Associations between different udder health groups defined based on a combination of total and differential somatic cell count and the future udder health status of dairy cows
Mastitis, in particular in its subclinical form, which may spread unnoticeable within a herd, continues to be a major challenge in the dairy industry. Somatic cell count (SCC) is a broadly used proxy for subclinical mastitis. The recently introduced Differential SCC (DSCC) representing the combined...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Preventive veterinary medicine 2021-07, Vol.192, p.105374-105374, Article 105374 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mastitis, in particular in its subclinical form, which may spread unnoticeable within a herd, continues to be a major challenge in the dairy industry. Somatic cell count (SCC) is a broadly used proxy for subclinical mastitis. The recently introduced Differential SCC (DSCC) representing the combined proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and lymphocytes as a percentage of total SCC, can be used in combination with SCC to categorise cows into four different udder health groups (UHG) depending on actual test day results: UHG A: healthy/normal, ≤200,000 cells/mL and DSCC ≤65 %; B: suspicious, ≤200,000 cells/mL and DSCC >65 %; C: (subclinical) mastitis, >200,000 cells/mL and DSCC >65 %; D: chronic/persistent mastitis, >200,000 cells/mL and DSCC ≤65 %. The objective of our study was to investigate to what extent the UHG aid in determining different statuses of cows: I) leaving herd before next test day, II) having >200,000 cells/mL at the next test day, and III) having ≤200,000 cells/mL at the next 3 test days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate these statuses based on routinely generated dairy herd improvement (DHI) data from Austria, China, Estonia, Germany, and Spain. Cows in groups C (odds ratio (OR): 2.13, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.95–2.34) and, particularly, D (OR: 3.91, 95 % CI: 3.31–4.62) were significantly more likely to leave herds compared to cows in group A. Late-lactating cows indicated the highest likelihood (OR: 16.03, 95 % CI: 14.44–17.81) to leave herds in our analysis. Interestingly, we found that cows in UHG B had significantly higher odds (OR: 2.77, 95 % CI: 2.58–2.98) to have >200,000 cells/mL at the next test day compared to cows in group A. As anticipated, cows in UHG B (OR: 0.40, 95 % CI: 0.38–0.42), C (OR: 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.07–0.09), and D (OR: 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.14–0.19) each were significantly less likely to have ≤200,000 cells/mL at the next 3 test days compared to cows in group A. Above described results are an example from Germany, but the same trends could be seen across all countries considered in our study. In conclusion, our findings illustrate that the UHG concept reveals additional valuable information about udder health and culling based a single test day over working with SCC only. Actual decisions in day-to-day farm management that could be taken were not investigated here and need to be further explored. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-5877 1873-1716 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105374 |