ff0fd72b942d072a7edc32f7d333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d6547c0481788b2dcdd67a7d7c04bc5c7f6b4ff0fd72b942d072a7edc32f7d333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7036-9538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229405/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8229405/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,39262,39263,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ivosevic, Jurica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganic, Emir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petosic, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radisic, Tomislav</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>INT J ENV RES PUB HE</addtitle><description>Possibilities to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are rapidly growing. With the development of battery technologies, communication, navigation, surveillance, and autonomous systems in general, many UAVs are expected to operate at relatively low altitudes. Thus, the problem of UAV noise impact on human health and well-being will be more pronounced. In this paper, we conducted noise measurements of two UAVs of different performance (quadrotor and hexarotor) in flying up and down, hovering, and overflight procedures. Respondents of good hearing who were confirmed by audiogram measurement and had participated in the survey during UAV noise measurement gave their subjective assessments on the UAV noise perception. UAV noise measurements and subjective respondents' assessments were analysed and related. UAV noise analysis showed that the parameters measured at the same measurement point for the hexarotor were higher than those for the quadrotor in flying up and down and flying-over procedures. Low frequency noise was present in the noise spectrum of both drones. Participants were able to distinguish between the noise of UAVs and had a generally more negative experience with the hexarotor. Regardless of the noise perception, more than 80% of the respondents believe there are more pros than cons for UAV introduction into everyday life.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Autonomous navigation</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Drones</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>LF noise</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise assessments</subject><subject>Noise measurement</subject><subject>Outdoors</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public, Environmental & Occupational Health</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Security management</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Subjective assessment</subject><subject>Traffic</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1v1DAQxS0EoqVw5RyJCxJKGX_Edi5Iq6hApVIOUK6WY0-6Xm3ixU4W9b_Hy1YV5cTJo-ffex7rEfKawjnnLbwPG0y7NdWUSQbsCTmlUkItJNCnf80n5EXOGwCuhWyfkxMuGFDa8FNy3cVxZ5Odwx6rm9WP6jqGjPVlEd1crXLGnEec5lzN6xSX23X1bUl7vKvs5I9s9QVtXhL-oV6SZ4PdZnx1f56Rm48X37vP9dXXT5fd6qp2vG3m2stGKAdCU6V1z7zzXiqr_EHrXePUIHsxDDB4xfpWMA-KWYXecTYozzk_Ix-OubulH4te3k52a3YpjDbdmWiDeXwzhbW5jXujGWsFNCXg7X1Aij8XzLMZQ3a43doJ45INa4QWwCVrC_rmH3QTlzSV7x0o0SrN2WGj8yPlUsw54fCwDAVzqMo8rqoY9NHwC_s4ZBdwcvhgAgApZSNbWiagXZhLRXHq4jLNxfru_638N8nDqEo</recordid><startdate>20210608</startdate><enddate>20210608</enddate><creator>Ivosevic, Jurica</creator><creator>Ganic, Emir</creator><creator>Petosic, Antonio</creator><creator>Radisic, Tomislav</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-9538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210608</creationdate><title>Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements</title><author>Ivosevic, Jurica ; Ganic, Emir ; Petosic, Antonio ; Radisic, Tomislav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-d6547c0481788b2dcdd67a7d7c04bc5c7f6b4ff0fd72b942d072a7edc32f7d333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Autonomous navigation</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Drones</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>LF noise</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise assessments</topic><topic>Noise measurement</topic><topic>Outdoors</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public, Environmental & Occupational Health</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Security management</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Subjective assessment</topic><topic>Traffic</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ivosevic, Jurica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganic, Emir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petosic, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radisic, Tomislav</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ivosevic, Jurica</au><au>Ganic, Emir</au><au>Petosic, Antonio</au><au>Radisic, Tomislav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><stitle>INT J ENV RES PUB HE</stitle><date>2021-06-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6202</spage><pages>6202-</pages><artnum>6202</artnum><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Possibilities to use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are rapidly growing. With the development of battery technologies, communication, navigation, surveillance, and autonomous systems in general, many UAVs are expected to operate at relatively low altitudes. Thus, the problem of UAV noise impact on human health and well-being will be more pronounced. In this paper, we conducted noise measurements of two UAVs of different performance (quadrotor and hexarotor) in flying up and down, hovering, and overflight procedures. Respondents of good hearing who were confirmed by audiogram measurement and had participated in the survey during UAV noise measurement gave their subjective assessments on the UAV noise perception. UAV noise measurements and subjective respondents' assessments were analysed and related. UAV noise analysis showed that the parameters measured at the same measurement point for the hexarotor were higher than those for the quadrotor in flying up and down and flying-over procedures. Low frequency noise was present in the noise spectrum of both drones. Participants were able to distinguish between the noise of UAVs and had a generally more negative experience with the hexarotor. Regardless of the noise perception, more than 80% of the respondents believe there are more pros than cons for UAV introduction into everyday life.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><pmid>34201153</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18126202</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7036-9538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (12), p.6202, Article 6202 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000666569100001CitationCount |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acoustics Aircraft Autonomous navigation COVID-19 Drones Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology Experiments LF noise Life Sciences & Biomedicine Listening Medical research Noise Noise assessments Noise measurement Outdoors Perception Polls & surveys Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology Security management Sound Subjective assessment Traffic Unmanned aerial vehicles Urban areas |
title | Comparative UAV Noise-Impact Assessments through Survey and Noise Measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A56%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20UAV%20Noise-Impact%20Assessments%20through%20Survey%20and%20Noise%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Ivosevic,%20Jurica&rft.date=2021-06-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6202&rft.pages=6202-&rft.artnum=6202&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18126202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2544978323%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544978323&rft_id=info:pmid/34201153&rfr_iscdi=true |