Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study

The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean engineering 2021-06, Vol.230, p.108970, Article 108970
Hauptverfasser: Degrieck, Augustijn, Uyttersprot, Bryan, Sutulo, Serge, Guedes Soares, Carlos, Van Hoydonck, Wim, Vantorre, Marc, Lataire, Evert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108970
container_title Ocean engineering
container_volume 230
creator Degrieck, Augustijn
Uyttersprot, Bryan
Sutulo, Serge
Guedes Soares, Carlos
Van Hoydonck, Wim
Vantorre, Marc
Lataire, Evert
description The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium. A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel. •Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000656923300007CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801821004054</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0029801821004054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EEqVwBZQ9ShnbjWOzoqqAIlViAawt156AS-NUTgrKjjtwQ05CorZsYTUfzRvNPELOKYwoUHG5HFUWTcDwMmLAaNeUKocDMqAy52nGMnlIBgBMpRKoPCYndb0EACGAD8jjrHWxcm0wpbdJ_erX359ffUhMcPt6YcJb4kOD0djGV-EqmSS2Ktcmmsa_YxI2JUZvzSqpm41rT8lRYVY1nu3ikDzf3jxNZ-n84e5-OpmnllPWpHxssoI5BZIuhGUSMpkZoSRXijocS7FQhc3QIVJp0eWgJJWZE0YxkI5TPiRiu9fGqq4jFnodfWliqynoXo1e6r0a3avRWzUdKLfgBy6qorYeg8VfuHeTCcU47zLIp74x_dPTahOaDr34P9pNX2-nsdPw7jHqHeF8RNtoV_m_bv0Bf4mTpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Degrieck, Augustijn ; Uyttersprot, Bryan ; Sutulo, Serge ; Guedes Soares, Carlos ; Van Hoydonck, Wim ; Vantorre, Marc ; Lataire, Evert</creator><creatorcontrib>Degrieck, Augustijn ; Uyttersprot, Bryan ; Sutulo, Serge ; Guedes Soares, Carlos ; Van Hoydonck, Wim ; Vantorre, Marc ; Lataire, Evert</creatorcontrib><description>The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium. A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel. •Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative numerical study ; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) ; Engineering ; Engineering, Civil ; Engineering, Marine ; Engineering, Ocean ; Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) ; Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction ; Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction ; Oceanography ; Physical Sciences ; Potential Flow Panel Methods ; Science &amp; Technology ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2021-06, Vol.230, p.108970, Article 108970</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>17</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000656923300007</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8570-4263 ; 0000-0002-3551-6686 ; 0000-0002-6113-5107 ; 0000-0002-5523-2322 ; 0000-0003-4390-8628 ; 0000-0002-2645-6394</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,39265,46002</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Degrieck, Augustijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyttersprot, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutulo, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedes Soares, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hoydonck, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vantorre, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lataire, Evert</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><addtitle>OCEAN ENG</addtitle><description>The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium. A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel. •Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles</description><subject>Comparative numerical study</subject><subject>Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Civil</subject><subject>Engineering, Marine</subject><subject>Engineering, Ocean</subject><subject>Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD)</subject><subject>Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction</subject><subject>Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Potential Flow Panel Methods</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EEqVwBZQ9ShnbjWOzoqqAIlViAawt156AS-NUTgrKjjtwQ05CorZsYTUfzRvNPELOKYwoUHG5HFUWTcDwMmLAaNeUKocDMqAy52nGMnlIBgBMpRKoPCYndb0EACGAD8jjrHWxcm0wpbdJ_erX359ffUhMcPt6YcJb4kOD0djGV-EqmSS2Ktcmmsa_YxI2JUZvzSqpm41rT8lRYVY1nu3ikDzf3jxNZ-n84e5-OpmnllPWpHxssoI5BZIuhGUSMpkZoSRXijocS7FQhc3QIVJp0eWgJJWZE0YxkI5TPiRiu9fGqq4jFnodfWliqynoXo1e6r0a3avRWzUdKLfgBy6qorYeg8VfuHeTCcU47zLIp74x_dPTahOaDr34P9pNX2-nsdPw7jHqHeF8RNtoV_m_bv0Bf4mTpA</recordid><startdate>20210615</startdate><enddate>20210615</enddate><creator>Degrieck, Augustijn</creator><creator>Uyttersprot, Bryan</creator><creator>Sutulo, Serge</creator><creator>Guedes Soares, Carlos</creator><creator>Van Hoydonck, Wim</creator><creator>Vantorre, Marc</creator><creator>Lataire, Evert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-4263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-6686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-5107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-8628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6394</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210615</creationdate><title>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</title><author>Degrieck, Augustijn ; Uyttersprot, Bryan ; Sutulo, Serge ; Guedes Soares, Carlos ; Van Hoydonck, Wim ; Vantorre, Marc ; Lataire, Evert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Comparative numerical study</topic><topic>Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Civil</topic><topic>Engineering, Marine</topic><topic>Engineering, Ocean</topic><topic>Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD)</topic><topic>Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction</topic><topic>Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Potential Flow Panel Methods</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Degrieck, Augustijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyttersprot, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutulo, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedes Soares, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hoydonck, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vantorre, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lataire, Evert</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Degrieck, Augustijn</au><au>Uyttersprot, Bryan</au><au>Sutulo, Serge</au><au>Guedes Soares, Carlos</au><au>Van Hoydonck, Wim</au><au>Vantorre, Marc</au><au>Lataire, Evert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><stitle>OCEAN ENG</stitle><date>2021-06-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>230</volume><spage>108970</spage><pages>108970-</pages><artnum>108970</artnum><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium. A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel. •Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-4263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-6686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-5107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-8628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6394</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8018
ispartof Ocean engineering, 2021-06, Vol.230, p.108970, Article 108970
issn 0029-8018
1873-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_webofscience_primary_000656923300007CitationCount
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Comparative numerical study
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Engineering
Engineering, Civil
Engineering, Marine
Engineering, Ocean
Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD)
Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction
Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction
Oceanography
Physical Sciences
Potential Flow Panel Methods
Science & Technology
Technology
title Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T09%3A52%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrodynamic%20ship%E2%80%93ship%20and%20ship%E2%80%93bank%20interaction:%20A%20comparative%20numerical%20study&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Degrieck,%20Augustijn&rft.date=2021-06-15&rft.volume=230&rft.spage=108970&rft.pages=108970-&rft.artnum=108970&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_webof%3ES0029801821004054%3C/elsevier_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801821004054&rfr_iscdi=true