Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study
The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean engineering 2021-06, Vol.230, p.108970, Article 108970 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108970 |
container_title | Ocean engineering |
container_volume | 230 |
creator | Degrieck, Augustijn Uyttersprot, Bryan Sutulo, Serge Guedes Soares, Carlos Van Hoydonck, Wim Vantorre, Marc Lataire, Evert |
description | The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium.
A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel.
•Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_webofscience_primary_000656923300007CitationCount</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801821004054</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0029801821004054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EEqVwBZQ9ShnbjWOzoqqAIlViAawt156AS-NUTgrKjjtwQ05CorZsYTUfzRvNPELOKYwoUHG5HFUWTcDwMmLAaNeUKocDMqAy52nGMnlIBgBMpRKoPCYndb0EACGAD8jjrHWxcm0wpbdJ_erX359ffUhMcPt6YcJb4kOD0djGV-EqmSS2Ktcmmsa_YxI2JUZvzSqpm41rT8lRYVY1nu3ikDzf3jxNZ-n84e5-OpmnllPWpHxssoI5BZIuhGUSMpkZoSRXijocS7FQhc3QIVJp0eWgJJWZE0YxkI5TPiRiu9fGqq4jFnodfWliqynoXo1e6r0a3avRWzUdKLfgBy6qorYeg8VfuHeTCcU47zLIp74x_dPTahOaDr34P9pNX2-nsdPw7jHqHeF8RNtoV_m_bv0Bf4mTpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Degrieck, Augustijn ; Uyttersprot, Bryan ; Sutulo, Serge ; Guedes Soares, Carlos ; Van Hoydonck, Wim ; Vantorre, Marc ; Lataire, Evert</creator><creatorcontrib>Degrieck, Augustijn ; Uyttersprot, Bryan ; Sutulo, Serge ; Guedes Soares, Carlos ; Van Hoydonck, Wim ; Vantorre, Marc ; Lataire, Evert</creatorcontrib><description>The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium.
A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel.
•Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative numerical study ; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) ; Engineering ; Engineering, Civil ; Engineering, Marine ; Engineering, Ocean ; Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) ; Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction ; Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction ; Oceanography ; Physical Sciences ; Potential Flow Panel Methods ; Science & Technology ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2021-06, Vol.230, p.108970, Article 108970</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>17</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000656923300007</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8570-4263 ; 0000-0002-3551-6686 ; 0000-0002-6113-5107 ; 0000-0002-5523-2322 ; 0000-0003-4390-8628 ; 0000-0002-2645-6394</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,39265,46002</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Degrieck, Augustijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyttersprot, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutulo, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedes Soares, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hoydonck, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vantorre, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lataire, Evert</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><addtitle>OCEAN ENG</addtitle><description>The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium.
A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel.
•Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles</description><subject>Comparative numerical study</subject><subject>Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Civil</subject><subject>Engineering, Marine</subject><subject>Engineering, Ocean</subject><subject>Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD)</subject><subject>Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction</subject><subject>Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Potential Flow Panel Methods</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EEqVwBZQ9ShnbjWOzoqqAIlViAawt156AS-NUTgrKjjtwQ05CorZsYTUfzRvNPELOKYwoUHG5HFUWTcDwMmLAaNeUKocDMqAy52nGMnlIBgBMpRKoPCYndb0EACGAD8jjrHWxcm0wpbdJ_erX359ffUhMcPt6YcJb4kOD0djGV-EqmSS2Ktcmmsa_YxI2JUZvzSqpm41rT8lRYVY1nu3ikDzf3jxNZ-n84e5-OpmnllPWpHxssoI5BZIuhGUSMpkZoSRXijocS7FQhc3QIVJp0eWgJJWZE0YxkI5TPiRiu9fGqq4jFnodfWliqynoXo1e6r0a3avRWzUdKLfgBy6qorYeg8VfuHeTCcU47zLIp74x_dPTahOaDr34P9pNX2-nsdPw7jHqHeF8RNtoV_m_bv0Bf4mTpA</recordid><startdate>20210615</startdate><enddate>20210615</enddate><creator>Degrieck, Augustijn</creator><creator>Uyttersprot, Bryan</creator><creator>Sutulo, Serge</creator><creator>Guedes Soares, Carlos</creator><creator>Van Hoydonck, Wim</creator><creator>Vantorre, Marc</creator><creator>Lataire, Evert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-4263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-6686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-5107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-8628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6394</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210615</creationdate><title>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</title><author>Degrieck, Augustijn ; Uyttersprot, Bryan ; Sutulo, Serge ; Guedes Soares, Carlos ; Van Hoydonck, Wim ; Vantorre, Marc ; Lataire, Evert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-34a5f2d9081b6c280585a6983991de486b9fc5edee18ced7098185d6a9208d313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Comparative numerical study</topic><topic>Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Civil</topic><topic>Engineering, Marine</topic><topic>Engineering, Ocean</topic><topic>Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD)</topic><topic>Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction</topic><topic>Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Potential Flow Panel Methods</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Degrieck, Augustijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyttersprot, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutulo, Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedes Soares, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hoydonck, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vantorre, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lataire, Evert</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Degrieck, Augustijn</au><au>Uyttersprot, Bryan</au><au>Sutulo, Serge</au><au>Guedes Soares, Carlos</au><au>Van Hoydonck, Wim</au><au>Vantorre, Marc</au><au>Lataire, Evert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><stitle>OCEAN ENG</stitle><date>2021-06-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>230</volume><spage>108970</spage><pages>108970-</pages><artnum>108970</artnum><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>The hydrodynamic interaction between ships or between the ship and the bank was studied by numerical methods. A number of new numerical results were obtained, for both ship–ship interaction and ship–bank interaction cases, by applying the double-body potential flow code HYDINTER earlier developed at Instituto Superior Técnico (University of Lisbon, Portugal). A comparative numerical study was made between these results and those obtained earlier for the same ship forms at Ghent University (Belgium) with a different potential code (ROPES), with a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code (ISIS-CFD) and with Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) data obtained in the shallow water towing tank at Flanders Hydraulics Research, Belgium.
A panel method is – in comparison with CFD – relatively fast and can often be used in real-time simulations. Because of this substantial benefit, the research focuses on identifying the limitations of applicability of this alternative computation method which neglects viscous effects and free-surface deformation. In this research, on the one hand good predictions are obtained for ship–ship interaction between encountering ships. On the other hand, the results for ship–bank interactions fail to predict the experimental trends. The errors increase at very close distances to the bank or another ship. The same holds true for the cases characterised by very large drift angles e.g. a tug crabbing near a large vessel.
•Numerical study of hydrodynamic interaction between ships and between ship and bank•Comparison of results from double-body potential flow codes, CFD and experiments•Applicability of potential flow codes which neglect viscous and free-surface effects•Good predictions for ship–ship but not for ship–bank or very large drift angles</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-4263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3551-6686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-5107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-2322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-8628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-6394</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8018 |
ispartof | Ocean engineering, 2021-06, Vol.230, p.108970, Article 108970 |
issn | 0029-8018 1873-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_webofscience_primary_000656923300007CitationCount |
source | Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Comparative numerical study Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Engineering Engineering, Civil Engineering, Marine Engineering, Ocean Experimental Fluid Dynamics (EFD) Hydrodynamic ship–bank interaction Hydrodynamic ship–ship interaction Oceanography Physical Sciences Potential Flow Panel Methods Science & Technology Technology |
title | Hydrodynamic ship–ship and ship–bank interaction: A comparative numerical study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T09%3A52%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrodynamic%20ship%E2%80%93ship%20and%20ship%E2%80%93bank%20interaction:%20A%20comparative%20numerical%20study&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Degrieck,%20Augustijn&rft.date=2021-06-15&rft.volume=230&rft.spage=108970&rft.pages=108970-&rft.artnum=108970&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108970&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_webof%3ES0029801821004054%3C/elsevier_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801821004054&rfr_iscdi=true |